Remember kids, everything that gets popularized gets radicalized

remember kids, everything that gets popularized gets radicalized.

the vanguards of pol, you who have been here through all of it. you who call yourself libertarian for the lack of another banner, you voices of reason, stop being quiet. stop watching these idiots argue and corner themselves into the abyss of polarization. yes the right is correct right now, but thats because the goal posts shift, not you.

this place is not a place for activism. this is a place for commentary. you nazis need to fuck off, and i say that just like i told those who a long time ago associated themselves with anonymous. you people who fall prey to polarization are not fit for this place. you cheer for pro wrestlers. you are as binary as the pc you type on.

enough with adhering to political parties, ideologies, partnerships, and anything else that fosters an outlet for drive without the critical thinking that is needed to justify the heighth and veracity of outlets the farsides contend to provide.

to those of you who know full well the similarities between the new nazis and the new commies, who can draw the similarities between the reactions of similar events on both sides, who can see the vulcanization of each parties in their own seasons of confirmation bias, who hesitate to side with nazis after this event, and yet know full well they are akin to what we need in reaction to the current affair of things, dont be baited into this. dont fall for this. this is order out of chaos. this is exactly the way things are meant to escalate. its problem solution. dont respond to radicalism with radicalism.

stay the course.

stay down the path of morality with freedom in tow. know wrong when you see it, but dont try to fight it with equal force in the opposite direction. use reason, not reaction. when someone like gosnell gets caught harvesting babies, be outraged, but dont go kill people who are walking into an abortion clinic.

just stay the course.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=4bXCJVEOF-E
researchgate.net/publication/268806252_Inferring_Human_Phylogenies_Using_Three_CODIS_STR_Markers_CSF1PO_TPOX_and_TH01
jhered.oxfordjournals.org/content/92/5/398.long
tau.ac.il/~geffene/PDFs/15-Mol_Biol_Evol_1994.pdf
nature.com/nature/journal/v415/n6871/full/415520a.html
rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/281/1786/20133222
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18466230
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12969463?dopt=Abstract
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03382.x/abstract
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1439-0388.2003.00384.x/abstract
digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1393&context=icwdm_usdanwrc
journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.0010070&type=printable
jstor.org/stable/2460058?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14655871
citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.174.698&rep=rep1&type=pdf
sociology.as.nyu.edu/docs/IO/1043/2008_Reconstructing_Race_in_AJS.pdf
collegium.hrvatsko-antropolosko-drustvo.hr/_doc/Coll.Antropol.28(2004)2_907-921.pdf
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01076.x/abstract
lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/on-the-concept-of-race-in-chinese-biological-anthropology-alive-and-well.pdf
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tea.3660290308/abstract
bio.miami.edu/mccracken/reprints/condor-113-747.pdf
pnas.org/content/92/10/4259.full.pdf
science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6228/1352
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11815945
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC534810/pdf/pbio.0020442.pdf
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1180234/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3951706/
mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/14/7/707.short
researchgate.net/profile/Warren_Johnson3/publication/227663576_Phylogenetics_genome_diversity_and_origin_of_modern_leopard_Panthera_pardus/links/53ecffa80cf2981ada112c1a.pdf
uff.br/gefras/artigo 83.pdf
eebweb.arizona.edu/courses/Ecol406R_506R/PUMA_for_Culver_lect.pdf
jstor.org/stable/2387512?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
bearproject.info/old/uploads/publications/A 28 Nuclear DNA.PDF
eebweb.arizona.edu/courses/ecol406r_506r/garcia-moreno1996-wolf.pdf
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11472538
researchgate.net/profile/Christopher_Kyle/publication/12035218_Genetic_structure_of_North_American_wolverine_Gulo_gulo_populations/links/0fcfd50ec27bb60633000000.pdf
researchgate.net/profile/Carles_Vila/publication/12080301_Genetic_variation_and_population_structure_in_Scandinavian_wolverine_Gulo_gulo_populations/links/54f2b60e0cf24eb87949009d.pdf
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11050551
mbe.library.arizona.edu/data/1995/1206/13forb.pdf
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00852.x/abstract
research.amnh.org/~rfr/paetkau99.pdf
jhered.oxfordjournals.org/content/90/1/108.full.pdf
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22391749/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4776623/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2795070/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2933725/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15651931
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016028960200137X
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23593038/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3938855/
people.virginia.edu/~ent3c/papers2/three_laws.pdf
isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic185351.files/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf
webspace.pugetsound.edu/facultypages/cjones/chidev/Paper/Articles/Plomin-IQ.pdf
atavisionary.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Heritability-of-interests-a-twin-study-Lykken-bouchard.pdf
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289609001561
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289607000244?np=y
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289613000470
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Thanks now I'm a fag from reading that

6
>reddit spacing
>reads
>becomes fags
you deserve it, post pics of transition on Sup Forums please

for instance, common sense would dictate that the majority of nigger culture has applied themselves to a subset of culture that is above all inappropriate as a reaction due to a misunderstanding of what they are reacting to.

they are not beyond redemption on an individual basis.

they are not smart on the whole, and individually can be far worse than the average, but so can we.

stop using meme words, they only serve as a false base for understanding. for instance, saying based.

stay armored against the criticism of others with a sharp sword, not a dull shield of ignorance and meme culture.

this level of reaction is precisely what im talking about. i have never been to reddit. and yet because of this meme no one seeks to argue on a level befitting of this board.

the people who call themselves nazis are looking for the validation of group think. the same exact thing applies to marxists.

So things like "nigger culture?"

What is it they are reacting to? You haven't said anything yet.

>asking new/pol/ to be decent people
Although, you are very right, senpai, you're asking a shark not to follow blood.
But, righteous people will always be true, you don't need to tell them.

...

You want treasure?

Hate to break it to you, but Nazis VS Commies is gonna be fun as hell to watch. The only problem will be when they have to decide on the final solution for white people. Use to be that they were waiting for the weak and unfulfilled to slowly die off or kill themselves; now that people are fighting back everyone has to be at least a little involved in order to secure a place for ourselves in this world. Mainly in addressing and living by what we believe to be right.

what this place has become. it used to be that this was a place you came to hear the voice of reason through the sides fighting their fight. there were valid points on both sides, and to those points went credence. im telling you to stop reacting in such a manner that you fight fire with fire. react in a manner that you dont catch on fire. react with objectivity and reason and not knee jerk party think from one side.
thanks but as much as i and you may know that, people like us enjoy watching this shit play out too much. we used to come here to talk about the shit that was playing out elsewhere, but now we come here to comment on it as its happening.

i hear you ... and using a reactionary vessel to arbitrate the outcome we saw fit was what we vied for. but now im telling you its gone too far, we need to start cleaning our house. we need to bring this place back through a sense of common sense. making too much sense is what we were known for. now we shoot for shock value. its not going to pan out well if we let it run as rampant as we have for the last 5-7 years.

How is properly structuring your writing an insult in anyway? Are you fucking retarded or something?

I was referring to your comment about niggers.

Good post OP - here, have some Left Rev McD
youtube.com/watch?v=4bXCJVEOF-E

this argument is one that pisses me off the most. really what this is boils down to the person arguing it having dumbed down their way of thinking to accomodate polarization to the point that they need to either see you as an enemy, or a friend. there can be no inbetween. its this exact binary bullshit that falls on the precept first and foremost that its a right and left spectrum with no up or down. secondly it is patently without merit.

>Radical Objectivisme
Wrong decade faggot. Go with the time. If you don't pick a side you can kiss your life for the next 50 years good bye. And supposing you are white and a man, good luck in an affirmative victim institution society. And no, we will let the left not thrive here any more, they made their stance clear; open border, mixing for an average higher IQ, positive discrimination of all man, especially white, big state, high debt for financing the peace on earth utopia. This is about genetic, cultural and discursive survival. Go be a philosopher on /lit/

>binary bullshit
which is hilarious since they can't seem to see "binary" in literally anything else.

oh sorry. they are reacting to what they have been told to react to in the manner and on the precepts they have been handed. they react to being impoverished while taking absolutely no responsibility for their action. they lean on the precept that they have been held down in a losing fight and justify apathy through it. they can be redeemed by arguing reality as it exists, arguing their misinterpretation of it, not damning them for misunderstanding and furthering the problem you are pretending to complain about by calling them all niggers.

also fun fact, common sense dictates not all niggers are black. and not all blacks are niggers. but that falls outside of the lines of propaganda and into the realm of common fucking sense, so here it often falls on deaf ears and calls of shill and ahmed and other fun memes.

memes have ruined this place. they were more fun when we didnt know what they were, because no one was aiming for them. now its all a big laugh without any sensible form of argument.

Sup Forums is for lulz
Sup Forums is for lulz
radicalize everything

You say precept but the word I think you want is presupposition.

Whenever something like yesterday happens and the right looks back, half the movement turns coat and wants to be "civic nationalists"

It happened when Spencer did the Nazi salute after Trump won and its happening again..

FFS they are trolling. Do you honestly think they want to put Jews and non whites into ovens? Are you this fucking dense and over sensitive?

If so, go back to the left or back to the BASED BLACK DUDE, LE EBIC KEIKISTAN.

>not all niggers are black. and not all blacks are niggers
Moron

here we go again. see this. the time dictates what you are called, not who you were, are, or are going to be. you build your sense of right and wrong on the shifting sands of the moment. you will never be right for long.

nout wrong with wrestling you cunt

you are correct, i apologize

i always mix those two

>literally shows a fucking graph of the crossover.

man .. come on

>you nazis need to fuck off
>>>>>>>>>>>>/oven/

Nah m8, you fuck off back to where you belong

>80 years of Marxism has told me materialism is true religion
>history starts with 1945
shu shu, no need to waste time on you. Thrive on an other continent

the premise of people pretending to fight to garner a crowd when in reality they enjoy dinner hookers and blow together behind the scenes while their fans fight for them is exactly whats wrong with the divide and conquer that we are experiencing

>READ
source on image
researchgate.net/publication/268806252_Inferring_Human_Phylogenies_Using_Three_CODIS_STR_Markers_CSF1PO_TPOX_and_TH01

sources to btfo niggers:

(1997) Barbujani et. al., find a human genetic distance of ,155. There are no recognized subspecies.

jhered.oxfordjournals.org/content/92/5/398.long

(2001) Kim et. al., find an Asian dog genetic distance of ,154. There are eleven recognized subspecies.

tau.ac.il/~geffene/PDFs/15-Mol_Biol_Evol_1994.pdf

(1994) Roy et. al., find a North American coyote genetic distance of ,107. There are nineteen recognized subspecies.

nature.com/nature/journal/v415/n6871/full/415520a.html

(2002) Schwartz et. al., find a Canadian lynx genetic distance of ,033. There are three recognized subspecies.

rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/281/1786/20133222

(2014) Jackson et. al., find a humpback whale genetic distance of ,12. There are three recognized subspecies.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18466230

(2008) Lorenzen, Arctander & Siegismund find a plains zebra genetic distance of ,11. There are five recognized subspecies.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12969463?dopt=Abstract

(2003) Pierpaoli et. al., find a European wildcat genetic distance of ,11. There are three recognized subspecies and five biogeographic groups according to (Mattucci et. al., 2016).

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03382.x/abstract

(2007) Lorenzen et. al., find a Kob antelope genetic distance of ,11. There are two to three recognized subspecies.

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1439-0388.2003.00384.x/abstract

(2003) Jordana et. al., find a south European beef cattle genetic distance of ,068. There are eighteen recognized subspecies.

digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1393&context=icwdm_usdanwrc

been to reddit as many times as ive been to australia, and somehow i know i never want to go to either one.

(2004) Williams et. al., find a red winged blackbird genetic distance of ,01. There are twenty-two recognized subspecies.

journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.0010070&type=printable

jstor.org/stable/2460058?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14655871

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.174.698&rep=rep1&type=pdf

sociology.as.nyu.edu/docs/IO/1043/2008_Reconstructing_Race_in_AJS.pdf

collegium.hrvatsko-antropolosko-drustvo.hr/_doc/Coll.Antropol.28(2004)2_907-921.pdf

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01076.x/abstract

lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/on-the-concept-of-race-in-chinese-biological-anthropology-alive-and-well.pdf

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tea.3660290308/abstract

bio.miami.edu/mccracken/reprints/condor-113-747.pdf

pnas.org/content/92/10/4259.full.pdf

science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6228/1352

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11815945

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC534810/pdf/pbio.0020442.pdf

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1180234/

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3951706/

digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1393&context=icwdm_usdanwrc

tau.ac.il/~geffene/PDFs/15-Mol_Biol_Evol_1994.pdf

(1997) Wise et. al., show that the genetic variability within humans is 0,776. There are zero recognized human subspecies.

mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/14/7/707.short

> literally, what is plebbit spacing goys I just got here for r/againsthatesubreddits
> when do we shut this sub down I don't like it

marxism is the far left, its the opposite of what im arguing. literally nothing ive said is marxist. make an argument or fucking lurk cunt.

(1997) Wise et. al., find a chimpanzee genetic variability of ,63. There are four recognized subspecies.


researchgate.net/profile/Warren_Johnson3/publication/227663576_Phylogenetics_genome_diversity_and_origin_of_modern_leopard_Panthera_pardus/links/53ecffa80cf2981ada112c1a.pdf

(2001) Uphyrkina et. al., find a leopard genetic variability of ,58. There are thirteen recognized subspecies.

uff.br/gefras/artigo 83.pdf

(2001) Eizirik et. al., find a jaguar genetic variability of ,739. There are nine recognized subspecies.

eebweb.arizona.edu/courses/Ecol406R_506R/PUMA_for_Culver_lect.pdf

(2000) Culver et. al., find a puma genetic variability of ,52. There are six recognized subspecies.

nature.com/nature/journal/v415/n6871/full/415520a.html

(2002) Schwartz et. al., find a Canadian lynx genetic variability of ,66. There are three recognized subspecies.

jstor.org/stable/2387512?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

(1998) Paetkau et. al., find a North American brown bear genetic variability of ,5275. There are nineteen recognized subspecies.

bearproject.info/old/uploads/publications/A 28 Nuclear DNA.PDF


(2000) Waits et. al., find a Scandinavian brown bear genetic variability of ,687. There are nineteen recognized subspecies.

eebweb.arizona.edu/courses/ecol406r_506r/garcia-moreno1996-wolf.pdf

(1996) Garcia-Moreno et. al., find a coyote genetic variability of ,629. There are nineteen recognized subspecies. They further find a Gray wolf genetic variability of ,574. There are thirty-seven recognized subspecies.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11472538

(2001) Girman et. al., find an African wild dog genetic variability of ,643. There are five recognized subspecies.

researchgate.net/profile/Christopher_Kyle/publication/12035218_Genetic_structure_of_North_American_wolverine_Gulo_gulo_populations/links/0fcfd50ec27bb60633000000.pdf

Yep, These idiots do not know how to protest nor respond when one of there own kills another person.

(2001) Kyle & Strobeck find a North American wolverine genetic variability of ,55. There are two to three recognized subspecies.

researchgate.net/profile/Carles_Vila/publication/12080301_Genetic_variation_and_population_structure_in_Scandinavian_wolverine_Gulo_gulo_populations/links/54f2b60e0cf24eb87949009d.pdf

(2001) Walker et. al., find a Scandinavian wolverine genetic variability of ,325. There are three recognized subspecies.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11050551

(2000) Polziehn et. al., find an elk genetic variability of ,395. There are seven to eight recognized subspecies.

mbe.library.arizona.edu/data/1995/1206/13forb.pdf

(1995) Forbes et. al., find a bighorn sheep genetic variability of ,6235. There are three recognized subspecies.

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00852.x/abstract

(2000) Reinartz et. al., find a bonobo genetic variability of ,535. There is one subspecies.

research.amnh.org/~rfr/paetkau99.pdf

(1999) Paetkau et. al., find a polar bear genetic variability of ,68. There is one subspecies.

jhered.oxfordjournals.org/content/90/1/108.full.pdf

(1999) Wilton, Steward & Zafiris find an Australian dingo genetic variability of ,445. There is one recognized subspecies.

eebweb.arizona.edu/courses/ecol406r_506r/garcia-moreno1996-wolf.pdf

...

(1996) Garcia-Moreno et. al., find a domesticated dog genetic variability of ,5085. There is one recognized subspecies, and there are many breeds.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22391749/

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4776623/

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2795070/

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2933725/

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15651931

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016028960200137X

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23593038/

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3938855/

people.virginia.edu/~ent3c/papers2/three_laws.pdf

(2000) Turkheimer presents his Three Laws of Behavioral Genetics and explains their meaning.

Turkheimer begins by stating, "The nature-nurture debate is over. The bottom line is that everything is heritable, an outcome that has taken all sides of the naturenurture debate by surprise. Irving Gottesman and I have suggested that the universal influence of genes on behavior be enshrined as the first law of behavior genetics (Turkheimer & Gottesman, 1991), and at the risk of naming laws that I can take no credit for discovering, it is worth stating the nearly unanimous results of behavior genetics in a more formal manner."

The Three Laws are as follows:

? First Law. All human behavioral traits are heritable.

? Second Law. The effect of being raised in the same family is smaller than the effect of genes.

? Third Law. A substantial portion of the variation in complex human behavioral traits is not accounted for by the effects of genes or families.

isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic185351.files/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf

No. You don't space at all. You write everything is one big long text bc spacing is reddit. The worst thing you can ever be is reddit and reddit is everything other than non ironic hitler worship

isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic185351.files/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf

(2005) Philippe Rushton and Arthur Jensen (author of, "The g Factor") conclude that IQ is the greatest indicator of future success in Western societies when inter-generational income dependence is accounted for.

They also found that IQ is at least 50% heritable and likely nearer to 80% heritable. To draw comparison, height is 70-90% heritable.

During their analysis they concluded that Whites have a minimum of 75% IQ heritability.

webspace.pugetsound.edu/facultypages/cjones/chidev/Paper/Articles/Plomin-IQ.pdf

(2004) Plomin & Spinath discuss intelligence in the wider context of genetics, genes, and genomics.

Their discussion is multi-faceted; their analysis illustrates proof of the genetic heritability of intelligence, the immense weakness of environmental explanations for intelligence, changes in heritability during development, a multivariate analysis of IQ and various testing metrics, gene expression profiling, and genomics.

This is an excellent compilatory piece.

atavisionary.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Heritability-of-interests-a-twin-study-Lykken-bouchard.pdf

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289609001561

(2009) Rushton & Jensen refute erroneous claims made about the nature of the Flynn Effect and its relationship with the Black-White IQ gap.

In their conclusions they state, "We conclude that predictions about the Black–White IQ gap narrowing as a result of the secular rise are unsupported. The (mostly heritable) cause of the one is not the (mostly environmental) cause of the other. The Flynn Effect (the secular rise in IQ) is not a Jensen Effect (because it does not occur on g)."

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016028960200137X

Not quite shock value, more like a spinning vortex of uncomfortable truths that paralyze and create spite in people. We need a renaissance of new thinkers that build on ideas of community and positive self image.. People that act, not react. A people that use the shit of the world to build a better garden.

.. Not like it'll ever happen, though.

are you arguing for a wall of text? im not sure exactly what your trying to say you want in your format? or are you perhaps attacking my credibility through a flimsy argument instead of addressing its point?

...

...

(2001) Rushton & Rushton show evidence for racial-group differences in the form of brain size and structure, IQ, and musculoskeletal trait variation.

Their analysis shows significant variation in both the structure and sizes of the brains of Negroids, Caucasoids, and East-Asians. In addition to this, they have found differences in the skull shapes and structures of the races, alongside differences in average height and weight and all parts of the bone and muscle structures from the neck to the feet.

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289607000244?np=y

(2007) Shatz analyzes the relationship between IQ and fertility.

They find that IQ is negatively associated with total fertility rate, birth rate, and population growth rate. This means that higher IQ populations are less fertile than lower IQ populations.

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289613000470

(2013) Michael Woodley, Jan Nijenhuis, and Raegan Murphy conclude that Western IQs have declined by an average of 1,6 points per decade since the Victorian Era.

Higher IQ people are more productive, healthier, and are more creative. The reduction in IQs across the West has been met with a marked decrease in average productivity and general health despite vast increases in average wealth, nutrition and access to healthcare.

The cumulative reduction in IQ is between 12,45 and 13,35 points or roughly one standard deviation on a normal IQ bell curve. This represents an eight-fold reduction in the number of geniuses and a counter to the Flynn Effect.

The resultant decrease in IQ is attributed to dysgenics in the form of outbreeding and negative mate selection within populations. The importation of migrants of different races and ethnicities preempts the outbreeding and subsequent loss in IQ. This effect has sped up as migration has increased

>the time dictates what you are called
And you can predict the future marxist.
is more the place for pseudolectual masturbaters like you

listen i get what youre saying, and what im saying is that an attempt at persuasion through a logical argument is the key to fixing the problem, not fucking ethnic cleansing.

this. god knows nobody is actually down to start resorting to cruel and inhumane behavoir at the stage we are at. its just joking and memes. as the nation gets closer and closer to collapse and civil war perhaps this will change but for now its goofs and gafs

Who will you present your logical argument to?
Do you think you will reason and present a logical argument to a 76iq dindu nuffin?

when you dont move, and time does, that is exactly what happens. if i thought like a democrat in the 1800's i would probably fit in here now.

this Go be a radical objectivist on /leftypol/ come back with results

ive done it to every single god damn one ive met. how fucking hard is it to out think someone with that low of an iq? you are talking about dogmatism and its precisely what im attempting to fight right fucking now.

bravo sir! its nice to "hear" a voice of reason among the mentally retarded voices that society has left behind.

I too come here for the discourse and the exchange of ideas. I am not here for the seemingly limitless display of chimps blinded by ideology and massive desire to fit in somewhere.

Outthinking=/logical argument&reason
Back to step 1,kid.
Who will you present your logical argument to?

but nigger, we move. Shifting away from a degenerate left, who openly embrace the white genocide, replacement, affirmative action or how you like to call it. According to UN standards a degenerate pussy objectivist probably loves and masturbates to its declaration defines what happens ONLY in white countries as Genocide, fuck off.
Thread abandoned

out thinking someone while not abusing that power and presenting propaganda in the place of a logical argument is also a fucking option.

then leave, youve contributed fuck all. im not saying dont shift from a degenerate left, im saying dont do it by being a degenerate right. there a constructive versions of both. kys when you leave.

So,you are not going to use logical argument and reason to convince the nigga fella to do what you think is best.You see,that nigga fella will destroy you if (((i))) tell him you fooled him because he doenst fucking understands even if he wants therefore making it a very useful tool in social engineering to destroy YOU.

You preach to an abandoned centre. Follow your own advise, MOVE BITCH

Good point, OP.
I had a decent chat yesterday with an anarcho type who was NOT a total dick (!) which was a pleasant surprise, I do not think I even swore at him once. Anyway some Jap guy in that thread gave us some Eastern Wisdom:
"The eagle needs both a left wing and a right wing to fly, but the wings get thinner away from the centre".

this

here here!

love it!

>"The eagle needs both a left wing and a right wing to fly, but the wings get thinner away from the centre".
really makes u think

>REEEEEEEEE GET OFF MY LAWN
this place is for whatever the fuck people want to use it for. you dont own it. zen out and let people be idiots if they want to be because youll give yourself an aneurysm trying to fight against the current.

>The only problem will be when they have to decide on the final solution for white people.
nah that wont be a problem. look at how much the "holocaust" benefited the jews in the long run. we will finally get our own victim card. kek unfortunately the only people left to flash it to probably wont give a fuck. im feelin lucky lads, lets ROLL THE DICE

ive tried, but ive also tried fighting it to some avail. im just trying to get you and people like you to stop watching it like television as we are wont to do. its entertaining, its fun, and we know we could step in if we needed to, but we all to often dont and it has resulted in a completely different culture over time, one that makes me want to leave. i just want the old pol to resurface like i know they can. we went quiet when people stopped lurking and its coming back to haunt us.

ancaps have a lot right, and have a lot of bugs to work out. but without that argument, them and the libertarians have fallen to the low point of having to watch retarded radicals cringe their way to societal dominance.

im not telling them to get out, im telling you to start changing their mind. that needs to be the culture again.

no,the vast majority of people rest in the center, you just feel a surge and youre losing your shit about it.

you want to come here and tell everyone whats up but you dont understand what this place is. talking on and on about rational discourse. where the fuck do you think you are??? youve got holes in your head m8. when people come to Sup Forums for IT advice, people tell them the instructions for bricking their computer. thats the point. what on earth did you think you were going to get from talking to people here. its a prank, bro.

this place is for people who are trying to suicide the world, user. nothing more. people see society as a carbuncle, an absurd overgrowth. the point is to cause as much butthurt as is humanly possible before watching the whole thing implode in a smoking heap of rubble. if you come here for anything else you will be sorely disappointed.

thats why the pol logo is a fucking swastika. thats not accidental. its not because the board is "natsoc" and that fashism is muh best systommm, its because that is the most offensive symbol in existence. thats the point you fucking clown, its a prank. jesus fucking chroist some of these threads today.

>this place is for people who are trying to suicide the world, user. nothing more. people see society as a carbuncle, an absurd overgrowth. the point is to cause as much butthurt as is humanly possible before watching the whole thing implode in a smoking heap of rubble.

sure, that's why R/pol/ sucks each others cocks all day long on here?

your theory...
has been DESTROYED!

what are you talking about?

are you pols leader, or you just speak for and represent all its members, or you just know majorly what the majority is about?

You sound like a teen browsin Sup Forums

While I agree with some of your points, I ask you this, what would YOU have us do? Should we just sit back and do nothing?

everyones nihilistic every now and again, but it might be the absolute, eternal nihilists that are everyones common enemy, and then after that, the non nihilists are sectioned in their various sections of conflictive disagreement.

and then the contest is for each side to best argue their case, best stand their ground, best attempt to convince the others, and fence sitters of the worthiness of their cause.

Go fuck yourself shill, you do not represent Sup Forums.

Your entire message is "be complacent and don't do anything." Eat shit and die.

no im just enlightening you idiots who actually take this shit seriously. youre the useful idiots and people are playing a joke on you to make you ruin your lives. dont you understand?