((((((MSNBC contributor)))))) on "Standing up to violent leftists"

What did he mean by this?

Other urls found in this thread:

i.4cdn.org/gif/1502668706938.webm
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

(((Sherman)))

It means that the alt rights tactics are stale copypasta. But you already knew that.

Communists known as Anti-Fascist Action would attack the NSDAP, the various news papers sympathetic to the Marxists would state the reverse that it was the NSDAP who attacked the Antifascists, however their is documentation going all the way back to 1918 when Anti Fascism got going in germany, they anti fascists nearly took over the whole Country until the Spartacan revolt was put down by returning German soldiers and paramiltary groups. The Antifascists have been around a long time and the media protects them when they commit heinous crimes against people and property, and any who speak against them are slandered as "Nazis".

yep

Opposing leftists is by its definition violence, because they are objectively Good and we are objectively Bad

Did this fucker forget that communism happened

Oh so Hitler and his diverse group was securing the existence of the 2nd german republic from the soviet union sympathizer communists? And?

He's saying Hitler did nothing wrong, he just doesn't know it.

Yes? There were running fucking street fights between the SA and communist thugs. You literally cannot argue Hitler's SA was not fighting violent leftists. It's a well documented historical fact.

is he arguing that Germany after WW1 was a nice place?

EVERY SINGLE TIME

Hitler also hated smoking and was a vegetarian.

Better start chain smoking and eating nothing but meat.

>the right disagrees with the left, therefore the right are Nazis
>it's morally justifiable to precipitate violence against Nazis
>if you call out the left for being violent, you're also a Nazi

I mean, if everyone to the right of Stalin is automatically a fascist with an antifa target on their backs, what the fuck should we do?

These radicals are pushing to give the west exactly two options:
>complete ethnic suicide
>complete extermination

Given that I don't exactly like the notion of killing myself for the original sin of being born white, why the fuck SHOULDN'T I embrace fascism under these circumstances?

Hitler's speech on this very subject

i.4cdn.org/gif/1502668706938.webm

He's literally saying Hitler was justified and did nothing wrong

>Being against violence makes you a Nazi
Holy shit, what kind of mental gymnastics DOES IT TAKE

Of course not, we're just seeing communism/anarchism/far left extremism further legitimized to the point where people who oppose it are on Hitler's side, IE, the end result of "punch a nazi XD", which was a legitimization of political violence and the same exact shit that happens in communist regimes ("liberals get the bullet too").

Look up all of the leftists on twitter foaming at the mouth at anyone daring to use the "both sides" argument in this.

Violent leftists are a legitimate problem, though.

When I read tweets like this I start to question whether Hitler was actually right. If the media will lie about this, why not Hitler?

It means Hitler was right all along and the wrong people won ww2

It means the left is pulling the same shit it did in Weimar Germany as it is doing now.

People hate the left not because they are full of hate, but because the left exists only to destroy. When they destroy something you hold precious, you want them gone.

goddamnit

Damn

If they'd stop being violent, there wouldn't be a problem.

Liberal indoctrination mental gymnastics.

Nice numbs btw

>What did he mean by this?

I don't think he was, people like him just think they were 100% righteous and weren't the original/overwhelming aggressors and went a huge way towards legitimizing nazism and fascism (to say nothing of all of the horrific sexual debauchery that went on in Weimar Germany.)

They're doing exactly what their forebears did close to a century ago.

Hitler literally saved millions of lives

(((he))) is creating his enemy from thin air for propaganda/ideology purposes. it's communists' schtick. ask anyone from an ex-communist country (prefereably someone who's dad wasn't a communist party operative/member).

That's alot of parenthesis what did you mean by this

((( jew )))

someone with a twitter account send him this

its a tank

>being this new

>((he))) is creating his enemy from thin air for propaganda/ideology purposes.

Not exactly, he's just stretching the definition of "nazi" to be so broad as to include ANYONE who opposes "violent leftists", which he thinks aren't actually violent at all because they're wholly legitimate in their aims.

Which, as you said (and was expressed in pic related), has been a tactic of communists worldwide for as long they've existed, and even after it's blown up in their faces to incomprehensible degrees like , they'll still do the same fucking thing because they're animals.

And honestly, I'm not a nazi or even a fascist, I'm probably best described as a sort of paleocon. But it's going to be harder and harder for scores of people far less conservative than me to not identify as these things when sociopaths like ((((((((((Gabriel Sherman))))))))) scream "YOU'RE HITLER" at anyone who doesn't like terroristic gangs of communists and anarchists.

Libtard equating the euro political spectrum with the American political spectrum because Hitler.

But Hitler was a Socialist, can't get much more leftist than that.

>wtf, i love violent leftists now

...

fuck, forgot pic

>nazis are in the WH now according to this psychotic jew

Using this kind of logic in today's political climate doesn't provide any strong evidence to support the narrative that "muh Nazis" were evil. In fact it just makes everything seem like a lie, which it is - but I bet normies are starting to wonder what the fuck is really going on.

stretching or creating out of thin air, same shit when it comes to communists. in fact, they're the happiest bunch of people if and when they see an actual nazi. by having some experience with communists who like to call themselves 'antifascist', let me tell you. every actual nazi is literal food that keeps communists and 'antifascists' alive. since nazis got deservedly their arses handed back to them almost 70 years ago, communists and 'antifascists' have serious trouble touting actual nazis to the public. hence, making up nazis is their only tactic. as a citizen of an ex-communist country, believe you me. your american 'antifas' are following the communist indoctrination techniques down to a t. same rhetoric, same actions, same tactics. trust me, we've been dealing with 'antifascists' (read communists) like these for over 70 years now, and they all are the same. lying, deceiving, defaming, mob mentality, anti-democratic, vile, petty, self-righteous, shallow, violent, self-absorbed, but also very resourceful and extremely well organized. the only difference between your 'antifas' and our 'antifas' is the fact that ours were actual communists. which, truth be told, nowadays are not as violent as their siblings from the west.

Meanwhile, silence in the face of antifa firebombings.

Nah I get what you're coming from, it's obviously just semantics to focus on "stretching or creating". It's only relatively recently that I've become to understand how communists behave and how they've routinely ended up as so astonishingly murderous and how viscerally insane and sociopathic they can be (@tankietanks is a great exhibit of "tankie" depravity, even though I think the person who runs it is a leftist themselves.)

And for what it's worth, when I was younger, I actually used to be sympathetic to democratic socialism. The kind of people I've seen drawn to the DSA on twitter and elsewhere has made me realize they're not much different than outright tankies (and they rub shoulders with them constantly.)

Just curious but which ex-communist country are you from?

What I've found hard to come by are accounts from people who suffered tremendously under both the nazis and the soviets.

He was standing up against violent leftists though, your point? By this point Russia already had a bloody revolution on a monumental scale and been held back from a full-on European invasion stalled only by Warsaw, 1920.