Really activates the almonds doesn't it?

Really activates the almonds doesn't it?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Popper
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>We wont tolerate the intolerant
Ok, and we won't tolerate your lack of tolerance.
CIVIL WAR WHEN

If they actually wanted to follow through, Kebabs need more scrutiny.

the entire idea of tolerance is bullshit.

if a person "tolerates" something it means they hate it but they "allow" it.

niggers.
you don't "allow" anybody to do anything.
they do it regardless of you.

"tolerance" is a fucking joke.

what they should be teaching the chilluns is "mind your own fucking business".

Nope.

"YOU WILL TOLERATE WHAT I TELL YOU TO TOLERATE"
Is not tolerance, my homosexual friend...

The left is suddenly in favor of destroying Islam I take it?

>We wont tolerate Nazis
>But we will tolerate Muslim extremists who are almost the same but in oppressed.

To define who is worthy of tolerance is another form of power.

didn't the Nazi's in Germany partially rise to power due to being attacked in the streets?

I won't tolere this.

I googled this guy carl popper and skimmed through his biography.

>born into wealth
>never had a job just wrote his entire life
>people still think he had enough life experience to form valid opinions on anything and waste time reading his books

just lol

What Tomek said.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Popper
>All of (((Karl Popper)))'s grandparents were Jewish

Another thread of this? I guess the other one didn't have the result you were looking for.

>Popper became attracted by (((Marxism))) and subsequently joined the Association of Socialist School Students

its not even coincidences anymore

It can be summed up simply as "kill all nazis".

So basically there is a choice between intolerance, weakness and hypocrisy and the comic is advocating hypocrisy. I know what I choose.

>source : The Open Society and Its Enemies.

Gee I wonder who could be behind this book

Someone replace the Nazis with Muslims please

On a sidenote: doesn't apply to sandniggers.

...

This

Hitler was a socialist.

...

You know the funniest thing about Karl Popper's argument?

Ive used this argument with educated and academic people and they have all disagreed when it came to Islam.

Luckily for us Austrians we dont have retarded 60 IQ "white power" rednecks, but the irony still remains.

>tolerance

Not to change the subject too much here... Y'all got me thinking a little bit.

So they want to tear down pic related for owning slaves. Not being tolerant of remembering historical figures they deem as intolerant. So why are they not tearing down every mosque? The prophet Mohammed owned numerous slaves.

What gives?

KEK HARD

I agree with that, but for the wrong reasons.
Muslims don't belong in a first world country.

See guys the christians were right to burn heretics and homos at the stake!!!!

Good lesson

To seek a peaceful positive way to deny inalienable rights to life, liberty and happiness to others who don't share your skin color is an oxymoron. That's why we don't have to tolerate your shit.

>tl;dr
Go fuck yourselves, statists.

>The link between Popper’s theory of knowledge and his social philosophy is his fallibilism—just as we make theoretical progress in science by deliberately subjecting our theories to critical scrutiny, and abandoning those which have been falsified, so too, Popper holds, the critical spirit can and should be sustained at the social level. More specifically, the open society can be brought about only if it is possible for the individual citizen to evaluate critically the consequences of the implementation of government policies, which can then be abandoned or modified in the light of such critical scrutiny—in such a society, the rights of the individual to criticise administrative policies will be formally safeguarded and upheld, undesirable policies will be eliminated in a manner analogous to the elimination of falsified scientific theories, and differences between people on social policy will be resolved by critical discussion and argument rather than by force.

Gee whiz, does not allowing criticism and truth in government policy and academia sound like anyone we know?

>WE ARE GOING TO USE POPPER IN OUR ARGUMENTS, BUT MAKE A MOCKERY OF HIS THOUGHT IN REALITY. BAKE THE CAKE BREXITEER FASCISTS

Nice

Fucking kek this is great m8

>they unironically believe this crap

then why hasn't America become Nazis yet?

Yeah, unlike what this comic is saying, no one really gave them a chance from what I remember. They were pretty unpopular for most of their existence and only gained gradual popularity when things got bad and people took real notice that the NSDAP had been the only ones saying things were as bad as people finally realized. They almost faded into obscurity many times because people were not ready to receive their way of doing things, but commies, degeneracy, and the economy got way out of hand.

HAIL HYDRA

10/10, this is perfect.

Does this mean that we also shouldn't tolerate islam and communism?

Also, Anti-Fa? They just can't tolerate fascists!

let's talk about islam...

You fucking retard.

All this guy is saying is that whichever ideology wants to prevail must kill all dissenters.

Aka Naziism. Ergo you guys are ignorant Nazis not some morally superior vanguard.

Pol is satire dipshit. We pretend to be what you really are.

George Soros claims as his mentor the philosopher Karl Popper, author of The Open Society and its Enemies. “He influenced me with his writings and his thinking,” Soros says in his book Soros on Soros.
Popper is portrayed by Soros and others as opposed to threats to democracy and even opposed to Marxism and communism.
But Popper’s anti-communist record is weak – so weak that it practically disappears under the weight of his own work. Popper had been a communist in his youth.

George Soros, who first encountered The Open Society as Popper’s student at the London School of Economics, founded the Open Society Institute to propagate Popper’s ideas, particularly in Eastern Europe.

But since Soros has come to be associated with financing what is called the “progressive” movement, which includes Marxist and even pro-communist groups, could it be the case that conservative praise for Popper has been misplaced?


Although some have tried to distance Popper from socialism, his embrace by Soros and his funding of the modern-day progressive movement seem to demonstrate that those committed to make the “open society” a reality see no problem with combining the two.

An article about Gara LaMarche, who was Vice President and Director of U.S. Programs for the Open Society Institute (OSI), explains how this self-styled progressive appreciates and understands the “open society” concept:

With the money and vision of philanthropist George Soros, the Open Society Institute implements a wide range of initiatives aimed at promoting open societies by shaping government policy and supporting education, media, public health, and human and women’s rights, as well as social, legal and economic reform. It’s a tall order, but philosophically LaMarche is completely in accord with Soros’ philosophy.

I think that is an ad hominem my white friend.

Hah! Well played.

The biggest mistake in his line of thinking comes from the definition of "intolerance" and "tolerance". Both are highly subjective based on the perceived world. To be fair, or at least as fair as possible, we can not rely of subjectivity. That is why ALL freedom of speech should be tolerated, save direct calls to violence.

It's cut and dry, and applies to everyone equally. There is nothing subjective about it.

Well meme'd good sir! Do one for antifa and or commies please

Mohammed was also a pedophile.

Also, every historical figure who existed before the abolishment of slavery owned slaves. Tear down all of the Washington statues. Deny the founding fathers for being the embodiment of what you hate.

But, despite the absurdity of it all, I understand where those people are coming from, even though they probably don't appreciate it like I do. In post communist countries, the statues of Stalin and Lenin were torn down, despite them being historical figures and the statues themselves being part of history itself in order to symbolically begin the start of a new era, free of communism. What these kids do to the statues, even though they look retarded and entitled doing it, can be paralleled with what these post communist states did.

They pick and choose what they want to tolerate, it has nothing to do with any reasoned out opinion.

If we can look at one bad thing someone did and justify tearing down everything honoring them, then why should we honor MLK? He was a plagiarist, a communist, be cheated on his wife while a man of the cloth, and he would beat and fuck white prostitutes because they were white also while married and a man of the cloth. At least slavery was acceptable back when these other men had slaves, MLK's actions were never acceptable in his lifetime. I don't want a statue honoring a man who used his position as a servent to God to manipulate vulnerable sex workers into positions of degradation and violence, and who could not stay faithful to his own wife AND one who stole other people's works to reach his esteemed positions in life.

All I got out of this is that we should ban and suppress sand niggers as much as possible. not a few whites that cant even protest with a permit

noice

>WE DON'T HAVE TO TOLERATE YOUR INTOLERANCE
>WHY AREN'T YOU TOLERATING OUR INTOLERANCE? POLICE HELP!

Can't these retards fucking spell?

My point stands. The ONLY thing we need to be intolerance on is violence, those who call for it, and those who commit it.

Checkm8 fag.

This pissed me off as well.

LAST VIRTUES
A
S
T

V
I
R
T
U
E
S

Tolerance is a fairly nebulous concept to begin with but to anyone sane it certainly doesn't mean "accept all opposing viewpoints without question and enact legislation accordingly".

This. Except they are changing the definition of tolerance now. Now tolerance means you have to accept and support everything except ebil Nazis and opinions critical of tolerance. It's okay to commit violence against these groups even if those groups are not being violent. It's all bullshit to make people more passive and accepting of getting fucked over by those devious enough to take advantage of all this.

Yeah. We won't listen to philosophers or intellectuals. Here we have a vast array of life experiences due to browsing this echochamber non stop.

t. deludel Sup Forumstard.

What is tolerance exactly? Tolerate free speech, right to gather and to hold meetings, rallies, demonstrations?

To hold leftist point of views, otherwise, you are a nazi and shouldn't be tolerated.

And who gets to decide, what qualifies as intolerance? Libtards are already pushing legislation, which makes "misgendering" trannies and not using preferred pronouns a legal offense. They will encroach on individual freedoms more and more, until anything other than compliance with the progressive agenda will be illegal.

This asshole is as much an "intellectual" and "philosopher" as that black girl at Yale was oppressed, with her privileged background living in her exclusive community with her father's $3,000,000/year as an executive.

RARE
Holy shit, the first time I've seen an intelligent post from that flag.

common sense, but too bad that is also vague, so ultimately civil war

It's even more paradoxical for your brainpea but to become intolerat in the name of a probability of becoming intolerant is you being exactly at the same spot you're shitting on .