Let's re-brand Nazism

Let's re-brand Nazism. Thoughts? Suggestions?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=yB8Ci7X5HUU
youtube.com/watch?v=QAwWM55dTSE
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kibbutz
lawoffice.org.il/en/articles/aliyah-to-israel-by-dna-test/
washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/03/16/is-israel-an-apartheid-state-this-u-n-report-says-yes/
bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/hcv0415.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

I personally would go for like a pure white and gold European thing. Like in this video: youtube.com/watch?v=yB8Ci7X5HUU

We just need something new since there's so much propaganda that people automatically associate Nazism with pure evil and they're blinded to the fact that we just want to secure a future for white kids.

Nice guy National Socialism

We'll call it National Faggotism so the sjws wont know which way its going.

Maybe we could call it Purism or Dextros?

nazism is bad, why would you like to make it come back?

It's just a social experiment. Damn. Chill.

Funny, we literally just tried that to almost no avail. We took out nearly all of the edgy stuff, let in some lolberg-type people, and we even let in some "good kikes".

The (((media))) still branded us as Nazis, and most of the extra "followers" we gained into the "movement" by trying to be sneaky scattered and ran at the first hint of trouble.

We called it the Alt-Right.

youtube.com/watch?v=QAwWM55dTSE

Jewbegonism

>Let's re-brand Nazism.
No. Whatever you do they will always call you an anti-semitic nazi racist. Don't fall back and don't let them push the overton window to the left.

Already taken. They call themselves "Antifa" now. Pretty damn kikeish, no?

>pic related
>one of the fringe people who we tried to incorporate into our "rebranded movement"

>democraps r da real raycisss
>Antifa r da real fayshisss

Fuck off retard. Everyone is kinda racist and Antifa are commies. Stop taking your political cues from Steven Crowder.

People are too spineless. The minute whatever our group is called gets compared to Nazis, everyone will abandon us in our fight. Instead of creating a new brand, why don't we try to take all the punch out of Nazism? I mean the left is already desensitizing people and turning it into a playground insult.

Keep talking out of your ass Soros, no one here cares

ohh lets just bring auschwitz back, just a social experiment!

Alt right is the trs/identity evropa/richard spencer crowd

Pjw is alt lite

Compelling argument you've got there, quality stuff 10/10.

Socialism is pretty popular with the kids these days, but you can't let people think it's compatible with globalism, so call it something like "national socialism".

National Globalism

Then why did he literally call himself Alt-Right multiple times as you can see in the picture that I just posted??

You're the one with the nazi flag on. Get with the flow newfag

Calling yourself a "Nazi" is terrible branding and almost certainly inaccurate.

Real Nazis were specifically German nationalists. They had specific policies based on political and economic theory of the early 20th century, and particular to the situation Germany was in in the 1920s and 1930s. You might have a favorable impression of the Nazis, you might admire many of their values, you might take inspiration from their example, but you're not and can't be a Nazi.

Meanwhile, to the people of today, the Nazis are the most demonized figures in all of history. They've grown up with entertainment where making a character a Nazi is the shortest cut to having the audience understand he's meant to be pure, unredeemable evil, and an acceptable target for any kind of violence.

this isnt a peace symbol??

Point out that Jews are Nazis now:

JEWS HAVE NATIONAL SOCIALIST COMMUNES IN ISRAEL:
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kibbutz
> Kibbutzim began as utopian communities, a combination of socialism and Zionism.
ISRAEL USES DNA TESTS TO GRANT CITIZENSHIP TO JEWS
>lawoffice.org.il/en/articles/aliyah-to-israel-by-dna-test/
>When Can a DNA Test Grant Israeli Citizenship?
>The DNA test can be used to receive Israeli citizenship only in order to prove that a person is the child of an Israeli or child of a person that is Jewish.
THE UNITED NATIONS CONFIRMS THAT ISRAEL IS AN APARTHEID STATE
>washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/03/16/is-israel-an-apartheid-state-this-u-n-report-says-yes/
ISRAEL IS A NATIONAL SOCIALIST ETHNO-STATE, IMPOSING APARTHEID ONTO A RACIAL GROUP.

Ethno-Socialist Worker's Party

I gotta ask you guys. Do you put out incorrect statistics to deliberate polarize people even more? Or do you just take these MSpaint infographics at face value?

bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/hcv0415.pdf

page 7

A kekistan flag would make this post complete

Call it "Classical Libealism" or something with "liberal in it. Anything with the word right gets labeled Nazis by the left.

What you're pointing at doesn't show statistics on interracial crime, and therefore can't contradict the statement in OP's image.

add a based black dude

wait I got it, Call it "African Liberalism", the only goal with the name should be to confuse the left.

>shillposting this hard
Alt-Right is a kike term cooked up to give form to the vaguely right wing mass that is rising across the west. You can't fight something if it has no name, so (((they))) gave us one.

>using the wrong statistics
>nigs are still massively over-represented & whites are massively under-represented in this particular category of criminal behavior

Woah, you sure showed him!!
Sup Forumsturds btfo!

>crime victimization

crime by definition victimizes someone you fucking commie

Half of that infographic uses bad reasoning.

Let's examine the case where every group's equal and unbiased in their crime. Suppose black people are 20% of the population, and white people are 80%, and suppose (for the sake of argument) that blacks and whites commit crimes at equal rates per capita, and select their targets randomly.

So 1 in 5 crimes are commited by blacks, 80% of their victims are white, 20% are black. 4 of 5 crimes are committed by whites, 80% of their victims are white, 20% are black.

Out of 1000 crimes, 200 are committed by blacks, against 160 whites and 40 blacks. 800 are committed by whites, against 640 whites and 160 blacks.

So for equal criminality and lack of racial bias in targetting, blacks and whites will commit equal amounts of crime against each other.

If you try and make that a "per-capita" figure, then blacks commit four times as much interracial crime per capita. But you can't draw a meaningful conclusion from it. Because they're the minority, they're in an interracial-target-rich situation. If you randomly shoot someone, they're much more likely to be white than black.

Blacks are 5-10 times as violent and seriously criminal as whites. That much is true. The "25-200x adjusted for population size" thing, however, is based on incorrect mathematical reasoning. You're applying the misleading unbiased minority factor on top of the real difference in criminality.

Interracial crime is one case where the total figure, not per capita, is what should be compared.

That's retarded, (((they))) have always been fine just calling us right wing nut jobs or neo-nazis when people asked.
>This is exactly what they did when people started asking "hey what's this alt right thingy?"

Disenfranchised right leaning groups made up the term to try and expand, it kinda worked for awhile but then the bubble popped after it got too widespread and most of the newcomers scuttled away in fear.

The kikes didn't need any help calling us names, that's been their area of expertise since 1946.

Wrong. Spics are a bigger cancer to whites than niggers are.

Pics related. Spics attack white people, niggers attack and each other and Spics. Meaning niggers are better neighbors, since theyre more likely to attack each other than to attack you. A spic is more likely to attack you, the gringo.

...