Why are communists so fucking retarded?

Why are communists so fucking retarded?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=YNRt-8GEi6c
youtube.com/watch?v=o9eXi3RL8q4
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

they're communists

...

Being retarded comes before being a communist. You know, doing the same mistake over and over and learning nothing? Also, the entire ideology is tailored for kids who have never really interacted with serious people.

Because these fucks aren't communists. They are faggots and statists that blindly believe the bolshevik's lies.

nice to see that you volunteered as an example for my question

Please explain. Your argument so far is that communists are retarded because "look a pic of a faggot in a beret".

Communists are retarded because communism is retarded.

No that's not my argument. There shouldn't be an argument necessary to call a system that has failed EVERY SINGLE TIME, resulting in millions of people dying and mass poverty, retarded, you fucking commie retard.

Damn, I can always count on Sup Forums to provide quality threads and insightful criticisms!

wtf I hate gommunism now!

...

...

I will try to answer your question seriously without turning into a tl;dr effortpost. Here goes.

These "people" are usually completely reliant on others. They spend their whole lives depending on others not only financially, but intellectually. They need to be told what to think and what to believe. They hate things like individualism and success because those are things that are both scary and out of reach for them. You will never see a commie that has its life together, except for the small handful of elite at the top of an actual communist regime. Surely these "people" imagine that they would be at the top if their country became communist, but they delude themselves. As drones completely dependent on government for money and media for thought, they would be absolutely worthless as leaders.

If communism is so good then why doesn't it work? Checkmate.

Communists are so retarded they all think they'll be in the party. They're thinking they "in on it" and so thinking they can steal from the poor to install themselves as an elite.

...

...

...

...

>White woman on the picture

yeah sure, let's forget that fatherless homes are mostly nigger homes.

...

You have to be a moron or a teenager to think those sentences are in any way clever. The fact you think this is some massive intellectual blow to redistributionism speaks volumes about your general ignorance.

...

>redistributionism

...

"Its because of single mothers that dindus turn to crime, not because of their race!"

...

But of course the famines elsewhere in the world during the 20th century had NOTHING to do with Capitalism?

...

the politician they're shilling for always promises their group will get the lion's share of the new regime's stolen money

They can't succeed on their own, so they rely on an ideology whose central premise is "rely on other people to give you free shit"

...

Ben garrison?

Shut up, dad.

triggered leftycuck fag detected

gee idk

94% of commies are literally faggots and spcial retards with no friends. Their version if communism exists only in their heads and on forums. Funny the only places that allow them to espouse their cancer are capitalist countries. A true communist is proud of heritage.

...

anyone who subscribes to a statist, or extremist view is a retard who feels like they can fill in the cracks of their boring personality with someone else's ideas.

cry more wuss

youtube.com/watch?v=YNRt-8GEi6c

>peasants crops seized

Epic meme

That wasn't real communism.

Now you are just blaming authoritarian statist regimes for failing and blaming that on the concept of communism.

ohhh my god I used to work with that person. straight up the least functional human being I've ever met. i shudder to think what they've been up to for the last 7 years

don't bother, they're a retard who thinks of you take a million dollars away from a billionaire, he won't be able to feed himself.

>muh 6 million

>advocating theft via the brute force of a massive totalitarian state
Cool ideology.

> yeah sure, let's forget that fatherless homes are mostly nigger homes.

How is it a nigger home if the only nigger left.

Right...because real "ideal" communism is when power is given back to the people after the state acquires all means of production. The problem is that this has never been realized. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Actually personal property is just fine under communism.
The means of production however should be owned by everyone, not just a select few.

You just advocated stealing 1,000,000 dollars cash from the rich.

...

>should be owned by everyone
>should
Also, why?

>40-80 year old Russian: Living in the USSR wasn't perfect but everyone has a house and a job and nobody starved during peacetime when I was around. We were poor but it wasn't like 1984 or Cold War propaganda.
>23 year old American who thinks he knows everything from being out of college and worshiping David Horowitz, Ben Shapiro, Robert Conquest, and the Mises Institute: ACKSHUALLY

>after the state
>after the state

>communism
>state

Nice strawman. The people seize the means of production, the people benefit from the means of production. No state necessary. The state is what props up and protects parasitical oligarchs and those jews you hate so much.

> redistributionism
> gimme the fucking shit you worked for so I can feed leeches and parasites because my waifu marx

Different poster my friend

>nobody starved
Bahahahaha. Off to the gulags with you, Ivan.

Because they have little to no grasp on historic or economic reality.

i'm not a communist but if you've ever worked a real job you'd know that they guy at the top gets away with a lot of shit that could be considered more or less theft. predatory banking could be considered theft as it is done without informed consent. i'm not saying the wealthy are inheriently evil and don't deserve what they have, but you seem to be implying that shitting all over a bunch of poor people because they're forced to work within the system to survive is a good thing.
i also don't understand where you got this totalitarian state thing from seeing as i am an anarchist, or why you would defend the obscenely wealthy seeing as you'll never be one of them.

>should be owned by a tiny few

Why?

...

I see. Regardless. Why should the means of production be owned by the Mob? To increase efficiency or "fairness"?

> Implying we are all authoritarians in here

>extracting rent
>creaming off profit
>receiving dividents
>inheriting wealth

>worked for

My sides.

>taxing the rich turns you into Stalin
Pure ideology

Fucking clockwork lel

Who is going to build your workplace, your tools, organize the jobs and manage the work you dumbass? BTW what you're proposing in the meme is called joint-ownership you retard, there is nothing wrong with it, what you can't do is steal the workplace somebody else built because you want to use it, that's called being a thief and thieves are shot.

The last famine was in the mid 1940s and was largely due to war damage and poor harvests.

its not stealing if everybody owns it, retard

Everyone likes the thought of free stuff for everyone. Anyone who thinks about it hard enough realises free stuff for everyone is difficult, the rest of them become communists.

Mercury poisoning.

As a syndicalist, I wouldn't use the term mob. Industries would be organised by confederations formed of worker representitives and industry specific specialists, as opposed to the current system of managers trying to extract the most from the powerless workers below them in order to deliver shareholders the highest dividends.

> building a house and renting it out
> earning part of the money for organizing, managing and providing a group of people with the materials for working
> inheriting the shit your parents/family/friends worked for

Fixed

...

>The state is what props up and protects parasitical oligarchs and those jews you hate so much.

true enough. the state creates monopolistic conditions so politically connected businesses can make unnaturally high profits.

go directly after the state. diseconomies of scale will naturally break up companies that are unnaturally large. their size is perpetuated by regulations that disproportionately hurt smaller businesses but are easily absorbed by already established businesses.

your vision of a post-state world is probably more egalitarian than mine. things aren't ever going to be equal and shouldn't be, but the state is exacerbating inequality rather than solving it.

Workers can operate their own workplaces.

This more your liking, faggot?

>we dont need a boss
top fucking kek, this meme was made by someone who has never done 10 minutes of blue collar work in their life.

You think a bunch of retarded grunts with iphones are going to stay motivated to finish projects and meet deadlines on their own?

You think they are even going to realize everything they are supposed to do on their own? Fuck no, they will forget a ton of details and do a pisspoor job.

I get it, nobody likes having a boss. But yet you will always have one. If its not a private organization it will be the Government pointing rifles at you (like every communist country in history)

If everybody owns it, nobody takes care of it. For example, in China, the facades of apartment buildings go to shit because collectively nobody wants to chip in and make the thing look presentable. Humans and Communism aren't meant for each other.

>Protecting a country's borders and maintaining society

By your logic it is perfectly moral that governments extract taxation from their citizens, BTFOing your own ideology. Well done.

>Fuck no, they will forget a ton of details and do a pisspoor job.
This is the pinnacle of communism

Why are right wing so fucking retarded?

They don't respect any form of private property, OP.

That includes their own selves.

...

>faces of leftypol
Ruh roh wouldn't want to bump into that guy in a dark alley.

t. never held a job in his life

you vastly over-estimate the ability of the average "worker"
The government will run your life, and be your boss.

>le stoopid lazy poor people meme

Slave Morality

except that everyone does not own it.
you merely assert that everyone owns it.
which is what property norms are.
assertions
the difference is that private property norms lead to prosperity for all.
collective property norms lead to prosperity for none

the government in China owns and manages those, not the people.

Because if I built something it's mine, the capacity to produce stuff has nothing to do with the legitimacy of me owning it, retard.

And if I wanna pay somebody to use my shit so they can produce shit that I can sell there is nothing wrong with it.

Nobody is stopping you from creating a joint-ownership business for all the employees working there, the fact that you don't see it is because large scale production operations require some form of hierarchy of authority to function, just like the military, it wouldn't work if all soldiers had an equal say regardless of their rank etc, nobody would agree on anything and at the end someone or somebodies end up forming some form of hierarchy regardless.

If you don't agree with the practices of a business you can leave whenever you want assuming you live in a free country.

...

no they can't
they need someone to tell them what to do

>If everybody owns it, nobody takes care of it.
those do not correlate
>Humans and Communism aren't meant for each other.

>reddit switcharoo
kek
it worked "ok" for the soviets

>Being sarcastic
You're an anarchist why dont you hate an inherently authoritarian statist system

>communism was never tried

youtube.com/watch?v=o9eXi3RL8q4

>the government in China owns and manages those
Exactly. Which is why every building is falling apart. Your neighborhood is only nice because the people around it chip in to make it nice, not because the government bureau in the capital is worried about you.
youtube.com/watch?v=o9eXi3RL8q4

> implying you're gonna get rich by washing dishes at mcdonalds all your life