Deleting History

Genuinely, what's the difference here?

Daesh destroys all remnants of history

Niggers are destroying the pieces representative of opression and slavery in their eyes


I mean, come on man, it doesn't take much to see the difference

One has historical value, the others is purely political.

None. Even the same sponsors

One is statues of winners, and the other is statues of beta-male permavirgins who lost

ISIS destroy pieces which represent islam in a fashion which they disagree with. Those statues (albeit replicas) were of famous islamic poets. They have not destroyed monuments to the warfare of islam, nor destroyed the history of the Quran.

The point is, removing, deleting history is a path to self destruction. Pretending (childishly) that something didn't exist to make you feel better is self destructive.

I could have used the Germans & Nazi's as an example - Germany is so aghast at its Nazi past, that it has moved so far politically left that the country is self destructing once again.

The left is cheaply-produced kitsch in the service of Jim Crow politics; the right is an irreplaceable artistic artifact of one of mankind's earliest civilizations.

Dumbass.

we.don't.care.about.traitor's.statues.

All of the Iraq museum statues were replicas, it is the thought behind the destruction which matters.

One is an ancient historical monument of value. The other is just a statue.

dimov with the facts

None, the middle eastern statues probably also owned slaves and rebelled.

Yeah, it was a real dodged bullet there. Still, ISIS has destroyed or sold on the black market a whole lot of antiquities in Iraq and Syria.

One is the Government legally taking down monuments. The other is terrorist illegally taking down monuments.

ja ja jaa only returds in usa and middle europe , west world go down , to much stupid people with to much power and money
its over
dont pay tax
dont accept laws
buy gold/silver/guns and wait

>thinking it stops with Confederate monuments
there's a reason Canada is the worst country

The left is jousting windmills cause they represent Dutch Imperialism.

Not really, what they are actually aiming for is a "clean slate", as in a child born would see nothing but the desert and quran

They also want to get rid of statues of Joan Of Arc, Catholic sanits, and Lincoln.
Basically, if it's a statute of a whyte peepole they want to bring it down.
12% of the population wants to replace everything with black images.

Never heard an argument from the anti-statue side that wasn't exactly what ISIS would say if you asked them.

Not really. The swords of qādisīyah are around 5km (less as the crow flies) from the Iraqi museum where those pictures were taken. They still stand.

one is done because of their stupid religion and because they hate education because it threatens their stupid religion

the other is done because right wingers started erecting monuments during the civil rights movement to rub it in black peoples faces.

The ones on the right killed way more people.

None, exactly the same

OH SHIT A STATUE OF A MAN ON A HORSE THIS WILL NEVER BE SEEN AGAIN

You could be talking about either statue

Marxists have historically tried to engange in iconoclasm in order to create their "new history" narratives.

See:
-Bolsheviks destroying churches and statues of the Romanov dynasty
-Mao destroying virtually everything in his "cultural revolution"

>These idolatrous statues littering the land have no purpose except insulting Allah. We must remove all offenses to Him!

This wrong. ISIS isn't "principled" in their destruction of history.

They also pick and choose what to destroy just like nogs.

>Genuinely, what's the difference here?
General Lee was a Nazi.

Guess history books no longer exist...

I felt so good after deleting everything on Boomerbook, coincidence?

so I guess I gotta build giant statues now to replace the ones taken out

god damn niggers

right is much older/rarer/more valuable, and left has become a flashpoint for white supremacists

So should Turks destroy statues of Mustafa Kamal because of the Armenian genocide?

>Flashpoint for white supremacists

Statues can be rebuilt, but ideas are bulletproof
*tips fedora and vanishes back into the shadows*

FUCK history its full of RACISTS!

Exactly how was General Lee a Nazi? You can't just call people you don't like fascists or Nazis...words mean things, dumbass.

>General Lee was a member of a national socialist party from 1930s Germany.

I don't thinks so. Also, Lee's views on race were shared by many Union generals, and Union soldiers too. "Nazi" isn't a word for any white male that triggers you.

Also, Emperor Caesar owned way more slaves than Robert Lee. When are you gonna go to Italy and destroy all his statues?

...

Canadian wildfires killed more people, but if Trudeau tried to put them out, they would win.

>TFW Marxists' pet idiots get out of hand and destroy progressive monuments

Irony. Also, it will be funny to see how the Marxist white atheists and the Hispanic Catholics fight each-other in the future.

Question #1 Why are they doing this?
Question #2 What do I do next?