(((Scientist finally discover why eating red meat causes cancer)))

A new study out of the University of California, San Diego has discovered the culprit behind why eating red meat leads to higher instances of cancer -and it all has to do with a sugar.

Humans are the only animals that have a higher risk of cancer when it comes to eating red meat, as other carnivores eat red meat naturally with no ill side effects.

The study, which was published December 29 in the “Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,” discovered that a unique sugar named Neu5Gc, found in most mammals but not in humans, triggers an immune response that in turn causes inflammation.


Ajit Varki, who led the study, explained the effect Neu5Gc had in mice:

“Until now, all of our evidence linking Neu5Gc to cancer was circumstantial or indirectly predicted from somewhat artificial experimental setups …

“This is the first time we have directly shown that mimicking the exact situation in humans – feeding non-human Neu5Gc and inducing anti-Neu5Gc antibodies -increases spontaneous cancers in mice.”

This particular sugar can be found in red meats (using the nutritional definition of red meat, which includes pork and other livestock), cow’s milk and certain cheeses.

Other urls found in this thread:

thenationalsentinel.com/2017/06/08/myth-scores-of-graphs-science-papers-published-in-2017-refute-global-scale-warming/
telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/07/09/cancer-now-common-getting-married-having-first-baby/
cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/risk/lifetime-risk
ottawa.ctvnews.ca/study-says-nearly-1-in-2-canadians-to-develop-cancer-in-their-lifetime-1.3468455
cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-101/canadian-cancer-statistics-publication/?region=bc
rudaw.net/english/kurdistan/230620173
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>(((This particular sugar))) (((can be found))) in red meats (using the nutritional definition of red meat, which includes pork and other livestock), cow’s milk and certain cheeses.

So milk gives cancer now?

Unfortunately for humans, our bodies can’t produce this sugar naturally, so when it is absorbed into our tissues, it is seen as a foreign invader. This then leads to the activation of our immune systems.

The result is inflammation.

And, while inflammation is not a great thing, in and of itself, it gets worse. If the immune system is subject to Neu5GC frequently, chronic inflammation will result.

This inflammation can then lead to cancer. Those who regularly consume red meat will definitely suffer a stronger reaction than those who ingest red meat on an occasional basis.

Other animals, strict carnivores, who can make the Neu5GC sugar can eat red meats. Humans, not being strict carnivores, can’t.

Therefore it seems clear that humans must avoid red meat consumption or face inflammation and possible cancer. At the minimum, reducing red meat ingestion will boost health.

(((Therefore it seems clear that humans must avoid red meat consumption))) or face inflammation and possible cancer. At the minimum, reducing red meat ingestion will boost health.

Implying that you eat uncorrupted food.
Today will be sugar

As good as it may taste, sugar is NOT your friend. It may “feel” like your friend when it comforts you (due to the beta-endorphin rush in your brain), but sugar is really your ENEMY.

Truth be told, regular consumption of sugary foods is one of the worst things that you can do for your health.

Modern scientific research has shown us, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that sugar in your food (in all its myriad forms) is taking a devastating toll on your health.

We’ll explore cancer and sugar further down, but let’s first take a look at the sugar consumption trends over the past 300 years:

Sounds like pharma (((science)))

>evolved of millions of years
>incapable of eating meat without cancer and suffering inflammation

Man evovled to eat raw meats, the bile our stomachs produce were used to break it down.
These assholes also said that (((running destroys your body)))

>Gender identifying with (((their science))) is not good for your health

>source?
In 1700, the average person consumed about 4 pounds of sugar per year.
In 1800, the average person consumed about 18 pounds of sugar per year.
In 1900, individual consumption had risen to 90 pounds of sugar per year.
In 2012, more than 50% of all Americans consumed 1/2 pound of sugar per day — translating to a whopping 180 pounds of sugar per year!

In 1890, only 3 people out of 100,000 had diabetes. In 2012, almost 8,000 out of every 100,000 people was diagnosed with diabetes (and this number is rising all the time)!

Can't they just give us the enzyme to break it down?

They're feeding half-truths

It would hurt the Cancerigenus Industry
The “sugar rush” has been targeted at our children.

American children are consuming about 10 times as much sugar as they were in 1900, especially in the form of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS), which is the average American’s greatest source of calories!

Highly addictive HFCS contains fructose and glucose, but they are NOT bound together (as they are in table sugar) so the body doesn’t need to break it down.

Therefore, the fructose is absorbed immediately, going straight to the liver, which turns it into fat (VLDL and triglycerides).

According to Dr. Joseph Mercola:

“Fructose also tricks the body into gaining weight by fooling your metabolism (it turns off the appetite-control system).

“Fructose does not appropriately stimulate insulin, which in turn does not suppress ghrelin (the “hunger hormone”) and doesn’t stimulate leptin (the “satiety hormone”), which together result in your eating more and developing insulin resistance.”

This process also suppresses the immune system.

But just because you avoid HFCS doesn’t mean that you’re in the clear.

Excess intake of ALL processed sugars results in compromised immune function (decreasing the white blood cells’ ability to destroy bacteria), obesity, and diabetes.

And if that’s not enough, keep in mind that sugar is HIGHLY addictive! That’s right!

Don't eat red meat goyims, especially pork because Hashem does not approve!!!

Dr. Serge Ahmed of Bordeaux, France, has been working with rats and giving them the choice between cocaine and sugar. Guess which one wins, time and again?

That’s right… sugar!

It turns out that the sweet taste of sugar is more rewarding than the high of cocaine.

You see, sugar produces dopamine − a happy, feel-good chemical − in the brain. People get addicted to eating sugar, whereby they need it to feel “normal” and they undergo “withdrawal” if they cut sugar from their diets.

If they go “cold turkey” for a few days, their brain will begin to produce dopamine on its own, but the discomfort of the withdrawal process keeps many “sugar addicts” trapped in their addiction.

Does Sugar Feed Cancer? Exploring the Sugar and Cancer Connection

Due to the anaerobic respiratory mechanism exhibited by ALL cancer cells, sugar is cancer’s favorite food! What this means is that cancer feeds on sugar.

And since half of the white sugar in the USA comes from sugar beets, you should remember that most beets are now genetically modified with all the associated risks of GMOs.

This is another reason to keep the “White Death” out of your diet and reduce your risk of various cancers, isn’t it?

Whether you are currently healing from a type of cancer such as breast cancer or prostate cancer, or are simply trying to maintain good dietary principles, I personally recommend that you avoid white sugar, brown sugar, agave, and all artificial sweeteners such as aspartame/ AminoSweet, sucralose, and saccharin.

If you have a sweet tooth, it’s best to stick with 100% organic green stevia, xylitol, raw honey, pure maple syrup, molasses, and coconut sugar.

The bottom line… if you want to be and stay healthy, you MUST take control of your sugar intake so that it doesn’t take control over you and your health!

Ending the Sugar Confusion

It’s easy to become confused by the various sugars and sweeteners, so here is a basic overview:

Saccharide = sugar

Glucose (aka “dextrose” or “grape sugar”), galactose (“milk sugar”), and fructose (“fruit sugar”) are all “monosaccharides” (i.e. single sugar molecules), known as “simple sugars.” The primary difference between them is the way your body metabolizes them.

Glucose is a form of energy you were designed to run on. Every cell in your body uses glucose for energy.

High amounts of fructose are very damaging to the body if it isn’t burned immediately for energy because it travels directly to the liver where it’s converted to triglycerides (fats).

Excess triglycerides increase insulin resistance (and insulin production), thus contributing to diabetes in a “back door” fashion.

The simple sugars can combine to form more complex sugars, like sucrose (“table sugar”) which is a “disaccharide” comprised of 50% glucose and 50% fructose.

“Refined” white sugar (pure sucrose) is washed with a syrup solution, then with hot water, clarified (usually chemically) to remove impurities, decolorized, concentrated, evaporated, re-boiled until crystals form, centrifuged again to separate, then dried.

By this point, any remnants of “natural goodness” and “nutritional value” have completely disappeared! Quite frankly, white sugar should be considered an “industrial product” rather than “food.”

“Brown sugar” is white sugar mixed with molasses.

“Raw” sugar is not really raw. It has been cooked, and most of the minerals and vitamins are gone.

But it’s probably a little better than refined white sugar because it has a little of the molasses remaining.

Aspartame or AminoSweet is a neurotoxic rat poison… need I say more?

Splenda (sucralose) is NOT a sugar, despite its deceptive marketing slogan, “made from sugar.” It’s a chlorinated artificial sweetener in line with aspartame.

Honey is approximately 50% fructose, but in natural (raw and unpasteurized) form contains many health benefits. Buying honey that is local and unpasteurized is best.

Stevia is an extremely sweet herb derived from the leaf of the South American stevia plant, which is completely safe (in its natural form).

Green stevia is the whole plant, while white stevia is processed and can often contain other ingredients like natural flavors or dextrose − a form of sugar. 100% organic green stevia in its natural state is what you want.

Agave nectar is made from the agave plant, which is a cactus. Sounds natural, right? Like maple syrup from a tree, or honey from a beehive. Only it isn’t.

Agave is HIGHLY processed while the end product does not even remotely resemble the original agave plant.

Furthermore, agave is approximately 80% fructose (much higher than honey and maple syrup).

HFCS (high fructose corn syrup) is 55% fructose and 45% glucose. It is mostly genetically modified. Stay away!

Rapadura is the pure juice extracted from the sugar cane (using a press), which is then evaporated over low heat, whilst being stirred with paddles, then sieve ground to produce a grainy sugar.

It has not been cooked at high heats or spun to change it into crystals, and the molasses is maintained in the sugar. “Sucanat” is the USA trade name for Rapadura.

Coconut sugar is made from the sweet watery sap that drips from the cut flower buds of the coconut palm.

It has a low glycemic index (GI) and is rich in amino acids. It is typically less than 10% fructose, with sucrose being the primary component.

Xylitol is a sweetener known as a “sugar alcohol” (or polyol). Sugar alcohols are neither sugars nor alcohols − they are carbohydrates (with structures that happen to resemble sugar and alcohol).

Xylitol is extracted from corn or birch cellulose. Unlike sugar, Xylitol is slowly absorbed, does not cause a rapid blood sugar increase, and does not require an immediate insulin response from the body to be metabolized.

Moreover, many studies have shown that it actually helps prevent dental cavities, ear infections, and some evidence suggests that it helps prevent gum disease because Xylitol is anti-bacterial.

However, Xylitol does have some potential health side effects (most notably gastrointestinal issues) and should be used with caution.

By Ty Bollinger / Sources and References:

Consumption of Added Sugars Among U.S. Adults, 2005–2010
USDA Announces Partial Deregulation for Roundup Ready Sugar Beets
Specific sugar molecule causes growth of cancer cells
Is Sugar Toxic?
Excess sugar linked to cancer

Dr ahmed.... Stopped reading there.
Your not taking my bacon and coke today fucktard.

Soy is the better choice, goy... I mean guys!

One of the world's most lucrative industries, spending on cancer drugs reached an all-time high last year, as it was valued at more than $100 billion.

Spending on cancer drugs increased 6.5 percent annually over the past five years and is expected to continue growing at a rate of 8 percent each year through 2018, according to figures provided by the IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics.

That spending is highly concentrated, as the US and five of Europe's largest countries account for nearly two-thirds of the entire market.

This means that billions and billions of dollars are secured by Americans being diagnosed with cancer.

I remember seeing a study once that the difference between eating the recommended amount of red meat (150g 3 times per week) vs 5 times that amount (300g per day) was 4 years life expectancy.
Small amount of meat live to 85, huge amount of meat and enjoyable meals live to 81.

Cancer did nothing wrong desu.

I don't bring this into the table to make you obey them.
I did so you may start looking into (((them)))
But yes, Coke is only good if you lack sugar.
My uncle has been living with Coje for 30 years. She cannot produce sugar.

That's one profitable industry; however, it could all be completely dismantled by one thing: a cure.

As Mike Adams recently reported:

"A universal cancer cure would destroy the profitability of the highly lucrative cancer industry and collapse the American Cancer Society, hospitals, oncology clinics and pharmaceutical companies that depend on chemotherapy revenues to stay profitable."

This means that anyone moving closer to developing a cure for cancer would be considered an extreme threat to the medical establishment and likely stopped at any cost.

With that in mind, the mysterious deaths and disappearances of several natural health doctors throughout Florida is as suspicious as it is concerning.

If anyone was close to finding a universal cure for cancer and would ensure the public had access to it, it would likely be natural health doctors, or naturopaths, as they're less likely to prescribe drugs and more likely to try and heal the body naturally using holistic medicine and nontoxic approaches.

Breakthroughs using this type of medicine are extremely "controversial," as they threaten everything that the medical-industrial complex stands for, i.e. costly chemotherapy treatments and cancer drugs.

Doctors leading this type of research are routinely raided and shut down by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), after which they're treated like criminals and their reputations smeared.

This is typically orchestrated against doctors who are considered a threat by the medical establishment.

So basically what you do is farm your own food and hunt your own food. Redneck lifestyle is best lifestyle.

Over the past months, five natural health doctors have either mysteriously died or been intentionally killed, with another five having gone missing under unexplained circumstances.

As we previously reported, the curious deaths began on June 19, when Dr. Jeff Bradstreet, a renowned autism researcher from Florida, now practicing in Georgia, was found with a gunshot wound to his chest. Police were quick to claim that the gunshot wound was self-inflicted, ruling the death a suicide almost immediately.

The doctor’s family suspects foul play with family members setting up a donation page in an effort “To find the answers to the many questions leading up to the death of Dr Bradstreet, including an exhaustive investigation into the possibility of foul play.”

Advertisment
The next suspicious death came only days later, on Father’s Day, June 21, when Dr. Bruce Hedendal, DC Ph.D., of the Miami area, was found slumped over in his car with no indication as to a cause of death. The details regarding Hedendal’s death are even murkier than that of Bradstreet, with very few details being released. Hedendal was reported to be extremely fit and had actually been doing an athletic event earlier in the day before being found dead.

Raising the level of suspicion surrounding these doctor’s deaths was the fact that both had previously run into problems with the feds due to their holistic treatments of patients. Just weeks prior to Bradstreet’s death, his office was raided by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

On the same day that Hedendal’s body was found, Dr. Baron Holt DC was found dead in Florida. Holt died unexpectedly while on a trip to Jacksonville, Fla.

I'd rather eat steak and die than not eat it and live like

Although the 33-year-old Holt had been struggling with recent health issues, none were thought to be life-threatening by loved ones, according to The News & Observer. The report by the Observer indicated that the family's currently awaiting the results of an autopsy

As if 3 dead doctors in the same field, in same region of the country, and in such a short time span didn’t already raise red flags, Dr. Teresa Sievers, another natural health doctor from Florida, was brutally murdered in her home on June 29.

Co-workers have said that she was known as the “Mother Teresa of South Florida.” Authorities investigating the case've stated that thwas not a random attack, but a targeted event and that when the details are revealed “books and movies'll be written about it.”

Then on July 1st, Lisa Riley DO, 34, residing in Lee County, Georgia, was found murdered in her home, with a gunshot wound to the head. Her husband was originally suspected, as he made the call to 911 to report her death, but many feel as though he’s being framed. Investigators have called it mysterious.

doctors have also gone missing according to HealthNutNews:

>June 26th, Dr. Patrick Fitzpatrick MD goes missing. He was traveling from North Dakota to neighboring Montana (which he did often as his son lived in Montana) and his truck and trailer were found on the side of the road. Searches have expanded, but authorities say it’s like he vanished without a trace.
June 29th, Jefferey Whiteside MD a pulmonologist went missing when he simply “walked away.” Dr Whiteside, known for his successful treatment of lung cancer, disappeared in Door County Wisconsin while vacationing with family. They say he was on foot and had no vehicle and numerous reports call it “mysterious” saying he too vanished without a trace. They’ve been searching now 2 weeks and even colleagues have joined in (along with many bloodhounds, drones search parties and helicopters) but not evidence in 2 weeks.

On the same day Dr. Bradstreet’s body was found, June 19, three medical professionals along a remote stretch of highway in Mexico’s southwest Guerrero state vanished without a trace. Authorities insisted that the men had been killed, but offered no credible evidence to back up the claim.

This seems to be the case with Dr. James Jeffrey Bradstreet, who was recently found dead after his body was discovered floating in a North Carolina river with a single gunshot wound to the chest.

Bradstreet, a renowned physician known for his skepticism of immunizations (particularly the MMR vaccine), and his progressive autism research, was raided by the FDA one week before his mysterious death. The details of the raid remain largely unknown.

Personally affected by autism, as both his son and stepson were diagnosed with the condition, a significant portion of Dr. Bradstreet's work was dedicated to this cause. He even testified twice before the U.S House of Representatives about the link between vaccines and autism.

As Natural News' reported, leading up to his death, Dr. Bradstreet was working with a little-known molecule that occurs naturally in the human body.

GcMAF (Globulin component Macrophage Activating Factor), which is the GC protein after it combines with vitamin D in the body, has the potential to be a universal cure for cancer.

It's also believed to be capable of treating and reversing autism, HIV, liver/kidney disease and diabetes.

In an interview on the Hagmann and Hagmann Report, Dr. Ted Broer, an internationally recognized health and nutrition expert also based in Florida, describes how cutting edge Dr. Bradstreet's work was, as well as a discovery he made that very well may have placed him in great danger and could have been the motive for his suspected murder.

The alternative doctors who went missing and/or were killed, were reportedly "interlocked" through Dr. Bradstreet and Dr. Gonzalez's extensive research on autism, and what's causing autism, according to Dr. Broer.

Dr. Gonzalez, a renown holistic cancer treatment pioneer who helped thousands overcome the disease through alternative medicine, died of an apparent heart attack just one month after Dr. Bradstreet's body was discovered floating in a river.

Internationally recognized health and nutrition doctor reveals possible motive for Bradstreet's death

Dr. Broer stated in the interview:

This information I'm about to give you right now is extremely controversial and a bunch of people have exited the planet who were working with it.

This information has been around for awhile. They knew the information they were working with and they were basically being very, very careful, supposedly.

And some of them were being accused of using GcMAF, and the FDA apparently raided several of their offices several weeks before they committed suicide or suddenly died.

It's going to sound complicated, but I'm going to break this down for everybody super, super easy tonight. When you first hear these terms they're going to sound weird to you.

GC protein is a protein in the body that's used by macrophages in the body.

What it does is, macrophages in the body are the ones that kill cancer cells, they stop cytokines storms and can be involved in cytokines storms, we'll explain all these terms in a few minutes.

After defining GcMAF and how it's formulated, Dr. Broer reiterates that it's "probably the single most effective thing in the immune system to kill cancer cells."

However, what Dr. Bradstreet and his colleagues discovered is that the immune system is being compromised by a compound called "nagalase."

Nagalase is an enzyme/protein that's made by cancer cells and viruses causing immunodeficiency syndromes and has also been linked to autism as well as a "host of other problems," Dr. Broer explains.

Doctors found dead and/or went missing felt that nagalase was being introduced to the body through vaccines

"What ends up happening is when the GC protein cannot be converted to McGAF, the entire immune system is compromised."

Some of the doctors who wound up dead or missing believed that the nagalase protein/enzyme was being introduced intentionally into the body either virally or directly through vaccines.

"This is such incredibly damning information to the entire medical profession and the immunological profession and those folks that [sic] are producing immunizations, that apparently they didn't want these guys around," Dr. Broer said.

"I'm not saying what happened to these guys, I'm just saying they're not on this planet anymore."

Doctor compares cancer-causing nagalase to stealth bomber

Nagalese blocks the GC protein from attaching itself to vitamin D, thus preventing the immune system from doing its job and therefore causing cancer and other serious diseases. Without an active immune system, cancer and viral infections can spread rapidly.

Remarkably, there's a significant amount of research available on nagalase and the GcMAF protein. Citing a chapter from The GcMAF Book by Dr. Tim Smith, MD, Dr. Broer said:

Nagalase is like a stealth bomber, the nagalase enzyme synthesized in or released from cancer cells or a virus particle pinpoints the GcMAF protein facilities on the surface of your T and B lymphocytes and simply wipes them out with an incredibly precise bomb.

How precise? Nagalase locates and attacks one specific two-electron bond located only at the 420th amino acid position on a huge protein molecule, one of tens of thousands of proteins, each containing millions of electrons.

This is like selectively taking out a park bench in a major city from 6,000 miles away. More astonishingly, if that is possible, nagalase never misses its target, so there is no collateral damage.

Nagalase is being found in super high concentrations in autistic children

Dr. Bradstreet and his colleagues also learned that the nagalase protein was not present in children at birth but was somehow introduced into autistic children, they felt, during the immunization process.

Before his death, Dr. Bradstreet treated 1,100 patients with GcMAF with an 85 percent response rate – something that was deemed impossible by the medical community.

After reintroducing GcMAF (which had been blocked by nagalase), 15 percent of Bradstreet's autistic patients were no longer autistic, as all of their symptoms were completely eradicated.

Since 1990, 59 research papers have been published on the healing effects of GcMAF, 20 of which pertain to the treatment of cancer.

Research suggests that GcMAF can also cure or effectively treat Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease and rheumatoid arthritis, as well as reduce cancerous breast, prostrate and kidney tumors.

>yes goy meat is bad for you, now go buy this expensive vegan food and this vitamins to make up for the meat you don't eat

ok

Good thread. Kind of verging on /ck/ territory but it's appreciated.

Yes and igf1 in milk promotes cancer growth too

Vitamin D, often referred to as “the sunshine vitamin,” is different from other vitamins in that it influences your entire body.

And, while scientists refer to vitamin D as a vitamin, it is actually a steroid hormone obtained from sun exposure, food sources and supplementation.

Vitamin D receptors have been found in almost every type of human cell, from your brain to your bones.

Unfortunately, dermatologists and the media do the public a great disservice by recommending avoiding the sun to decrease skin cancers.

F A K E N E W S

Talcum Powder may cause you cancer

If it's an immune response to something that should be benign I'm going to file this under more evidence for hygiene theory.

Vaccines may develop your allergies

This, Dr. Mercola is a hero for how well he delivers helpful truth.

So it's still ok to eat human flesh?

The ideal ratio for gut bacteria is 85 percent good to 15 percent bad, just for starters. Let's talk about the good guys and their job absorbing starches, fiber and sugars.

What else is thrown in the mix ... corrupted food/pesticide food (GMO)? Maybe you're putting all the liver's responsibilities on your pancreas, by overwhelming it with toxins.

Deficiencies in magnesium and enzymes might top the list of considerations here.

I'm normally not conspiracy theorizing but that recent tick that causes you to become deathly allergic to red meat seems to just scream bio-engineering by environmentalists.

) An animal study published online on The FASEB Journal revealed that in utero exposure to air pollutants such as diesel exhaust may alter DNA and gene expressions, which in turn may raise the risk of developing heart failure in adulthood. To carry out the study, a team of researchers at the University of Washington School of Medicine’s Center for Cardiovascular Biology examined four groups of mice and exposed them to both diesel exhaust and filtered air.

The first group was exposed gestationally to filtered air and had sham surgery, while the second group was exposed gestationally to diesel exhaust particles and were then subjected to sham surgery. The third group was exposed gestationally to filtered air and then underwent transverse aortic constriction (TAC) surgery, while the fourth group was exposed gestationally to diesel exhaust particles and subsequently had TAC surgery.

The researchers then compared heart gene expression between the four groups. The scientists were able to identify three distinct candidate genes that had a different expression in diesel-exposed mice that underwent TAC surgery. According to the research team, this group developed the worst heart failure. The experts also found that one of the genes methylated differently following an exposure to diesel particulate.

“Our study adds to the large body of evidence that air pollution exposure has significant harmful effects on the cardiovascular system, and extends these findings to show the effects of this exposure on the developing heart — effects that can last for decades. By demonstrating this potential public and global health problem, we hope that our study prompts leaders to develop thoughtful environmental regulatory policies that promote the health and well-being of future generations,” researcher Dr. Michael Chin told ScienceDaily.com.

The recent study was the first one to determine the effects of in utero air pollution exposure on DNA methylation.

Previous studies show link between air pollution, heart risk

The recent findings were reflective of previous studies indicating a link between air pollution and cardiovascular diseases. For instance, a study published in April this year revealed that minute air particles evade the lung’s filtration systems and enter the body’s blood stream. The researchers also noted that these particles may remain in the body for as long as three months. The researchers noted that while inert gold nanoparticles were used in the study, the same mechanism may be seen when people get exposed to ambient air pollution. (Related: Air pollution increases risk of heart disease and stroke, study says.)

In another study, ambient air pollution exposure was tied to increased odds of cardiovascular disorders such as heart attack and stroke. To carry out the study, the scientists examined data on 6,800 diverse participants and the air quality in six regions where they reside. The researchers found that long-term exposure to particulate matter and nitrogen oxides may result in the premature aging of the blood vessels. This, in turn, causes a more rapid calcium accumulation in the coronary artery. According to the researchers, this build up may stem proper blood flow to the heart and major blood vessels, thus increasing the odds of cardiovascular incidents. The findings were published in The Lancet journal.

Sources include:

ScienceDaily.com

BBC.com

EPA.gov

In promotion of his latest film, “An Inconvenient Sequel,” former vice president and global warming activist Al Gore is still desperately trying to make the case that planet earth is heating up, and that only carbon taxes can fix it. But as per usual, he failed miserably during a recent CNN town hall with Anderson Cooper, during which a commercial crabber and local mayor explained that sea levels around his tiny island have remained the same for over half a century.

James Eskridge oversees the day-to-day activities on Tangier Island, in Virginia, and he’s been fishing crab there for decades. He’s quite familiar with the tides, the currents, and various other elements in and around the coastal terrain. And other than an ongoing problem related to erosion, in which the shorelines of Tangier Island are progressively disappearing due to constant waves and storms, he says that everything is exactly the same as it’s always been, at least as far as ocean levels are concerned.

After listening to Gore’s spiel about the alleged growing threat of “climate change,” Eskridge couldn’t help himself in pointing out that the well-known figure’s politically correct narrative doesn’t seem to match the reality Eskridge faces every day. In challenging Gore on his position, Eskridge made a clear distinction between Gore’s view of the world, and what’s actually taking place on Tangier Island.

“I’m a commercial crabber and I’ve been working the Chesapeake Bay for 50+ years,” Eskridge told Gore. “I have a crab house business out on the water and the water level is the same as it was when the place was built in 1970. I’m not a scientist, but I am a keen observer and if sea level rises are occurring, why am I not seeing signs of it?”

Al Gore: Erosion caused by climate change, not ocean currents and wave action

It was the kill shot that completely annihilated Gore’s faulty argument, embarrassing him onstage in front of both his live audience and cable viewers. As anyone who’s been following the agenda of Al Gore for any considerable period of time knows, his proof of climate change and global warming centers around the idea that sea levels are rising, which Eskridge clearly pointed out isn’t true.

But Gore wouldn’t accept this. Rather than bow out and admit that science and logic aren’t on his side, Gore instead attempted to capitalize on Eskridge’s admission that Tangier Island’s coastline is eroding away. Gore proceeded to blame this erosion, which everyone knows is a product of things like wind, waves, and ocean currents, on global warming.

“Have [the storms] increased any?” Gore interjected as Eskridge was trying to explain how the weather is shrinking the size of Tangier Island.

“Not really,” Eskridge responded, pointing to historical evidence showing that Tangier Island has been eroding for probably hundreds of years. According to reports, as much as 66 percent of the island’s land area has disappeared since 1850, an inconvenient fact that debunks Gore’s insinuation that global warming is responsible – that is, unless man-made climate change has somehow been around since before the industrial revolution when everyone traveled by horse and buggy.

Al Gore has had trouble in the past differentiating between the reality of natural weather events and his wild conspiracy theories about climate change. Earlier in the year, Gore claimed that a weather event that took place in Florida was a clear sign of impending climate apocalypse. It turned that it was just a case of higher-than-normal rising tides resulting from the lunar cycle. (Related: To keep up with the latest climate change hysteria, be sure to visit and bookmark ClimateScienceNews.com)

Sources for this article include:

DailyCaller.com

NaturalNews.com

The New York Times had the latest dire warning about our impending doom from human-caused global warming/climate change: Government scientists from 13 agencies have all concluded, once again, that our modern society is killing the planet, “directly” contradicting President Donald J. Trump “and members of his Cabinet” who have dismissed such nonsense as a hoax.

“Evidence for a changing climate abounds, from the top of the atmosphere to the depths of the oceans,” said the as-yet-unreleased report, a copy of which just happened to be leaked to one of the Trump administration’s most critical newspapers.

The Times continued:

The authors note that thousands of studies, conducted by tens of thousands of scientists, have documented climate changes on land and in the air. “Many lines of evidence demonstrate that human activities, especially emissions of greenhouse (heat-trapping) gases, are primarily responsible for recent observed climate change,” they wrote.

It truly is the end of the world as we know it — right? And this report comes just as the president confirmed to the UN that he has formally pulled the United States out of that massive wealth transfer scheme otherwise known as the Paris Climate Accords. How ironic, huh? (Related: This former EPA official is so duped by the hoax she resigned over it.)

Except that none of this was just coincidental. In fact, you could even say this has all been planned out by sycophantic supporters of the last president, Barack Obama.

As reported by the Washington Free Beacon, there is an unofficial “shadow” office filled with Obama loyalists pushing the previous administration’s science agenda, which of course includes the global warming/climate change hoax.

The site noted:

The group of science experts who left the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) after President Donald Trump took office “is informal yet organized,” according to a report from the health-oriented news website Stat.

Members of the organization, numbering in the dozens, have given advice and counsel to Democrats in Congress, while consulting with scientific groups and societies and have even held group-wide strategy sessions. They have also remained engaged in the former administration’s science agenda out of a presumed “sense of necessity,” Stat reports.

The people who make up the informal group see Trump as a threat to science or, more correctly, to their Left-wing science agenda, a major departure from the self-described “science geek,” Obama himself.

“At a time when the Trump administration has flouted the advice of the broader scientific community, they see themselves as filling a void within the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, which has been serving the president since 1976,” Stat reported.

Starting to get the picture? This development, coupled with the leak of the latest dire ‘world is ending’ “climate” report to the Times, and it all makes sense.

“There was no chance that this team was going to go work only in Silicon Valley or for lobbying firms,” a former staffer told Stat. “A lot of people feel a sense of personal responsibility to use what we learned for the greater good at a time when the federal government is averse to things we think are really important.”

Translated, that means at a time when Americans finally have a president and an administration that is on to these hoaxers, now more than ever they need to undermine Trump, subvert legitimate climate science and continue to push a scare tactic that, if ever realized, will lead to global authoritarianism and the death of American individualism, freedom, and liberty.

As for the leaked “science” report, the best that the “scientists from 13 agencies” could come up with is a half-degree of warming over the next century.

Meanwhile, real scientific studies say the government’s scientists are full of it.

Nigger being able to eat something is different from maximizing your lifespan

thenationalsentinel.com/2017/06/08/myth-scores-of-graphs-science-papers-published-in-2017-refute-global-scale-warming/

lol... mice. Mice don't habitually hunt vertebrates.

The one that does is a vicious desert mouse that eats small lizards and snakes, I think.

False climate change narrative now being used to push genetically modified “drought resistant” corn on Africa


Each day, farmers face real-world challenges to produce food, especially in countries where their lives depend upon agricultural success. Managing natural resources and crop yields in the face of unpredictable weather is a daunting task. African farmers face irregular seasons of drought; therefore they must breed and select the right drought-tolerant and insect-resistant hybrids in order to maintain their yields.

The last thing these farmers need is multinational seed corporations and billionaire investors sensationalizing the climate change narrative in order to introduce GM seeds, take over farmland, and steal away farmer’s right to use their own seeds and adapt them to regional weather and pest challenges. However, that now seems to be an issue: The pretentious climate change narrative is being used as a selling point to push genetically modified “drought resistant” traits on African farmers.

The main culprits, who are bringing this “climate change solution” to Africa, are the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Monsanto. Both of these entities have cleverly funded, infiltrated, and/or helped develop the Efficient Maize for Africa (WEMA) project, an organization committed to producing drought-tolerant and insect-protected maize varieties.

The five countries participating in the WEMA project are now being sold on the necessity of Monsanto’s “drought resistant” maize genes. Even though these GM seeds have only shown a six percent reduction in yield loss in times of moderate drought, they could become the “climate change solution” for African farmers who are always looking for ways to increase corn yields. However, small, short-term gains with Monsanto’s GMOs doesn’t equate to long term resiliency, especially when nature is unpredictable, or when weeds and pests resist the GM technology.

However, small, short-term gains with Monsanto’s GMOs doesn’t equate to long term resiliency, especially when nature is unpredictable, or when weeds and pests resist the GM technology. The resiliency of nature can quickly render these genetically modified traits worthless, putting a farmer’s livelihood at risk.

The single gene edits that Monsanto introduces to these countries is insufficient to handle unpredictable and ever-changing drought conditions. Drought tolerance is an adaptation process in plants governed by several genes throughout the plant’s makeup. The quality of the soil also plays a vital role in a plant’s ability to withstand insects and drought. Monsanto’s gene edits could exacerbate the farmer’s problems long term because the GM plants won’t be naturally suited to handle ever-changing weather conditions.

If current selective breeding practices are replaced by a one-size-fits-all GM trait, then farmers won’t be able to adapt to regional climate activity with a diverse selection of seed traits. Once these genetically modified seeds are unleashed into these countries, there will be a perpetual need for Monsanto’s technology. The biodiversity of the farmers’ seed selection will dwindle and their agricultural success will depend upon Monsanto.

So why does the solution always center on Monsanto’s gene edits? Why aren’t these billionaires helping African farmers create healthy soils, improve water storage, or diversify the type of crops they can grow, so they can be independent?

The WEMA project joins Monsanto and the Gates Foundation with the African Agricultural Technology Foundation, the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, and African agricultural research systems that implement field trials. The coalition has been shrouded in secrecy from the start. Farmers and the rest of society from the five affected WEMA countries (Kenya, Mozambique, South Africa, Uganda and Tanzania) have been excluded from the debate. According to the African Centre for Biodiversity and the Kenya Biodiversity Coalition, it has been difficult to obtain more information on the GM technology that is pushed into these affected countries. Questions have been deflected. These two pro-biodiversity groups gathered in Kenya in July of 2017 to discuss with African farmers and other concerned people what the WEMA project has been up to.

According to groups, Monsanto has already donated its failed Bt insect resistant maize called MON 810 to four of the WEMA countries, even though most countries have stopped using this technology due to the development of increased pest resistance to the GM maize. Why is Monsanto dumping its failed technology on these countries? (Related: Study shows Monsanto’s Bt toxin kills human embryo cells.)

The concerned people are also wary that Monsanto is donating the GM genes to open the door to manipulate and control other crop traits in Africa. After all, the supposed GM drought tolerant maize is only being made available unless the countries accept Monsanto’s insect resistant trait and herbicide resistant trait. (The Roundup ready trait just got commercial approval in southern Africa.)

By joining with CIMYTT, the WEMA project becomes an open door for Monsanto to access a sacred, diverse maize germplasm, which is a diverse collection of African maize, which spans 12 countries and holds valuable traits. Will Monsanto engineer aspects of this germplasm, claim property rights, and commercialize it? (Related: Visit GMO.News and stay up-to-date with all subjects biotech.)

This kind of stuff makes me see why people smoke even though it's bad for them. It seems like almost everything I want to eat is supposed to kill me in some way.

Don't be fooled
Always remember:
Water can kill you

buying a trip just to slide
how retarded are you

PROOF that Hillary’s “popular vote victory” was a total fraud: Local voter registrations found to exceed population.

The deep blue enclave of California has been a single-party state for decades — ever since the early 1990s, following the Reagan revolution (Ronald Reagan, in fact, once served as the state’s governor). With that one-party rule has come one-party corruption.

According to documents recently obtained by legal watchdog organization Judicial Watch, several of California’s heavily Democratic counties have a voter registration discrepancy that may have led to the outsized election results that handed Hillary Clinton her popular vote majority in November.

And for that, Judicial Watch may seek legal remedies against 11 California counties demanding that they clean up their voter registration rolls. (Related: Judicial Watch continues to dig up damning dirt on Hillary Clinton only to have the corporate media TOTALLY ignore it.)

As noted in a press release, the organization has sent a notice-of-violation letter to the California state and county officials, and has threatened to file suit in federal court demanding they comply with voter registration statutes aimed at helping to prevent voter fraud.

>sugar is bad for you

Thanks for reiterating samefag

Under provisions of the National Voter Registration Act, or NVRA, states are required to take a number of steps to ensure voter registration accuracy, but according to data obtained by Judicial Watch, 11 California counties have more registered voters than voting-age adults. They are:

— Imperial: 102 percent

— Lassen: 102 percent

— Los Angeles: 112 percent

— Monterey: 104 percent

— San Diego: 138 percent

— San Francisco: 114 percent

— San Mateo: 111 percent

— Santa Cruz: 109 percent

— Solano: 111 percent

— Stanislaus: 102 percent

— Yolo: 110 percent

As SHTF Plan observes, 10 of these 11 counties went for Clinton during the last election, and not by any small margin, so this can’t just be a coincidence:

Out of California’s 58 counties, 25 voted Republican in the last election, and 33 voted for the Democrats. So roughly 56% of California’s counties vote Democrat, but only 9% of the counties that have this problem are Republican.

That strongly suggests that this is by design, and not an accident.

It’s quite obvious that election officials in those heavily Democratic counties and municipalities are not putting much of an effort into clearing names of people who don’t belong on voter registration lists — either because they’re dead, they’re not real, they’re in the country illegally, or for other reasons.

Keep up the good work, doctor.

SHTF Plan noted further:

And of course, the only reason anyone would do that is if they intended to stuff the ballot.

Judicial Watch’s lawsuit, if it succeeds, may have a dramatic impact on the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, given all of the “alleged” voter fraud in some of the most heavily, and most Democratic, counties. That’s not to say that the eventual Democratic Party presidential nominee won’t win the state anyway, but it’s a safe bet the margin of victory will be much smaller.

As Judicial Watch noted in its press release:

Under Section 8 of the NVRA, states are required to make a reasonable effort to remove the names of ineligible voters from official lists due to “the death of the registrant” or “a change in the residence of the registrant,” and requires states to ensure noncitizens are not registered to vote.

The legal watchdog noted that there is “strong circumstantial evidence that California municipalities are not conducting reasonable voter registration list maintenance as mandated under the NVRA,” according to the notice letter sent to California Secretary of State Alex Padilla.

“California’s voting rolls are an absolute mess that undermines the very idea of clean elections,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. “It is urgent that California take reasonable steps to clean up its rolls. We will sue if state officials fail to act.”

California isn’t the only state being targeted by the organization to curb voter fraud. Notice-of-violation letters have also been sent to Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina and Tennessee, according to the press release.

Fuck that
you try to remove meat/daily I'm gonna make history with you fuckers

>stop eating meat goyim
>eat insects instead

Typical mexican

You're catching on.
Be informed of (((their))) nonsense

Academics are trying to “normalize” eating insects by baking biscuits out of ground insect powder.

A team of researchers at the Abertay University in Dundee, U.K. have created a cookie recipe made of cricket flour in hopes of attaining a more sustainable food source for the the world’s estimated population of nine billion people by 2050. In making the cookies, the research team used house crickets from Thailand that were finely-ground into flour. According to the experts, the flour contained about 1,100 crickets for every 100 grams. The research team also noted that the flour used was organic, Fairtrade, gluten-free and rich in protein.

The researchers then used other traditional ingredients in baking the treat. The experts stressed that preconceived attitudes about food should change in order to meet the food demands of a growing global population. However, project supervisor Dr. Alberto Fiore of the Division of Food and Drink noted that the Western world’s reluctance about consuming insects would be a big challenge.

“Insects are a lot more sustainable than other sources of meat like, beef, chicken and pork. They use a lot less land and water and you can eat the whole insect, not just part of the animal. You may not want to eat a whole cricket, but if it’s hidden away in flour, or in a biscuit, you may be more likely to accept it. The flour is already for sale and there are a handful of companies that have started out in this market. The UK, the Netherlands and Belgium are more advanced in this area than the rest of Europe and it will take some time for this to grow. If we are seeking to feed nine billion people by 2050 then we have to change our eating behavior, as the amount of meat we eat is not sustainable. You have to make products look and taste really appealing to consumers to hold their interest,” lead researcher Anja Sieghartsleitner told The Daily Mail.

The experts then conducted a taste test at the university’s cutting-edge 3.5 million British Pounds science lab. A local reporter noted that the cookies did taste like regular food, but had a bitter and slightly metallic after taste. However, the reporter said that if something is to be done to remove the after taste, the treat would be appetizing. (Related: Pepsi now experimenting with ground up insects as a source of protein for its snack products.)

>found in most mammals but not in humans
It seems like there is one type of meat that's safe to eat

Is nature trying to tell us something?

i already knew meat causes cancer, bc the farmers are dishonest with what goes inside it

Eat chicken, fish and lots of vegetables. Don't eat processed food

It's not that difficult.

Why this all ends in civil war: Radical Left-wing fascism and intolerance meets right-wing nationalism and resistance.

The entire Left-wing media has erupted today over the so-called “white nationalist” protest in Charlottesville where right-wing groups are protesting the systematic destruction of war monuments and white history in general. It’s worth noting that if the same event were flipped to Muslims, or African-Americans or women, it would be heralded by the Left-wing media as “courageous resistance” against tyranny and oppression. But because the attendees are mostly white conservatives, the event is portrayed as a neo-Nazi, almost “KKK” rally-ish in nature, which is of course a wild misrepresentation of what’s actually happening there. As usual, the Left totally freaks out over everything and sees pointy white hats everywhere they look.

The core assertion of the Left, by the way, is that white people have no right to history or culture. Thus, all monuments, flags and history of “white” America must be wiped clean in a kind of “cultural genocide” run by the intolerant Left. While the culture of African-Americans, Muslims and “progressives” must be celebrated and rewarded, all symbols of “white America” are to be demolished in a style that frankly looks a lot like communist China’s Cultural Revolution.

Meanwhile, radical left-wing groups are arming up all across America, with a group called “Redneck Revolt” (yes, they’re commie left-wingers) recruiting soldiers across 30 U.S. cities and posting documents to their website that teach leftists how to carry out acts of terrorism, torture and mass executions against their intended political enemies.

Another group called “Red Guards Austin” is a heavily armed, Left-wing terrorist group operating out of Austin, Texas. They wear red bandannas, carry “commie gun” AK-47s and call for an armed revolution against the government. Here’s one of their propaganda photos:

Yet the left-wing media ignores all that, choosing instead to completely freak out over right-wing protesters in Virginia who don’t want their statues torn down (nor their history “memory holed”).

The Far Left Watch website keeps tabs on left-wing extremism and violence across America, noting that such left-wing violence is always given a pass by the media as well as watchdog groups such as the ADL. NPR, NYT and WashPost will never describe radical left-wing terror groups as engaging in anything other than honorable, ethical “resistance,” even if they are openly calling for mass murder and the overthrow of the government.

Here’s why this all ends in civil war

Why does any of this matter? It’s simple: Thanks to the extreme censorship of Google and Facebook, there is no longer any allowance for public debate on the political or social issues of our time. The radical Left — which includes the “cult” of Google — simply believes that they have the right to silence all those with whom they disagree. Left-wing protesters at UC Berkeley even believe they have the right to pre-emptively murder conservatives in order to halt them from speaking.

The Left has become the fascist bully party of America, engaging in the actual fascism they ridiculously claim is somehow victimizing them. This is, of course, the entire philosophy of “crybullies.” They bully everyone else while claiming to be the victims. The real fascism in America today is squarely rooted in the distorted philosophy of the Left: Bigotry, intolerance and hatred disguised as “inclusiveness” and “diversity.” Now, the Governor of Virginia has even declared that conservatives have no right to assemble in public, denying their clear right to gather in groups to protest what they see as gross injustice against history and their culture. (Naturally, if the protest groups were any color other than white, no such denial of their right to assemble would dare be issued.)

Because no debate is allowed on any meaningful topic anymore — thanks to outrageous censorship of all conservative channels by Facebook, Google, YouTube and Twitter — the trend now pushes America toward extreme polarization. When the two sides can no longer talk to each other and one side is systematically suppressed by the left-leaning internet gatekeepers like Google, it only leads the two extremes to move further apart in terms of ideology.

Now, it seems clear to me that this cultural split of America has passed the point of no return, leading us to escalation into bloodshed and violence. America, it seems, is just one trigger point away from descending into open warfare on the streets of major cities where Leftists have become intolerant, racist bigots who call for the extermination of Whites, while Right-wingers have become tired of being oppressed, denigrated and verbally abused at every turn.

No left-wing outrage over bake shop refusal to bake “Trump cake” for nine-year-old.

Right now there’s a deafening silence emanating from CNN, The New York Times, and many other mainstream media outlets that, if this particular story of discrimination involved a gay, lesbian, or transgender wedding, you can be sure that they would all be in a resounding chorus of tizzy. But because it was a Trump supporter who was refused goods and services, you can almost hear the crickets chirping.

Let’s cut to the chase: A nine-year-old boy from California who admires President Trump wanted a cake made for his birthday bearing the business mogul’s “Make America Great Again” campaign hat. The boy’s mother tried to find a baker who would make this type of cake for her son, but none would agree to it. The mother ended up having to bake the cake herself, and her son still had a wonderful birthday.

The boy, named Dylan Harbin, later wrote a letter to President Trump explaining that the President is his “favorite president.” Young Dylan told President Trump about the cake his mom made for him, and other such childlike innocence that pulled at the heart strings of millions of Americans. The story quickly spread via the alternative media, and now many are asking the question: Where was the mainstream media’s outrage over this?

Given, no bake shop is required by law to bake a cake for anyone. But why, then, are bakers who refuse to bake cakes for gay weddings allowed to be bullied and forced into “re-education” programs, which is exactly what happened to Jack Phillips of Masterpiece Cakeshop in Lakewood, Colorado.

As reported by The Washington Times, Phillips refused to bake a cake for a gay couple because his Christian beliefs compelled him not to. Phillips was sued and ordered by the state’s Civil Rights Commission to go to brainwashing sessions, and had to change his store policies to comply with the demands of the LGBT community. Phillips also has to file quarterly “compliance” reports for two years following the incident.

This is quite the litany of punishment for refusing to bow down to the god of LGBT, and one that’s still being battled in court – with its next stop being the Supreme Court. Phillips’ lawyer has already presented a case, and oral arguments are set to be heard this upcoming fall as to the bake shop’s fate (as well as that of other businesses in the U.S. whose owners also wish to follow their consciences on matters such as this).

If bakers don’t have to bake Trump cakes, then they also don’t have to bake gay cakes

What’s interesting is that, in Phillips’ case, his right to refuse service is seen as intolerable because it discriminates against a protected group. But in young Dylan’s case, the bakers who refused to make his “Make America Great Again” cake are apparently being regarded as simply exercising their free speech rights. This double standard is quite hypocritical, and raises serious questions about the equality of justice in the U.S. today.

“Similarly here, cake shops declined Pickle’s order for conscience reasons,” wrote Michael P. Farris, president, CEO, and general counsel for the Alliance Defending Freedom, the Christian legal group defending Phillips in his cake case, on a recent blog post comparing the two cases. Pickle, just to be clear, is the nickname that young Dylan explained in his letter to the President that many people call him at school.

“Yet, no one on the Left is calling for legal action against the cake shops. And neither should anyone on the Right. The fact is that these cake shops have freedom of speech. They have the right to decline to use their artistic talents to celebrate events or promote messages that violate their beliefs, even if it offends a nice little kid.”

>In 1700, the average person consumed about 4 pounds of sugar per year.
did they not eat potatos or rice

New FDA-approved Hepatitis B vaccine found to increase heart attack risk by 700%

A new FDA-approved Hepatitis B vaccine has been found to increase the risk of heart attacks by 700%, yet Facebook, Google, YouTube and Twitter ban any talk of vaccine dangers. There is a complete blackout of medical and scientific facts if they show vaccines to be anything less than magical, risk-less, medical utopian gifts to humanity.

This new analysis comes from Dr. Jack Wolfson, a well-informed cardiologist practicing in Arizona who dares to speak out on the truth about vaccine risks. Here’s his report:

Hepatitis B vaccine linked to 700% increase in heart attacks

The FDA has approved a new vaccine for Hepatitis B. This is good news for the pharmaceutical company that makes the vaccine, but bad news for consumers.

You see, in the latest trial to examine effectiveness of the drug, heart attack risk was higher in the vaccine group. How much higher? Try 700% higher (1).

Vaccination and heart attack risk may not come as a surprise to you. The stated purpose of a vaccine is to invoke an immune response. The immune response is linked to inflammation, oxidative stress, and immune cell activation. All three are linked to heart attack risk.

Sadly, there a very few studies on vaccination and heart attack risk. Ironically, some studies demonstrate a beneficial effect of the influenza vaccine on heart attack risk. But researchers have identified flaws in study design and question the findings of flu vaccine benefits on heart attack risk (2). Other studies showed no difference between the vaccinated and the control group regarding the pneumonia vaccine(3).

Again, most of the vaccine schedule has not been studied for heart attack or stroke risk. In other words, we do not know if the DPT, MMR, shingles, polio, HPV or chicken pox vaccines increase heart attacks.

What is Hep B?

Hepatitis B is a viral infection contracted from blood to blood contact. This makes IV drug abusers and people who have sex with multiple partners most vulnerable. HBV is not spread through food or water, sharing eating utensils, breastfeeding, hugging, kissing, hand holding, coughing, or sneezing.

95% of people infected with the Hepatitis B virus do NOT become chronic carriers of the virus. They do not suffer from long-term liver complications, according to the CDC (4). A small percentage develop cirrhosis and/or liver cancer.

Vaccine toxins

The most popular Hepatitis B vaccine is nothing short of a witch’s brew including aluminum, formaldehyde, yeast, amino acids, and soy. Aluminum is a known neurotoxin that destroys cellular metabolism and function. Hundreds of studies link to the ravaging effects of aluminum. The other proteins and formaldehyde serve to activate the immune system and open up the blood-brain barrier. This is NOT a good thing.

An Ounce of Prevention

Health will never be found at the tip of a needle. We want to build the body up, not tear it down. Millions of years of evolution have provided us with the perfect immune system to protect us. Give the body what it needs and take away what it doesn’t. It is pretty simple.

Please follow these recommendations to extraordinary health.

1) Eat organic. Can we all agree that organic feed with limited pesticide exposure and GMO-free is the best diet to follow. The Drs. Wolfson follow our genetic programming and stick with hunter-gatherer Paleo foods. Works for our patients and will work for you. Sugar kills immune function.
2) Get sunshine. Before there was life on earth, there was the sun. Embrace its power to boost your immune system.
3) Sleep with the sundown and awake with the sunrise. Artificial light is a killer.
4) Get active. Walk, run, garden, and play.
5) Relax. Meditate and do yoga.
6) Drink quality water and a lot of it.
7) Get adjusted. Chiropractic care boosts immune function.
8) Get away from environmental toxins and EMF exposure.

Nice source there asswipe.

Cancer now more common than getting married or having a first baby or the flu
telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/07/09/cancer-now-common-getting-married-having-first-baby/

it is 1 in 2 people. meaning 50% of the population
cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/risk/lifetime-risk


ottawa.ctvnews.ca/study-says-nearly-1-in-2-canadians-to-develop-cancer-in-their-lifetime-1.3468455
cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-101/canadian-cancer-statistics-publication/?region=bc


Half of Kurdistan population could face risk of cancer in 3 years
half of the Iraqi population will face the risk of cancer in 2020,” he added.
rudaw.net/english/kurdistan/230620173

How long until they start trying to create laws to mandate that a percentage of all flour be cut with insect flour? The same way that they're gumming up car engines by forcing gas stations to add ethanol to their gasoline.

Does sugar make you sad? New study finds a link
By Anika Knüppel

The thought of a cupcake, skillfully frosted with fluffy vanilla icing, may put a smile on your face, but research suggests that, in the long term, a sweet tooth may turn that smile into a frown – but not for the reasons you think.

In a new study, published in Scientific Reports, my colleagues and I found a link between a diet high in sugar and common mental disorders.

The World Health Organisation recommends that people reduce their daily intake of added sugars (that is, all sugar, excluding the sugar that is naturally found in fruit, vegetables and milk) to less than 5 percent of their total energy intake.

However, people in the UK consume double – in the US, triple – that amount of sugar. Three-quarters of these added sugars come from sweet food and beverages, such as cakes and soft drinks. The rest come from other processed foods, such as ketchup.

>mexican intellectuals
any time a cell has to regenerate there is a chance that it becomes cancerous. for instance; those that workout religiously are 10x more likely to develop some form of cancer.

It depends on Trump
At the same time, one in six people worldwide suffers from a common mental disorder, such as a mood or anxiety disorder. Could there be a link between high sugar consumption and common mental disorders?

Earlier research, published in 2002, examined the link between depression and sugar consumption in six countries. The researchers, from Baylor College in the US, found that higher rates of refined sugar consumption were associated with higher rates of depression.

Since then, a handful of studies have investigated the link between added sugar consumption and subsequent depression.

In 2011, researchers in Spain found that when they grouped participants based on their commercial baked food consumption, those who ate the most baked food had a 38 percent increased chance of developing depression compared with those in the group with the lowest intake.

The association remained even after accounting for health consciousness and employment status.

consider the fact that cancer rates increased from 10% in 1970 to >50% in 2005, all since nixon declared war on cancer

consider the fact that cancer treatments have remained the same for 100 years using archaic radiotherapy and chemo

consider the fact that immunotherapy, cryoimmunotherapy have been around for over 100 years, but suppressed and avoided by medical establishment

consider the fact Kanzius RF Therapy (employs a combination of either gold or carbon nanoparticles and radio waves) has been sidelined for over a decade

consider the fact that the FDA setup red-tape and expensive phased clinical trials to delay and discourage new treatments

also it has been proven that diseases like cancer can be treated with a combination/cocktail of old common, cheap, repurposed drugs

I know that.
It's the sugar bit the thing I'm suspicious