Call women biologically worthless

>Call women biologically worthless
>Get fired

Why is anyone surprised by this?

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/VlNfl
youtube.com/watch?v=cVaTc15plVs
usnews.com/news/blogs/data-mine/2016/02/18/study-shows-women-are-better-coders-but-only-when-gender-is-hidden
archive.is/XwQrl
archive.is/KDYWA
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Show me in the language of the memo where you interpret that he called women biologically worthless

>Biologically fit

It's damn near impressive how much publications have tried to smear this memo, despite it being released to the public.

>out at the company
Whitebois are even illiterate, how will you ever compete?
>inb4 its a kikeboi
Still white

He never said that god I hate CNN so much

Well thanks to Google sacking the fella it'll give what he wrote more prominence.

Because they know normies won't actually read it. They'll just take CNN word for it.

Did you actually read the letter?
Of course not, CNN read it for you and you blindly trust them.

>implying I'm a rural and suburban retard who has time to read every autistic manifesto on the internet

I'm sure they'll act shocked when the left and liberals as a whole lose another election.

They just don't learn. People aren't ducking their heads anymore because PC enforcers get a little hissy. We look, we learn, and we vote.

>"educated" cityshit claims reading is hard
I thought you were supposed to be smart?

>leaf

Is this legal? You can't fire someone for their views?
Is he going to sue the crap out of google?

reckt

>live in the communication age
>anyone can find anything in seconds / minutes
>nobody checks anything
>swallows whatever the media tells them

>Is he going to sue the crap out of google?
He's currently investigating whether or not to sue.

i think he's just saying that unlike trumpcucks, he is gainfully employed and wasting his time reading another unemployed trumpcuck's faggy rantings isn't in his best interest. keep jerking your little boydick to gay porn though, looks like its really propelling you forward

>(((CNN)))
user, please.

>Is this legal?
i believe so

>You can't fire someone for their views?
of course you can

Definition of Huxley was right

This whole debacle. My God it's a happening in and of itself.

Supposedly the reason he was given for his termination was advocating harmful gender stereotypes in the workplace. He should definitely sue. Imagine pic related as they try to argue how his facts are harmful.

>if it upsets me, you should be fired over it
mark this day as the moment google dethroned itself, watch for competitors, google is decaying from the inside, no protest or boycott needed.

>all that projection

Why is CNN allowed to just slander him like that? He never came anywhere close to claiming that, they need to retract and apologize.

You can't fire someone based on political views, and you can't fire someone for speaking about working conditions with their coworkers. The only way something like this should have ended up with firing is if he was incessantly spamming people with it, or if he spent paid company time doing the research and writing.

> watch for competitors

which ones?

I've always been taught different. Maybe it varies on state

>be employed at company
>one of thousands of nobody desk jockeys
>write opinion-based manifesto
>blast employer on second page

Soon all of the Lügenpresse will join. They will just say that he was fired because he was a sexist, regardless of what he wrote.

Because liberals are stupid and run their mouths off and conservatives want them too because they think they'll get votes from it.

>You can't fire someone based on political views

it wasn't a political view. anyways, a company has every right to dictate its own culture. frankly, i hope he sues google. i'd like to see what comes out of it

https:// www. documentcloud. org/documents/3914586-Googles-Ideological-Echo-Chamber.html

Here is the document

test

> taught different.

i don't think you've been taught very much at all desu

>have tried

THEY SUCCEEDED.

there's a reason why people don't call blacks niggers at work. even if they are inferior

How was it not a political view? He stated biological facts and then argued conservative anti-forced diversity views from there.

Stop trying to steal accomplishments of Northern Africans. Just because they have black skin, doesn't mean they're the same race as you morons that never got out of the stone age.

>Argue that Google needs diversity of opinions
>Get fired for your opinion

99.999% of people aren't even going to open the actual document, much less read it all the way through.

They read the title of the article, maybe the first two or three sentences, and then move on to the next chunk of fake news from the MSM.

lol, what biological facts?

Googles gonna pay for this one

The publications and news platforms will really show their true colors when posting their stories on this. This guy is obviously telling the truth and yet they will blatantly spin it.

In fact, many times in the memo he directly addresses Googles' authoritarian approach at silencing any criticism, and then....gets fired over it. Lel.

Companies that are deeply embedded into the system (Google is well known for its connections to the CIA and other government agencies) are simply microchasms of society and how ((they)) want to run everything.

He literally wrote the exact opposite thing.

>being this ignorant
i mean i'm a fucking brazilian and even by brazilian standards that was ignorant as fuck
you don't even know what you're talking about bro

>diversity of opinions

not all opinions are created equal

nice story bro

>biological unfit
non of this is in the memo
if anything its pretty well versed
now if he really got fired over the memo alone jewgle is up for a multi billion dollar lawsuit
he's going to milk google, which might've been his intention after all
>write political incorrect memo
>make it viral
>get fired
>sue the company
'murica fuck yeah

Link to memo?

holy fuck thank you
god damn you know how many niggers believe that africans are 1 collective group of people and all achievements are shared. i actually had a nigress tell off a alger for her claimer north african achievements wuz hers

The information and stats about gender presented by the man with the PhD in biology and backed by other scientists:
archive.is/VlNfl

they are succeeding, but we are pushing back. hold the line

this x a million
holy fuck, that lafuck must have been so triggered by seeing empowered women to write (or even think of writing) such a fucking racist, sexist, xenophobic fucking document! I'm glad that white-cis scum got fired. "Hmmmm? Maybe I won't be fired for being a racist pig. I think I should be reqrded and praised for living in the 60s" -Lamfuck

THIS IS A WARNING TO ALL YOU RACISTS!! YOUR TIME IS COMING

>jewgle is up for a multi billion dollar lawsuit
he should sue the media for slander too

What was his reasoning for his conclusion?
It's a no brainer to say women are unfit for manual labor such as construction and heavy lifting. Tech seems gender neutral to me.

Do they even read the shit they report on?

>out at

Fucking hell. I hope he sues CNN because this is libel. His memo was pretty tame and said nothing like that.

This is literally fake news.

where're the studies?

F A L S E F L A G
A
L
S
E

F
L
A
G

for those that haven't seen it yet

youtube.com/watch?v=cVaTc15plVs

>Tech seems gender neutral to me.
Except, by law, it currently isn't.

Obviously.

It only looks only gender neutral until you realize that when you take an equal mix of thousands of men and women and test them for programming ability, the top performers will always be 80% male and 20% female. If you think that's gender neutral, you're a fucking retard.

explain

This level of bait

objectively false

women are actually better programmers

usnews.com/news/blogs/data-mine/2016/02/18/study-shows-women-are-better-coders-but-only-when-gender-is-hidden

The memo has citations. Go to bed, grampa.

Women enjoy free education in college, a supportive social environment (which is destructive to men), and legal enforcement of job hiring quota rates.

I shouldn't have to explain these things. They're common knowledge.

archive.is/XwQrl

Dude, "we" can't do shit if normies don't want to READ FOR ONCE IN THEIR GODDAMN FUCKING LIVES.

The world would look nothing like what we have today if people bothered to do 15 minutes of research in regards to important issues, not even shit like Jewgle's Jewing.

99% of people are fucking morons.

Tell the truth.
Get fired.

This isn't how you run a great company.

Women are biologically worth MORE than men - wombs are valuable yo. It is only intellectually where they are inferior, and no amount of female hysterics will change this fact.

>theres some differences in preference hence we cant expect a complete 50-50 in an egalitarian system

>abloobloo my poor fucking roasties

Get the fuck out of here. You stink! Slut!

>be company
>apply meritocracy
>men float to the top because they're more able
>Marxists angry, because Equality of Outcome > Equality of Opportunity
>fire most of the men, pass laws mandating women
>meritocracy dies
>company goes stagnant from diversity-hires
>company dies

AOL used to be king-shit.
Then after AOL, it was Yahoo.
And after Yahoo, it was Google.

None of these companies last forever and all of them die the exact same way.

no citations to studies

Is this from the memo? If so, then that's awesome!

Liberals hate individuality. I'm a little surprised, only because I've seen some liberals openly advocating for individualism, but only when it's socially convenient. In reality, the whole concept of being accepted and treated as an individual horrifies them, because it takes away the shield of identity politics and its crutch of collectivism.

Wait a minute. Republicucks want to end welfare but apparently they're unemployed so that's why they collect the most of it? But then why would they vote to end it? Im confused /leftybro/

cnn is literally fake news. the article said nothing like that. I will never give cnn a second of my personal attention and neither should you.

>Women enjoy free education in college
where did you get this from? your butt?

>a supportive social environment (which is destructive to men)

> legal enforcement of job hiring quota rates.
citation needed
how?

Their whole business model revolves around the concept of keeping a narrative going that there are good guys and bad guys and NO middle ground.

Of course they will twist reality at every point they can to keep making people believe that if you are not spouting unproven progressive ideas, then you are a bigot tht should be skinned alive.

They don't work as hard user. No one said they can't code.
They don't put in the fucking hours.

What do you have a factual disagreement with?

AHhaha what an insane headline holy fucking shit.

What it actually should say: Man who does not want to be discrimanated against fired for speaking out.
Sometimes i wonder ... do normal people really not understand that 'positive' discrimination on one side always means negative discrimination on the other? do they not get that 'promoting' women in tech means preferring them over better qualified men? or are they ok with this?

This is the reason they cite.
>“men monopolize code authorship and simultaneously de-legitimize the kinds of social
ties necessary to build mechanisms for women’s inclusion”, meaning values such as politeness are favored less by men

At some point they went from simply cherry picking and skewing the facts to just telling outright, provable lies.

archive.is/KDYWA here's an archive of the entire thing. It doesn't say that women aren't biologically fit. It says that they are more inclined to deal with people so the company should be more communal in it's approach to projects.

>be Sup Forumsack
>make shit up

>I'm just going to pretend all these things aren't true!

they can't "code" tho

>Click ID.
>Scroll through posts.
>Appeal to ignorance non-stop.

nothing. 'cause i don't know if anything he said were facts

Tell me how Yahoo's diversity-hire CEO worked out. I'll wait.

freedom of the press in the United States is protected by the First Amendment

>Tech seems gender neutral to me
from my personal experience women are more likely to get distracted
on top they are easily triggered if you assign them multiple tasks at a time, sometimes to the point they take it personally and drop everything
even if they are only tasked 50% of what a coworker has to do
if i know somebody is likely to cause trouble i keep them out of mission critical projects from the get go
simply not worth the headache

If we can't be assed to provide evidence, he will be proven correct. I'm enjoying watching him play devil's advocate.

citation needed

btw, i work in tech. the laziest motherfuckers are always men. women feel like they need to prove something