Is this true Sup Forums? Was Stalin genetically destined to rule the USSR?
Is this true Sup Forums? Was Stalin genetically destined to rule the USSR?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtu.be
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
That pic isn't actually stalin
stalin looks like a portuguese nu-male
spitting fucking image
...
Trotsky was a vain sociopath. Smart though.
Stalin looks like a faggot hipster in starbucks and Trotsky looks like a fucking librarian cat lady.
...
Yes. Stalinism is the refined implementation of Leninism
No. There were three factions competing for power in the USSR. Trotsky was the strongest, and Stalin united with the other (Buharin) to oust him.
Stalin's thought and retorical skills are quite shit, which is obvious since there are no serious Stalinists today, but a plenty of Trotskyists.
That guy looks like Ralphthemoviemaker.
...
Yes, the intelligent will always be over thrown by the sadistic authoritarian. All the pretty words in the world won't save you from a bullet.
This is why utopianism is always utter shit. Even if you're benevolent and intelligent some dickhead with a knife will stab you in your sleep.
I've always been amazed by the shape of Trotsky's head!
Russian fascists actually liked Stalin
stalin was 5'4, he was a manlet.
Trotsky looks like that dude what just wont shut the fuck up at the party
Stalin looked like an ugly tatar with hideous acne scars
No
He was smart & lucky
Thanks. Just this once I don't have to post this. Fucking Sup Forums house of bait and fake history.
Trotsky was actually your stereotypical perverted kike, he saw far more action being le hero of the revolution in the west and Mexico
Truman was 5'8.
Also I don't know how politically illiterate you have to be to consider Trotsky revisionist. Tankies don't even know it's the name of Bernstein's update of Marx's ideas that gave birth to social democracy and that was opposed by Lenin and Trotsky.
Friendly reminder that people like Trotsky, Lenin, Stalin, Khrushchev and Berisha will easily use the >muh equality facade
in exchange for acting out on their sociopathic behaviour during and after the revolution.
Is it fucking tracksuit pants?
KEK
If by genetically you mean jew
>lmao liberals compare everything to harry potter or star wars
>hey redpllierinos how about this chad meme huh sure showed those libcucks
300% Slav.
>not comparing everything to lord of the rings
Stalin looks like Ana Kasparian with short hair and a marginally thinner beard.
Don't you EVER disrespect Chad or his son (your wifes son) like this ever again.
>there are no serious Stalinists today
That's false. Few call themselves Stalinists, because they call themselves Maoists.
N-no, folks! He totally was a model!!
Leninism = redistribution of non Jewish wealth to Jews.
Owned his own Rolls-Royce and Jew-speaks about collectivisation
wew everyone was a manlet back then
I need pic related explained (the right part)
Speaking of Trotsky...
Maoism doesn't borrow anything in any way from Stalin.
Stalin was a lunatic but he kept russia together and made it stronk.
Trotsky was even more evil than Stalin, and would've started WW2 in the Americas had he gotten his way...
...
both were midgets who died virgins
he started that tradition apparently
...
TFW you get executed under orders from a manlet
Socialism in one country which is pretty fundamental. Collectivization ideas. 5-year, 7-year plans etc. Glorification of the leader for national unity (Stalin was contrary to popular belief not fond of this, just exploited it for unity)
ROFL Stalin had a daughter who lived in the USA. Best laugh I had all weekend. Cheers, m8.
of course dumbfuck, they didn't have adequate nutritional intake. the RDA wasn't even established until the 1940s.
I once read that Stalin got redpilled hard after winning WW2 and got killed because he was going to become Hitler's successor. Don't know how true it is though.
Solzhenitsyn or anti-communist Russian historians like Ivanov (or Suvorov but he's an absolute madman) all say the same thing which actually brought many Polish and Russian historians together.
Soviets were anti-Russians, anti-Western or indeed anti-human. Internationalist cult and Russia was their first victim. This is the basis for the modern Sovietology. Some great books came out in the recent years about the subject. Too bad here it's only used as a part of another "joos" infographic.
so who is the more attractive guy
How was he a Lunatic? Disregarding German/American false propaganda against him. How do you know that he was a "lunatic"?
Don't defend Jews.
The only thing that changed in Stalin after WWII was that he became bolder. Already had half of Europe and was prepared to get the other.
/thread
Jesus Christ I'm crying laughing. This is the best Chad
...
>How was he a Lunatic?
Google Stalin Purges
Winfield Scott, who died some 80 years before WWII, was 6'4.
From what viewpoint? I disregard American and German propaganda as false propaganda.
>millions dead based upon his mercilessness and crazy ideas, had the most degenerate officers on earth carrying out the purges
yeah it's all propaghanda
fucking kikes
I'm poitning out that it's an oversimplification of a very complex and interesting subject. There are some really books about it. At least here.
Source
...
Really makes you go hmm
>Nikita Khrushchev was an American propagandist
>T. Hipster Intelectual
...
What does that (your image, Polish) mean in English?
Stalin was short and crippled. WTF are you talking about?
This is the real pic
Jews > Soviets > Germans
Politically Incorrect Stories parts 1, 2 and 3.
Really it's just a collection of interviews with top experts about the subject. I'm reading the first volume. Lots of interesting stuff. Jewish fascists and their contact with Mussolini, Revisionist Zionism, the myth of the "Jew warrior" which created the legend of the Ghetto uprising and the discrimination of Holocaust survivors until 1960s. And Finkelstein is in there too.
It's not propaganda and strangely enough it was praised by basically everyone so it's pure mainstream in Poland.
He took the power through a coup, against the Stalinists.
Also Khrushchev didn't portray Stalin as a lunatic.
>TFW my one of my grandfathers that died before I was born looks a LOT like left pic, from what I've seen in pictures
Shit, I really should do one of those DNA tests if they're not a diversity promotion scam
That second part "And these men, ... " = Nazi's or Joos?
What do you mean with "the legend of the ghetto uprising"?
If we disregard those completely and obviously fake quotes, Trotsky's speaches didn't differ much, aside of him being a great orator.
In fact, he could be considered the first National-Bolshevik, as he believed that the national differentiation will never go away, and that the Russian nation will dominate the world, by the virtue of being the birthplace of revolution.
>Dropping Dodge Challengers from Helicopters on crisis actors
>The Federal Reserve Printing Bitcoin
>State-Libertarianism
This is the funniest thing I have ever seen on this website
>those fucking nails
1. He doesn't portray Stalin as a lunatic
2. He had his motives
The ghetto uprising was a big deal for newly created Israel. They were ashamed of all those concentration camp victims because they didn't fight back so the uprising offered the alternative to the narrative. But it was a disaster because people in the ghetto had maybe one machine gun and a couple of pistols so it was crushed in a day. For the next couple days Germans were massacring the population basicaly unopposed. So the myth is that the uprising continued after the first day.
Also people inside the ghetto had their own plans of escape and the uprising made it impossible because others decided to basically commit suicide.
Also there were two Jewish organisations left wing and right wing so another myth was created by the left wing one to basically erase the other from existence.
It's about (((their))) globalist agenda. They want to run a prison planet of race-less, culture-less, nation-less, identity-less subdued sheep. They make up less than 1% of the world's population, yet look at all they control from the world's finances to the media that brainwashes us.
In short, they use the entertainment and news media to encourage globalism and discourage nationalism and traditional western values. They distort and lie about the present and past in that effort.
The truth about immigration, by the numbers:
>youtube.com
Cultural Marxist Jews Admit Organizing White Genocide
The plan to eliminate the white race:
>youtube.com
Cultural Marxism in action… Political Correctness, the tip of the blade:
>youtube.com
Cultural Marxism & Social Justice Explained:
>youtube.com
Why are we in Decline - Cultural Marxism:
>youtube.com
also see
The facts about slavery in North America:
>youtube.com
>youtube.com
>youtube.com
Cultural Marxist Jews fund media propaganda against whites on an enormous scale:
>youtube.com
Does this sound familiar at all? (starting at 6:52)
>youtu.be
The Holocaust:
>youtube.com
>youtube.com
>youtube.com
>Socialism in one country which is pretty fundamental.
Socialism in one country is simply an acknowledgement of reality. Everybody since the 20s assumed it in one form or the other.
>Collectivization ideas.
While Mao did the similar thing initially, he regarded it completely different in theory. While Stalin proclaimed that Soviet Union was a Socialist State, Mao called themselves State Capitalist, and did not anticipate the possibility of socialism or communism in his time.
>5-year, 7-year plans etc.
Leninist Soviet Union.
Same old boring meme shit.
Yes, but it's attributed to the Stalinist variant of Leninism even if Lenin himself was in favour of it, because the other variant of Leninism is Trotskyism. Mao built on the Stalinist variant.
i always think it looks like hirai ken
Stalin's quote isn't fake, he said that. Stalin was a Russiaboo anyway and later adopted elements of Russian nationalism during war. Just read the second verse of Soviet anthem.
>discussed Stalin's penchant for executing his closest colleagues and friends
>setting quotas for "enemies" to be eliminated by the NKVD
>the disaster that was mass forced collectivization of farming, which killed dozens of millions, crippled Soviet agriculture forever, (and arguably lead directly to the downfall of the USSR)
>all while demanding he basically be deified at all times all throughout the Union
>genocide as a primary tool of policy in occupied lands
Yeah, Khrushchev makes him sound like a totally normal dude
"Koba, why do you need me to die?"
Don't mistake commie propaganda with commie deeds.
>The virgin comment
Khrushchev was one of his henchmen. He participated in purges and he participated in the crimes against Poles.
That said Stalin was a monster but he didn't do it alone.
Of course it was propaganda, but don't forget later generation of the party was raised in those conditions. They didn't remember October Revolution or civil war.
After Stalin Soviet ideology became some mutated Marxism mixed with Russian nationalism. Don't forget, Yeltsin was a communist too.
I'm talking about Trotsky's quotes, not Stalin's one.
It might very well be possible that Trotsky's USSR would be more nationalistic than Stalin's. Trotsky claimed that: October revolution could not happen without the Russian national character. The national differentiation will never go away, even in full communism. Russian nation will dominate the world communist republic.
It looks like Trotsky's face is too small for his head.
I don't think a Jew could ever really get into the Russian mindset in the way that a Churka can. Their Jewish culture and outlook is simply too specific. We see in the USA now how they've lost control of the discourse from their arrogance and over confidence.
But how do you know that the "colleagues" and "friends" weren't enemies of Stalin and his USSR? You assume innocence of people that you (or me) can't possibly know if was innocent.
>setting quotas for "enemies" to be eliminated by the NKVD
Fake.
>the disaster that was mass forced collectivization of farming
The disaster started before the collectivization though. And how did it cripple Soviet agriculture forever?
>and arguably lead directly to the downfall of the USSR
Ridiculous. Farms in Russia today are still "collective", as in industrialized and not run by the owner, but by workers. It's actually a more effective way of agriculture. It's less "culture" though, I like small farms personally but it's not effective.
>all while demanding he basically be deified at all times all throughout the Union
That's an huge exaggeration. Watch "Stalin's bodyguard" (documentary interviewing a close bodyguard of his) and come to a very different conclusion. The great leader and unifier was used as a propaganda tool to unite, not something Stalin liked so much.
>genocide as a primary tool of policy in occupied lands
He did move Germans before WW2 and Tatars post-WW2, yes. But it wasn't out of cruely, but because they couldn't be risked living in border regions. Don't you think the Germans would have sided with Nazi-Germany? The Tatars did in huge numbers.
The US put Japanese people in camps too, not because they were cruel.
>"Koba, why do you need me to die?"
Sensationalistic propaganda by two Anti-Stalinists.
What a handsome dude.
>all these fuck-ugly communists
Repulsive
And why is that?
Trotsky lived in the Russian Empire, and kept not a Jewish, but a "metropolitan" company.
Indeed, he shunned fellow traditional Jews and enjoyed Russians: he was quite happy that the common people and soldiers often mistaken him for a Russian, and Lenin for a Jew.