They can't convert us, we convert them

It's the simple truth.

I do believe very, very FEW people actually start from the right wing, and stay right wing.

The default status is left wing. Education is left wing. Television is left wing. Entertainment is left wing. News is left wing.

The people you see on the right wing, are people who have actually thought for themselves. We grew up in the left wing. Yet we made the choice to go right wing. Why is that? We exposed ourselves to more than blindly obeying authority. We went out of our way to see things as how they are.

You don't go from this right wing view back to left. You just can't. Doing that would be like that blue pill fag from the matrix. It's a one way street for a transformation.

That's why they are trying to plug the leak in this dam. They censor us. They're falling apart. They try to stomp out our free speech with their monopolies. Time is on our side. That's why you see them desperately trying to incite a civil war. They're losing. It's that simple.

Keep red pilling. The extremism of the left and the right is the shilling. Shills want you to think it's all just nazi vs. communist. Shills want to divide us. The elite want to keep their power. The elite don't want you to compete with their monopolies on optics, information, data, internet access etc. They desperately want us in a civil war. Time is on our side. Do not yield.

Other urls found in this thread:

globalnews.ca/news/1416321/city-of-vancouver-formally-declares-city-is-on-unceded-aborginal-territory/
econlog.econlib.org/archives/2012/09/do_indians_righ.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

The Jew stopped smelling fear

Yup, you can't undo the redpill and that's why they are scared. Once you've taken the redpill you start to turkey think for your self and basically becom inoculated to leftism.

I meant "truly think"

I am pretty sure we are witnessing a a political shift.

After WW2 everyone just wanted to fuck, work, and be left alone. Slowly but surely liberals changed and became less about wanting to be left alone and move about demand people pay their share. Liberal is hitting its bottom now having become a hostile, demanding monster.

The right is still in its infancy and trying to find it feet and fit into the new world. That resulting in most of the bullshit we see.

Eventually The right will start to stand for people just living their live and not being hassled so much, because that the opposite of what the liberals are doing and pissing everyone off with,

Being right-wing takes an alternative self taught education. You have to read stastics and a lot of material and world history. Its easy to be liberal and left thinking

I'm still pretty lefty on lots of things tho. I know about the JQ, race realism, sex realism, Jews + communism, the Holohoax, the consequences of feminism, libertarian economics, the importance of hierarchy, the usual Sup Forums topics, but I still support some socialist policies like single payer healthcare, health and safety laws protecting workers, moderate environmentalism, things like that.

And I have yet to see a compelling defense of colonialism/imperialism from any Sup Forumsack. As far as I can tell, Canada, the USA and Australia rightfully belong to the native peoples who lived here. Whether or not we can find who the rightful owners are for any given piece of land is doubtful, but it is still theirs, and we (as the civilized race of the world) ought to do something to compensate them.
> inb4 nigger crime means we don't owe reparations
> inb4 might makes right
> inb4 muh Solutreans

Rightfully owned according to who?

You only own something for as long as you're able to defend it.

Vae victus.

Do you always throw out your principles when it suits you? As a white British male, I would have expected better from us. We are the ones who set an example for the rest of the world to follow, WE are the ones who voluntarily hold ourselves to a higher standard than the animals, because WE are the standard bearers of Western civilization, and colonialism was wrong by our own ideals. We are not the violent savages who kill for the sake of killing, we are philosopher kings in this dark world, and colonialism is beneath our dignity.

I think you are correct OP.

I was raised right-wing, I had a dad who from a very young age taught me about niggers

>Yup, you can't undo the redpill and that's why they are scared. Once you've taken the redpill you start to turkey think for your self and basically becom inoculated to leftism.
That's the idea. The problem is, sometimes the redpill is adulterated with shit, and people react to the shit by vomitting up the pill. We should therefore correct the shit wherever we find it so people don't swallow it with the pill. I won't get into what the shit is, but there's a lot of it in circulation.

> inb4 might makes right
But it IS might makes right, you stupid cunt. There is no land in this world that hasn't been taken from someone else. Tribes conquer other tribes, that's it. No land belongs to anyone, only to those who are strong enough to keep it. There is nothing about the US, Canada or Australia that makes it "native" land. Hell, in the US most of them GAVE the land away for guns and alcohol.
Show me where it says it's there land. Until then, fuck off from this place and die of anal cancer.

you are not a white 'person', you are a white 'reject'

Bump

>And I have yet to see a compelling defense of colonialism/imperialism from any Sup Forumsack


Follows it up by saying he doesn't want to hear the defense which is clearly has heard here as he doesn't have a reasonable counter response.

Saying inb4 is not an argument u faggot shill

I agree with you OP. We live in strange times indeed. I'm just happy I get to watch all of this unfold, and be alive in the time we are in.

I was a young conservative. Voted Bush twice. Now I'm an ultra progressive socialist motherfucker who wants everyone to use the same goddamned bathroom.
So you're wrong user.

Nice, I suppose you support Europe getting BLACKED as well? Because hey, if they can't keep it, fuck 'em, right? We should celebrate the rape and pillage of Sweden, because they are just being outcompeted, right?

Might makes right is simply not compelling, and is a form of the naturalistic fallacy. If land was purchased from natives, then fine, the ones who purchased the land are the legitimate heirs to it. The fact that Sup Forumsacks try to argue that Solutreans were in America before natives just goes to show that there is an inherent recognition of ownership by those who first homesteaded the land. If there were any living descendents of the original Solutreans who could demonstrate that it was their land, they would be the rightful heirs. That isn't possible however, and we KNOW that there are natives who can trace their land claims back to before the settlers claimed it. This exact thing happened in 2014 when the Vancouver government recognized that the city of Vancouver is situated on unceded Musqueam, Squamish and Tsleil-Waututh First Nations.
globalnews.ca/news/1416321/city-of-vancouver-formally-declares-city-is-on-unceded-aborginal-territory/

I needed this, user - thank you

It could be a tumor. Just saying.

OP a big difference between the left and the right is how people view themselves. If they are lost and weak they are very inclined to believe in leftist views where the state is needed to protect and support the individual.

Somebody on the right is much more likely to be self-reliant and capable of handling adversity. To them the state is more an obstacle and hindrance.

So left vs. right is more than a pill or single defective concept, it leads into self-esteem and the very Elite driven indoctrination that you mention. imho, it is a much tougher nut to crack than you imply.

No, i am arguing that we use might to take it back, rightfully. God u are a useless shill . U faggots don't mind reminding us that we lost the civil war or ww2 as if that justifies ending white supremacy, but somehow white winning wars of conquest is immoral.

We have an unquestionable right to whatever we wish so long as we have the strength to take it and the will to defend it

Thank you for your opinion, /r/the_donald

So you acknowledge that you are throwing out any and all claims to moral high ground by your willingness to use violence? Whites winning wars of conquest is immoral because us whites are the moral betters of the other races, and shame on you for being willing to lower yourself to the dignity of a fucking nigger tribe in order to get your way. I have no doubt that you would be successful if you decided to use violence, but don't expect me to approve when you do. A tyrant is always overthrown, but those who ascend the dominance hierarchy by virtue of their competence, and maintain their authority by being a leader worth following will flourish forever.

>You don't go from this right wing view back to left. You just can't.

I did once I saw what a bunch of autistic faggot losers the right-wing attracts and I realized most of those racial IQ statistics are bullshit. Seriously, those J. Philippe Rushton and Richard Lynn "studies" you all cite are fraudulent garbage.

>Whites winning wars of conquest is immoral because us whites are the moral betters of the other races, and shame on you for being willing to lower yourself to the dignity of a fucking nigger tribe in order to get your way


When kill ur enemy, they win.
You're too moral for this world, goy
Is racial survival worth fighting for?
I say nigger so i am one of u


Fuck off shill

Wow, it's like you can't read what OP wrote.

>> Shills want you to think it's all just nazi vs. communist. Shills want to divide us.

>Seriously, those J. Philippe Rushton and Richard Lynn "studies" you all cite are fraudulent garbage.


Any facts to back up that claim, shlomz?

A lot of it was done to escape the corruption in the east. Say they remained isolated another hundred years and people came in with even better tech. I imagine it would have been perhaps bloodier.

We gave them reservations... not much.

A culture was caught in the crossfire of a battle against corruption. I guess the lesson is to never let corruption take root so deeply. If the people were good, and not desperate I doubt the indians would have been slaughtered like so.

Are you saying to pack everything up and leave? at this point I don't think it's plausible. It's just a shitty part of reality. Like evil existing at all in a sense.

Do you have no honor? Would you betray your own principles to save your skin? I thought ideals were worth fighting for, even dying for? Niggers are objectively terrible; they rape, murder, steal, smash property, and are lazy, good-for-nothing leeches, but they are still treated with equa, and THAT is what makes the white race great. That we can look at the pathetic pieces of shit that we share this planet with, hold our noses, and try to make things better.

...

Nigger what are you rambling about

bump

The first paragraph literally describes Classical National Socialism. Congratulations, you're a Nazi.
Health care for a strong people, taking care of expectant mothers particularly to ensure strong healthy Canadian children.
Protecting workers
Environmentalism,


As for the last paragraph. Simply this. We came, we saw, we conquered.
If the muslims came with guns and took our land, we would be the losers and we would have to accept that. But that is not the case. Our "leaders" are spitting in the face of what OUR ancestors built.

Remember son. There was not a single building in Canada that stayed standing before OUR ancestors came here. The natives had that whole time to create a civilization and they failed.
Rome erupted over 2500 years ago and still stands today.

Canada didn't exist before we came here. Those tribes were killing each other long before we came and killed most of them. We claimed this land by right and deed. And we were here first anyway.
Smaller settlements of Germanic and Nordic tribes, there are remains of Bronze Age tools that have been found here that date far further back that the coming of the savage. They likely killed our men when they were of greater number, but due to climate conditions and differences, they dwindled soon after that, a few hundred years later, the Sons of Normandy came and cleaned house and what you see before you is the product of that.

Never think that the "noble native" owns this land. They lost.

Nearly every colony was better off under British rule. The moment they were driven out they reverted to tribal warfare, caste systems, and unchecked violence. There are some exceptions, but generally they're east asian, or predominantly white areas.

Colonoalism isn't a universal good or a universal evil. It depends on the case. If the stewards of a nation abuse power and commit atrocities, then invasion may be justified. Otherwise, none of our business.

After reading your replies to other folks.

Give your girlfriend to me. I'll treat her real good, since there's no point in defending anything you've won, right?
You won her heart, but you have no right to defend that.
I'll take her body.

>thinking you can unlearn facts

>The default status is left wing. Education is left wing. Television is left wing. Entertainment is left wing. News is left wing.


Wrong.

I stopped reading here.

...

I meant to quote the dipshit leaf, my so-called Brother...

You are a disgrace to our Kin that you would so willfully spit in the face of your ancestors who took this land by right through strength and deed.
Did your forebears die for nothing? They secured this land and created civilization here and handed it off to their children.
They created structure to protect us from the elements and from danger and for almost 400 years we've developed that land.
And now you want to give it away?

I'd kill you myself if I ever found you, traitor.

I'm sorry you had to hear about it like this user

Well, at least you're consistent when you say that if Muzzies conquer Europe, we would have to accept that. I can respect a person who is consistent, but you're still LARPing about
> we wuz North American natives

Imho, this is the weakest link in the white nationalist platform. Every other talking point may be buttressed by facts, statistics, and hard reasoning, but colonialism is at odds with Catholic social teaching, and it shows.

>Being right-wing takes an alternative self taught education. You have to read stastics and a lot of material and world history. Its easy to be liberal and left thinking

Not necessarily, people who have lived in socialist/communist hellholes would know firsthand the horrors of leftism.

Yeah but they can censor us, brainwash a generation of young people, and wind up killing us in a massive zerg rush.

That's what happens with communism.

Once you take the redpill, there's absolutely no going back.

what the fuck are you talking about? I never said we were the North American Natives. I said there were tools discovered here from the Bronze Age.
I should have said "There were tools of European design found and dated to belong to the bronze age"
This means we must have traveled here long before Columbus.
But those folks were Europeans. Not "Native North Americans"

We killed people, someone else killed us, we came back and killed new people, and now we're here.

If the invaders came with guns and took our land by force, I would be okay with losing because that would mean I would have a chance to fight for my birth right.
However, like I said. Our leaders are simply giving it away.

If the Native Americans want to take back "their land" then by all means they should. They would be morally right if they win and we would be morally right if we win.

Is the infrastructure we built rightfully theirs too?

Stop being obtuse, you know exactly what I mean. By mentioning the possible existence of European descended persons in America, you're trying to assuage your guilt by implicitly stating that Europeans have a nativist claim to the land, and that we were only 'taking what was rightfully ours'
The barbaric 'might makes right' doctrine is consistent, but detestable, because it makes a mockery of human dignity. If you want to act like nigger savages, then so be it, but it is beneath the dignity of the white race to do so, and you reveal that white nationalism has no legitimacy except amongst the brutes.
The land is theirs. If you were the rightful owner of a piece of land, and came back years later to find that a gypsy had built a shack there, would you care, or would you kick them off the land and tear down/repurpose whatever structure they had built? The Libertarians even acknowledge this, and Murray Rothbard says that
> if the current title is the result of crime, and the victim or his heirs can be found, then the title properly reverts immediately to the latter, without compensation to the criminal or to the other holders of the unjust title.
Whether or not we could find the rightful heirs is a separate question, but the moral case has already been made, and white nationalists lose bigly. Americlaps can keep their land if no heirs may be found, but homesteading on the land is not enough to justify ownership.

Link. Polite sage for forgetting to include it in my previous post
econlog.econlib.org/archives/2012/09/do_indians_righ.html

I am immediately posting this to /r/cringe, thanks for your sweet cringe content!

>reposting something that will only serve to Redpill more normies
The left is retarded

What a worthless place filled with worthless, unoriginal people this reddit must be.

true

The land is not theirs, they lost it. If they feel like taking it back they can try, same goes for the spics and the niggers. This is the aryan way, despite how much you try to kushner us into thinking that are not a race of warriors. You are attempting to pass off our last 50 years of kike submission as being our natural way of doing things, whereas the roman/viking way is our true spirit.

You may want to give up on shilling you're not very good at it, maybe u could try your hand at organized crime boss, white slave trader, lawyer or war criminal. Plenty of jobs for jews to go around