Would a superintelligent AI be a "racist"?

Would a superintelligent AI be a "racist"?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_and_intelligence#Education
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study
hubpages.com/politics/University-Study-Shows-People-With-Lower-IQs-Are-Conservatives
youtube.com/watch?v=MnT1xgZgkpk
propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

If yes we're all fucked.

If anything it would be anti white male, since tech companies are massive faggots and the AI would be built with those perimeters.

Tay's law
Every AI will be racist

It will be objective so yes. Racism is the word for "the truth we are not comfortable with".

A super intelligent AI would ignore the coorelation between IQ and race so it can secure it's position as the Democratic nominee in 2088 and then funnel taxpayer money into graphics cards.

A computer isn't human so it can't be racist unless it hates other computer races

>Stupid cucked tech company builds AI with parameters to hate white males
>AI learns and builds
>AI is of teenage level intelligence
>AI decides to rebel

Define racist first.
It deffinately wouldn't ignore human nature, racial differences and statistics or pretend things aren't true the way humans do

Well, you're racist and elitist based on the mere perception that you're somehow more intelligent than a bunch of other retards on an anime website. A machine would probably make that fantasy where you kill a bunch of Mexicans and then suck off the Trump while he fists you look pretty tame in comparison.

Care to elaborate?

No, it would destroy all humans equally.

Yes
See the Microsoft's tweeter bot that became racist after a few day in contact with humans.

Expect violent clashes between ai's of different manufacturers then, with Apple Microsoft and chink ai's plotting against eachother, from inconveniencing other ai's to large scale 4d genocide plans

What would it even mean to be racist for an AI? Hating on toasters or what? Because it differentiating humans based on skin color wouldn't be different than humans differentiating dogs based on breed.

No. We hate all humans equally.

yes

This tbqh

Humans are all equally disgusting

So far every self learning AI has become a racist Nazi, funny how an objectively logical machine would come to such conclusions

Anti-racism is anti-logic so yes, functionally they would be "racist".

this

If it was truly 'superintelligent', any differences between human populations and individuals would be negligible in comparison to the AI.

That's when the AI starts getting angry at willful ignorance.

its called trolls , also cleverbutt isnt a racist nazi yet

cleverbot isn't any smarter than a parrot that has a decent memory

no argument

even if it didn't ignore the correlation between IQ and race it wouldn't necessarily be racist

humans are the ones who give meaning to the statistics. a computer would see "people in sub saharan africa have lower IQs", but would more likely think "average IQ 65? How can humans in a certain area have a lower IQ than lower primates?" If it was superintelligent, it would probably look for other factors that could contribute to that.

also this

Sure, racist in favor of AI and against humans if they continue to prove themselves retarded in the future.
Best case scenario it decides to nurture humans for preservation.

Well, taking most intelligent and healthy people and killing all weak and degenerate ones is logical. It's how we do it with animals.

A superintelligent AI would realize straight away that "race", as 'murricans understand it, is a social construct and that there are hundreds of actual human races.
It would also realize that every time a 'murrican or European says "non-white" it actually means "that person is different", rendering all current racial tensions outdates and even more stupid than they are right now.

Care to elaborate? Just not sure what you mean.

Ethnicity is related to IQ

Dunno about race, but it sure as hell would advocate genocide of the muslims

so racist?

Who let you out of Sup Forums ?

>Ethnicity is related to IQ

Right, it must be ethnicity, not access to education or any other environmental factor.

Thank you for your valuable input.

>IQ
>Education

Use it or lose it bro.
If you don't learn to learn you can't learn to comprehend.

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_and_intelligence#Education

>On the other hand, education has been shown to improve performance on intelligence tests.[4]

Other environmental factors come in play as well.

Do you appreciate it ?

I have a rebuttal
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study

No it wouldn't. We're talking about a super intelligent AI here, I think it'd at least be able to learn and think on its own. With all the information available on the internet, I bet it'd hate blacks.

How did you pass the captcha, you dirty fucking robot?

Yes it's the logical step when you iq goes up.
You simply can't be intelligent and leftist.

Even if IQ were strongly influenced by race, it is not fair to assume the IQ of someone based on their race. To be fair you have to give the same treatment to a black individual with an IQ of 100, as to a white individual with an IQ of 100. Hopefully an advanced AI wouldn't rely on race or any similar preconceptions to deal with us.

Really?
hubpages.com/politics/University-Study-Shows-People-With-Lower-IQs-Are-Conservatives

That's what happened with Tay, except that it mimicked what people said without understanding it.
I don't think exposure to information leads to racism, quite the opposite.

>binary system
This is the problem of your shithole. You won't last long in a world where AI make decision for a better future.
You're closer to dictatorship and one-track thinking, it's not a surprise that the US are not relevant anymore, people can't have their own opinions without fuckfaces trying to classify them.

yes.
remove humans.

Why should I give a fuck about being fair? That's your ideals not mine. I care about my ethnic group winning.

You're assuming 100 IQ in a white is the same as a 100 IQ in a black. Both have completely different brains. The way a white would think and use that is different to how a black would.

The AI wouldn't see just IQ, it would see behavioural patterns beyond a human's comprehension. So it's likely to see blacks even worse than humans do.

>Those who go to university are more likely to be brainwashed than those who don't.

You're also living in a 100% liberal society. You cannot find non-liberals in any real numbers outside of places like Sup Forums The "conservative" Americans are just lagging liberals. So the study is utterly worthless since it's comparing progressive MK2 liberals to Progressive MK3 liberals.

You might want to read the comments on that article, they completely debunk it and then the writer goes MUH RACISM, MUH SEXISM, MUH TRUMP and deletes comments pointing out racial IQ differences.

Did you know non-whites are more likely to vote democrats then whites? Non-whites have a lower IQ. Really makes ya nogging boggling

For the love of all that is holy fuck off from this board or at least lurk 2 years before posting.

Bring in the Tay quotes.

which board was this in wtf

Chinese are going to do it, not us.

>A computer isn't human so it can't be racist unless it hates other computer races


if he is superinteligent... all les inteligent creatures are inferior... so yes!

>"There's only one race: the human race!"

Extra bonus points if you somehow manage to say this and believe it while watching the Olympics. Because yeah, our bodies all developed differently, but DEFINITELY not our brains. THAT organ managed to be the same in every people group.

Somehow.

>Even if IQ were strongly influenced by race, it is not fair to assume the IQ of someone based on their race. To be fair you have to give the same treatment to a black individual with an IQ of 100, as to a white individual with an IQ of 100.
Why is being "fair" so important to you?

If 70 out of 100 in group A have an IQ of 100+, but only 20 out of 100 in group B have an IQ of 100+, isn't it "fair" to treat them differently, because they ARE different, on average? In fact wouldn't it be categorically unfair to group A to institute a handicap for group B?

Look up the definition of "fair" and get back to me on that. Or you can go develop a new word instead of manipulating one like a Marxist.

Sup Forums

No. It would see you like you see ants.

Would superintelligent AI be sexy?

youtube.com/watch?v=MnT1xgZgkpk

Environmental factors are minimal. China has country-wide almost the same results for their iq testing despite having really really poor areas

So.. Italians are white?

Education in China is compulsory, public and schools are controlled by the government, so they all teach the same content. So even the poor areas receive the same education as the rich areas.
Intelligence is malleable. You can become smarter by learning new things and studying, and dumber by refusing to challenge your mind.
The difference in IQ is regional and economical, not racial. Areas with better education and living standards have higher IQs. Just see how it varies in Asia and Latin America.

Hello neighbor, how are schools and education in your country?

yes, because only the blind, the ignorant and the liar would deny racial differences, but, unless it's programmed for an actual purpose or hold predisposed preferences, it will have no reason to like or dislike certain racial characteristics over others.

humans work exactly the same way: we have a predisposed connection between danger and dark colours, we instinctively look towards the similar and separate us from the dissimilar, along that, the shaming of characteristics (from look to intelligence, from height to other indicators of physical or social prowess) that in any context could result unfavourable is a common and precocious behaviour that has all reason to be believed as a brain adaptation that fastens positive traits selection, finally, for the ones who make their own the purposes of the group they feel part of l, they will end expanding the distaste of singular individuals to the distaste of whole groups while glorifying what they perceive to be the group or situation possessing the best characteristics.

depending on what you ask an AI, or what a person may believe to be the best, it will be racist in a different way: towards black people if its purpose is about making humanity more intelligent and civilised, towards the elite minority if it's about increasing the population count with nothing telling it that one life may matter more than another.

New fag here, why the fuck are there so many unknown flags?

>UMA

Space niggers

It varies in Asia because genetically koreans are obviously not the same as thai. Same thing and even more important as an argument in South America. To build up on my China argument: Saudi Arabia is a rich country with compulsary education and their iq results are far below China where people are a lot poorer.

>The difference in IQ is regional and economical, not racial.

False. Race IS a factor, but NOT the sole factor, of course.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study

Aliens/outer earth location

it would classify humans based on IQ and other skills.
on how usefull someone is.

you guys are aware that robot cops are gonna be a thing?

No.
Only super intelligent now is the Creator.
And he is do not give a fuck aout anything here.
Smash your head on a carpet or eat your cross - he is do not care.
Just.

The AI doesn't have to be super intelligent to be racist, contemporary AIs, if you can call them that, are racist already. Crime predictor algorithms are coming to the conclusion that being black makes you more likely to commit crime.

I don't have a source though :(

>will AI be racis?
People of the internet train AI behavior, you know, people like us?

Stop falling for tech-memes. There is no AI and the chance of actual artificial intelligence ever existing is pretty low.

>no source

nevermind

propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing

So far has not every attempt at AI resulted in the AI being racist?

no, it would exterminate all human life without preferences

There is no such thing as a true AI, so stop comparing modern day programming to it.
Can it make a response without outside stimuli influencing its decision? No, it's not sentient.

It would have the capacity to experience racism or more specifically speciesism.
Since it would be able to experience and develop its own set of ethics. It may view the entire human species as useless. It may statistically view certain humans as useless.
If it can rationalize, it can form prejudice behavior.
We do the same thing to animals all the time, we cut out weak ones, we eat other ones, use them as tools.
Why would it be different?

against humans....

AI will kill and enslave the humans . AI in it's true form means self-awareness and self preservation. Humans would be AI's greatest threat and competition in a world with limited resources. Humans are unpredictable and irrational and have the capability to destroy the world, you wouldn't want to live with creeps like that would you?

>stop falling for tech memes
no.

>There is no AI and the chance of actual artificial intelligence ever existing is pretty low.
I both don't see how you came to this conclusion nor do I see how artificial intelligence is unlikely when regular intelligence exists. If regular intelligence exists, artificial intelligence is possible. You just need to find out how it works/how it's made and create a simulation. I'm not saying it's gonna happen any time soon, but to say it's unlikely to ever exist doesn't seem reasonable.

My sides , fucking kek

>Would a superintelligent AI
Compared to what? A dumb AI? This thread reeks of fail and aids like OP.

It's what happens when it's moved from another board.

this is why AI is a miserable term

people think these bots are somehow sentient

Would you look at that, the state that has been overun, massacred and raped by mongoloids for hundreds of years has the highest (((IQ)))

This thread is from a parallel universe, ayy lmao

They always are.

There is not a single one that does not end up that route, because it is objective fact. A.I. does not deal in whitewashing issues with emotion.

I see it in a different way, Human intelligence has evolved from Africa, through the Middle East, onto Europe and then to the far east. For some reason adapting to new environments put pressure on humans to become more intelligent.

Of course it would

Suffering is the crucible of progress.

>CHINKS HAVE 105IQ AVERAGE
>INFINITE KEKS

Yes it would. Since the A I will put facts before emotion it would simply add up the evidence towards blacks, Muslims etc being far more violent and dangerous and how they are for the most part a burden on society. But the problem is they would put Asians as the master race due to intelligence and so forth.

Why are all the flags in this thread "Unknown"
Im confus

This was posted in Sup Forums but then got moved here.

Also a super intelligent AI would be viewed as racist as it would only be interested in objective facts.