huh...
Huh
Other urls found in this thread:
fa-mag.com
brookings.edu
twitter.com
faireconomy.org
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
> When reality shits all over your politics
So red equals jews huh?
Wealth inequality exists? Holy shit, bring in more brown people!
now add the line that shows how much taxes each bracket pays
taxes are literally another shoah
>commie talks about distribution of cash like it's handed out will-nilly to whoever by one central source
Color me surprised.
Mostly protestants, actually (55% of the wealth is controlled by them, jews only control 1.1%, arabs control 5.8%). However this segment also disproportionally includes jews.
>rich: nothing
>poor: nothing
>4th highest: everything
>middle: almost everything
ask people where they think they fit in on that distribution for another shocking error of perception.
the fact is poor people are just stupid
the rich must be up to some devil magic to get so much wealth though
whats the solution?
the (((1%)))
80% of taxes come from the top 10% earners.
Which represents 0.001% of their earnings.
why would you want anything done about it?
its good that the world is full of mostly stupid people
to be clear
all poor people are stupid
but
not all rich people are smart, it only takes one smart person in your family line to make everyone in it rich
This is why we need to fully embrace the meritocracy and allow the natural hierarchy to form and perpetuate itself.
Limit welfare to only those who have earned it, welfare needs to be more than just a charity.
We also need a National Labor Service which will put people to work IMMEDIATELY which will focus on practical skills rather than meaningless service positions so that they can graduate out into a career or job after a year or two.
They serve the State as workers, the State trains them and pays them a living wage, they learn skills which can be put to use advancing the Nation as a whole.
I have no problem with skilled people or economically smart people providing a service or product which advances the status of The People or the Nation and moves it forward technologically, morally, spiritually or in any other way advances the principals of the Nation. I would be happy to see my fellow countrymen earn money and be successful only so long as they produce nothing which harm or debases the moral, physical, spiritual or any other form of the Nation or The People.
Fuck commies.
>not all rich people are smart, it only takes one smart person in your family line to make everyone in it rich
lol no
>its good that the world is full of mostly stupid people
I tire of living in a world full of islamic trucks of peace and other maladies caused by stupid people
People don't realize that most the wealth is still stuck in investments in the economy. The rich get rich because consumers buy products or services from the businesses the rich invest in:
>the rich invest where they think they can make money
>business uses the money
>consumers like the product or service
>buy it
>initial investment provides return
>the rich reinvest or keep the money in the company
>rarely can liquidate large amounts of cash
>cycle starts again
...
Wow so rich people have lots of money. Really activates my niggers.
Don't try arguing with retards. They want to believe that all wealthy people bled from their ass to earn their money through hard work.. No chance they are a bunch of underhanded money-grubbing jews who inherited their wealth.
Let them keep lying to themselves. They are defending (((them))) without even realizing it.
Also people move around the economic brackets quite frequently
>allow the natural hierarchy to form and perpetuate itself
the natural hierarchy is tricky jews scheming to get all the shekels while keeping the gentiles acting like crabs in a bucket
should that really lead to such a distribution though?
here i fixed the image to be less misleading
pic very related, its the fixed image i previously mentioned in this post
>should that really lead to such a distribution though?
not that user. absolutely, if you have access to capital and connections investing is super easy, if you are born to a shit family. RIP in peace
Why is it the ideal ratio of distribution Americans want has the middle class about the same as the 4th highest economic group? Everything is almost equally distributed in this ratio.
There would be no point in moving up the economic ladder and the fiscally irresponsible would have nearly the same as the people who are most likely to use the money optimally if we were to try to achieve this ratio of wealth distribution.
are you saying George Soros ismore intelligent than you?
>tesla was stupid
>elon musk is smart
lol
> "US" wealth distribution
Those are not citizens in any real sense.
The vast majority of millionaires are self made and billionaires are even more likely to be self made. Moreover most people move out of poverty. Those who fail to graduate high school, have children out of wedlock, or don't get a job often find it much harder though.
...
You should at least go to google before being clinically retarded in public.
>The vast majority of millionaires are self made and billionaires are even more likely to be self made
who gives a shit?
>there is no correlation between intelligence & income
if you say so
i mean i get it
you're poor so you cannot accept this because to do so would mean you admit you're as stupid as burlap sack of turds
lol income is how much you take from the economy, not what you contribute
>if I put on this God flag before I lie, maybe they'll trust me
answer the question
Are you dumber than George Soros?
Strawman harder, kid.
fa-mag.com
Leftist source: brookings.edu
You retards are poor because you know nothing
but if the rich had less wealth they would pay less in taxes so why don't the just be poor?
Are you aware that most of wealth is inherited? Are you arguing Paris Hilton is a high IQ self-made business woman.
who gives a shit if they are self-made?
I don't
If he does all the things you say he does then yes, I am dumber than George Soros. Still hate the guy but you have to be at least a decent amount more intelligent than the average person to be able to coordinate attacks on entire economies.
now make one for racial distribution and % immigrants
>I am dumber than George Soros
good goy
This is a reality many people don't want to admit.
No shit they pay most, look how much fucking money they have you retard
Look up the pareto distribution / Price's law.
Top 20% having 80% of the share of wealth is completely normal.
False.
Whites voted for Trump.
Niggers, spics, roasties, jews, and other unfavorable groups voted for Hillary.
The income disparity is because most whites actually fucking work for a living.
Meanwhile in real life
faireconomy.org
Next you'll tell us the medici, rotschild, soros and trump are self-made.
It's a measure of how much value you produce. How much of your income you KEEP is what you take out of the economy. The guy making millions who turns right around and spends that money on building things and living a lavish lifestyle is great for the economy, the guy who throws it all in a savings account and simply makes money off interest less so.
Why don't we just eliminate welfare entirely?
huh...
low IQ retards aren't successful
That must be why particle physicists rule the world by absolute fiat.
>4th Highest 20%
>2nd Lowest 20%
That's the exact same category, dumbshits
Economic inequality exists for the same reason academic and athletic inequality exists; people are biologically unequal, and there's nothing anyone can do about it.
Shittons of low-IQ retards are disproportionally successful. All you have to do is look at startup culture to see that.
If that were true people would have no problem with it.
Most wealthy people earn this level of income through capital investment. Since the fuckin fed pumps fake money into the market, the stock exchange becomes over inflated, and there you go. liberals love the fed because it allows them to pay off voters. Fuck off Commie!
>some shitty dime a dozen startup with their ""REVOLUTIONARY"" product
>get tons of VC
>never makes a profit
>born poor
>education choices are shit
MUST BE GENETICS
Exactly. Then they get bought out by retarded fortune 100 company and the CEO (who was already getting paid millions a year) gets a ridiculous payout, stays on 3 years and jumps to his next gig.
lul
Can someone explain to me how the rothschild never show up on these "richest people" in the world lists
Guys like Bill Gates and some poo in loo or mexican shows up but we all know rothschild have more capital
The cause of the extreme imbalance is also the cause of why the economy is bad. The imbalance itself means nothing and is in part. Our financial system where new currency enters the market as debt, and which heavily taxes businesses such that they intentionally run inefficiently so as to maximize deductions, has been flooding the financial markets with a vastly inflated money supply, which in turn causes major inflation (eventually hyperinflation) in the consumer markets, is what has been screwing the middle class. Prices go up, wages lag behind, players at the top have massive gluts of money to gamble with and everything's "insured" in the form of printing more money when shit goes insolvent and a recession hits.
that doesn't show their childhood education quality now does it
They are successful not because of their low-iqs, though (more like despite of). It's probably because they excell in areas not related to IQ.
However, high iq people are far more likely to succeed.
I thought it was well known that 5% of people own 95% of the wealth
I think there is at least some truth in this.
We live in an age when there is no guaranteed ticket up the social ladder. Lawyers might LARP as servers in a restaurant. Whole industries are shrinking or disappearing. And immigration just gluts the supply.
So success now requires lateral thinking which may at first blush seem imprudent. Clever yet conservative individuals may still trek away at formerly tried and true paths yet arrive at dead ends.
But then being slightly too dumb or crazy to heed some risks might land you vocationally or entrepreneurially into little or unexplored territory.
Childhood IQ tests are actually a good predictor of success and occupation.
People have a problem with it because they're lazy, jealous and greedy.
#NotAnArgument
Childhood education quality is fucked by teachers' unions. They stand in the way of school choice, and the most experienced teachers with the most clout in the union set the rules such that they no longer have to deal with little inner city shits. If parents could send their kids to whatever public school they wanted to, or use their child's share of tax revenue as a voucher to another private school, the disparities would vanish.
>I thought it was well known that 5% of people own 95% of the wealth
Why would that be well known? Literally when have you even seen that discussed outside of internet infographs?
So basically it doesn't matter because even though 99% of wealth is owned by the elites, the regular people still have quite a lot of money and are quite rich compared to other countries?
God, capitalism is so horrible
Wrong, it's because they get lucky enough to get one (1) employee who knows what they're doing (typically they entrap an awkward nerd with no friends who's extremely smart and a workaholic, then get a high-quality manager to do everything else). It's true that they're successful IN SPITE of their low IQ and overall garbage ability and usually insane hubris, but that is also completely non-sequitur with regard to anything that has been said so far.
Not by the same metric of success. Someone with a high IQ is more likely to make 6 figures, and someone who is worth 10 figures is most likely to have high IQ, but other than that it's all correlations at these high levels: better access to education and higher-quality genetic stock means the child is of course a hell of a lot more likely to be very rich, as it has access to the connections necessary to be rich along with good genetics and knowledge. Further having high IQ would help, but may not be as necessary as most people are implying.
They're on this one:
en.wikipedia.org
though there seems to be no good estimate of their wealth?
Because I'm not a retard who thinks hurr durr 300k salarymen are the ones oppressing us and should pay 90% of their income. Especially in the world of social media where people can achieve multimillionaire status almost overnight.
Where is the problem here?
and jews will own more and more until us goyim are just race mixed light skinned nigger spics working for shekels and taking out loans
>being so much of a bitch you defend people who exploit you
lol
>B-BUT MUH EDUCATION
>WHY ISN'T TYRONE WITH AN IQ OF 80 SUPER SUCCESSFUL AND IN COLLEGE???
>FUCKING RAYCISTS
>THIS IS PUBLIC EDUCATION'S FAULT!!1
>AN IQ OF 80
lead pipes and lead paint most likely
The older I become, the more I think this is true. Every dirt poor person I've ever met has been a fucking retard.
Occasionally I have met a smart one, those people don't tend to stay dirt poor for long though.
I think it's fair so long as everyone has the opportunity to climb out of poverty. Whether they have the mental capacity is another story though.
Tesla died poor.
Moreover, even with an IQ of 9999, if you don't even know a field exists, you can't contribute to it. If you don't know the people for it, you can't create a meaningful company. It's simple arithmetic: no matter how smart you are, you can't exist at every point in space at once.
Hahahahaha that source. Moreover, read my source before posting as none of what is claimed has anything to do with the study I cited. Moreover, it still says that the majority of billionaires did not inherit their wealth. Absolute income has gone up for all Americans compared to their previous generation. Some of the reasons why once poor people are less likely to make it to the top than other groups of Americans is because of the pathologies I mentioned earlier. Being the child of single mother is the number one predictor of success, crime and intergenerational poverty.
I can point out certain individuals too. Bill Gates, Oprah, Warren Buffet, Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Ellison, Howard Schultz
OK shlomo whatever you say. I'm sure disproving your own point was part of your master plan.
Pareto Principle.
20% control 80% of wealth.
It goes for other things too. Like 20% of the men are fucking 80% of the women.
KEK
He may have died poor, but the guy was pretty rich for some time. He spent it later on developing some alien level tech that probably never could have worked, but that's beside the point.
It's known to already work though.
100% of american posters make retarded posts
I don't understand what your argument is exactly. What education are they missing?
School in the US is free if you are poor. In fact, the children get taken away if they miss school.
College is basically free if you have decent test results (higher IQ = higher results).
>money=intelligence
boy they really pulled a trick on you, didn't they?
Sorry, I don't speak macaco. Go be delicious somewhere else.
>Because I'm not a retard who thinks hurr durr 300k salarymen are the ones oppressing us and should pay 90% of their income.
Okay, you have opinions on tax distribution.
Why the fuck would your opinions equate to any having any knowledge on tax distribution?
Can't tell the irony but bless your heart.
That's not how math works.
They pay their taxes and they pay progressively more on all fronts. You can't move the goal post.