>One day last summer, around noon, I called Athena, a 13-year-old who lives in Houston, Texas. She answered her phone—she’s had an iPhone since she was 11—sounding as if she’d just woken up. We chatted about her favorite songs and TV shows, and I asked her what she likes to do with her friends. “We go to the mall,” she said. “Do your parents drop you off?,” I asked, recalling my own middle-school days, in the 1980s, when I’d enjoy a few parent-free hours shopping with my friends. “No—I go with my family,” she replied. “We’ll go with my mom and brothers and walk a little behind them. I just have to tell my mom where we’re going. I have to check in every hour or every 30 minutes.”
>Those mall trips are infrequent—about once a month. More often, Athena and her friends spend time together on their phones, unchaperoned. Unlike the teens of my generation, who might have spent an evening tying up the family landline with gossip, they talk on Snapchat, the smartphone app that allows users to send pictures and videos that quickly disappear. They make sure to keep up their Snapstreaks, which show how many days in a row they have Snapchatted with each other. Sometimes they save screenshots of particularly ridiculous pictures of friends. “It’s good blackmail,” Athena said. (Because she’s a minor, I’m not using her real name.) She told me she’d spent most of the summer hanging out alone in her room with her phone. That’s just the way her generation is, she said. “We didn’t have a choice to know any life without iPads or iPhones. I think we like our phones more than we like actual people.”
>I’ve been researching generational differences for 25 years, starting when I was a 22-year-old doctoral student in psychology. Typically, the characteristics that come to define a generation appear gradually, and along a continuum. Beliefs and behaviors that were already rising simply continue to do so. Millennials, for instance, are a highly individualistic generation, but individualism had been increasing since the Baby Boomers turned on, tuned in, and dropped out. I had grown accustomed to line graphs of trends that looked like modest hills and valleys. Then I began studying Athena’s generation.
>Around 2012, I noticed abrupt shifts in teen behaviors and emotional states. The gentle slopes of the line graphs became steep mountains and sheer cliffs, and many of the distinctive characteristics of the Millennial generation began to disappear. In all my analyses of generational data—some reaching back to the 1930s—I had never seen anything like it.
>At first I presumed these might be blips, but the trends persisted, across several years and a series of national surveys. The changes weren’t just in degree, but in kind. The biggest difference between the Millennials and their predecessors was in how they viewed the world; teens today differ from the Millennials not just in their views but in how they spend their time. The experiences they have every day are radically different from those of the generation that came of age just a few years before them.
>What happened in 2012 to cause such dramatic shifts in behavior? It was after the Great Recession, which officially lasted from 2007 to 2009 and had a starker effect on Millennials trying to find a place in a sputtering economy. But it was exactly the moment when the proportion of Americans who owned a smartphone surpassed 50 percent.
Blake Davis
>The more I pored over yearly surveys of teen attitudes and behaviors, and the more I talked with young people like Athena, the clearer it became that theirs is a generation shaped by the smartphone and by the concomitant rise of social media. I call them iGen. Born between 1995 and 2012, members of this generation are growing up with smartphones, have an Instagram account before they start high school, and do not remember a time before the internet. The Millennials grew up with the web as well, but it wasn’t ever-present in their lives, at hand at all times, day and night. iGen’s oldest members were early adolescents when the iPhone was introduced, in 2007, and high-school students when the iPad entered the scene, in 2010. A 2017 survey of more than 5,000 American teens found that three out of four owned an iPhone.
>The advent of the smartphone and its cousin the tablet was followed quickly by hand-wringing about the deleterious effects of “screen time.” But the impact of these devices has not been fully appreciated, and goes far beyond the usual concerns about curtailed attention spans. The arrival of the smartphone has radically changed every aspect of teenagers’ lives, from the nature of their social interactions to their mental health. These changes have affected young people in every corner of the nation and in every type of household. The trends appear among teens poor and rich; of every ethnic background; in cities, suburbs, and small towns. Where there are cell towers, there are teens living their lives on their smartphone.
Christian Hernandez
>To those of us who fondly recall a more analog adolescence, this may seem foreign and troubling. The aim of generational study, however, is not to succumb to nostalgia for the way things used to be; it’s to understand how they are now. Some generational changes are positive, some are negative, and many are both. More comfortable in their bedrooms than in a car or at a party, today’s teens are physically safer than teens have ever been. They’re markedly less likely to get into a car accident and, having less of a taste for alcohol than their predecessors, are less susceptible to drinking’s attendant ills.
>Psychologically, however, they are more vulnerable than Millennials were: Rates of teen depression and suicide have skyrocketed since 2011. It’s not an exaggeration to describe iGen as being on the brink of the worst mental-health crisis in decades. Much of this deterioration can be traced to their phones.
>Even when a seismic event—a war, a technological leap, a free concert in the mud—plays an outsize role in shaping a group of young people, no single factor ever defines a generation. Parenting styles continue to change, as do school curricula and culture, and these things matter. But the twin rise of the smartphone and social media has caused an earthquake of a magnitude we’ve not seen in a very long time, if ever. There is compelling evidence that the devices we’ve placed in young people’s hands are having profound effects on their lives—and making them seriously unhappy.
Anthony Gutierrez
>post-Millennials are safer, physically, than adolescents have ever been. But they’re on the brink of a mental-health crisis.
Just pushing that Gen-Z have mental issues as a way of explaining why they're not doubling down on the SJW credo. They need to be drugged-up and re-educated.
Hudson Jones
>In the early 1970s, the photographer Bill Yates shot a series of portraits at the Sweetheart Roller Skating Rink in Tampa, Florida. In one, a shirtless teen stands with a large bottle of peppermint schnapps stuck in the waistband of his jeans. In another, a boy who looks no older than 12 poses with a cigarette in his mouth. The rink was a place where kids could get away from their parents and inhabit a world of their own, a world where they could drink, smoke, and make out in the backs of their cars. In stark black-and-white, the adolescent Boomers gaze at Yates’s camera with the self-confidence born of making your own choices—even if, perhaps especially if, your parents wouldn’t think they were the right ones.
>Fifteen years later, during my own teenage years as a member of Generation X, smoking had lost some of its romance, but independence was definitely still in. My friends and I plotted to get our driver’s license as soon as we could, making DMV appointments for the day we turned 16 and using our newfound freedom to escape the confines of our suburban neighborhood. Asked by our parents, “When will you be home?,” we replied, “When do I have to be?”
>But the allure of independence, so powerful to previous generations, holds less sway over today’s teens, who are less likely to leave the house without their parents. The shift is stunning: 12th-graders in 2015 were going out less often than eighth-graders did as recently as 2009.
>Today’s teens are also less likely to date. The initial stage of courtship, which Gen Xers called “liking” (as in “Ooh, he likes you!”), kids now call “talking”—an ironic choice for a generation that prefers texting to actual conversation. After two teens have “talked” for a while, they might start dating. But only about 56 percent of high-school seniors in 2015 went out on dates; for Boomers and Gen Xers, the number was about 85 percent.
Grayson Gutierrez
Humans crave a mechanical life, as Mechanical life craves a human one.
Brayden Martin
>The decline in dating tracks with a decline in sexual activity. The drop is the sharpest for ninth-graders, among whom the number of sexually active teens has been cut by almost 40 percent since 1991. The average teen now has had sex for the first time by the spring of 11th grade, a full year later than the average Gen Xer. Fewer teens having sex has contributed to what many see as one of the most positive youth trends in recent years: The teen birth rate hit an all-time low in 2016, down 67 percent since its modern peak, in 1991.
>Even driving, a symbol of adolescent freedom inscribed in American popular culture, from Rebel Without a Cause to Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, has lost its appeal for today’s teens. Nearly all Boomer high-school students had their driver’s license by the spring of their senior year; more than one in four teens today still lack one at the end of high school. For some, Mom and Dad are such good chauffeurs that there’s no urgent need to drive. “My parents drove me everywhere and never complained, so I always had rides,” a 21-year-old student in San Diego told me. “I didn’t get my license until my mom told me I had to because she could not keep driving me to school.” She finally got her license six months after her 18th birthday. In conversation after conversation, teens described getting their license as something to be nagged into by their parents—a notion that would have been unthinkable to previous generations.
Zachary Kelly
This JEAN M. TWENGE writes wonderfully.
Parker Carter
>Independence isn’t free—you need some money in your pocket to pay for gas, or for that bottle of schnapps. In earlier eras, kids worked in great numbers, eager to finance their freedom or prodded by their parents to learn the value of a dollar. But iGen teens aren’t working (or managing their own money) as much. In the late 1970s, 77 percent of high-school seniors worked for pay during the school year; by the mid-2010s, only 55 percent did. The number of eighth-graders who work for pay has been cut in half. These declines accelerated during the Great Recession, but teen employment has not bounced back, even though job availability has.
>Of course, putting off the responsibilities of adulthood is not an iGen innovation. Gen Xers, in the 1990s, were the first to postpone the traditional markers of adulthood. Young Gen Xers were just about as likely to drive, drink alcohol, and date as young Boomers had been, and more likely to have sex and get pregnant as teens. But as they left their teenage years behind, Gen Xers married and started careers later than their Boomer predecessors had.
>Gen X managed to stretch adolescence beyond all previous limits: Its members started becoming adults earlier and finished becoming adults later. Beginning with Millennials and continuing with iGen, adolescence is contracting again—but only because its onset is being delayed. Across a range of behaviors—drinking, dating, spending time unsupervised— 18-year-olds now act more like 15-year-olds used to, and 15-year-olds more like 13-year-olds. Childhood now stretches well into high school.
Alexander Gonzalez
bump
Thomas Perez
>If today’s teens were a generation of grinds, we’d see that in the data. But eighth-, 10th-, and 12th-graders in the 2010s actually spend less time on homework than Gen X teens did in the early 1990s. (High-school seniors headed for four-year colleges spend about the same amount of time on homework as their predecessors did.) The time that seniors spend on activities such as student clubs and sports and exercise has changed little in recent years. Combined with the decline in working for pay, this means iGen teens have more leisure time than Gen X teens did, not less.
>So what are they doing with all that time? They are on their phone, in their room, alone and often distressed.
>One of the ironies of iGen life is that despite spending far more time under the same roof as their parents, today’s teens can hardly be said to be closer to their mothers and fathers than their predecessors were. “I’ve seen my friends with their families—they don’t talk to them,” Athena told me. “They just say ‘Okay, okay, whatever’ while they’re on their phones. They don’t pay attention to their family.” Like her peers, Athena is an expert at tuning out her parents so she can focus on her phone. She spent much of her summer keeping up with friends, but nearly all of it was over text or Snapchat. “I’ve been on my phone more than I’ve been with actual people,” she said. “My bed has, like, an imprint of my body.”
Liam Wood
>In this, too, she is typical. The number of teens who get together with their friends nearly every day dropped by more than 40 percent from 2000 to 2015; the decline has been especially steep recently. It’s not only a matter of fewer kids partying; fewer kids are spending time simply hanging out. That’s something most teens used to do: nerds and jocks, poor kids and rich kids, C students and A students. The roller rink, the basketball court, the town pool, the local necking spot—they’ve all been replaced by virtual spaces accessed through apps and the web.
>You might expect that teens spend so much time in these new spaces because it makes them happy, but most data suggest that it does not. The Monitoring the Future survey, funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse and designed to be nationally representative, has asked 12th-graders more than 1,000 questions every year since 1975 and queried eighth- and 10th-graders since 1991. The survey asks teens how happy they are and also how much of their leisure time they spend on various activities, including nonscreen activities such as in-person social interaction and exercise, and, in recent years, screen activities such as using social media, texting, and browsing the web. The results could not be clearer: Teens who spend more time than average on screen activities are more likely to be unhappy, and those who spend more time than average on nonscreen activities are more likely to be happy.
Benjamin Price
>There’s not a single exception. All screen activities are linked to less happiness, and all nonscreen activities are linked to more happiness. Eighth-graders who spend 10 or more hours a week on social media are 56 percent more likely to say they’re unhappy than those who devote less time to social media. Admittedly, 10 hours a week is a lot. But those who spend six to nine hours a week on social media are still 47 percent more likely to say they are unhappy than those who use social media even less. The opposite is true of in-person interactions. Those who spend an above-average amount of time with their friends in person are 20 percent less likely to say they’re unhappy than those who hang out for a below-average amount of time.
>If you were going to give advice for a happy adolescence based on this survey, it would be straightforward: Put down the phone, turn off the laptop, and do something—anything—that does not involve a screen. Of course, these analyses don’t unequivocally prove that screen time causes unhappiness; it’s possible that unhappy teens spend more time online. But recent research suggests that screen time, in particular social-media use, does indeed cause unhappiness. One study asked college students with a Facebook page to complete short surveys on their phone over the course of two weeks. They’d get a text message with a link five times a day, and report on their mood and how much they’d used Facebook. The more they’d used Facebook, the unhappier they felt, but feeling unhappy did not subsequently lead to more Facebook use.
Aaron Reed
>This doesn’t always mean that, on an individual level, kids who spend more time online are lonelier than kids who spend less time online. Teens who spend more time on social media also spend more time with their friends in person, on average—highly social teens are more social in both venues, and less social teens are less so. But at the generational level, when teens spend more time on smartphones and less time on in-person social interactions, loneliness is more common.
>So is depression. Once again, the effect of screen activities is unmistakable: The more time teens spend looking at screens, the more likely they are to report symptoms of depression. Eighth-graders who are heavy users of social media increase their risk of depression by 27 percent, while those who play sports, go to religious services, or even do homework more than the average teen cut their risk significantly.
>Teens who spend three hours a day or more on electronic devices are 35 percent more likely to have a risk factor for suicide, such as making a suicide plan. (That’s much more than the risk related to, say, watching TV.) One piece of data that indirectly but stunningly captures kids’ growing isolation, for good and for bad: Since 2007, the homicide rate among teens has declined, but the suicide rate has increased. As teens have started spending less time together, they have become less likely to kill one another, and more likely to kill themselves. In 2011, for the first time in 24 years, the teen suicide rate was higher than the teen homicide rate.
>Depression and suicide have many causes; too much technology is clearly not the only one. And the teen suicide rate was even higher in the 1990s, long before smartphones existed. Then again, about four times as many Americans now take antidepressants, which are often effective in treating severe depression, the type most strongly linked to suicide.
Lucas James
>What’s the connection between smartphones and the apparent psychological distress this generation is experiencing? For all their power to link kids day and night, social media also exacerbate the age-old teen concern about being left out. Today’s teens may go to fewer parties and spend less time together in person, but when they do congregate, they document their hangouts relentlessly—on Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook. Those not invited to come along are keenly aware of it. Accordingly, the number of teens who feel left out has reached all-time highs across age groups. Like the increase in loneliness, the upswing in feeling left out has been swift and significant.
> This trend has been especially steep among girls. Forty-eight percent more girls said they often felt left out in 2015 than in 2010, compared with 27 percent more boys. Girls use social media more often, giving them additional opportunities to feel excluded and lonely when they see their friends or classmates getting together without them. Social media levy a psychic tax on the teen doing the posting as well, as she anxiously awaits the affirmation of comments and likes. When Athena posts pictures to Instagram, she told me, “I’m nervous about what people think and are going to say. It sometimes bugs me when I don’t get a certain amount of likes on a picture.”
>Girls have also borne the brunt of the rise in depressive symptoms among today’s teens. Boys’ depressive symptoms increased by 21 percent from 2012 to 2015, while girls’ increased by 50 percent—more than twice as much. The rise in suicide, too, is more pronounced among girls. Although the rate increased for both sexes, three times as many 12-to-14-year-old girls killed themselves in 2015 as in 2007, compared with twice as many boys. The suicide rate is still higher for boys, in part because they use more-lethal methods, but girls are beginning to close the gap.
Andrew Butler
>Social-media companies are of course aware of these problems, and to one degree or another have endeavored to prevent cyberbullying. But their various motivations are, to say the least, complex. A recently leaked Facebook document indicated that the company had been touting to advertisers its ability to determine teens’ emotional state based on their on-site behavior, and even to pinpoint “moments when young people need a confidence boost.” Facebook acknowledged that the document was real, but denied that it offers “tools to target people based on their emotional state.”
>In july 2014, a 13-year-old girl in North Texas woke to the smell of something burning. Her phone had overheated and melted into the sheets. National news outlets picked up the story, stoking readers’ fears that their cellphone might spontaneously combust. To me, however, the flaming cellphone wasn’t the only surprising aspect of the story. Why, I wondered, would anyone sleep with her phone beside her in bed? It’s not as though you can surf the web while you’re sleeping. And who could slumber deeply inches from a buzzing phone?
Hudson Bell
>Curious, I asked my undergraduate students at San Diego State University what they do with their phone while they sleep. Their answers were a profile in obsession. Nearly all slept with their phone, putting it under their pillow, on the mattress, or at the very least within arm’s reach of the bed. They checked social media right before they went to sleep, and reached for their phone as soon as they woke up in the morning (they had to—all of them used it as their alarm clock). Their phone was the last thing they saw before they went to sleep and the first thing they saw when they woke up. If they woke in the middle of the night, they often ended up looking at their phone. Some used the language of addiction. “I know I shouldn’t, but I just can’t help it,” one said about looking at her phone while in bed. Others saw their phone as an extension of their body—or even like a lover: “Having my phone closer to me while I’m sleeping is a comfort.”
>It may be a comfort, but the smartphone is cutting into teens’ sleep: Many now sleep less than seven hours most nights. Sleep experts say that teens should get about nine hours of sleep a night; a teen who is getting less than seven hours a night is significantly sleep deprived. Fifty-seven percent more teens were sleep deprived in 2015 than in 1991. In just the four years from 2012 to 2015, 22 percent more teens failed to get seven hours of sleep.
Luke Young
>Electronic devices and social media seem to have an especially strong ability to disrupt sleep. Teens who read books and magazines more often than the average are actually slightly less likely to be sleep deprived—either reading lulls them to sleep, or they can put the book down at bedtime. Watching TV for several hours a day is only weakly linked to sleeping less. But the allure of the smartphone is often too much to resist.
>Sleep deprivation is linked to myriad issues, including compromised thinking and reasoning, susceptibility to illness, weight gain, and high blood pressure. It also affects mood: People who don’t sleep enough are prone to depression and anxiety. Again, it’s difficult to trace the precise paths of causation. Smartphones could be causing lack of sleep, which leads to depression, or the phones could be causing depression, which leads to lack of sleep. Or some other factor could be causing both depression and sleep deprivation to rise. But the smartphone, its blue light glowing in the dark, is likely playing a nefarious role.
>The correlations between depression and smartphone use are strong enough to suggest that more parents should be telling their kids to put down their phone. As the technology writer Nick Bilton has reported, it’s a policy some Silicon Valley executives follow. Even Steve Jobs limited his kids’ use of the devices he brought into the world.
>What’s at stake isn’t just how kids experience adolescence. The constant presence of smartphones is likely to affect them well into adulthood. Among people who suffer an episode of depression, at least half become depressed again later in life. Adolescence is a key time for developing social skills; as teens spend less time with their friends face-to-face, they have fewer opportunities to practice them. In the next decade, we may see more adults who know just the right emoji for a situation, but not the right facial expression.
Adam Scott
>I realize that restricting technology might be an unrealistic demand to impose on a generation of kids so accustomed to being wired at all times. My three daughters were born in 2006, 2009, and 2012. They’re not yet old enough to display the traits of iGen teens, but I have already witnessed firsthand just how ingrained new media are in their young lives. I’ve observed my toddler, barely old enough to walk, confidently swiping her way through an iPad. I’ve experienced my 6-year-old asking for her own cellphone. I’ve overheard my 9-year-old discussing the latest app to sweep the fourth grade. Prying the phone out of our kids’ hands will be difficult, even more so than the quixotic efforts of my parents’ generation to get their kids to turn off MTV and get some fresh air. But more seems to be at stake in urging teens to use their phone responsibly, and there are benefits to be gained even if all we instill in our children is the importance of moderation. Significant effects on both mental health and sleep time appear after two or more hours a day on electronic devices. The average teen spends about two and a half hours a day on electronic devices. Some mild boundary-setting could keep kids from falling into harmful habits.
Carter Ortiz
>picks Athena for the fake name cringe
Samuel Price
>In my conversations with teens, I saw hopeful signs that kids themselves are beginning to link some of their troubles to their ever-present phone. Athena told me that when she does spend time with her friends in person, they are often looking at their device instead of at her. “I’m trying to talk to them about something, and they don’t actually look at my face,” she said. “They’re looking at their phone, or they’re looking at their Apple Watch.” “What does that feel like, when you’re trying to talk to somebody face-to-face and they’re not looking at you?,” I asked. “It kind of hurts,” she said. “It hurts. I know my parents’ generation didn’t do that. I could be talking about something super important to me, and they wouldn’t even be listening.”
>Once, she told me, she was hanging out with a friend who was texting her boyfriend. “I was trying to talk to her about my family, and what was going on, and she was like, ‘Uh-huh, yeah, whatever.’ So I took her phone out of her hands and I threw it at my wall.”
>I couldn’t help laughing. “You play volleyball,” I said. “Do you have a pretty good arm?” “Yep,” she replied.
Brayden Perry
>investing in the pharmaceutical jew die kike die
Thomas Gray
Hey, I'm not saying it's good, I just see the writing on the wall. Clinical depression is going to be the standard mental state in 20 years.
Angel Diaz
Nigger i have a flip phone and will have useful PHD im doing good
I wonder when he'll make the connection between Apple and Hendricus G. Loos.
Lucas Hall
I continue to stand by my belief that the iPhone was the spiteful curse leveled upon the world by the cancer ridden Steve Jobs when he realized that he was genuinely going to die and he would not live long enough to become an immortal through technology.
Julian Torres
>Invest in tech, and invest in antidepressants. That was excellent advice about a decade ago. You missed the bus.
Christian Lopez
>another "kids and their new technology are destroying everything" moron writer
Embarrassing
Hudson Stewart
>useful PHD
Name one.
Jason Morales
>not seeing what is in front of your eyes it's a real problem dipshit
Elijah Murphy
The cunt has an abysmal writing style, can't believe you made me read all that shit. Ends the article on "yep" with no meaning at all beyond reinforcing the useless, solipsistic female ego? Are you fucking kidding?
Add to this, what Barrie Trowers has said that the EMF is rendering girls sterile and LOL. Those girls aren't technologically handicapped, many are legit born (for reasons I can't get into here) as psychopaths and soulless NPD's that society and tech only exacerbates to the extreme. With a sterile zombie populace on the brink, I'm stacking ammo twice as deep. Better learn some skills too I guess because this is not going to last and everything built shall crumble.
I disagree. Virtual reality hasn't gone mainstream yet, and that is going to do a lot more to fuck people up than phones.
The dystopia has only begun.
Isaiah Cox
>Unlike the teens of my generation, who might have spent an evening tying up the family landline with gossip, they talk on Snapchat, the smartphone app that allows users to send pictures and videos that quickly disappear. They make sure to keep up their Snapstreaks
What is this bullshit. You're really going to go moral high horse in replacing "spent an evening tying up the landline" (fucking liar) with uses own phone to chat with friends?
>in the 1980s, when I’d enjoy a few parent-free hours shopping with my friends
And here acting like family breakup wasn't in full effect in the 80s. It's the era of latchkey kids and unsupervised fucking around at friends.
How the fuck can you have the brass balls to claim teens staying home and noodling on their phones is more dangerous than them meeting up at some illegal party or in the woods to get plastered?
How the fuck can people already have rose coloured glasses about their 80s youth? We mocked our parents for this shit. Don't you remember anymore?
Leo Watson
The worst part is I don't see any way out of this that doesn't involve a cataclysmic hard reset through nuclear war, act of God borderline extinction level natural catastrophe, or Butlerian Jihad tier social reaction.
We are on the brink of a titanic evolutionary filtering event and how or even if we'll come out the other side is anyone's guess.
Tyler Nguyen
almost certainly. these motherfuckers...
David Stewart
>Uncle Ted was right That's obvious. did you believe you were smarter than a 160 iq?
Nathan Rogers
not going to the mall anymore is because of subburban sprawl in America, not phones
Lincoln Foster
>be genelet >disappear into a virtual world and eventually an hero
oh no sure gonna lose sleep over this tonight
Brandon Reyes
>Across a range of behaviors—drinking, dating, spending time unsupervised But this is literally illegal for minors. What author implies? Becoming criminals?
Ayden Hall
This is my cell phone. I can throw it on the ground and all I have to do is put the pieces back together and it'll work just fine. Smartphones are a bunch of fragile fags.
Nathan Baker
Bump, because I'm Gen Z and agree with just about everything this article says from what I have observed.
Xavier Sanchez
TL;DR someone's getting paid per word
Jackson Rivera
Had a smart phone until last Sunday. It was one of the Kyocera hardened models, because I'm rough on phones. It overheated and died. I went to the Verizon store, and on a whim, got a flip phone. It's one of the hardened military models. It works great as a phone. As an internet browser, it's useless for all but the basic stuff. When the smartphone died, it took hundreds of memes and screencaps I'd taken from the election. I also realized how much I'd been on the internet at places like work or just hanging out with family. It wasn't like a full blown withdrawl, but I'd pull out my new flip phone and fiddle with it compulsively before putting away only to pull it out a few minutes later. I'm getting better about it now. My brain is resseting to its pre 2012 state when I got my first smartphone. My online usage is limited to my ancient desk top. I find that my mind wanders off on pleasant tangents that I realize I had been missing. I make up stories in my head again, writing what amounts to internal fan-fiction in quiet moments or when my body is engaged in some rote task that does not require my full attention. I didn't realize how much I missed my internal life and the characters I created in my head until a couple of days ago. It's pretty nice.
Christian Anderson
>young girls spending all their time on their phones and getting depressed >young men spending all their time playing vidya and making bros4lyfe
this cunt author is only focusing on the roastie tinder demographic young men are enjoying their time online so much that they're happier than other generations despite a bad economy God help them if we ever get real virtual waifus
Kevin Gomez
Why you brainlets can't comprehend what is happening? It's transhumanism! The idea of transhumanism as some magical future where people will live forever becoming some sort of human-machine powerful hybrid is probably just a fantasy. In reality people are not using technology for improvement and instead by simply consuming technology to satiate their primal needs they're becoming dependent of the machines. Smartphones are used to regulate sleeping habits, used to store information(exteriorization of memory), used for communication... it is doing alot of what our brains were meant to do. We're becoming weaker as this transhuman process advances, a process fueled by corporate greed and a universal lack of meaning in human life. Technology is killing us.
Ayden Powell
>>Government fucks with the natural order of things. >>Why won't millions of years of evolution conform to my modernist BS >>Western societies literally coming apart at the seams >>Abandon everything but the sacred bull government >>The bull must be appeased
Oliver Wilson
This process will advance even further with even more human dependency of technology in the close future. Not only that but our future technology will also be able to change human behaviour much quicker than we imagine, a simple app like Tinder can make a great impact in how we sexually interact, in the future more apps will do significant impact just like Tinder and alter human behaviour in large scales. Human masses of weak technology slaves instead of powerful human-machine hybrids, we're using smartphones as extensions of our brains and the result is pathetic. Transhumanism in the 21st century smells like crap.
Gavin Johnson
well said. in less words than the article in the OP too. the internet was both a blessing and a curse along with globalism. It's a sad state of affairs in which we live in and when you start to really notice it it's hard not to go insane. western society is being held together by fucking duck tape at this point
Samuel Lee
We could have used technology for good, it would take just some smart powerful people to get together and change the course of humanity. But that didn't happen. We used technology to satisfy our immediate needs, the train, the car, the plane, the TV, the video game, the IPhone then the ultra-realistic japanese sex doll. How would someone two centuries ago, looking at newly developed machines that could transport tons of products at once, even think that this process would end in catastrophe? Why would someone look at a flying machine for the first time and not be happy about such a conquest? We loved technology from the beginning and were late to see how it could affect human life. If we used technology to enhance men we could dominate galaxies, we could achieve sci-fi dreams, but instead we became slaves. Don't know if it's to late for men to conquer machine, maybe or doom is inevitable. Anyway, right now we're just a shadow of what our ancestors were.
Levi Bailey
>the internet was both a blessing and a curse Literally nothing wrong with the Internet or the technologies that run it, including the web. If you are seeking to blame something, you blame the people who created, pushed and popularized social media culture as well as data brokering and the supplementary technologies and cultural shifts required to run such a business model. Prior to that, everything was good.
>captcha: snowden road spooky.
Matthew White
The moden men is individualistic, but at the same time is not an individual. The human animal only cares about himself but simultaneously is dependent of social interactions, this creates sick social circles that devoid any collective goal. Those creatures all bounded by need but with no mutual direction cannot be called civilized, civilization demands long term thinking and collective ends. The modern men is a savage with a smartphone.
Jace Powell
Do liberals really read social science statistics without understanding the influence of race?
Oliver Ward
>I have to check in every hour or every 30 minutes Found your fucking problem.
Kayden Brooks
Underrated comment.
Parker Evans
...
Parker Gonzalez
We're a dying species.
We're dying spiritually, emotionally, and physically. Millennials are the last generation on this planet... we've fallen into the technological trap without question or forethought, sheep being herded into the slaughter house unknowingly.
This is what it feels like to be black pilled.
David Reyes
>they're safer >they're less likely to have sex with everyone >oy vey they're mentally ill goy
Brazil needs more people like you, I hope you reproduce.
Jaxson Ward
I was talking about that in and but I still see possible solutions, not for "humanity", for individuals only.
Carter Ross
We need to start building jammers and going to war
Gabriel Jenkins
I think this is the "great filter" that prevents sentient species from ever leaving their home planets. This is the answer to where are all the ayy lmaos.
Josiah Long
oh my god what a load of crap
Carson Gray
I'm almost convinced that the pyramids scattered across the entire planet was from an advanced human civilization before our time. That perhaps at some point tens of thousands of years ago existed a grand civilization, but they too fell into the hands of technology, greed, and ego that lead to their own demise just like us.
Maybe humanity continues to reset itself after so many trials, and from the ashes of our time here we'll start over again, in a cave learning to make fire once more.
Levi Price
Thinking about "humanity" makes any problem complicated to solve. "Humanity" as a way of saying "the Homo sapiens sapiens species" is a giant group that is highly heterogeneous. If you try to help such a big and diverse group you're doomed to fail.
Carson Flores
>blacks and mongrels >humanity
Chase Wright
The Greek mythos speaks of ages of man prior to our own current age, the iron age, and each prior age was better and more glorious than the one to come after.
Man started out in a "golden age", so to speak, with great marvels and superiority of body and mind, but fell and reset to the next age, the "silver age", same process, then the bronze age, and then to our current iron age.
Very similarly the Hindu mythos speaks of similar ages of man, and if I recall correctly Mayan (or was it Aztec?) also speaks of such ages of man.
Metaphors are interesting
Eli Wright
A lot of people think that way, they keep thinking in terms of species, it's dumb.
Lincoln Gonzalez
I'm almost becoming convinced that the Egyptians & Myans weren't the ones who built the pyramids.
They're merely just local tribesman who stumbled upon the abandoned ruins of a previous grand civilization and starting carving art, pictures, and creating a system of hierarchy to fuck with their clansmen.
Robert Howard
Ave Omnissiah.
Ian Mitchell
TED WAS A FAGGOT, kill ALL luddites
Joshua Thomas
You can't understand the boomer cuckmind without first understanding the TV transformation over the national zeitgeist. They literally watched their parents turn into histories first zombie gen. iGen has a profound link to media, too, call it Web 3.0. The counter-reaction to it is going to be HUGE.
Elijah Flores
>I can't deal with change wah wah wah
Nothing has really changed. Human beings have always been socially addicted fuckos. Now they're just doing it in a new frontier
>but muh time at the mall with stacy and chad and friends
Nobody gives a shit. If smart phones were around when you and your dinosaur friends were children, you'd be addicted to them as the kids are. Maybe kids are too dependent on technology but that's humanity in a nutshell.
Matthew Baker
>why arent those goyim slaving away in my factories and dying for israel!
Justin Brooks
because life is messy. social interaction is messy. people today just aren't living, and constantly being plugged into phones and such are degrading our ability to interact with each other. Children are having difficulty developing empathy.
we are literally becoming sociopathic monsters. Do you think it's a coincidence that the rise of smartphones and social media has paralleled politics and political rhetoric getting so divisive where nobody is willing to work with anyone?
>"spent an evening tying up the landline" (fucking liar) with uses own phone to chat with friends? there's a difference between actual, live conversation over the phone, and sending memes over an app. it's all about the power of the dull moment. we are overstimulated because we try to "beat" boredom. whenever we find a lull in the day, that is a "boring" moment that has to be filled. So we reach for the phone. In a conversation, when we reach a lull, everyone goes to their phone to fill the gap, whereas previous generations soaked in the dull moment. dull moments are moments for reflection. you sit there and stew in the juices of the conversation, and that can lead to new conversation when you rethink that joke someone told and it reminds you of something you saw the other day, or when you absorb the details of that heated argument you had over what kind of pizza it was that the group of griends had 2 weeks ago at that place, and it leads to a new string of thought that you then share out loud. Conversation is live. there is no preparing. you dont have the opportunity to write and edit your message and then send it. real conversation is messy and often uneven. And it's the way our brains are wired to function in social contact with others.
>And here acting like family breakup wasn't in full effect in the 80s that is never even remotely suggested. And regardless, not everyone had a broken family in the 80's. Seems like projecting to me.
Matthew Peterson
>In a conversation, when we reach a lull, everyone goes to their phone to fill the gap, Whoever has their cell phone nearby when you talk to them isn't worth talking to and should be shunned and ostracized.
Aiden Campbell
I bothered to put my headphones on for this you sack of dog shit. How dare you waste my time. Reported.
Luis Walker
What was it?
Jose Gonzalez
That's because they were both created for each other
Mason Campbell
>The average teen now has had sex for the first time by the spring of 11th grade, a full year later than the average Gen Xer. tfw you didn't until college
Brandon Young
>Beginning with Millennials and continuing with iGen, adolescence is contracting again—but only because its onset is being delayed. Across a range of behaviors—drinking, dating, spending time unsupervised— 18-year-olds now act more like 15-year-olds used to, and 15-year-olds more like 13-year-olds. Childhood now stretches well into high school. and beyond in some cases
Nathaniel Gonzalez
Calm down and take your meds you are sperging out lad.
Jackson Wood
that reminds me I need to refill my prescription
Robert Rivera
>Uncle Ted was right how did you know I had an uncle ted?
Hudson Hill
Organic Chemistry.
Aiden Ortiz
I genuinely feel bad for the iPhone generation. I was only born half a decade before them, yet my childhood was so much more fun. Yeah we had video games and we had computers/internet but they were so much less convenient that we would still do other things, like play in the woods. It must be so depressing to look back on your childhood and think "all I fucking did was sit on my phone/tablet and play minecraft." Convenience isn't always a good thing.
tl;dr - "I'm old and the world isn't the same as it was when I was young. These youngsters are FUNDAMENTALLY WRONG AND PROBABLY EVIL, and it's this NEWFANGLED TECHNOLOGY to blame."
Anthony Wilson
>18-year-olds now act more like 15-year-olds used to
Nathan Ward
Lul if you think phones change anything.
I had my first smartphone at 23, before that I still spent all my days alone in my room playing video games and chatting online. The only difference is that what people used to do at home you can now do anywhere, and that's not really a bad deal. Most people still socialize just fine.
John Martinez
I really would love to know where the idea of "OH MAH GOOOOOOD! THE KIDS DONT DO (((HOMEWORK))) ANYMORE!" started.
In almost my entire fucking highschool career I barely did ANY, and that was because one of the teachers in my freshman year straight up told us that the grading system only counted tests, mid terms and finals, and that mids and finals accounted for something like 80% of our entire grade. This meant you could straight up do NO homework, fail almost every regular test, but if you aced mids and finals, you were good.
Also my school system straight up dropped the passing grades from C- to D+ and then to straight up D- by the time I was a senoir (think it was in 02. Im 33, so someone else do the math.), not even joking. Part of me believes that was because they were holding back so many niggers it started to get ridiculous when 26 year old tyrone was a freshman in HS....
Evan Allen
It's a symptom, not a cause. Kids take to their phones because their lives are bland and meaningless, not the other way around.
Luis Jones
>All screen activities are linked to less happiness, and all nonscreen activities are linked to more happiness
So, in other words, kids now have access to ALL information and knowledge, free of charge, without a bias filter being over it, and that makes them less happy then if they were ignorant and believed every single lie some adult tells them because they want to "shield them from how harsh reality is"
Well fucking color me surprised when 13 year old billy finds out mommy and daddy lied to them when they said the world will be great once they "grow up" and everyone out there is "really nice and cool once you get to know them".
Everyone called me a fucking loner and a nihilist because by the time I was 15 I had learned, the hard ways, that niggers get everything handed to them on a silver platter if they cry RAYCIS and that in reality only about 10% of everyone around me would find any real happiness. Hell, how miserable and out of it the teachers and faculty around me were was a big enough clue of the realities.
Jaxson Ross
Get ready my commie friend.
Why do you think they are pushing degeneracy on younger and younger people? They see the writing on the wall. Soon enough its going to be "cool" again to go out, get fucking wasted, smoke some cigs or some weed and have a toss with ol mary jane rotten crotch because "we need to get you iZombies SOCIAL again! Gotta replace those falling birthrates so you kids can pay into my social security and pay for that obamacare and boogies surgery!"
So fucking glad I havent paid a CENT in taxes, and if I can do it somehow, I never will. Fuck this system, im not paying for boomers retirement or for Sally (born steven)s transition surgery or cindy "gates of the city" jewskis birth control pills and abortions.
Caleb Fisher
Brings back memories of each time I dropped my old Nokia 3310. Falls, breaks in 3 parts, put them back and your are ready to make that call.
Henry Jones
>tl;dr "m-muh big bad scary technology is gonna kill us all!!! DRUMPF IMPEACH!!!!!!"
Nicholas Turner
>sex doll
Again with this shit. I guaran-god damned-tee you that the first time man made a DOLL, another man looked at it and said "I bet if I made that bigger I could fuck it......"
Man as a species is driven by its basest instinct which is to fuck. We build empires complete with armies and walls so we can protect the things we FUCK, develop new medicines and technologies to extend our life, so we can FUCK more. Someone post the copy pasta about how man will go to the very stars so we can FUCK the first alien bitch that wont melt our dick off with their acid cum.
Every great thing we as a species has come down, ultimately, to "muh dick".
And thats perfectly fine, because it makes our species continue. Its what we were programmed to do on the genetic level, and no amount of faggotry and trannies and feminism will ever stop it. It will just make the drive that much harder.
