Remind me again why Sup Forums still thinks Richard Spencer is right-wing?

Remind me again why Sup Forums still thinks Richard Spencer is right-wing?

Other urls found in this thread:

soundcloud.com/pozzcast/ep2-the-unbearable-whiteness-of-being-richard-spencer
mega.nz/#F!B4dB2SzQ!h_pMC30v2a_y31iD0dy0sg
youtube.com/watch?v=pQ3q9QTIn50
twitter.com/AnonBabble

National-SOCIALISM hint-hint

Cum in my beard faggot

who cares. Nazbol isn't cucked

This faggot reeks of controlled opposition but he has been useful. If this is truly best timeline then
>richard spencer dies
>martyrdom
>white pride quintuples
>no more Dick Dispenser being controlled opposition

>venerates stalin and mao
doesn't get more cucked than that, m80

I always said that Sup Forums nazies are commies in disguise. Half of Sup Forums belongs to /leftypol/

George Lincoln Rockwell said Mao was a pretty cool guy.

So he's saying, the middle class who invests and runs businesses has alienated the poor working classes?

He gives you vacuous nonsense about loving your race and country

hes national socialist. its left not right wing.

un-ironically this
you all might be a little more open to socialism too if you lived in a pure ethnostate, when the people around you are just like you, it's easier to empathize with people "down on their luck"

He ain't wrong , Marx's critic of liberalism and it's economy is a handy tool for all who seeks to oppose it . Only neo cons believe that cucking for a global capitalism qualifies one to be a right winger .

NAZIS WERE COMMIES WHEN IT CAME TO ECONOMY. However here everything else didn't became subservient to economy , that's what commies and liberals did . Liberalism and it's economy shares the same metaphysics and presupposition(social contract and human nature) it here where the degeneration started ....Infact capitalism realized marx's ideal/solution far better than communism ever did.

Sup Forums has just been shilled by the russian government for a long time

kill it with fucking fire spencer has always been a cuck

even without the blatantly socialist policies (pro single payer) he's a statist. that he relishes using the power of the state is much more reprehensible than wanting to use that power for white people exclusively.

at best, he's embracing the left's worst nightmare of how state power can be wielded as a motivation for the left to dismantle the state's authority.

at worst, he's the new boss same as the old boss.

white people are pretty awesome, but we're not awesome enough to make socialism function well. spencer's white pride is extremely distorted in that sense.

You know what to do.

>NatSocs never had criticism of capitalism

...

why you gotta lie ?

He's just observing the same problem Marx observed, wealthy elites became more allied with each other than their nation of origin. His answer is to reject that elite-internationalism instead of instituting worker internationalism to combat it.

I don't love that he's nazi-ish, but there's finally some people who are proud to be white and not covered in tattoos.

They always critique the concept of individual freedom.

liberal economics has a metaphysics? are you fucking dumb?

while he did say this it was mostly to appeal to foreign business and in no way does it represent his actual handling of the economy

>/po/ is ok with multinational corporations outsourcing skilled labor and importing unskilled labor from third world countries

Literally nothing about Richard Spencer is right wing. He's just a racist liberal.

soundcloud.com/pozzcast/ep2-the-unbearable-whiteness-of-being-richard-spencer

>liberal economics has a metaphysics?

Imagine being this pleb/

EVERY economy or system is based on certain sets of presuppositions ,suppositions that are metaphysical , pls go and read up locke and smith .

...

That's not even an incorrect statement though.

you're either confusing liberal philosophy with economics, pleb. thats what happens when you try to sound smarter than you are.

This. There's a reason why big companies are pushing for diversity, and it's not because of ideology.

so he promotes business relations by confiscating their wealth on a massive scale, forcing them overseas? he rejects them by basing his entire economy on their productivity? why is it nazis are so often completely ignorant of both economics and their own history?

>you all might be a little more open to socialism too if you lived in a pure ethnostate, when the people around you are just like you, it's easier to empathize with people "down on their luck"
Nope. A parasite is still a parasite, regardless of its skin color

It's all cancer. They all think their should be a powerfull government to regulate civilization. Both commies and nazi's did their best to indoctrinate kids, leading to out of control kids that would defy their parents if the state asked it of them.

i like my rights, and both of these sides just want to create a government that has the ability to take them away from me.

If you care about cultural and ethnic homogeneity, at least take off that internationalist flag and put on the NazBol one, faggot

Because Nazis are leftists and leftists are economically retarded.

There is a Beginning and an End to every process. Communism brings those Ends much sooner!

What does an oragami board have to do with anything?

Can you not read between the lines? (((bourgeois)))

>Sup Forums dont understand the difference between ceneter-left economics and left wing economics

Amazing.

>Being a consumer whore capitalist.

Capitalism is a disease that destroys cultures.

This....It's as close he can get to the JQ

he's fucking right you dipshit

remond me again why you're a kike shill???

>unironically shilling for dialectical materialist reading of history
>>>/leftypol/

He's right. I'm not a fucking Communist either. Capitalism works for the Left, not the Right. Capitalism has sided with open borders, elimination of culture, homosexual marriage, diversity, etc.

>you're either confusing liberal philosophy with economics

this got to be a b8

Prove why the conclusion drawn through it is wrong
Then you can criticize the method

And RP (((Libertarians))) wonder why everyone makes fun of them. Corporatism has been the globalists source of power. It'll take Pol a few years to understand that unfortunately. There's a reason the Nazi's disliked both unfettered Capitalism and Socialism.

Are you nigger-tier IQ? The fact that he agreed with Marx on one single thing doesn't make him a marxist. Remember the historical context in which Marx wrote his books. The proletariat was indeed alienated but that doesn't matter. Spencer understands that we don't divide ourselves on class but on race.

>capitalist:get out of my store nigger, you are a net negative presence
>the state: WOOOOOW RACIST MUCH? you're going to prison for violating the ((civil rights act))
not to mention its even worse over in germany, who once had a nazi state if you can believe it

>This faggot reeks of controlled opposition
He does. I watched some video where they had him commenting on that Scottish National Gallery video with the black dude chimping out. Richard Spencer said some shit like "I can understand him because our people oppressed his people and he should be afraid of us."

Are you people retarded? National socialsm refers to prussian socialism not the marxist hoogeyboogey bullshit.

>And RP (((Libertarians))) wonder why everyone makes fun of them
ron paul has been called a racist twice as long as spencer has been alive

Nah he's not controlled opposition but tries too hard to appeal to centrist cucks.

Capitalist works for capital, if the left is the main ideology they will work for them to fin capital

>right wing intelectuals
Every fucking time

>Are you people retarded?
This board is the living proof of the bell curve.
mega.nz/#F!B4dB2SzQ!h_pMC30v2a_y31iD0dy0sg

And? The left calls everyone who isn't lobotomised a racist.

>capitalist: employing you in my company is now a net negative. even though what we're doing is still benefitting our community greatly, we aren't making the profits I need in order to expand and increase my profits even more, therefore you are being fired. sorry about your beautiful white children not being able to afford college anymore, but that's not my problem. it's survival of the fittest don't-you-know; if you're not fit for making me money, you don't deserve to live! :')

They don't just share your skin, they are your kinsmen.

i'm just calling you out on using word salad to embellish what you're saying, which isn't very smart to begin with. "liberal" economics is just economics and its pre-suppositions are in no way metaphysical.

so? you can still regulate and tax an economy into the ground, even while you make the government sell everything

A person living in a society and thinking he should not be forced to contribute to that society is the definition of a parasite.
Stop projecting.

I think his hair cut is kinda haught/

Raaaaar

all economic systems after feudalism are liberal economic systems. austrian economics are a liberal economic system.

>if you love you people you are socialist

yea becouse when you love someone you rob them and share their money with degenerates.

>Liberal economics is just economics
First of all let's clear something off , are we taking theory or application ?

Commies no, thanks. KYS

Lol neets "work shy" were put in camps with other burdens on society in Nazi Germany, not given a piece of everyone elses hard work. Know what you are talking about before you say dumb shit. National socialist doesn't imply socialism like what lives in Europe and American blue states today. That kind of socialism is just communism for idiots who were fooled into thinking it wasn't.

fuck that
if were playing make-believe Nazis then I get to be the fuhrer, I already called it

...

You mean it wasn't "real socialism"? It has never tried before, right? But this time will totally work.

Almost like calling everyone a cuck eh

>moor couldn't defend his precious capitalism

even feudalism is a liberal economic system to a certain degree. my point is liberal economics is directly based on the study of economics, and thus only makes very limited pre-suppositions and even those are usually empirically backed. they're not in any way metaphysical.

>never tried before
Moor education
It was tried. It was the reason Franco won the civil war.

>They don't just share your skin, they are your kinsmen.
And yet they feel entitled to my money. Again, those parasites can fuck right off.

Read Hitler's Revolution.

just because there exists a philosophical argument for system does not mean that system now depends on the presuppositions of that argument. that's why locke and ayn rand are not credited with the invention of liberal economics.

>Contributing to society includes subsidizing parasites
Fuck off commie scum

Any group that survives in socialism thrives in capitalism. The system would work once you start removing the micks and slavs, but then you wouldn't need it anymore.

Fact of the matter is that the USA was an experiment in self selection. Only the craziest motherfuckers would sell it all to take a shitty two month boat ride so they can go to church.

Not just whites, fanatic whites.

Yes

You talk quite vaguely throwing terms that you don't understand and committing revisionist reading of history based on your surface level observation . If you seeks to what i am talking about then look up locke(especially his social contract and his take on human nature) and then smith . Like i previously mentioned for me the economy don't take the upper hand , so the transaction of commodity and the flow of capital isn't my primary concern rather what it is based upon . By that i mean the idea of man and his relation with collective it takes/establishes beforehand (which was Homo economicus) . contemporary economy is neoliberal and not exactly liberal so we won't go there for now . However they laid the foundation for the modern man as a being, what we are living isn't a deviation but rather a logical conclusion of such model/system.

It's not your money.
If someone, on a personal level, feels "entitled" to state money then they'll also be corrected.
But you saying they do isn't an argument.
>the only way I can defend being a parasite is by strawmanning
You should probably hang yourself at this point. Your idea of how society should work is lower than pre-civilized humans. It's lower than apes. How does it feel to know that neanderthals were more evolved than you?

That is true. Franco made the Social security laws in Spain. Bigger than Obamacare.

Franco didnt won the civil war because he was a socialist, he won because he received support from the country to defeat the commie 2nd Republic.

Just like the republicans received from the USSR.

>It's not your money.
Yes it is, commie scum. The state didn't work for that money, I did. What I do with the money I earn is my business and mine alone. You are not entitled to the fruits of my labor.
You should probably fuck off back to /leftypol/ since that seems more your speed.

He won because of support from the socialists in Germany.
The ones you were trying to say had never been tried before.
The Republicans would've won otherwise, especially with Stalin equipping them.

you're an idiot

>socialists in Germany.
The word has been tainted by Marx and I wouldn't use it so freely.

The state does not hoard for money, but distributes it to milltary contractors, bankers etc

But I rarely get any criticism from you "taxation is theft" guys when it coems to private contractors or bankers. State is controlled by these groups. The majority of your tax dollar went to the milltary contractor who built beds for 10k a piece in afghanistan, or the banker who screwed up but bailed out,
far less than the lazy goverment worker in the recration department.
I had libertarian guys who refused to believe that fed was privately owned as if critisizing private proverty is sacrosanct,

The state printed that money and made it available for you to "earn" in the first place, you retarded ape. The state is what creates "private property". The state is what creates "free enterprise".

>What I do with the money I earn is my business and mine alone.
Yes this is what degenerate "people" like you genuinely think. I like that you faggots don't even try to hide the fact that capitalism is what enables the destruction of white society.

Don't mistake my stance for the one that tries to blame/credit it all on some intellectual elites as if they somehow conspires/determines the flow of history or that of it's episteme . I am not stating that , you are simplifying the matter way too much . Maybe i am being incoherent for failing to read where you are coming from.

Also i take back
>However they laid the foundation for the modern man AS A BEING

that was badly put but then english isn't my first language . What i was trying to say is the notion of man ,equality,egalitarianism ,secular ,rational and all that ..

It's tainted by humanity.

You apply socialism on the tiniest scale with the best of friends and you will sow discontent. Roommates dispute for territory in the fridge, and people will always manage to be late with rent and think they can slide because they are "friends".

People are free to start tax exempt socialist charities whenever they want. The only group that manages to do this is the Amish, and that's only with very strong culture and self selection

It's true. Communism was "invented" as a response to inhuman exploitation of working class by capitalists, which began with industrial revolution.

>notion of man ,equality,egalitarianism ,secular ,rational and all that ..
... which destroyed us

Why let them keep it?
The more you use it the more you take it back from Marx, and the more you tear down the "capitalism is all that can save us from communism" meme

The word bolshevism has more of a bite when referring to Marx's socialism, anyway.

Don't even like the guy but he strikes me as similar to a Hegelian collectivist.
The "Socialism" refers to collectivism. Reminder this was made by Hitler's strongest ally.

youtube.com/watch?v=pQ3q9QTIn50

What's the deal with pleb-tier faggots coming on the board lately strawmanning natsoc as gibs for degenerates? Hitler's Germany banned unearned income and usury. They maintained property rights, encouraged small businesses, and drafted the unemployed into a public labor pool. The chronically lazy were put in work camps. How does that have any resemblance to the sort of welfare state advocated by modern social democrats?

Good morning, Faggot.
When do you get off work? I wanna hang out.

Because the common men will if you call yourself a socialist associate you with communists. Times have changed.

This kind of freedom enables whites who care about whiteness to construct a haven for whites.

You're misidentifying the cause of your strife.
It all follows from immigration. This is a mistake that the government made.... Not a problem associated with individual rights for citizens.