Why do modern leftist women have to be constantly reminded that they're special? Don't they have enough rights?

Why do modern leftist women have to be constantly reminded that they're special? Don't they have enough rights?

...

Stop whining and get laid you virgin

It's not modern leftist women, it's all women, of all creeds.

The only difference is that modern men lack the capability to engage women through charisma and will. So the women turn to other sources of self-fulfillment, like the triple parentheses, or refugees.

Strip away the feminist message of the statute, and it's actually pretty cool

Am I the only one imagining something lewd happening to the girl?

Remember that the idea of being special and a high focus on individualism, are right-wing traits and not a left wing traits, which focuses on the collective.

And that the whole empowerment theory bullshit was started by American psychologist Julian Rappaport.

Because they're .. children. And not in the hot way.

I would say a lot of those women could do with seeing a therapist

>Shadman

>that pigeon also taking no shit from feminists

Nah, somebody will post the OC eventually

Its a representation of a child being sacrificed to Moloch.

Is there anything more pathetic than an internet white knight? The answer is of course 'no'

...

wrong faggot

Kek

yeah there's a pic of the bull fucking the girl

fucking kek
Thanks dude.

You can go to reddit all day faggot, but I don't care about your reddit screenshots.

Why are women sociopaths

this

this has to be shadman

Completely the opposite, my friend.
Right-wing perspective considers the family the smallest social unit, while leftist approaches overrate individualism and snowflakeness.

>rugged individualism is the only kind of individualism
I hate you pseudo-intellectual retards that post here.

Maybe you're right, collective thinking and focus was never a left wing thing. I remember when they Soviet union individualised the farm system. It was terrible, how they forced everyone to be individuals and told them all they were special.

stay mad, you're still wrong cuck

It's about the oppressed becoming the oppressor and taking down patriarchal power structures. We're on to them though.

...

Why would I be mad about not going on reddit so much I think they are a good representation of anything other than idiots?

Am I the only one who thinks about (pic related) when I see this "art" display?

...

Lol

haha at these stupid LARPers. leftists only know science fiction and fantasy references, they have no knowledge of history

Bump

Identity politics are not individualism. Your Xe, xir whatever gendrr is not individualism, your pan whatever sexuslity is not individualism, your race is not individualism.

what are they even protesting

KFC closures, apparently.

I nearly chuckled because I had to look at the picture again.

That's because rugged individualism is a joke that's impossible unless you're some fucking 1 in a billion anomaly. Their philosophies are still individualist, they just can't fulfill them because they're normal people. Fuck off if you can't into philosophy, nigger.

Are they nun versions of the Spanish inquisition?

...

I thought this was a publicity stunt for some TV show.

>von Neumann
>normal

...

>AS A WOMAN IN TECH
It's probably a fucking data entry monkey or secretary in a tech comparny

...

Nope its a protest im texas over some abortion bill

Its his brother dahsman

omg

there are barely any women working in finance/accounting, if you look at the ratio of women to men, and im sure a lot of them would enjoy it

beta men are part of the problem

Extremely underrated post

>Reddit posts
>underrated

You didnt even read it dumbass. Its one of the funniest things ever

...

>Fat
Check
>Neckbeard
Check
>Beta faggot mannerisms and general faggot posture
Check

It all checks out doc. We've got a low test faggot here.

...

...

Bump

See top left

What is this meme?

Israeli military historian Martin van Creveld wrote a book called The Privileged Sex, which argues that women are actually the privileged gender. There's also The Myth of Male Power by Warren Farrell. There's also The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature by Steven Pinker.

Add to that decades of advertising marketed towards women, "you're worth it", "i'm worth it", "maybe she's born with it", "i'm kind of a big deal", "every woman is a goddess", etc. Add to that that most women have nothing going on in their lives, and cannot see their own hypocrisy.

Every woman wants to feel "special" because every woman wants to attain the highest status possible, to obtain the best mates. And every woman wants to avoid being on the bottom of the social totem pole no matter the cost, which is why they will viciously attack and bully other women just to avoid being on the bottom.

...

And this:
>Baudrillard observed that in our pornographic, media-driven culture women’s sexuality is portrayed as a “devouring, gaping voracity,” a well of desire that never runs dry. This logic inevitably leads to the female sex becoming a metaphor for insatiable consumerism. He writes: “Sexual liberation, like that of the productive forces, is potentially limitless. It demands profusion to come true, a ‘sexually affluent society.’ It can no more tolerate a scarcity of sexual goods than of material goods. Now, this utopian certainty and availability can only be incarnated in the female sex. This is why in this society everything-objects, goods, services, relations of all types will be feminized, sexualized in a feminine fashion” (Baudrillard, 1990b: 26).

>For both Baudrillard and Le Clézio, the fetishisation of the human body is indicative of a much greater problem. The pervasive influence of consumerism and its hollow values have essentially replaced all other ethical systems. We are living in a period of moral degradation in which market fundamentalism has trumped all other ideologies. The modern subject no longer knows what it means to live a virtuous life.

>The play of fashion then, inherent in consumerism, becomes a process of reconfiguration of what is Good and what is Evil at the level of sign in a system where consumers have ‘been taught to look for things’ (1993: 46) that the system will always be able to provide. If you want to be a porn star on Tuesday and a housewife on Wednesday this can happen; it is vital, even, to the entire illusion of choice in the consumer system, bringing to mind Baudrillard again, ‘the only drive that is really liberated is the drive to buy’ (Baudrillard, in Pawlett, 2007: 91).

I like.
moar?

...

>ElisabethTheWitch

Well at least her username is appropriate, pic related

Bump

...

Why would someone extremely good at coding computers have good social skills? You have to be borderline autistic to write good code anyway, OCD, think like a machine. Coding, at least innovations in coding, is largely a solitary task. This dumb cunt wonders why there are so many neckbeards in coding. Has she ever seen pictures of:

Ken Thompson (Unix, Go) or Dennis Ritchie (Unix, C)
Bill Gates or Paul Allen (Altair Basic)
Richard Stallman (GNU)
Linus Torvalds (Linux)
Steve Wozniak (Apple)
John Backus (Fortran)
John McCarthy (Lisp)
Bjarne Stroustrup (C++)
Larry Wall (Perl)
Guido Van Rossum (Python)
Jeff Bezanson (Julia)
Mark Zuckberberg (Facebook)
Larry Page or Sergey Brin (Google)

Gary Kildall (CP/M) arguably looks like a "normal" person, but Gates basically ripped him off, and Kildall died in a biker bar in 1994.

This dumb bitch doesn't understanding systemizing/empathizing when it comes to STEM. Does she know what a "nerd" is?

This stupid bitch also doesn't fucking understand the hacker ethic. Your code speaks for itself. The identity of the coder is irrelevant: age, race, gender, religion -- all those identity politics brownie points that braindead liberals use to bolster their victim status. It's WHAT you say, not WHO says it, stupid fucking cunt. A computer doesn't give a fuck if a vagina fed it 1s and 0s, it just needs to fucking work. And since women can hardly do anything for long without getting bored, why the hell should anyone expect them to have written more code throughout history than men? A meritocracy doesn't need "fresh eyes."

Somehow I don't think this retarded cunt thinks that coalmines need "fresh eyes" or a "diversity" of viewpoints.

...

They live in a movie where they think they're the main character

"The fundamental defect of the female character is a lack of a sense of justice. This originates first and foremost in their want of rationality and capacity for reflexion but it is strengthened by the fact that, as the weaker sex, they are driven to rely not on force but on cunning: hence their instinctive subtlety and their ineradicable tendency to tell lies: for, as nature has equipped the lion with claws and teeth, the elephant with tusks, the wild boar with fangs, the bull with horns and the cuttlefish with ink, so it has equipped woman with the power of dissimulation as her means of attack and defence, and has transformed into this gift all the strength it has bestowed on man in the form of physical strength and the power of reasoning. Dissimulation is thus inborn in her and consequently to be found in the stupid woman almost as often as in the clever one. To make use of it at every opportunity is as natural to her as it is for an animal to employ its means of defence whenever it is attacked, and when she does so she feels that to some extent she is only exercising her rights. A completely truthful woman who does not practice dissimulation is perhaps an impossibility, which is why women see through the dissimulation of others so easily it is inadvisable to attempt it with them. – But this fundamental defect which I have said they possess, together with all that is associated with it, gives rise to falsity, unfaithfulness, treachery, ingratitude, etc. Women are guilty of perjury far more often than men. It is questionable whether they ought to be allowed to take an oath at all." -Arthur Schopenhauer

Women have no logic whatsoever about things. Or any idea of pragmatism or efficiency. They think everything is like a movie script or home decor or some shit. They dont like or feel something is right (usually something trivial and insignificant) and want to change it on a whim "oh i dont like a man as president i feel like a woman deserves it now"

...

>being this new

I bet that statue is a tranny, like the Statue of Liberty.

>She is literally bastardizing someones work
WTF is wrong with people today, in the future maybe some lefty faggot will bastardize the statue of david or mona lisa

...

Everyone should stand up to the greedy fucks of (((Wall Street))) banker parasites like Goldman Sachs. Pieces of shit engineer economic ruin for the peons, support the left, and never do an honest day's work in their life.

My hatred for them knows no bounds.

>captcha: impasse street

christ

OH BOY WOMEN CREATING SEXUAL SELECTION HIERARCHIES WHERE THERE WERE NONE WHAT A SURPRISE

...

Manufactured struggle is king.

We live in bad times.

WOWWWWW WE CREATED A SEXUAL SELECTION HIERARCHY IN A CONTEXT THAT WAS FREE FROM IT AND NOW PEOPLE WE DEEM SEXUALLY UNFIT FOR ARBITRARY REASONS ARE MAD AT US WOWWW WTF MYSOGINY

Why do you post this? this is pure concentrated cancer.

But it says Sup Forums?

It belongs on Sup Forums

Who are these cucks?
"Sup Forums" and "Sup Forums" never goes out anywhere beyond these borders.

Because wamen think they are better than men.

There's no need for drama, that is just what they think but couldn't say. Because they know it not true. So they pretend they are. It is the pretending part that gets them blindsided by reality. And when they get hit hard, they cry victim.

Pussy pass

You dont own Sup Forums faggot

...

...

...

Bump

Men in tech talk about tech.

Women in tech talk about women in tech.

This is sickening

...