>Yes, Greece and Bulgaria should do that.
So, you will send them here, then we should send them to the other side of the world paying for the trip of few hundred thousand muzzies, yet the fucks came in europe to get to the west of it. Somehow we are at fault and should pay hundreds of millions for it. Really fair and balanced.
>The law says you need to guard the border, 2 million illegals have come through your borders since 2015, is that lawful? The law also says the border states are the ones responsible for ALL asylum claims and ALL deportations.
Oh how nice, however you are forgetting you have no proof they came through here, they could have easily came from italy, spain or by boat in any country. And yet you are too squeamish to let us just shoot them, so we are to guard against a literal foreign invasion that you are the cause of and your open arms and refugees welcome campaigns are to blame.
>The law says, if you guys let them come to your countries and they want asylum, you hae to do proceedings. Those proceedings can be 24hr fast saying "no war in Turkey" and that is that. But you don't want to do that.
we do that on massive scale but your guys are forgetting, the administrative and humanitarian costs are hilariously massive, compared to our laughable economies
>If Greece lets them into the EU, yes they need to deal with them.
see the above points
>Getting paid to take care of illegals and for deportations will create massive amounts of jobs in Greece, thus boosting their economy.
that's not how economy works, in spite of what Keynes says, the money to take care of those people will come from taxes and will essentially bleeding money to create shit, clogging the centers toilets
... cont