Why can't we all just get along

Why can't we all just get along

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=4MKD8lhmgJY
youtube.com/watch?v=HLNhPMQnWu4
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

bcuz you touch youself

because life has become soulless and meaningless and the only way we can cope is to take it out on others

To get along requires calm rationality

When dealing with two very childish, hyperemotional faggots that are both the far left and the far right thats impossible.

My suggestion is simple.
We are not sitting on a fence or "have no core values" we dont value authoritarianism so that is our opposing platform. When they say "Pick a side" say "the side without the race-obsessesed authoritarians "

We Are the Anti-Authoritarian (AntiAuth) faction. We are strong. BELIEVE!

we can.
Why don't we?

its the dracos user.
they dont have human emotions

because humans are a warrior race, we love war and violence.

>AntiAuth
How bout 'free people'. AntiAuth sounds like a bad cocktail.

Politics have become an emotional outlet while interpersonal contact is means to an end. It's ass backwards.

bump

Finally, a rational minded person on this site

Inversion is what the devil does.

This has all become too much. When I remember what things were like 15 years ago it just makes me sad because I know that we've reached a turning point that cannot be undone. It used to be that labeling someone racist or any of the other personal attacks held no weight, and people who used them were considered stupid. Now it has become the go to tactic for literally every liberal, and will only widen to include people who are aware of any difference in any group of people. I feel like it's too late, and anything done after this is only damage control.

And Jesus sanctions kiddie diddlers.

Life has no meaning anymore. In America you will end up spending 80% of your spare time sitting on the toilet while you play on your cellphone. Interaction means you become the victim of cultural enrichment. The toilet is so much better than society.

the final red-pill.
getting along.

Yeah!!! Why can't all you goyim just move along!!! No one wants you here!!!

Because people associate morals and politics too easily. Aren't you a GOOD person is said too frequently and has no place in debate. Rise above morals, choose logic and focus on facts.

Because scarcity exists and human desires are infinite.

No, just the church.
I don't equate the two.
Hmm, interesting. Jesus + Authoritarianism = church / kiddie diddlers.
It's almost like the authoritarian mindset takes good ideas and twists them.

>muh horseshoe theory
Nope, only whites can handle freedom. Shoo cuckservative, you will not replace us.

youtube.com/watch?v=4MKD8lhmgJY

It used to be possible to discuss politics with people that disagreed with you and you disagreed with...

>the church that physically embodies mankind's closest link to a specific deity isn't to be equated with that deity
And I guess Ronald McDonald really has nothing to do with hamburgers either huh faggot

>doesn't know about Hammurabi's Code

Your politics are now a fashion accessory.
Gonna go to the store and get some alt-right. Libertarianism is so last season. Can't be seen with it in public.

I hope we can user... i hope we can

The light glinted so hard off the studs in your skinny jeans when you said that that I went blind for a second

Yeah, when you were in school and had to fear immediate consequences for misbehaving. Now back to "morals"

>church that physically embodies mankind's closest link to a specific deity
>Humans aren't capable of fucking anything up.
Separate the two, faggot. When you say the church embodies the closest link to a deity, you are giving credence to their dogma, since only they believe that... but you believe that too? You must be a total jesus freak/kiddie diddler.

What does Hammurabi's Code have to do with anything I said

"The Free People" Sounds Much better - but the meaning is so basic i fear it may be taken over by radicals of both sides in no time. How about "the freeman Militia"

Rules for entry
>Remain as close to the political center as possible - no radicalism

>We are not a reaction to the government, we are not thugs for the government - we are a reaction to it's people. If you believe that in these approaching times pragmatism is mandatory.
Act with as much force as necessary and onlyh in self-defence.
Act under the rules set by the US Constitution
Act under the guidance of the Enlightenment
Under NO CIRCUMSTANCES should criticism of government be tolerated. The point is to deal with the two factions who are about to start a civil war

>We are strongly anti-authoritarian. Freedom means the ability for all people to forge our destiny.
No Antifa, No BLM, No Alt-right, and No KKK

>Emphasis of Humanity
Humanity is universal. One's mind (IQ or Thoughts) does not make them less of a person. We are all one at the end of the day - this is our creed.

>No religion/lack of religion
We neither prescrivbe to religion or athiesm. We are merely a faction seeking peace through our own hands. Religious disputes cause infighting therefore shall not be tolerated.

I still care about you. Abuse is a form of love.

Dude's a tweaker. He doesn't know what he's talking about and he diddles kiddies.

Monty python vs alt left/alt right


youtube.com/watch?v=HLNhPMQnWu4

What in the fuck are you going on about.
Rules to be a free person? YEAH! Break the rules and you are no longer a free person.
Free People works well for several reasons. Specifically, the implications of being against 'free people'.
No rules needed.

>how does Hammurabi's Code relate to the conjunction between politics and morals
how are you old enough to post here

you took an analogy between the Catholic church and fucking Ronald McDonald seriously, you're retarded

I'm done, hopefully my samefagging illuminates on OP's question: too many people in this country are far too fucking stupid to let their inane, uneducated, vainly formed ideas on how the world works and what came before them be trafficked among the communities. 7/10, legitimately irate that such levels of stupidity would be communicated at all even if for lulz

Because Peace isn't good for business.

Turns out that if you give a bunch of monkeys instant worldwide socialization, in a decade or two they all start killing each other! I'm glad we could all be a part of this experiment, together. It was a pleasure having you all as fellow test subjects.

Let's hope the eclipse sets things right.

No. rules to act as a faction against authoritarianism

Not seeking to overthrow a govt or it's core values. Not seeking religious supremacy. Not seeking ethnic supremacy - just a stop to the violence. This means we HAVE to address the grievances, and flaws of both sides without making an embittered loser where the problem will just start again in another 50 years. We WANT to tackle anti-white sentiment in the west and in the media. We WANT to tackle media bias and a complete lack of media ethics But id this shit's gonna work and use people both conservative and classical liberal we're going to have to set some ground rules so we dont fall apart.

Also so there's no room for mistranslated and a takeover from either group. Once the Job is done, we shall revert to a watchdog.

>you took an analogy between the Catholic church and fucking Ronald McDonald seriously, you're retarded
I wrecked your argument with a single sentence. You have no rational retort, yet still feel as though i should somehow loose in this exchange. You've demonstrated that you aren't intellectually honest enough to be making comments of any weight, and have therefore relegated yourself to the shit bin of this thread.
You then go on to claim that everyone else in this country is in the shit bin.
Trolling is an art. Get gud.

Do you know the story about fog and scorpion?
You can't get along with scorpions, its just genetic property of scorpions.

What you are proposing would absolutely devolve into authoritarian cock-smacking.
>'i'm more free than THAT guy'
>'what kind of music does a free person listen to?'
>'need some free people approved music to listen to.

You sound like you are trying to build a collective identity rather than representing the will of the truly free people.

Bump

Go back to r*ddit

You can pick your friends and you can pick your nose
but you can't pick your friends nose. And boy, humanity sure loves to dig each others gold.

If only everyone would agree with all of my political and religious views, then there wouldn't be a problem....

>but you can't pick your friends nose
is that a challenge?

What are your political and religious views?

I'm a Protestant conservative.

Ideologically?
Because there is no free exchange of ideas. This stagnation drives division, rather than consensus and conclusion.

Physically?
We are animals. Its in our nature to support our own identity over others.

Fixed

Because life is full of Tracy Barlow types

jews and their melting pot meme

We do a good job as long as no one is pushing us to do otherwise.
Our problem isn't in our differences, but in our willingness to allow others to dictate our reality.

Because we need more walls to get along.

Geographic distance has always been a buffer, up until the 20th century, in which large scale movements of identity rendered group altruism nearly void.

As long as groups exist, they will have an identity and shared interest. The closer they are to one another, the more conflict will exist. That could practically be a law of nature.

Walls are inherently defensive. Why so offended?
It's almost like your thinking is backwards.

Conflict is one thing, violence is another.
There was a ton of conflict in Brooklyn in the early 1900s due to so many different identities coming together, and yes there was violence. But is the violence what we remember from those times? No, we remember the melting pot. Differences propped up and shared for everyone to partake in.
Humanities resting point is in peace. We instinctively strive for it. Those that don't have an instinct towards peace have a problem connecting with their own humanity.
Usually caused by the perception of lack vs. prosperity. It isn't until have vs. have-nots contend that we really have a divide, and imagine that, this is what drives the left to hate whites.

White and black are two different identities that could never be equal. They could never be equal because they are two different identities, otherwise nobody would know what the fuck you were talking about when you mention white people or black people.

The very language we use and the way we think about people ensures that there will always be ingroups and outgroups and the differences will always be magnified during periods of strife as people become critical of other people for reasons why the strife occurs.

do you make a distinction between equality and harmony? If harmony can be achieved through inequality, would you prefer that?
You are everyone you hate. Consider that.

There's an old saying. "Strong fences make good neighbors"

Think about that for a little

If you went to prison..went to the cafeteria...you saw one section all whites, one section all black, one section hispanic, one section asians..etc..who would you sit with? Someone you look like and can agree with..so it's not racist..human nature

I thought it was "an armed citizenry is a polite citizenry".

That is indeed also a quote. They're separate

You've never been to prison. Good on you.
That shit only represents about 20% of the general pop.
The guys with their heads down do much better than the rest. "Just trying to do my time" gets you out of 90% of the problems. It isn't until you start acting like some kinda tryhard edgelord that you get fucked up.

agitprop

I get yer point as well, but I'm not entirely sure where you are addressing it. I don't want to jump the gun (if i haven't already) and make assumptions.

>We need walls to get along
>Walls are inherently defensive

Pointing out that we would get along better with others, particularly other nations to our south, if we have a healthy and understood border

How we get along within the United States? Who knows. We have Commies and National Socialists brawling and a dishonest press that foments bitterness and fanaticism on both sides. Maybe a pro liberty movement will have to rise up to put them in their place.

You can be concerned about demographic change without being a national socialist

Equality and harmony are two different terms with different meanings so of course there is a distinction. You only get equality between members of the same group with the same identity but harmony can be achieved between members of different groups, depending.

Inequality will always exist between different groups and different identities. It doesn't matter what is written on a piece of paper or how many police officers are sent to raid homes for posting on twitter. It will exist and there will be no equality except between members of the same group with the same identity. Harmony of a sort can of course be achieved through inequality but that depends on the nature of the groups involved and definitely will not last forever. Ideally groups would work out their differences and achieve harmony in a mutually beneficial way but the history of the world would suggest otherwise.

It's true I'm everyone I hate but everyone I hate is also me. We're all stuck on the S.S Humanity boat with all these strangers and we've set sail for the fucked up globalism sunset where were all smashed together and expected to work out our impossible differences. At least interesting times are ahead.

So we agree.
The thing about a pro-liberty 'movement' is that nowadays, 'movements' tend to lean more towards fashion statements. That's what i was referring to in an earlier post.
Wondering if a lack of movement wouldn't be the best option. When you have two factions screaming for you to pick a side, the only way to win is not to play.

We actually do, when we're all living among our countrymen with shared culture, conversant in each others ways of living
The problem is fuckheads wanting different peoples living together for no reason

There are two things that drive conflict. Demographic change and resources. Given enough conflict (major demographic shift and limited resources) violence is inevitable.

The 'melting pot' isn't inherently good. In the time it has existed it has caused unnecessary violence, the mongrelization and destruction of cultures, and the destruction of genetic identity.

And the melting pot isn't even a good comparison for what we have today. We have massive demographic shifts occurring, that even if we started today we couldn't reverse for generations. We also have less resources, due to an exploding world population, which has only increased wealth disparity.

Peace goes against our nature.

I agree that "it" would be hands off for now. The snake only strikes when it's tread upon

>no step on snek

>At least interesting times are ahead.
this is true.
Don't lose yourself to the whims of others.
Better yet, take the next two days to find the root of all of your motivations. Pluck out the ones that were planted by others and save what is yours. I'm sure you'll find the remainder to be entirely unexpected, and entirely new.

Too many people, not enough resources.

I HATE niggers, women, spics, wops, gooks, kikes, chinks, ragheads, micks, wogs, eskimo, goyim, guidos, gweilo and gaijin

>Peace goes against our nature.
I disagree, where does that hostility come from?
If peace goes against our nature, why are there only 300 or so gun murders a day in America? Shouldn't it be closer to millions if all of us are so inclined towards violence?
People want to be left alone to live their lives how they see fit. That is an inclination towards peace. When the perception arises that they aren't able to do so, they may get violent.
Eliminate the perception, eliminate the violence.

Because Rodney Kang is dead, OP.

No.

Go back to your safe space.

Sup Forums is doing great if it is making you uncomfortable.

Because Jews want to rule over everything and everyone.

I wanted this to be true...

But what you'll find is that (if you're white) you will be grouped in with the alt-right as the left gets more and more extremist and starts blaming not just conservatives but ALL white people for "racism".

And when that happens, you will know he was right all along.

Kill yourself. Let the resources of the earth be consumed by those who have some joy in it.

That's what you get for playing their game.
Would you be so dower if a thousand people insisted that you were a barn owl? No, you would probably just laugh at them.
You should be doing the same for anyone calling you something that you aren't. How would they know anyway?

Part of evolving and becoming more likely to make it further as a species is to fight each other and become more hardened, savvy and durable.

WTF IS GOING ON WITH THAT PHOTO?!?! I SEE 4 MEN IN UNIFORM AND 6 UNIFORMS FLOATING, WTF KIND OF PHOTOSHOP IS THIS?!

we can, but we don't. I suppose it could be because of our selfishness, and our lack of empathy, though I will probably never know.

Normies shall be brought to heel.

That's what we do here, yet no one dies.
Hardship leads to growth, but only if the one on the floor can learn something from the ordeal. The winner doesn't care to learn, since he won.

I ask myself this too, then realize that there is somebody who will doxx me if I dare speak out about removing tiddies from my vidya games.

I can't chill out if I don't get my vidya titties.

We do get along, its just that you want the entire human race to be friends...it ain't gonna happen.

Why cant we all just get a bong?

In the last couple years I've realized that my motivation is just to add meaning and purpose in my life. After growing up in an empty home with video games and fast food there is nothing more important to me than adding people who are important to me in my life. Too bad i'm basically socially retarded and suck horribly at pursuing what I want most out of life which I guess is why i'm on Sup Forums of all places.

Goodnight user. Hope you find your motivations too.

>why are there only 300 or so gun murders a day in America?
America is a wealthy nation with abundant resources. People will remain complacent until that changes, due to demographic decline and loss of protection for their interests, causing a loss of resources. Then there will be violence.

>People want to be left alone to live their lives how they see fit. That is an inclination towards peace.
People want resources, in a resource scarce world. Perhaps some just want some land and some crops, living a technologically deficient life. But that isn't the case for the mass majority of people, who want an increasing standard of living. That requires resources, more than the world has. That creates conflict.

I've got mine already, but best of luck to you on yours.

While i can't argue with any of that logic, that's not the conflict we are seeing in this country right now.
We are experiencing an identity crisis. We don't know who we are and want to make a fight of it. The internet has exposed us to the awful truth that 85% of us are exactly the same, and that's quite jarring.
Blame mass commercialism, if you want. It certainly didn't help, but the real culprit is the fact that so many people were so intent on living normal, quiet, peaceful lives that they didn't care to develop any kind of real personality outside of a copy of something they saw on TV.
Complacency led to this. Complacency which thrived on the desire for peace.

Where is the fun in that? There would be no happenings, no one wants that.