With each passing day, it becomes increasingly evident that he was right

With each passing day, it becomes increasingly evident that he was right.

Other urls found in this thread:

doorofperception.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Unabomber-Manifesto.pdf
cyber.eserver.org/unabom.txt
cc.com/video-clips/7urmqw/upright-citizens-brigade-unabomber
youtube.com/watch?v=kt9-XgwWMM4
void.cat/adc1f3f56a98a5b465e6db1199a45cf79fe3eeb9&v
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

It shouldn't have taken you so long to realize this, but I am glad you are coming around. Uncle Ted did nothing wrong.

Really boils the peanuts when you find out that they didn't want his views being broadcast on national television so they allowed him to just have life in prison without parole instead of going on trial for the death penalty.

His lawyers fucked him over. He wanted to die because prison is a horrible environment for him.

His put-down of the leftist's psychology is absolutely scathing.

You have to love how they always show this police sketch of him or the pic with the disheveled hair and jumpsuit, never one where he looks decent. But he blew people up, and I guess he took it too far

As time goes on, humanity splits further apart into two very distinct races:

One race is neoliberals. An ultra evolved, technologically advanced, genetically diverse, absurdly high IQ, highly aesthetic, androgynous race of city people, who not only possess an extremely developed problem solving intelligence, but also have a highly developed social awareness that allows them to work in large teams in such a way that they can use a great diversity of skills to reach goals which they couldn't achieve on their own.

The other race is conservatards, whom we can just call homo Trumpanus. A very devolved, degenerate, inbred, low-IQ race that mostly lives in the woods and in suburban shitholes. Not only are they extremely belligerent and low-IQ, but they completely lack any type of social teamwork skills that would allow them to build any type of advanced society. Because the neoliberal race has achieved a level of success so far beyond the wildest imagination of the homo Trumpanus, the homo Trumpanus tries by any means necessary to appropriate the resources channeled towards the ultra advanced societies built by the neoliberal master race, in a pathetic and desperate attempt to survive the natural selection process.

>A very devolved, degenerate, inbred, low-IQ race that mostly lives in the woods and in suburban shitholes.

76% of democrats have a high school diploma.

Gr8 b8 m8, I needed a nap

He could have done a lot better with his bombs I think

go away mena

Why do people keep posting threads about Ted Kaczysnki wuz rite? Is it a weird slide thread or are people so addicted to attention even under anonymous conditions that they'll gladly be the 50th person in one month to pick a thread that they know has good odds of being successful rather than spit out something interesting that they've been thinking about?

Old man holding a gun?

>The other race is conservatards, whom we can just call homo Trumpanus. A very devolved, degenerate, inbred, low-IQ race that mostly lives in the woods and in suburban shitholes. Not only are they extremely belligerent and low-IQ, but they completely lack any type of social teamwork skills that would allow them to build any type of advanced society. Because the neoliberal race has achieved a level of success so far beyond the wildest imagination of the homo Trumpanus, the homo Trumpanus tries by any means necessary to appropriate the resources channeled towards the ultra advanced societies built by the neoliberal master race, in a pathetic and desperate attempt to survive the natural selection process.

>A very devolved, degenerate, inbred, low-IQ race

have you even seen chelsea clinton?

Where you think basic resources for life (food, water, etc) come from for city folks?

>SHTF
>city dwellers riot and freak out because food water and electricity is near impossible to come by
>kill each other for things as simple as a half bottle of water

>SHTF
>innawoods folk barely effected
>small towns band together, pool resources, open lines of trade
>slightly uncomfortable at first, but they adapt, even enjoy the change

is that weird al?

If he was so smart how come his bombs were so shitty and weak?

Did better than a 747

In the process of translating his manifest so it becomes readable for older and younger danes.

I've thought this for years. On that note 4 chan is part of the problem.

Let me fix that for you

By the year 2050, the world will consist of:

>Libtard and sjw race: white traitors, shitskins and mulattos who are subservient to a computer mind and are used as slaves to maintain it: they behave much like insects
>Have low IQs because of dysgenic breeding and have diseases brought in from the Third World, rarely live past the age of 30

>The free folk: conservative ubermenschen who preserve their high quality genetics by only mating with each other, practice permaculture and are capable of defending themselves due to their strength and high IQs because of rigorous eugenic practices
>maintain only the technology they need but don't rely on it to survive and are thus self-sufficient and live in tribal communities rather than corporate socialist slavery

>no mention of jews

Good to know we will have implemented the final final solution before 2050.

You are confused.

THIS! Fuck Drumpfy McLittlehands and F U C K white people.

Wasn't his brother murdered by the KGB when visiting relatives in Katyn?

Per his correspondence, both public and private, some of the bombs were intended to wound. Others, while designed to kill, were kept small to minimize collateral.

Plus he had to make them out if shit he scrounged.

You're entirely correct OP. I came to this conclusion yeas ago but have only recently accepted its the only option for me after experiencing wage slavery.
Who here /preparingtobecomeselfsufficient/ ?

Is there an audiobook I can listen in my car?

>danes too dumb to learn easiest language on the planet
bork

He thought technology had advanced to it apex and could go no further. It did. He was wrong.

No he didn't you stupid abo. He specifically says that the longer the techno-industrial system lasts and the greater the technology becomes, the worse the consequences will be.

I never bothered to read his manifesto. Can you give me the short version?

You can't really give a tldr version and hope to accurately understand his views. Having said that I'll give it a go.
>The techno-industrial system ultimately controls the world and creates slaves from us. The more of it we have the worse the consequences.

>tfw the crazy hermit living in the woods was right all along
What has the world come to?

He was right why do you think he rip them off their filthy clueless hands

Will I end up on a list if I search for it?

Libs are the real racists/assholes for projecting their weakness onto any cause/minority group and use them as excuses to lash out at individualism because they take comfort in being a big collective. As a result, they push technology that furthers collectivism and reduces individual worth or importance. This combination of technology and hyper socialism kills humanity.

Ted couldn't see a way to remove commies so he decided the problem thus was technology and if we rejected it we could become individuals again. He later remarked in prison that things got worse than he ever imagined as a result of things like smartphones, totally enslaving people.

youre on pol, youre already on all the lists

Everyone is on a watchlist m8.
doorofperception.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Unabomber-Manifesto.pdf

If you want to make ommlete you to break some eggs

You already on Twinks list

He made them out of wood and scraps he found so they couldn't be traced. If his brother hadn't ratted him out, he'd probably still be mailing out bombs.

No, his manifesto is quite prevalent on the webs.
cyber.eserver.org/unabom.txt

Who is he and what did he do? Why is pol talking about him?

Ah yes if only we didn't have electricity or modern civilization we would be a lot happier having half our children die before they turn 5 and suffering in chronic pain from having to work manual labor all our lives.

Reminder he got his brain fried by MK ULTRA experiments.

literally who?

Because he didnt want kill anybody.it was more like fireworks police was saying bombs

The ultimate red pill. Not even LARPing, history will prove him to be correct.

He was right about the problem but presented no solution. His 'solution' was just dumb.

What was wrong with his solution? He had very few options but to attempt to rally up support for his ideas. He has succedded with that to an extent.

There's gonna be a new tv piece/ biopic about him, so he's in the public consciousness

Primitivist audiobook? Come on now.

your day cant come soon enough. I hope im there to witness the blood letting.

KEK

>Toronto
>Liberal utopia

lol

This.
People like Ted Kazcynski are complete rarities and would unironically be high flying government officials who would do a good job. I guess it just suppose it comes down to which agenda you're pushing that determines that.
You see it all the time on the (((climate))) front

>"This is X he has Y qualifications and he says (((climate change))) is real. He's a professional and therefore you have to believe him!"
>"But this is A and he also has Y qualifications, but he says it isn't real. Why shouldn't I believe him instead?"
>"BECAUSE HE'S A KOOK TRYING TO TRICK PEOPLE FOR MONEY!"

The cry of bigot is raised mostly by bigots.

>leaf
Shocker

Most republicans didnt even finish highschool

>have you even seen tiffany trump or barron for that matter?

Replace the first paragraph by deprecated replasable chumps and the second by calcified Twinks ...

How bad is it to breed out of one's blood group? spoilerO-/spoiler

While people on the Right tend to view the Left as a single machine, these critiques have been around since the beginning. Bakunin, Moss, Camatte, Perlman, and countless others have written scathing critiques of the Left.

What is strange though is that none of them ever escape the core of Leftist thinking. And this goes for Kaczynski as well. Not only did he push the immediacy of revolt, he effectively identifies technology as the true bourgeoisie and nature itself as the universal class. The flip-side of this would be those who were essentially pacifist versions of Kaczynski. Camatte and Perlman saw humanity as the universal class, particularly primitive humanity, and technological development (or domestication) as the ruling class.

I think Perlman came closest to escaping this Leftist thinking. His idea was similar to Jung, as the human begins to develop in the same way as the leviathan, accumulating a shell and a mask along with the development of society. He develops this protective shell as a defense as he is forged to the leviathan. And the greater the layers of this shell the farther away man falls from his humanity. Tearing away the shell tends to reveal a corpse rather than a human.

It is the myth and oral style of writing which gives it the potential to escape leftism. And in some ways I think it is more helpful than traditionalism, which is theoretically great, but generally still trapped in an enlightenment mode of thought and style.

I suppose one could even say that Perlman's myth even predicted the outcome of a man like Kaczynski. He became very machine-like in his revolt against civilisation, really effected nothing apart from publishing ideas reiterating what we already know, and in the end found himself transferred from the heart of dead nature to the deepest recesses of the megamachine.

cont'd

probably because school is fully infiltrated and politicized by the left

U r a asshole

cont'd

At best, people who develop technology are just tinkerers and workers. Even at the highest levels of science men have no power over how their technological development will be used. The majority of technology today is really an attempt just to keep up with other forms of technology and to offset fragility in the system. Develop a rocket and it is up to the political system whether or not it will be manufactured and used. Develop gene altering technology and it is up to God whether or not whole areas will be wiped out as if a black hole had entered humanity.

It doesn't seem to me that either case is possible, revolution tends towards war and evolution seems impossible with a foolish populace consumed by decadence. Cataclysm seems the only way we will ever return to a proper society, which means patience, developing the few relationships and small groups possible to maintain these ideas, and then striking when the time is right (which may mean allowing other groups to lead a revolution, or accelerating towards the cataclysm only to reveal ourselves at the last moment).

Of course, my criticisms may be too consequentialist, and he simply chose the wrong targets. There is also an artistic irony in the devices he used in that that they were essentially a decayed form of technology, but I don't think this was a very primitive way to kill people. Maiming people or leaving their fate up to an accident is a very technological mindset.

Ted did literally nothing wrong.

See:

>He thinks he's not on a list

cc.com/video-clips/7urmqw/upright-citizens-brigade-unabomber

youtube.com/watch?v=kt9-XgwWMM4

If he wasn't insane then he could have not signed the plea and dismissed his lawyers and asked for the death penalty.

>kaczynski's thinking is leftist?
He began by living Inawoods for a number of years without attempting revolution. The reason he changed was because his favourite nature spot was destroyed by the system and he came to the conclusion that the system sooner or later will inevitably infringe on the lives of people who wish to escape it, so fighting back was needed.

why can I claim tax free status if I donate to a charity but I can't claim tax free status on my taxes since they are charity?

Ted was super redpilled about the left but his main fear or impetus for his MO was fear of technology, specifically artificial intelligence.

He's gotten retarded now though and supported Clinton over Trump I think.

He was super autistic though and couldn't interact with other people. Genius but everyone he taught and all his colleagues were constantly weirded out by him which led him to leave society.

well then start the ethnic cleansing if you're so sure, you faggot leaf - let's see what happens

the washington post printed it, and we all know they are REAL NEWS

wtf is wrong with canadians..

Go to Alberta you understand..

How does this make it not leftist? It doesn't address my point, and it doesn't address his call for a world revolution against technology.

technology in and of itself is not bad. I guess what he was worried about was technology becoming more important than people? Which throughout history anyway certain things were considered more important than certain people anyway

Thats how you grab someone by the pussy.

>prison is a horrible environment for him

Supermax--23 hours a day in a box without any human contact--is hell for anyone. And the people who get put in there are primarily there due to wrongthink, e.g. people like Kaczynski and Eric Rudolph, rather than due to body count or brutality.

>modernity sucks
Heidegger said everything better decades earlier without killing innocent civilians

The crazy hermit living in the woods is always right.

he's right you know

He killed like a guy by mistake he is the devil incarnate probably a hoax to catch him faster any way

I want that shit on a t-shirt

But it's not inherently good or neutral either. However, it does suggest a human weakness in that they are not always fit to live in the natural environment, humans are essentially a negative (or unfinished) animal. Without completion, and relying on the mind rather than physical characteristics, they are not of nature in the same way that other animals are. They are physically below nature but mentally above it. And this paradox creates a situation where humans may destroy the natural environment as their mental escape progresses.

In other words, the fragility which causes humans to flee their environment increases that fragility as further technology is sought out. And with each progression humans become further removed from nature, until all that is left is a completely mechanised civilisation - and when people seek to flee this society they seek either destruction of humanity altogether (as in transhumanism) or a return to nature.

But nature at this point is seen as just another mechanism. These people forget the paradox of man and nature, now viewing it as a whole interconnected world which self-corrects, functioning in the very way machines balance abstract information. The film "Avatar" is how modern humans view nature, an interconnected grid where humans, plants, and animals can attach at any moment - like a form of sex without reproduction (this is literally how one domesticates the animals, a mechanical-sexual connection). Technology has simply advanced to a point where it processes other technology itself and cannot be even seen as technology. The human (old) technology is only a threat insofar as it seeks to destroy this world.

cont'd

cont'd
And this is the moral of basically every popular science fiction story: even the most destructive technology can be subverted to human freedom. Which suggests that technology is not neutral at all, but is instead a materialisation of the human spirit, a mirror of his inability to exist within nature, or a domesticating light where the world of the gods enters the world of men.

The great danger here is that technology can cause men to lose sight of that which makes them human to begin with. And if they are not prepared to enter the world of the gods the light alone will destroy them.

Perhaps worse, these betrayal of world boundaries could mean that men enter the battlegrounds of the gods, allowing for the titans to triumph over them, leaving nothing but void in between men and the parents of the gods. And this is perhaps why primitive, and even ancient, societies were careful of the mythical qualities of their technology. Like the images of the Gorgons which adorned shields and decorated the entryways of palaces it was a reminder of the world of the gods and death, for both enemies and oneself.

He connects political correctness and the softening of minds to oversocialization. The more connected you are the weaker you will be.

>Eric Rudolph

Anybody have this vid, sounds hilarious

Another point of interest is how much industrial communists and anarchists hate primitivists. John Zerzan was often threatened and even attacked by anarcho-communists for his views. So these types of people had to endure what everyone else is just waking up to for quite a long time.

void.cat/adc1f3f56a98a5b465e6db1199a45cf79fe3eeb9&v

Perhaps, but Heidegger was largely just working through the work of a colleague, and there were people who said this before him. And the manner in which Heidegger discusses the ideas takes much of the importance away due to the lifeless framing of the ideas.

I cum in your mouth.

lmao ffs

His assessment of the situation was correct but his strategy was pure Luddite bullshit.

This is interesting but what should he theoretically have done to spread his ideas better user? Seems like you're saying there is no true "revolution" unless there's an unavoidable event that destroys the system with no human intervention.

Also as far as I know he didn't seem to truly care about the fate of society and just wanted to live on his own in the woods until his woods started getting destroyed by construction which was his last straw.