Stop calling it white genocide. The second a normie hears that, they think "lol nobody is being rounded up into camps, idiot" and reject the concept.
Call it White Fade-Out.
1) It stops people from denying it's happening. White people are fading from the world and that's easily provable 2) It stops them from getting bogged down on the word genocide. Yes, it's intentional from (((them))) and yes it does technically fit the UN definition, but the average person already dismissed you forever by the time you get to that point. 3) The only responses to it are to argue that it's a good thing, which will activate the almonds of whites listening, or to argue about the causes, which you can then use to get a discussion going on hormones in the water, (((media))), welfare, etc. Get them to agree it exists first, then let them walk down the path of logic about what's ultimately causing it. 4)"Fade Out" isn't tied to anything political right now. It doesn't carry any baggage. But it does sound vaguely worrisome
Remember how the left called it "pro choice" instead of "pro abortion." and "diversity" for "remove whitey." Word choices matter. Use their tactics and win.
I don't even use the word "white" at all, for the same reasons you stated. I simply say "demographic replacement."
For example, I'll say something like: "Native Britons are undergoing demographic replacement in their ancestral homeland. Only 40% of Londoners, for example, are native Britons. If ancestral Japanese only made up 40% of Tokyo or if ancestral Chinese only made up 40% of Beijing, human rights organizations would spring into action."
Joseph Thomas
White people have been the center of the world for thousands of years. Take a break m8
Asher Gutierrez
Remove the platelip and clean your room.
Josiah Hill
Replacement sounds intentional. Like it's a conspiracy theory. Lots of people will subconsciously reject it just from that.
Owen Wilson
FUCK OFF RICHARD YOU HIPSTER CUNT! STOP GIVING PEOPLE "ADVICE" > Stop calling it white genocide. > Call it White Fade-Out. So you want to trivialize genocidal rape campaigns? Actually forming a case for why people are pointing out the truth of the matter is more important.
Luke Kelly
How do you respond to someone who comments America is a diverse melting pot and that it doesn't belong centrally to whites?
Brandon Hall
White ethnocide
Leo Nelson
I think the case for a white America is less strong, which is why I always try to steer the conversation to Europe, where diverse tribes of white people have indisputable claims to the various regions of the continent.
But, if they press the matter, I point out that statistics on American demographics soundly disprove that America has always been a diverse melting pot of non-white people, considering that until the late 1960s America was about 90% people of European ancestry. So, yes, it's a melting pot - but primarily one consisting of different ethnicities from Europe, not the entire world.
Henry Sanders
Really? White people are fading out? More like equality has freaked out some low self-esteem folks. There is no getting out of this, sorry! Because there is people that actually care for bigotry. I was over the moon with the daily stormer, user always pulls through when the BS level has gone to high. So push white nationalism, it won't work.
Jeremiah Rodriguez
When I discuss Europe, I find a lot more success when calling them "indigenous Europeans" instead of white. Leftists become more sympathetic.
James Walker
Good idea OP.
Lincoln Edwards
>"indigenous Europeans"
I like that. I think I'll start using that instead of "ancestral Europeans." (Although it might make the jump to America more difficult, if the discussion ends up going that way.)
Adrian Cooper
>Stop calling it white genocide.
afraid it'll take with the normies? a slow genocide is genocide nonetheless.
Kevin Ward
softening the rhetoric makes it weaker.
Gabriel Kelly
The issue is that White Genocide does not take with normies. The absolute most important thing is to make the average person acknowledge that it's happening. You need them to agree to this one basic fact before you can get anywhere, and if the average person hears "genocide" without seeing a scene that looks like Schindler's List, they'll think it's bullshit. That's just how people are.
But people are problem solvers. They'll think about why it's happening. What could be causing it. That's when you gently nudge them to an inception style realization.
Jackson Phillips
It is intentional you fucking idiot. Look up the Kalergi plan.
Tyler Mitchell
>The issue is that White Genocide does not take with normies.
it will if it's repeated enough. "fade out" is too passive a phrase to describe something that is clearly very active and deliberate.
Ryan Robinson
Yeah no shit. But what does the average person think when you come at them with fistfulls of red pills like that?
White Fade Out is an issue you can discuss at a dinner party. White Genocide sounds like Alex Jones shapeshifting child molesters.
Jordan Nguyen
It's about knowing your audience. A lawyer arguing before the Supreme Court is going to use different words than he would arguing before a jury of laypeople, even if the core of the legal argument is the same.
Jaxson Evans
>James "Memo Your Hormones" Damore >James "Causing Kike Nose Envy" Damore >James "Snout Superior" Damore >James "Ontologically Male Honker" Damore >James "Sniff Out the Trannies" Damore >James "Oversnout" Damore >James "Sniff a Sneak" Damore >James "No Genome, No Pheromone" Damore >James "Check Your Genome" Damore >James "Program a Binary Gender Spectrum" Damore >James "Trapping Traps" Damore >James "Snout Supremacy" Damore >James "Sexy Snout" Damore >James "I Like My Genders Like My Sniffers" Damore >James "Binary Nostrilled Bad Boy" Damore
Josiah Howard
a fade out is something that happens naturally and for which nobody need take responsibility. fuck that.
Michael Hill
Leftists will never use the term. We need them to adapt our language to control the narrative. Imagine how week a leftist looks defending White Fade Out vs mocking the "tinfoil basement conspiracy" of White Genocide. Picture it in your head for a minute and tell me I'm wrong.
Nicholas Nelson
so i'll call it what i want
Luis Watson
>Leftists will never use the term.
leftists are gone. cut your losses.
Austin Ward
Good goy
Jason Ramirez
>leftists are gone What are you talking about?
Xavier Gomez
In 1960, America was 90+% white. America has been a melting pot, of European people. What we're seeing now is different groups of people, and they aren't integrating all that well. For example, black people have been in America for nearly as long as white people have, and yet, black people still aren't integrated in the "melting pot".
Caleb Moore
i mean that trying to change the mind of some middle-aged SJW is a fools errand.
Noah Harris
>White Fade-Out
Good Night White Right You gave it a good fight ... But dat pussy so tight! Aaiight?
Jason Parker
Ethnic Cleansing.
They are ethnically cleansing white nations of whites. This must be stopped and reversed.
Oliver Carter
"genocide" sounds silly at first but it has impact.
Juan Morgan
You're not trying to change their mind. You're trying to get them to adapt your language so they're in a weaker position for a normie audience.
They do it all the time to great effect. Global Warming became Climate Change. Pro-Abortion became Pro-Choice. Gay Marriage became Marriage Equality. Illegal Aliens became Undocumented Immigrants.
It's a tactic that works.
Jose Martin
>You're trying to get them to adapt your language
and why would they be so dumb as to do that?
Landon Martin
>Global Warming became Climate Change. Pro-Abortion became Pro-Choice. Gay Marriage became Marriage Equality. Illegal Aliens became Undocumented Immigrants.
notice it's only the leftists that use those words.
Brody Kelly
>Picture it in your head for a minute and tell me I'm wrong.
You're wrong. In fact I feel they would mock the term 'fade out' even more easily. Remember, they argue based on emotion and snark, which ultimately comes to them via authority. It doesn't matter if something is factual or not, all they have to do is associate shame with it, which they can do with anything.
Adam Miller
>and why would they be so dumb as to do that? Because they always fall for bait. It's a pathological part of being a hardcore leftist. youtube.com/watch?v=xgiLm9bCxrU
Elijah Cox
mfw white illumination and dissipation
Camden Jenkins
>Because they always fall for bait.
no they don't. give me a single example where this has worked on the left.
on the other hand, you're here on Sup Forums trying to change our language. so who's trying to trick who?
Dylan Wilson
>White Fade-Out
Being afraid that your race is going to dwindle and die out is the same as admitting that you can't even compete.
The truth is that whites have been competing and winning for thousands of years.
I don't understand all this fear. White men rule the world. That is not about to change.
Jayden Lewis
White Fadeout is actually a pretty subtle stroke of genius. It is innocuous that no one can really argue against it, and it gets the topic on the table in a normie friendly way. Imagine you're at a dinner party (or that you just have friends) and someone mentions something about diversity and multikulti etc., and you sagely note that white fadeout is an ongoing phenomenon in the country, and you don't appreciate it. Now the leftist has a few options available to them > Mock you/try to socially shame you Not very likely, since you framed your opinions in a very mild way, and normies don't like it when a seeming moderate has their feet held to the fire, because most of them are moderates or simply don't have opinions > Try to deny white fadeout exists An impossible position, as the statistics and facts are explicit > Try to argue that white fadeout is a good thing This is what you will most likely run up against, and this is where you can slam them to the ground. Argue about the rights of indigenous European peoples to have self-sovereignty in their own lands, and you can even go so far as to say that indigenous Europeans are being replaced, and you can ask if people would tolerate this happening to Tibetan people or w/e.
Transitioning this to Canada, USA, Australia etc. is more difficult, but you could still argue that while immigrants are welcome, fundamentally changing the demographic makeup of the country aka white fadeout is wrong.
Gavin Diaz
> competing and winning for thousands of years.
this means recognizing potential threats before they get out of hand. things are way out of hand.
Levi Walker
Look up the immigration act of 1965 that was signed by lbj. Also the immigration act of 1790. USA was white right up until after 1965.
Noah Phillips
it doesn't take advantage of the "mental averaging" that people do.
if you have lots of people saying "white genocide", people will take note. they may not call it white genocide in turn, but they might be concerned enough to look into it.
"white fadeout" sounds weak, and causes less concern. it can be ignored.
Charles Wood
frankly, "white fadeout" almost sounds petty.
Camden Torres
Other way around. Genocide is too loaded of a term. It makes people switch off and disregard. They'll reject that it's even real.
Fade Out sounds like an ongoing problem. People's brains naturally will search for a reason why it's happening.
Chase Jenkins
> Leftists become more sympathetic. Do they? Show me an example of a conversation where this happened? Or at least explain how that conversation went.
You know what your talking about without LARPing as some kind of "master mind"
Does she not look like a member of "Antifa" to you?
Anthony Smith
>It makes people switch off and disregard.
if someone is set in their ways, then yes. but for younger people it will work.
Aiden Thompson
Racial Vandalism
Zachary Allen
Says he, his jewish flag hidden.
Kevin Peterson
actually, there's many more "white" people now than a hundred years ago, and the population will continue to increase
its just there will be more mixed people also
this extinction meme is a meme
Isaac Jackson
>this extinction meme is a meme
it's a meme, but memes are good
Kayden Carter
Frame it as a civil rights issue
Elijah Richardson
>You know what your talking about without LARPing as some kind of "master mind"
nice subtle jab. fuck off.
Logan Peterson
Don't use poltical correctness on us you fuck.
Andrew Jackson
"Displacement" then.
Asher Russell
eternal dissipation of the white alleles synthesis
Jacob Sanders
They have similar makeup but otherwise completely different faces.
Leo Ross
Normies don't understand the nuisanced useage of the term 'genocide'. While your average Sup Forumsack understands it in the same way the UN defines it, normies think genocide can ONLY be violent.
Ryder Bailey
i think in that one picture of zeena her face is completely indistinguishable from taylor swift in general
i have NO IDEA where "completely different faces." came from there
you must not have looked at taylor swift too many times
>White Fade-Out White displacement or white cleansing sounds better, but I like what you're saying OP.
I'd also say it depends on who you're talking to. With an ETERNAL NORMIE, you'd use 'white displacement', but with a center-right to right wing normie, white genocide should do fine.
John Walker
no!
When we have: Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for EVERYBODY, what do we have over periods of time? We have fewer and fewer White children When we mix more and more non-Whites with fewer and fewer Whites in the same living space? In time, White extinction. Its genocide because this doesn’t happen by chance. It is being forced upon Whites just like a rapist does not take no for an answer How is this not White geNOcide? Anti-racist is a code for anti-white