Is it okay to be an atheist who understands christianity and its morals is the best social model?

Is it okay to be an atheist who understands christianity and its morals is the best social model?

There are a lot of people like that.

>best social model

What a stupid argument. Child abuse goes against christianity.

>understands christianity and its morals is the best social model
No, because it isn't. What good thing did Christ teach? Nothing, he promoted poverty and weakness as virtues. That success and strength are signs of the sinful.

No.
Convert or die.

Weren't they doing it at the same rate as the rest of the population?

Too smart to believe in fairy tales.

The rest of the population were not devout Catholic clergy who were cleansed by the sacrament of Holy Orders.

>christianity and its morals is the best social model?
Christianity is the root of envy, where the rich are always guilty and the poor the heroes, where your talents must remain hidden and you must forever remain behind the lines of mediocrity so as not to draw negative attention. Christianity is the foundation for leftism and socialism .Paganism is goat compared to that kike invention.

Yes

>christianity and its morals is the best social model?

...

What created Yahweh though?

In fact, I'm agnostic and not exactly an atheist. I'm also too intelligent to be a fedora user.

>Christianity isn't the foundation for basic and morally agreeable laws

It's an uncaused cause, no beginning or end, alpha and omega, outside of time.

OK muhammed

Look into Vatican II and the modernisation of the church.

>It's an uncaused cause

If you have some sort of reasoning behind what "best" is that's better than someone who says that committing random acts of evil is best, sure.

>atheist
>"Best" morals
You're an intellectual fraud.

No because it's more than just a model for social mores

All things that exist in our universe have a cause. Therefore, there must be something outside of causality that created the universe (defining universe as all of existence, including multiverses).

>defining universe as all of existence
>there must be something outside

"reported incidents have since that time dropped substantially and, when they occurred, been reported by the church itself"
did you take the time to read you own fucking article

*tips fedora

Most atheists are like that.

This. True enlightenment is admitting "I don't know" when you truly don't know.