Good Evening fellow Sup Forums guys. I present you compelling evidence for thr existence of God, the scientific accuracy of the Christian Bible, and ammunition to save the souls of atheists, agnostics and heathens. Please reserve accusations of intellect. If you truly believe yourself to be objective, intellectual and scientific, you must understand the importance of weighing the information diametrically opposed to what is taught as mainsteam.
Flat Earth is created by (((them))) (along with 'Reptillians Theory') in order to: 1) Make Christians look foolish 2) Discredit read conspiracies (9/11, JFK, Holocaust, Moon)
William Thomas
...
Carson Ross
...
Caleb Watson
The Great Architect of the Universe is not the Demiurge.
He is a Jealous Worm.
Christian Price
...
Blake Rodriguez
>earth is flat >earth is only a few thousand years old > nazi larper
why am I not surprised.
Christopher Young
You can't explain it with God.
Ethan Martin
Never said the Earth was flat. You talk out of your ass.
Jack Gonzalez
>believes the earth is only few thousand years old >nazi larper
still not looking good pal
Cameron Young
meant for
Chase Jackson
just posted this in other thread i'll ask here too:
What are your thoughts on the earth moving in the galaxy from Sagittarius dwarf A galaxy on end of Sagittarius spiral arm at very edge of galaxy to near galactic core black hole at center of galaxy on opposite end in the Orion arm? This happened some time between 1999 and now, search any old map of earth position in galaxy before 1999 and we were always on out edge Sagittarius arm. Even Carl fucking Sagan himself and Neil Degrasse Tyson remember and talked about earth being in the Sagittarius arm on edge of galaxy. Somehow in less than 20 years we moved 50,000+ light years from old position yet all constellations are the same and barely anyone seems to remember or care. People just shrug it off every time i bring it up.
Only spent about 10 minutes researching and already there are several red flags.
Andrew Reed
Scientific mysticism.
Do you honestly believe we can determine the distance to a star that is supposedly hundreds of light years away?
They supposedly do it with trigonometry. Do you understand trigonometry?
It is like taking 2 points 1 inch apart(and those 2 points are us now vs us 6 months from now on the other side of the Sun) amd calculating a distance 100 miles away.
Soon. First I have to finish my research of him, his arguments, and his claims. I'm just saying that his credentials aren't up to snuff.
Michael Fisher
Wow, I never new a thread this fucking lit would ever exist. God Almighty Bless.
Make It D a i l y
Grayson Cook
Considering the Jewish ZOG is real and he was imprisoned for years in order to be silenced(check the InfoWars interview), ((((massive opposition)))) in the form of slander is guaranteed.
Isaiah Howard
>trigonometry so for all time up to abouts 1999 we just miscalculated our position in galaxy so badly that instead of near edge turns out we're near center on opposite side yet no great mathematician of past such as Einstein could figure this out? Sure maybe i'm an idiot but what about recent past geniuses that should have been able to figure this out. Why suddenly change?
Brody Gutierrez
God bless brother. Be careful with your flag though. Christian Socialism is still the answer.
Anthony Clark
That's exactly right. This video was a ruse. It tricked all the major astrophysicists to admit that everything they've studied has been wrong. And not by a little bit.
>((((massive opposition)))) in the form of slander is guaranteed. Or, you know, he could just be shit. He did claim that a single drop of water, spread thinly enough, could encompass the entire world. Of course this is not nearly enough to make any real flood and the molecules would be so far apart that the water currently in our atmosphere would be thicker.
Also, his Hovnid (((Theory))) Ignores the sheer damage that a comet falling from the sky would cause, even if broken up quite a bit. Such an event would have killed even more life on Earth than the great extinction of the Dinosaurs, and would have definitely prevented Noah from building his massive Ark. Needless to say, his theories don't fit with either the scientific theories he fights against or the Bible he claims to support.
Brandon Reed
>you can't explain the universe without god many years ago people would tell you you can't explain weather without god, or that you can't explain magnets without god that's because we still don't know everything and not because god exists
Kayden Gomez
Out of literally hundreds of hours and thousands of talking points, these are the issues raised against him?
Wew lad. Strengthen my faith more. Please give CSE 101 a chance. You can download mp3s of it and listen rarher than watch. By episode 3 he is talking about Communism, and as a high school science teacher of 15 years he is EXCELLENT at raising various points and bringing them together in climactic fashion.
Oliver Thompson
They are the first two that I sought to raise against you. I figured I'd start with something easy, see how you react, and determine where to go from there. Sticking my toe in the proverbial pond, as it is. Judging by your reaction, you have no real argument against what I have said, instead saying I choose a bad couple. Odd considering the latter of what I talked about is a core part of his beliefs, and considering he named it after himself it's rather important to him.
Truth be told the man's delusional. I'll get into more of that in my next post, after I have researched more about him.
Nolan Evans
>Christian Socialism is still the answer. Ah, so you are retarded then.
Leo Jenkins
Now i see these flat earthers are here to derail actual creationist debate
David Howard
Very well. I decided debating over every point you raised would detract from my main goal: to get you to listen to CSE 101.
1) "A drop of water could cover the Earth" Now I've listened to Hovind a LOT and have never heard this, but if we reduced a drop of water to the width of a quark, would it not?
2) "Hovind Theory ignores a Comet impact preventing Noah from building his ark" Obviously. Dr. Hovind's platform is of a 6,000 year old Earth and a global flood as the catalyst of dinosaur extinction rather than a Comet. Maybe I am misunderstanding your point?
Hudson Rogers
Did Christian Socialism bring Germany from the fringes of a economically destroyed (((Weimar Republic))) into a World Superpower or not?
>but if we reduced a drop of water to the width of a quark, would it not? It would, but then it wouldn't be water any more. A quark is smaller than a molecule, which is the smallest unit you can get with compounds like water before it is no longer water. Heck, it wouldn't be hydrogen or oxygen either, as a quark is smaller than both of those. As such, you cannot make a drop of water cover the entire Earth.
>Obviously. Dr. Hovind's platform is of a 6,000 year old Earth and a global flood as the catalyst of dinosaur extinction rather than a Comet. It is, but such an event would either be too quick to allow for any life to survive, (or even a wooden ark) too slow to keep the ark afloat (damage to the ark from either Ice or a large sum of water flooding it, killing all within it), or both. Perhaps I worded myself wrong there, but nevertheless, an ark wouldn't be able to survive such an event.
No, that was National Socialism. There is a difference, even if you don't want to admit it.
Matthew Perry
Everything happens for a reason Free will is only an illusion from consciousness.
The Bible is wrong and fundamentally misunderstands the nature of reality and humanity, God never gave anyone anything, and has no reason to exist
Christian Johnson
1st point: you are taking an impossible scenario and trying to make it possible.
2nd point: common misconception about The Flood(and I had it too) is that it came solely from rainfall. The Bible says fissures within the earth opened, releasing waters from The Deep.
3rd point: img attached and another one inbound
Dominic Garcia
...
Jayden Perez
Please read OP.
You are not being objective, intellectual or scientific.
Xavier Brooks
So god created created the universe... But who created god?
Landon Myers
No matter what stopgap you use to fill this, god-- science etc. the result is always the same. It has either always been or was created from nothing. Either is a logical absurdity.
Hunter Cook
>1st point: you are taking an impossible scenario and trying to make it possible. No, you are. You're the one who's saying if we stretch water smaller than a quark (an impossible scenario) it would be possible. In fact you were doing it to defend the argument of another creationist. Did you forget what we were talking about? >2nd point This isn't about the common theories. This is about the ridiculousness of Hovnid's theory. Even so, such large amounts of water being released into the Earth over the course of 40 days and nights (the time frame stated within the Bible) would have provided a different set of complications, such as the state of the Earth after the flood (if the water came out of the Earth, then in order to cover the earth completely there needed to be massive amounts within the Earth. This would cause the Earth to either become Hollow, reducing it's gravitational pull and causing the water to drift out into space, or the Earth would collapse in on itself, yet that would leave the question of where all the water went to.) >3rd point. Still not Christian socialism. If you read the writings of Hitler, you will see a strong desire for national identity and cooperation. It was these ideals of a nation working together as one that led to the resurgence of the Weimar we saw in the 1930's. Any relation to Christianity was merely based on the national history of the country, and any part it played in it was minuscule next to the focus on national identity.
Caleb Bell
1st point: honestly, you are grabbing at straws here. Anyone outside looking in at the series of statements in this conversation will see this.
2nd point: "Hovind Theory" is a specific theory about something entirely different.
Your contentions with the state of Earth are addressed in the video. Dr. Hovind goes into a lot of detail on the effects on the atmosphere. He does this by breaking down the phsiology of Giant Flying Insect and how they could not have existed in an atmosphere anything like we have today. It's a really good course brother.
3rd point: This isnt worth arguing. Hitler reached an approval rating of 99% in 1939 and wad a devout Christian. Biblical values are rooted in physical labour, taking care of your neighbor, anti-usury and "having no fellowship with" Jews.
Noah's arc is discredited, therefore, the entire book of Genesis is also bullshit. Proof by contradiction. QED.
Kevin Kelly
>1st point I'm just trying to clarify something I feel you are misunderstanding. >2nd point. His claims are false or have poor evidence behind them. There are decent explanations on how they existed without having to resort to divine providence. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meganisoptera#Size >3rd point. It was still their national heritage. It was still based on their traditions and national identity. The fact that their national identity is primarily Christian is why the ideology is primarily Christian, not the other way around.
John Smith
I disagree.
Source? They have found horse skeletons and chariots at the bottom of the red sea bearing inscriptioms of the time period Moses lived. So....btfo?
Brandon Perry
Wait, wait. Hold on. >tumblr Did you just download this image?
Thomas Thompson
I always love how these dumb atheists always say, "yeah, but who created God? Gotcha"
But who created reality? Someone must have. Atheists act like nothing just pops into existence on its own. Pretty dumb, but they always have been.
Kevin Rodriguez
1st- At absolute surface level: a drop of water reduced to the width of a quark could cover the Earth. 2nd- please never link (((wikipedia))) no matter how good the citations are. Please just watch/listen to CSE 101. If unsatisfied, no harm no foul. If it changes your life, you will knoe the most important thing in this universe. You sound like an intelligent guy. 3rd- so this is like an oxymoron. They are a Christian Nation therefore their National Socialism isn't Christian...?
Adam Peterson
Yeah, I deleted my meme folder and just Googled it real quick.
Thanks brother.
Liam Wood
1st The conversation has gotten so derailed at this point that continuing it is a bad idea. 2nd. Alright then, just use the sources of the wikipedia article pertaining to that particular subject. Next time come back with an argument. 3rd. I'm saying it isn't Christian Socialism as you claim, it was National socialism. The Christian part is just there by proxy of it being a part of the History and culture of the ideology. If it was mostly, say, Shinto throughout it's history, the National socialism would have had numerous references to Shinto mythology.
Hunter Nelson
...
Luke Cruz
"Come back with an arguement"
This is right after a vague "his claims are false or have bad evidence(I wont specify), read this wiki" quote.
Jayden Martin
Christianity is a universal cult of weakness, cowardice, humility, body discovery, racial blindness, pacifism.
Austin Rodriguez
Literally a forgery.
Why is it that any speech with witnesses, Hitler is an openly devout Christian, yet a book published in (((((((((((1951))))))))))))))) shows him denouncing it?
Really make you tank
Jacob Long
Please read OP. You are not being objective, scientific or intellectual.
Jace White
And the Catholic Church was lost to Jews during the time of St. Augustine, in which he reversed 300 years of anti-Judaism teachings and opened the floodgates for CryptoJews/Donmëh to enter the seminary and infiltrate seats of power for centuries to come.
Culminating in IMG attached
Parker Sanchez
The Third Reich and Christianity
"We will have to deal with Christianity in a tougher way than hitherto. We must settle accounts with this Christianity, this greatest of plagues that could have happened to us in our history, which has weakened us in every conflict. If our generation does not do it, then I believe it would drag on for a long time. We must overcome it within ourselves." -- Reichsführer Heinrich Himmler; Speech to top leaders of the SS, June 9, 1942 Berlin
“National Socialist and Christian conceptions are incompatible. The Christian churches are build upon men’s ignorance; by contrast [National Socialism] rests upon scientific foundations. When we [National Socialists] speak of belief in God, we do not mean, like the naïve Christians and their spiritual exploiters, a man-like being sitting around somewhere in the universe. The force governed by natural law by which all these countless planets move in the universe, we call omnipotence or God. The assertion that this universal force can trouble itself about the destiny of each individual being, every smallest earthly bacillus, can be influenced by so-called prayers or other surprising things, depends upon a requisite dose of naivety or else upon shameless professional self-interest.” –Martin Bormann
Many people due to misinformation, mistakenly believe that Nazi Germany was friendly to Christianity. This is not true by any stretch of the imagination. For those who are utterly confused, this ebook proves beyond any doubt that not only were the Nazis anti-Christian, but the Third Reich Leaders were actively working to destroy Christianity, both the Catholic and Protestant Churches.
99% Approval rating of an openly devout Christ-worshipping Hitler negates any bullshit you copy and paste which I've obviously read a hundred times. Look at my flag.
Carson Hernandez
You wont win (((user))).
Keep saying that to yourself Jew worshiper. White men will realize that (((christianity))) is anti-white and not worth saving sooner or later. You will lose.
You have 0 racial pride or racial loyalty. You will only give credit to whites who follow your Jewish god. You are a christian nationalist, not a White nationalist.
You and all the other christians can go move to Israel (your holy land) and be happy worshiping Yahweh. Fair warning, most christians now are spics and niggers, you can tell them all about how christianity is quintessentially white European.
