Memes aside, what are the chances of a new American Civil War?

Memes aside, what are the chances of a new American Civil War?

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/Freeyourmindkid/status/897555349607141376
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

not very good. the "right" would be extremely outnumbered and outgunned by cops + lefties.

>Its not the 20's. Do you think we're gonna lay down and let racists take over?

Yes, thats exactly what the fuck you're gonna do you stupid coon.

...

You think cops would take one side or split based on locality?

In the event of a civil war the military and the cops would gravitate towards the right. The left also has far less guns because they believe in gun control. A civil war would be insanely short only because the right would win in a heartbeat.

It's not the 60s, we're not going to lay down and let jews destroy our country.

obviously they would not be outgunned by lefties. they also wouldn't be outnumbered either. there would be a lot of defection among the armed services in favor of the right wing, and cops wouldn't be out fighting a war.

The Confederacy was a military power with an independently functioning government and the support of the majority of the population. They still couldn't win. What are some alt-right larpers gonna manage?

also the left hates cops, without a left leaning boss tell them what to do, like in cville, most cops are more than happy to crush antifa skulls

nobody wants to fight, just want to rub noses in stuff.

/ourguy/ is in charge of the Union.

>The Confederacy was a military power
have you ever, even once in your life, picked up a book? or do you just pull all the information you have straight out of your asshole?

3 in 4 of the us army voted trump

Have fun dodging drone bullets

>The military
And at the end of the day, I wouldn't expect all of the whites to naturally stick to their own.

Goddamn that eye roll is impressive

>hurr the south will win because we got da farms and all da guns and the left are just some pussy city slickers

>Police
>On the side that demonizes the police, riots, and wants more illegal immgration and more felons to ruin this country
>Being this fucking dumb

it's what the establishment wants

SO DON'T DO WHAT THEY WANT YOU TO DO

>sips cum
Be honest, you've paid your mechanic to fix some shit he just made up before.

>outgunned by cops + lefties
Unrionically believing this

Memes aside, the chances are so slim, it's not even worth talking about. If we turn the memes back on, then:

>OH MY GOD, GIF RELATED!!!

Battle Lines:

The Right:

NRA
Armed Forces
Law Enforcement

The Left:

Reporters
Queens
Trannies
Millenials
Socialist
Thugs
Illegals

It would be a bloodbath for the left.

Why you gotta be so damned honest about the sides of the battle, yo?

you are realy saying police would stay in the side of cop killers user?

Confederate officers still won the fashion war.
K sweetie?

>Memes aside, what are the chances of a new American Civil War?
Hi Russia.

imagine believing this

>Be the epitome of Christian Gentleman
>Beloved by your family, fellow countrymen and everyone who knows you
>Fight bravely and honorably, without hate or bias, a disadvantaged war that you don't want, but that your heart demands.
>150 years later the descendants of the people you fought for will lynch your statues because they can't lynch you.

This is beyond heartbreaking to be honest.

>Implying it'll be North Vs. South
It's going to be urban "america" against the very people that provide cities resources and protection.

Zero.

You have no leaders, no authority, no territory and no resources. All you have is shitty protests and low-grade terrorism.

Bout 5 years to a decade off, but possible.

none because the only side who would actually do anything is the left

Big city police departments always follow the orders of their Leftist Mayors and Police Chiefs.

Cops in big cites might side with lefties but anywhere outside of the major metros you will find vastly less affirmative action hires in leadership roles.

>urban "america"
...who have been shitting constantly on the us army for a good fifty years now

Literally 0. Things could always change in 10 years, but I think people are way to comfortable overall. It is mostly social media LARPing on both sides.

I'm expecting armed militias such as these to take over America at any time now.

The right would NOT be outgunned by the common left -- the antifa tards and whatnot. They aren't really the problem.

The real problem is the cops. The cops will do whatever the state tells them to do, as long as the state keeps the paychecks coming. A small handful may resist orders but most will play along.

Then you have the national guard. They will also play along as long as they're paid.

This is why the right would not be able to engage in open street warfare. Regardless of the number of guns or people the right has, state and federal forces have vast amounts of resources at their disposal. The right would need to engage in asymmetrical warfare. Guerrilla tactics would be necessary. Think of groups like Hezbollah.

It won't be until economic collapse is underway that large amounts of LEO and military would defect or at least abandon their posts, and that could take quite a while. Until then, refrain from open urban warfare. IEDs, roadside bombs, car bombs, small teams performing ambushes, etc, would be the most common tactics the right would make use of.

id say the chances were pretty high, given that certain events occur. 1) If trump somehow sinks lower than he already has (which i think is impossible) it becomes a matter of when antifa decides to get really violent. 2) if trump is impeached then war is imminent. 3) if the military refuses to follow orders from trump then the war will begin inside the branches of military between those who are loyal to trump and those who rebel.

The cops aren't left leaning, sorry.

The right has no guns, ANTIFA and drones are very scary to us humble backwoods farmers. We will do what ever you want xyr please don't hurt us with your sticks and stones!

>150 years later the descendants of the people you fought for will lynch your statues because they can't lynch you.
I guarantee you that a large margin of the statue removers are Yankee transplants and/or people whose ancestors weren't even involved in the Civil War or who don't know or care enough about their family history to be sure one way or the other. By contrast, I can tell you the names of several ancestors, where they fought, and what wounds they suffers. The monuments to the soldiers matter to me in ways that most of these people will never be able to understand. No larping here whatsoever.

Why would the police protect the left?

If there is a civil war, it's not "the evil right wing is attacking citizens" it's "the left and right wing are fighting each other.

Sure they aren't, but if you think the entire right wing would jump into a civil war, you're insane.

The majority of the right establishment has already condemned the protest, they'll condemn anyone who stands up.

It will be the 20's in 3 years kek

K keep me posted

who could possibly want a new (((war)))?
>nice try rabbi

But unless things really get out of control, they're going to choose to follow orders and keep their jobs. They're going to fire on the group that's more socially marginalized because they're "just doing their jobs."

Somewhere between nil and naught

Copfag:
Youd be suprised. Sociology courses, sensitivity training, and forced ideology like "crime is societies fault not the criminal's" have been getting pushed pretty hard for the last decade.

Fuck. My sherriff openly stated to us deputies that if there were to be martial law or some such declared he'd back the federal govt.

Hes also stated military veterans "arent to be trusted" which is colossally stupid considering 2/3rds of us ARE military veterans. Maybe he was telling us were on his "list." Idk.
Law enforcement aint the way it used to be man.

He said.

on Sup Forums.

"Calm down Mr. Brown"

Zilch. Nothing will ever happen. This shit will keep going on for the next 3 years, meanwhile dems and neo reds will keep passing legislation that makes them rich again, a new fuckface will be elected and will fuck your shit again, all of this and the culmination of world events will lead to another financial crisis again, the fed reserve will get away again, the big banks will get away again, dems will blame the reds and vice-versa again, you all will keep bickering for ever as usual and at the top of all of this, jews will laugh from a distance again.

If I missed anything please add.

Source: Dictionary.com
Terrorism: the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.

Not a matter of who they agree with more. It's a matter of upholding the law.

If a revolt happens, its gonna be after Trump gets removed from office. Alt-right Nazis and the like would be the ones to start something full-scale. And you will be massacred just like LaVoy Finicum.

This all started with President Ass up Face down Onigger

but it will be the '20s in less than three years

>civil war confirmed for next decade

Of course it's terrorism. If you can't engage your enemy on the battlefield, you resort to other tactics to chip away at his infrastructure and demoralize him. You never read The Art of War?

what about minorities who support the right?

not all of us of cum guzzling blm shills

No
Americans are too pampered by the state.
Anyone that genuinely believes that the Alt-Right would be able to last more than a week in a civil war scenario is delusional. You fat nerds would be immediately wiped out.

100%. The people on both sides have already subconsciously decided that they want to have a large scale civil conflict. What's happening now is they're working backwards from their desire for this conflict to build a rationalization for it starting with innocuously floating the question of if it will happen or that they don't want it to happen. After the idea is in the public space they'll shift from the hypothetical scenario of "if" to the hypothetical scenario of "should" at which point you're only one flashpoint event from the whole thing setting off. Now this could take years to happen but it is going to happen.

civil war? 0%
civil unrest 50%
2 groups of autists fighting each other with memes and sticks at every turn? 100% for the foreseeable future

This is probably the most realistic. The cops and military are slaves to money, they will do what they are told to do as long as they are paid. If the "right" had any brains it would realize that nobody wins in a civil war, it just destroys the country. The destruction of America, THE Christian nation, is what they wanted all along.

Zero. It would be bad for the economy.

To put it another way, why do you think groups like the Taliban and the Vietcong were so successful against the full might of the US military for so long? For a bunch of savages, groups like them gave the military a run for its money.

>If the "right" had any brains it would realize that nobody wins in a civil war, it just destroys the country.
America is already a dead nation. The America of the 40s and 50s isn't coming back. The sooner people accept this and move forward with realistic plans and expectations, the better. Time to start over.

>Memes aside, what are the chances of a new American Civil War?
Dead on arrival, cuck.
twitter.com/Freeyourmindkid/status/897555349607141376

Civil war less than 10%.
Domestic terrorism about 60% for

>he doesn't even understand that the painting he used conveys a sense of moral superiority of the south.

Unfortunately this

One side has guns...and food...and the military...and police...

The other side has what?

I don't think it'll be a war in the traditional sense. Things will just slowly escalate until someone finally assassinates a figurehead. At that point, a precedence will be set and you'll constantly have nutjobs on both sides trying to imitate it. Every few months we'll get news that some political activist was killed.

Anyone saying there will be a second civil war anytime soon is completely fucking stupid. There may be limited engagements and an increase in violence in the next 5-10 years, I totally concede that, but a full-blown civil war? No way.

America is among the most well-fed countries in the world. We have a major surplus of food and as long as that continues, most will be content. Even in a down-economy (which we are also not in the middle of), people will still be content.

Next, literally all politicians on both sides of the aisle are not condoning any sort of violence. This is a far-cry from the environment of 1850's America, when there would be regular diatribes to take up arms. I mean, fuck, most of you probably know the story of the caning of Massachusetts Senator Charles Sumner in 1856 by Representative Preston Brooks of South Carolina. Can you imagine Paul Ryan beating Pelosi on the House floor? Of course not.

Finally, and MOST IMPORTANTLY, America has an extensive powergrid and a very lazy population with little incentive to travel outside of the walls of their own home to "protest injustice." Why show up to a protest or take up arms when you can just use a hashtag to express your frustration? No, as long as the masses are pacified by television and the internet, most will be content with their lot. I don't know how many people were protesting at Charlottesville, but I can't imagine it was more than 10,000 in total, on both sides. The other 99.99999999999% of the populace simply don't care enough to take up arms.

Tl;dr: Things have to get a lot worse before a second Civil War is possible and that's not happening anytime in the next decade. I would love to bash lefties as much as the next guy, but this is yet another Sup Forums wet dream.

We're less than 3 years from the 20's again.

>MFW the south has a majority of firearms and know how to use them properly. along with a lot of the military and police backing conservatives
if the left or anyone think they can start a civil war and win they are very poorly mistaken, and i think just about everyone knows this. we can't decide which animal to hunt and the left can't decide which bathrooms to use.

uma

Elimination of the S.W.I.F.T banking transaction system would be needed.
Everything hinges on the movement of money. electronic money is vulnerable as fuck.

You're a naive idiot. You can't pick sides if shit tops off, you think hitler cared about based jews? Stick to your group

Please tell me that's staged

>America is among the most well-fed countries in the world. We have a major surplus of food and as long as that continues, most will be content. Even in a down-economy (which we are also not in the middle of), people will still be content.
THIS. Insurgents would need to try to cut off supply lines. Make roads and highways impassable using roadside bombs and ambush teams. Alternatively, introduce chemical or biological agents into city watersupplies.

>America has an extensive powergrid
This is absolutely not without its weak points. Take out a major metropolitan powergrid, and if it's not back on within 24 hours tops, you're going to see some major unrest. Looting, rapes, murders, etc.

blacks are usually POGs

it only takes 3 days for people to devolve into murdering hoards. read a book called Patriots, pretty good.

I think it will come But not now... It will at least take 10 years. In this time the left will even get shittier and then we will talk again.

>been military
>am a cop

Look guys, you aint WRONG, you just aint getting the full picture. Conflicts are ALWAYS more complex and dynamic that two totally opposite sides.

Heres how it would go:
1/3rd would be openly opposed to the govt and join whatever rebellion occurred.

Another 1/3rd would have no real strong opinions, theyd either desert, become sabotuers, play both sides for profit, etc etc. Most will lick the boot and keep on maintaining thier own status quo. This group will get the living shit purged out of it by the following group.

The remaining 3rd would wholeheartedly support the powers that be. They will openly fight the 1st group, and go to great lengths to purge the 2nd group. They will actually encourage the folks on the fence to jump ship because as soon as they find a few traitors and deserters they will become utterly convinced they are everywhere and begin purging anyone who doesnt seem excited enough about the organizations missions.

Meanwhile the populace will be doing the same thing. So there will be atleast 6 groups in any civil war, and the ways they interract can be very unpredictable.

Wars are NEVER 2 sided. History books just like presenting shit like that cuz its easy to make sides into good and bad.

No one acts that retarded, of course it is.

Some pathetic leftist probably did it thinking they could go viral.

>People you fought for lynch your statue
>Le face of "Well...Shit"

A civil war would in no way resemble the previous civil war, or any other current civil war conflicts.

Most Americans would abstain from fighting. Leaving probably about 10% or so on each side (like in revolutionary war).

Basically it would be slightly more organized and somewhat larger scale violence than we see with street gangs. But aside from select locales likely would not interrupt daily life too much. People won't be willing to walk away from their paycheck to go fight a civil war.

Unless order breaks down and leftists end up capturing entire cities or whatever, defeating local authorities, I don't think anything will happen.

...

this

First post worst post. Read your other replies

hispanics are counted in White.

i'm beginning to think most of the people here with this idea are 12yr olds. you must not know very many ex-military/national guard/actual LEOs. the majority that i've ever had discussions with (being from the south) say they would be at home protecting their property and families, they are people too and could care less about the upper elite if things got that bad. don't assume all soldiers of any kind would be blindly loyal to some rich people because of "patriotism".

Lol so the Mexicans are going to rise up?

oh my sweet summer child

Eh, don't really care. Chances are all I'll do during a civil war is hoard salt/spices, build a moonshine still, get shitty and shoot anyone who gets too close.

>So there will be atleast 6 groups in any civil war, and the ways they interract can be very unpredictable.

>Wars are NEVER 2 sided.

This dude is right. Never mind the amount of independent groups domestically, imagine what will happen if and when foreign actors insert themselves into the happenings.

>Most Americans would abstain from fighting
This too. Most people will be terrified and have no idea what to do. Fencesitters will start being either converted or killed by all sides.

Anyone who hasn't read this yet definitely should.

>the majority that i've ever had discussions with (being from the south) say they would be at home protecting their property and families
We're talking about the early days of a civil war. It's incredibly unlikely that shit would hit the fan overnight on a nationwide scale. It will start with a long series of skirmishes and guerrilla attacks over a series of months or even years.

>cops + lefties on the same side

ooookay

Wow sounds like you got it all figured out. I'm taken back by how thoroughly prepared you are to kick some white boy butt. Wish you the best

>not the 20s

Indeed. Weimerica won't last for long.

GUARANTEED
S O O N