1993: North Korea actually makes a deal with Israel to stop selling missiles to the Middle East in exchange for...

>1993: North Korea actually makes a deal with Israel to stop selling missiles to the Middle East in exchange for recognition of North Korea
>the Clinton Administration forces Israel to abandon the deal

>2005: North Korea offers full dismantling of its nuclear weapons program in exchange for a non-aggression treaty with the United States and help with the peaceful development of nuclear energy
>the Bush Administration instantly rejects any notion of a non-aggression treaty

>2015: North Korea says it will halt its nuclear weapons program if the US stops conducting aggressive military exercises near North Korea
>the Obama Administration instantly rejects the offer

>2017: North Korea has sent multiple obvious hints to the United States that it wants a peaceful resolution and doesn't actually want war
>the Trump Administration (not including Secretary Mattis) decides to escalate with even more rhetoric

Hmmm, really makes you think who are the real "mad men", doesn't it? Maybe the Kims saw what happened when Libya peacefully ended its WMD program it really made them think, too.

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/x9TcH
archive.is/L1dp4
archive.is/rBb4b
twitter.com/AnonBabble

It must be difficult being retarded, op. thanks for posting, champ

Oh my G*d. How could you be pro-communist! We must bring North Korea into the international banki... I mean negotiating table, now!

>being this bluepilled

>2017: Trump calls the crazy lying fuck on his bluff and he backs down without concessions.
>A Fucking Leaf makes a stupid post

>being this much of a trumpfag

why is un a million times better than this stick in the mud

>didn't read my OP at all

Oh, I went through the torturous process. You omit everything that Korea did to go against any agreement it made. They have a pretty clear fucking pattern for negotiations.
>stir shit up and bait the waters
>get someone to bite
>saber rattle and make false threats until we think the negotiating table is ours to pick through without having to give anything of meaning back, just stall for time while we attempt to develop the very things we said we would agree not to

>They have a pretty clear fucking pattern for negotiations.

A pattern of asking for peaceful resolutions and the US rejecting each offer or blocking North Korea from making deals with other countries. The sabre-rattling is the only thing the MSM always reports.

Yeah, forget how they are a death cult that starves and tortures a huge amount of their population

>asking for peaceful resolutions under ridiculous conditions or concessions that they will then directly go against and develop the things they agree not to develop anyway, MAYBE being considerate enough to try to weasel around with some kind of technicality to claim they were still in agreement
>Inricherd urarnium prorgram no spicificrry prorhibited!

It must be a bit more complex than that but yes, USA never wanted peace with NK, they will never do any step in their direction. What USA wants is a braindead unified Korea at their hand.

>stop conducting military exercises near our country
>ridiculous conditions or concessions

>stop conducting military exercises with your allies and our neighbor who we constantly antagonize and even attack
Fixed that for you. Let me guess, you think they weren't developing nuclear capabilities during the sunshine policy and their developments materialized magically when Bush called them out on it.

Yes, because America would definitely leave North Korea alone if they abandoned their nuclear program. The sunshine policy was a South Korean one, not an American one.

We'll never know because they never once have even come close to it, now, have they?
>le big-bad 'Murca would never ever leave a country well enough alone
Not so long as they threaten our allies and go against every agreement they make. Pull your tongue out of Trudeau's ass.

Might want to read some of your own government's defence reports before you start posting.

You do understand that the politics of the US and North Korea have nothing to do with being right or being moral, yes? It is all about strategic interests. Our military presence there, as a shield against North Korean aggression and proxy Chinese aggression, is how we wield much of our influence in that region.

We don't want NK gone because we want to keep our troops there to develop support from the nations in the region and to corral and intimidate China

Learn to realpolitik

Apparently North Korea is to some extent controlled by CIA/KCIA.

OK so the plan is to sell missile to the muzzie

>what is propaganda

>things that never happened
>while discussing a country that lies more often and more grandiosly than even mine

...

I don’t know, how is that good, Mohammed?

How do you know NK is really how our media says it is? It could all be bullshit propaganda, just like everything else in the news.

>peaceful development of nuclear energy

Quintessentially 56%

If in 2017 you arent aware that best korea is a puppet state then you are an oxygen starved retard

See flag.
Assume Chink.
Ignore

don't try it anakin

DELETE THI

>things that never happened

1993:
archive.is/x9TcH
>Israeli officials said that the United States was opposed to an Israeli plan to invest in North Korea as a way to prevent the North Koreans from supplying upgraded long-range missiles to Iran.

2005:
archive.is/L1dp4
>After a tense weekend of heated debate within the Bush administration, the lead American negotiator with North Korea made one last call to Washington at noon on Monday, Beijing time, and then signed a statement of principles that committed North Korea, in black and white, to give up "all nuclear weapons and existing nuclear programs."
>But the negotiator, Christopher Hill, had misgivings because the vaguely worded agreement left unaddressed the date disarmament would happen, and hinted at a concession to North Korea that President Bush and his aides had long said they would never agree to: discussing at an appropriate time providing North Korea with a civilian nuclear power plant, senior administration officials said.

2015:
archive.is/rBb4b
>Barack Obama said on Sunday that he does not believe North Korea is sincere in its offer to halt nuclear tests if the US suspends military exercises with South Korea, and that Pyongyang would “have to do better than that”.

Surprising that an Israeli would unabashedly lie.

what about that time after the korean war when kims dad demanded reparations from the US or he was gonna glass us and what did tbe US do?
They shipped over thousands of pounds of food and gave into the threat.
Nkorea has been threatening us for personal gain for over 60 years and its time we stop letting a coffee stain of a country push america around

>NK just wants to be left alone
>(((THEY))) want a bank in pyongyang
Makes you think

>>(((THEY))) want a bank in pyongyang

DELET THIS
NOW