Idiot Greeks

Why do dumb Greeks think he's Greek?

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/Hb8em
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

You are right, Aleksandar Makedonov was Bulgarian.

You are right, Iskandar Buyuk was Turkish.

He was Nordic, he had blue eyes and blond hair like all other ancient Europeans.

yes, Zander der Grosse was 100% Germanic. and Prussia is the Succesor State of Macedonia.

You are right, "Big Al" was American. YEEE-HAW!

You are right, Pharoah Askender was a proud son of Kemet.

Is clear that he was Alejandro a time traveler from uruguay

Alexander was actually a descendant from a group of Egyptians who accidentally sailed to the other side of the Mediterranean Sea instead of the Nile and ended up settling there but (((White people))) would love to say otherwise because everything they say is always 100% correct because of their skin colour.

This user is correct, Alexander was Egyptian and therefore black

You fucking dumb shitskin, Macedonia was Greek, Alexander spoke Greek, Alexander believed in GReek gods, Alexander was Greek

DeAlexandreioucus MaceDonalds.

Whites are deeply ashamed to admit they derived from albinos. Very ashamed.

They cant handle the truth. They cant admit that the world they live in is nothing but lies stacked on lies.

Luckily the truth doesn't care.

FYROM confirmed

you are right, Alexuru the Greitu was Japanese

He was Greek. It's just that all modern day greeks are Turkish rape babies.

here comes the Gr*k propaganda again

the truth is, Alexander the great was Illyrian(ie Albanian)

Keksander

>all
Wrong, not all.

Alexandlör Maxhedonj.

None of them actually. Some Greeks can be dark but almost all of them stayed free from Turkish genetic influence.

Turkroach detected.
> Every single good person in the history of the world was a Turk
Yet somehow, all the turks in the world now, and history books, where fucking roaches.

Ύψιστο ραβανί!

AHHAHAHAHHAHAHA

Turks look more greek than greeks

Youre right, Aixande was a proud warrior of abbo heritage.

Skopians look more Turk than Turks

>> Every single good person in the history of the world was a Turk
And also muslim! Like Jesus Christ or Musa(Moses)

we wuz aleczndr n shietttt

Don't lie browny

Greeks are better than other humans.

Nagy Sándor was indeed hungarian

russians are more turkic than greeks

...

He wasn't, but his father wanted to be. Also his mother was from a Greek colony. So he had some ancient Greek blood in him. As did he see himself has Greek? I would say, yes.

If he was greek why wasnt his kingdom called greece?

We are finno-ugric people

That roach flag

Alexander was Macedonian, a kingdom North of the Greek city states. In his conquests, he adopted Greek culture and spread it, including its language and philosophy throughout the known world. Greek is the defacto language of learning in the ancient world because of his influence.

Turks are roaches, though everyone knew that already. Their conquests, like all Muslim peoples, depend on preexisting internal weaknesses of their enemy, they have never won over any enemy in its prime. Roman Byzantium would still exist today if not for the damages of the fourth crusade (Christians vs Christians)

And history repeats itself

you are slavs mixed with mongols and turks

Plz, Alexandre o Grande was obviously lusitanian, just look at his olive skin and darker hair on that mosaic. Plus we portuguese are masters at azulejo (tilework) further proof that depiction of him is portuguese

Why do greeks think they are greek and not muslims, they got raped enough by them to pretty much be of the same race

This too. But more ugric

...

sure bud

That aint Albanian language stupid Turk

Because a mosaic is factual like a photograph.

Modern Greeks if anything are whiter than Myceneans and Minoans.

Don't know what you idiots are talking about... Alec Mawr, Brenin Macedonia was a proud Welshman through and through. Why does everybody steal our heritage?

You're slavs. You can't get more different then ugric

here's a reconstruction of an ancient Mycenaean grave

>Kekistani flag
>Bullshit pictures
hmm

>Bullshit pictures

Redpill me on Greek Cypriots (my gf is one I need to know if I'm race mixing)

Fucking brit doesnt even knows the difference between race and taxon.

In fact greeks do not cluster with turks. but with italians.

Look just tell me if she's likely to be a crypto t*rk

>tfw 1/4 Slav
>tfw 100% Slav features
END MY SUFFERING

You're right, Alex P. Keaton was the first American.

They look sorta irish

kys race traitor

huh?
>thinks i have a gf

>Macedonian
>Greek

Same shit, historically illiterate faggots

>Erastes
>Eremenos

id fuck you, id fuck you hard

...

debunked shit
archive.is/Hb8em

WE

>Illyrian
pretty sure Alexandria was known for it's massive library, he was clearly of Biblyonian descent

That one was a million times debunked

>archive.is/Hb8em
im half way true it and it still saying that they are niggers.
In other words: taking CEU (a northern European population) as the standard, northern Europeans have no evidence of African admixture.
Fucking cherry picking documents is a libtard tactic you fag, we aint talking about norther europeans here.

WE WUZ SAMOANS 'N' SHIIET

"The results are unambiguous: Tuscans/North Italians are found to be 2.1%/1.2% "Maasai" and 0% of all the other African groups"

your desperate reading is showing, you don't even understand it
pathetic
it says the reason for those numbers is that by assuming all global variation is african vs non-african, asian admixture in CEU is mistaken for african admixture in south Euros

calm your butthurt and try reading it again

Previous genetic studies have suggested a history of sub-Saharan African gene flow into some West Eurasian populations after the initial dispersal out of Africa that occurred at least 45,000 years ago. However, there has been no accurate characterization of the proportion of mixture, or of its date. We analyze genome-wide polymorphism data from about 40 West Eurasian groups to show that almost all Southern Europeans have inherited 1%–3% African ancestry with an average mixture date of around 55 generations ago, consistent with North African gene flow at the end of the Roman Empire and subsequent Arab migrations. Levantine groups harbor 4%–15% African ancestry with an average mixture date of about 32 generations ago, consistent with close political, economic, and cultural links with Egypt in the late middle ages. We also detect 3%–5% sub-Saharan African ancestry in all eight of the diverse Jewish populations that we analyzed. For the Jewish admixture, we obtain an average estimated date of about 72 generations. This may reflect descent of these groups from a common ancestral population that already had some African ancestry prior to the Jewish Diasporas.

also go back to asia, steppe trash

that's the abstract of the paper the article is debunking you dumb nigger
jesus christ your desperation is real

i was just linked something that just confirms it even more you nigger.
Dirt mud race tactics, "it has been debunkt"

I agree, Alaksandar i Hromayig was the last great Achaemenid king of kings in the empire but also the biggest traitor in Iranian history as he slaughtered so many of his own kinsmen.

...

Bullshit. Alejandro Magno was East Iberian.

Faceapp took the racial filter down, you cant even look white on pictures anymore, why even stay alive?

>look white
nobody cares, Europe isn't the jewsa

That was debunked, see this article Even the autor admitted he shifted 2 sides and didn´t make it to understand african diversity of snp. North african was conisidered sub saharan. so wrong

you are some kind of stupid, my copy past is from there you nigger

>North african was conisidered sub saharan. so wrong
" Tuscans/North Italians are found to be 2.1%/1.2% "Maasai" and 0% of all the other African groups""
you did not even read the thing

>not reading the premise of the argument
>"That is, I'm playing along -for the sake of argument- with the idea that East Eurasians are irrelevant, and Tuscans can be seen as a mixture of CEU "Europeans" and African groups."
you really are a dumb nigger, 100% african admixed

wtf stop sperging nigger.
what argument, you are not making on.
Look at the date, you are a nigger,, from a strong and proud warrior tribe.
Your ancestors where strong warrior named moors who invaded your mothes lands and raped them for centuries, as they will rape your female family in the future

data*

>butthurt non argument
typical negroid, come back when you finished middle school and can actually follow a simple argument without skimming

You still havent made a single argument, you are a nigger

Pic related is actual bust of Alexander the great from the time of Alexander.

Mural the turkroach posted was made by sandniggers post-AD Rome, after the population of the Italian peninsula had miscegenated with levantines.

I destroyed yours with of course, being an illiterate nigger, you failed to make a single counter argument to it

you mean the same Italians who are closest genetically to ancient Mycenean and Minoan samples?

almost all Southern Europeans have inherited 1%–3% African ancestry with an average mixture date of around 55 generations ago, consistent with North African gene flow at the end of the Roman Empire and subsequent Arab migrations.

debunked in

>almost all Southern Europeans have inherited 1%–3% African ancestry with an average mixture date of around 55 generations ago, consistent with North African gene flow at the end of the Roman Empire and subsequent Arab migrations.
is from archive.is/Hb8em

Half Illyrian from his mother.

The ancient Greeks based ethnicity on language, cultural, and religion not genetics. Macedonians spoke a Greek dialect, worshipped Greek gods thus were considered fringhe-Greeks

Modern Greeks wanted to claim Macedonia as their land during their national awakening in the 19th century so they revised history to their liking.

Macedonians were effectively Hellenised only after Alexander. It was partly due to some sort of a nation-wide Stockholm syndrome where the Greeks accepted and started venerating the man that conquered them, as being one of them. It's cuckoldry of the highest degree.

>this guy is this fucking dumb
that's part of the article the link is debunking, how are you niggers able to even function? oh wait, you don't

Historical accounts of Alexanders hair color describe him as blond, like most descriptions of ancient greeks/greek mythological figures.

Callisthenes 1.13.3 translation
>"For he had the hair of a lion and one eye was blue; the right one was heavy lidded and black, and the left one was blue; and his teeth were sharp as fangs, and he looked upon a defensive attack the same as a lion would."

Plutarch on Alexander the Great's Appearance

>Plutarch writes that Alexander was fair, but doesn't say he had red hair.
Plutarch's Life of Alexander (Section 4)
"4 The outward appearance of Alexander is best represented by the statues of him which Lysippus made, and it was by this artist alone that Alexander himself thought it fit that he should be modelled. 2 For those peculiarities which many of his successors and friends afterwards tried to imitate, namely, the poise of the neck, which was bent slightly to the left, and the melting glance of his eyes, this artist has accurately observed. 3 Apelles, however, in painting him as wielder of the thunder-bolt, did not reproduce his complexion, but made it too dark and swarthy. Whereas he was of a fair colour, as they say, and his fairness passed into ruddiness on his breast particularly, and in his face. 4 Moreover, that a very pleasant odour exhaled from his skin and that there was a fragrance about his mouth and all his flesh, so that his garments were filled with it, this we have read in the Memoirs of Aristoxenus.

So it appears Alexander was a blond, rather than a ginger. However, lion-colored might not really be tawny, but a strawberry blond or red-colored mane -- lion hair that is generally darker than the rest of the lion.