Embrace racial Darwinism

>embrace racial Darwinism
>start a war of annihilation
>lose, thus showing according to your own ideological standards that you're either racially inferior or your ideology sucks
>still have fans 70 years later
what

Other urls found in this thread:

historyonthenet.com/how-many-people-died-in-world-war-2/
tomatobubble.com/id240.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>start a war of annihilation
That literally didn't happen. They defended Germans from slaughter in newly annexed Polish territory and got attacked for it. They were objectively the good guys.

backstabbed....by a jew no doubt

Commies will teach a second lesson to American fascists

>And so we National Socialists consciously draw a line beneath the foreign policy tendency of our prewar period. We take up where we broke off six hundred years ago. We stop the endless German movement to the south and west, and turn our gaze toward the land in the east. At long last we break off the colonial and commercial policy of the prewar period and shift to the soil policy of the future.
>If we speak of soil in Europe today, we can primarily have in mind only Russia and her vassal border states.
Of course, their aim was just to defend Germans from "slaughter" that never happened.

What fucking Soviet Union? I see only Germany on the map.

It's the final result that counts. And the way it's going, Germany wins.

>final result
But final result was the defeat of Nazis.
Soviet Union disappeared too, but I don't see how does that matter.

You do realise that the Germans had the best kill count and least deaths during all the war all the while fighting a world alliance?
Shut the fuck up you armchair coffee shop commie lmfao
>start a war
Germany didn't start ww2
>lose
Against other whites, therefore not an argument.

>defeat

Yeah right. I'm pretty sure some Roman emperor said the same thing about some hobo from Nazareth that got crucified like a filthy kike thief.

>best kill count
Lost the war.
>least deaths
Lost the war.
>Germany didn't start ww2
They literally did when they invaded Poland.
>against other whites
Slavs were not ''other whites'' according to most of Nazis. Though they were pretty vague about their racial theories, mostly elevating or downgrading people however it suited them at that moment.
In any case kill count doesn't win wars, and for every Axis soldier who died in combat on Eastern Front, 1.3 Soviet soldiers died. Hardly some stellar kill count you presumed.

Nazis were defeated in WW2 and I have no idea how can someone be so mentally ill to refuse such a simple fact, and compare Nazis with Christianity.
Christianity was just a small cult, and according to Christianity Jesus getting crucified was no defeat.
Germany occupied and split into two was almost certainly a defeat according to Nazi ideology.

>Lost the war
Love how you repeat yourself and act like it's an argument.
Lost the war due to being GANGED UP ON by other whites.
>They literally did when they invaded Poland.
See pic related, you know nothing of ww2
>according to most of Nazis.
I don't give a shit about your anecdotal "b-but most neo Nazis say so;_; "

Neo Nazis are degenerate retards.
But the fact that thousands of slavs fighting for the Wermacht already dismantles your argument
>Soviet soldiers
Yeah and then how many British, French, American, Spanish, etc died at the hands of Germany either?
Germany fought on so many fronts it was incredible.
They were fighting a fucking gang.

In 300 years Hitler will be glorified as a cult leader, and nobody will give two flying fucks about Holoshit, 60 million dead Russian mutts and other lice infested subhumans, or some pitiful partition of Germany that lasted less than expiry date duration of a fucking yogurt.

You think British care about Napoleon? No.

>They defended Germans from slaughter in newly annexed Polish territory and got attacked for it. They were objectively the good guys.
Is there anything more pathetic and disgusting than political correct nu/pol/?

>that never happened

>Russian mutts
Most Russians are white bro.
Just because most of their anti-commie intellectuals were executed and their thoughts have been suppressed doesn't mean they're retards either.
Communism is fucked, they literally threw themselves wave after wave at the Germans at the hands of their incompetent communist leaders.

>b-but muh Mongol rape babies
That's only to the south

>GANGED UP ON
They pretty much fought Soviets until like 1944. Other commitments were dwarfed by amount of troops and resources deployed on Eastern Front. Yet they still lost even before Western Allies landed in Normandy.
>See pic related, you know nothing of ww2
What's ''Judea''? I don't know of any country named like that in 30's.
>But the fact that thousands of slavs fighting for the Wermacht already dismantles your argument
I gave you a quote from Mein Kampf about Hitler's geopolitical ideas. Here's another one:
>Here Fate itself seems desirous of giving us a sign. By handing Russia to Bolshevism, it robbed the Russian nation of that intelligentsia which previously brought about and guaranteed its existence as a state. For the organization of a Russian state formation was not the result of the political abilities of the Slavs in Russia, but only a wonderful example of the state-forming efficacity of the German element in an inferior race. Numerous mighty empires on earth have been created in this way. Lower nations led by Germanic organizers and overlords have more than once grown to be mighty state formations and have endured as long as the racial nucleus of the creative state race maintained itself. For centuries Russia drew nourishment from this Germanic nucleus of its upper leading strata.

As you can see, he clearly states Russians (and Slavs) are inferior and all success they achieved was thanks to Germanic elites.
>Yeah and then how many British, French, American, Spanish, etc died at the hands of Germany either?
More Germans soldiers died in combat on Western Front than Allied soldiers. And they were defending.
>Germany fought on so many fronts it was incredible.
They literally fought on one major front right until late 1944. And they were beaten on that front well before Normandy landings.

>muh k/d ratio
Is this what autism looks like ?

>>embrace racial Darwinism
already wrong, may as well stop here. the premise is not going to lead to valuable conclusions.

Provide sources that claim otherwise. Keep in mind however that Goebbels is not a source since the guy was literally minister of propaganda.
Thanks.
>they literally threw themselves wave after wave at the Germans at the hands of their incompetent communist leaders.
This is how average Hitlerboo imagines combat in WW2. Amazing.

No, that's what illiteracy looks like.
Dude why are you denying stuff that even Hitler openly stated?
Here, your Nazi friend helped me

>Germany didn't start ww2
>argument in support is a quote on boycotting German goods

Just tired of newfags cucking up natsoc because they try to suck up to their fellow lefties
Anyways:
>embrace racial Darwinism
Yes
>start a war of annihilation
Yes
>lose, thus showing according to your own ideological standards that you're either racially inferior or your ideology sucks
No. Hitler was a moron who started too many wars and shat on his generals because of his own ego. The ideology still makes for save prosperous strong nations
>still have fans 70 years later
Could it be somewhat related to our countries dying and natsoc policies objectively halting that decay and restore strength and prosperity?

>Yet they still lost even before Western Allies
"According to estimates, the Soviet Union suffered the highest amount of total deaths (including military and civilian) with between 21,800,000 and 28,000,00 dying during WW2"

"and thenGermanywith between 7,000,000to 9,000,000"
historyonthenet.com/how-many-people-died-in-world-war-2/

So let's put that into perspective

It took nearly 22 million Soviets to kill 9 million Germans

THAT'S WHY
Also just debunked your 1:1.3 ratio lie in this post >"What's ''Judea''? I don't know of any country named like that in 30's."
If you don't know these basics then why are you arguing?
>As you can see, he clearly states Russians (and Slavs) are inferior and all success they achieved was thanks to Germanic elites.
Yet he clearly states that is was due to communism
"it robbed the Russian nation of that intelligentsia"
>More Germans soldiers died in combat on Western Front than Allied soldiers. And they were defending.
Here we go again with the lies
>They literally fought on one major front right until late 1944. And they were beaten on that front well before Normandy landings.
They "literally" had no supplies after fighting this uphill battle

You're an extremely ignorant person, too many opinions too little knowledge.

>argument in support is a quote on boycotting German goods
...and a quote of Judea declaring war on the NatSoc's first

Read a little bit

Yes, killing civilians really shows the efficiency of NS regime and it's armies. Holy fuck hang yourself.
And I said ''IN COMBAT'' you autistic moron. Killing civilians and POWs is not combat.

>whites war with whites, but because one side has less whites it loses, therefore whites are inferior to blacks
K

>Yes, killing civilians really shows the efficiency of NS regime and it's armies. Holy fuck hang yourself.
>And I said ''IN COMBAT'' you autistic moron. Killing civilians and POWs is not combat.

>he seriously just implied it was the max is who killed the civillians

The (((Russians))) aren't bothered about killing their "own" people.
Look up the holodomor.

Hopefully I opened your eyes a little bit.

And how many people died in Judea's war against Hitler?
Moron. The headline expresses the sentinent behind the boycott.
Having to resort to ridiculous non-arguments like this only shows you have no arguments.
Read Zarathustra you alt-lite embarrassment

*nazis
Not max is

Auto correct

Would be interested in a source for that quote.

excited to see israel collapse and all the niggers and socialist hellholes starve to death in my lifetime

i will be comfy

>And how many people died in Judea's war against Hitler?
All of ww2 was for the sake of Judea and the Jewish people.

Not only consideringbthey had compete control of the media, press etc as well.

>alt lite
Check my posts and come again.


World War Two in Europe began on 3rd September 1939, when the Prime Minister of Britain, Neville Chamberlain, declared war onGermany. It involved many of the world's countries. The Second World War was started byGermanyin an unprovoked attack onPoland

But thanks for trying to discredit The FACTS i posted (((fellow nazi)))

Mine is Mein Kampf

>All of ww2 was for the sake of Judea and the Jewish people.
If you have to pretend to be retarded to make your point your point is retarded. How many people died since one newspaper announces a boycott on German goods until Hitler started WW2?

>Not only consideringbthey had compete control of the media, press etc as well.
Complete? Of which newspaper? What media? Do you have any idea of the media landscape of that time? Jesus Christ

>Check my posts and come again.
Alt-lite embarrassment. I'm not telling you to change your ideology I'm telling you to step up your game. As I, anyone could call you out on this bullshit. The argument to make here is that Hitler started a war doesn't mean NatSoc is not a feasable system to fix the problems of our day.

>The Second World War was started byGermanyin an unprovoked attack onPoland
>But thanks for trying to discredit The FACTS i posted
They are facts which is why they don't fit your arguments.

> (((fellow nazi)))
Literally how is it possible to be this dumb? If you engage in an hour long discussion to deny that Hitler started the war not only do you grant the opponent that NatSoc is to be rejected if he did (which MY argumentation does not), you're also bound to lose that discussion as everyone including yourself knows that it is not true and posting boycotts as equivalent to war only discredits you and everything you could say that actually DOES speak for national socialism further. Purge your argumentation from bad arguments

You're implying that there was no political drive behind declaring war on Germany.
You must be retarded.

>Complete? Of which newspaper? What media? Do you have any idea of the media landscape of that time? Jesus Christ
Not an argument
"With World War II raging in Europe, four Jewish Mega-Giants control 'neutral' America's national media."
tomatobubble.com/id240.html

So far you present no argument and just decide to resort to personal attacks

>>embrace racial Darwinism
>>start a war of annihilation


Source?

>They are facts which is why they don't fit your arguments.
>declaring war isn't starting a war

I wasn't going to Cherry Pick from the article, it was opinionated with some truth.
Fact of the matter is: Germany didn't declare war on anyone.

These guys have no idea what they're talking about germanbro.

How are things.

>end up in a war against almost the entire world
>kill a disproportionate amount of the enemy
>nearly fucking win
>lose simply due to being outnumbered

wow you're right, totally inferior

>They literally did when they invaded Poland.

the russians invaded poland, why weren't they attacked?

This so much.

Right Wing Safety Squad advising all anons viewing this thread to follow the instructions of this image in order to combat /leftypol/ slide/bait threads such as this one. After the requirements are met, hide and ignore this thread. Regards, Right Wing Safety Squad.

Due to the fact majority of army generals were worried about UK guarantee of Poland, Hitler took time to reassure us: "do not worry I will not throw Europe in another war for an irrelevant shithole like Danzig"

Literally Von Manstein words in his book of memories.

>>they literally threw themselves wave after wave at the Germans at the hands of their incompetent communist leaders.
This is 100% true. What the fuck are you on about, have you seen the death count of Russians in WWII compared to that of Germans for fuck's sake?

The Soviet's military strategy was literally "Throw bodies at the Germans until they stop their advance".

You need to pick up a book, shill.

>making so many countries go to war against you and getting btfo'd because of it says nothing about your ability to wage wars

tmw it was a white vs white war

>>making so many countries go to war against
>making
Hitler tried to have peace talks to many western countries, he didn't want war.
None of them wanted any of his talks.
You're a retard.

Starting a war without declaring it is a war crime.
Fact is Germany started the iolence

>declaring a boycott isn't starting a war
Correct. And stop pretending you believe that to mean a literal war. If they declared a literal war on Germany in 33 how many people died in the horrendous war years of 33-38?

>I wasn't going to Cherry Pick from the article
I wonder why. I really do.

>You're implying that there was no political drive behind declaring war on Germany.
No I'm not. You are a retarded partisan who joined natsoc to fit in and now ruin it for everybody unable to defend it.

>Not an argument
No shit you braindead retard it's a question. You are not even able to think outside of memewords you picked up. I'm done with you. If you want to help National Socialism please never speak in favor of it again.

>tomatobubble.com/id240.html
Epic source you have there bro. Upvote. Except that America wasn't part of the beginning of WW2 and nothing you post in any way substantiates your claims since the point in discussion was
>All of ww2 was for the sake of Judea and the Jewish people.
>Not only consideringbthey had compete control of the media, press etc as well.

I'm leaving now. I know you throw an autistic tantrum right now but once you calmed down please reread this thread and consider suicide. Anyways never talk about NatSoc again.

>takes entire communist and capitalist world to defeat one fucking country
enough said.

I'm gonna ignore all the insults and try to find the actual arguments, you don't have many.
>And stop pretending you believe that to mean a literal war.
Yet they declared war on Germany as well as boycotted their goods

>Epic source you have there bro. Upvote.
Not an argument.
>America wasn't part of the beginning of WW2
Yet they were profiting, funding and conspiring against Germany way before the war began

>I'm leaving now
I can see why, you must be embarrassed

>invade Polecucks
>what could have been a 1v1 territorial dispute gets hijacked by brits and French eager to suppress red urgent Germany and they now have a legitimate casus belli
I won't stand here and say the invasion was justified, because you'll just pull out your retarded /his/ ""arguments"", but the war objectively became a WORLD war when the British and French declared war. Therefore, they started WWII

He was a man famous for keeping his word, wonder why brits didnt trust him.

This. Poles started the Bromberg massacre, killing thousands of ethnic germans. After that, Hitler marched into Poland, to save the ethnic germans from the slavic poles.

Jews

Bullshit, the only killing happened after Germany had invaded and it was a reaction to German militias attacking Poles.

You're the rapebaby here

wtf op? Create ideology+start&lose war+ideology survives=flawed ideology DOES NOT COMPUTE

>"Hey Germany, Poland is under our protection and if you attack them we will be forced to go to war that will be potentialy devastating"
>"lol fuck you idgaf"
70 years later
>"OY VEY IT WUZ BRITS WHO STARTED THE WORLD WAR WE DINDU NUFFIN"

t. schlomo ivanovich

>>"Hey Germany, Poland is under our protection and if you attack them we will be forced to go to war that will be potentialy devastating"
And then Russia happened.

How does that invalidate the german agression? They were warned, they still did it. Besides, Russia invaded on September 17. By that time France and Britain already declared war on Germany, and fighting not one but two military powers at once is a bit stupid.

>roach
>celebrating rape

color me surprised

You know the Russians invaded Poland along with Hitler and they split the land, right?

>Poland is under our protection and if you attack them we will be forced to go to war that will be potentialy devastating
Why didn't that happen with the Russians?

Ok, why didn't England protect Poland?

I already explained it to you, I suggest you try reading it.

>Ok, why didn't England protect Poland?

Allies weren't fucking prepared for shit

When France surrendered they were still in process of assembling the disassembled artillery pieces from long-term storage

>I already explained it to you
Weird how fighting two military powers wasn't a problem when talking about Italy (who didn't even attack your countnry) for them. Almost as if they didn't really give a shit about Poland.

Depends what you mean by "giving a shit"
Did they care for Poland because they had such love for my country? Of course not.
Did they care for Poland because the alliance allowed them to tie down Germany and prevent it's expansion? Yes.
It was purely strategical thinking, executed brilliantly by the British. Hitler swallowed the bait like an ultimate retard and attacked Poland. By contrast the allies carefuly considered their targets instead of declaring wars left and right. By not antagonizing Soviet Union they opened up the door for future alliance, when Hitler again sperged out and backstabbed Stalin, sealing his own fate.
This is of course strategy and politics way above the head of a typical Hitlerboo stormfag, who is too dumb to understand it and instead repeats his mantras:
>"wut about Russia huh"
>"m-muh Stalin!"