This question must have been considered by economists - what lines do they peddle to justify (((them))) owning our Reserve Banks>
Economics Fags: What are the best arguments for not having your Reserve Bank owned by Government
Dominic Myers
Other urls found in this thread:
federalreserve.gov
twitter.com
Caleb Jenkins
(((they))) dont have to justify shit
Wyatt Lee
venezuela
Leo Foster
There's no justification. That's why they play dumb and say it's not privately owned.
Samuel Anderson
Currency is a good like any other, and as such should be provided on a competitive market like any other. Fiat state money is printed to allow for long military conflicts without having to raise taxes. Raising taxes makes it significantly harder to continue warring for long. Printing of fiat currency devalues that currency through inflation. Fiat currency is ultimately valueless, meaning at any time the rug can be pulled out and it becomes useless. Govt setting interest rates also completely ruins how an economy functions. Interest rates are signals for when people should spend, save and invest. Interest rates should also be treated as a good and should be organically raised/lowers according to the market.
Ethan Butler
oh you want the central bank owned by the state.
you're retarded. central banks in general are evil and destroy nations.
I misread your title.
Kill yourself faggot.
Adam Lopez
Well, do you want a cabal of international satanists to instigate a civil war to tore your country up in order to make you comply ?
Jeremiah Murphy
The object of centralization of money or currency is control. Social engineers must have control in order to enact their desires into the world. Keynesian economics is a smokescreen of pseudo intellectualism to bring the wishes of (((them))) into manifestation of the economy.
Juan Miller
...
Parker Bell
...
Jace White
...
Kayden Roberts
...
Jordan Kelly
...
Xavier Wilson
...
Easton Lewis
>Currency is a good
No.
at least you tried
Levi Lewis
>shills against Keynesian economics then shills for it
What the fuck are you doing?
Jaxson Gonzalez
Neat fake chart. Do you ever do any research?
Daniel Rogers
>then shills for it
What the fuck are you saying?
your chart is from 1996 to today..
Parker Butler
1996 to today from chart 1 =/= 1996 to today in chart 2.
So......
Austin Hill
no shit idiot.
my chart includes fractional reserve lending notes. how do you not know this?
Jason Fisher
>your chart is from 1996 to today..
What's your point?
Xavier Morales
see
what's your point? how is this useful discussion? are we getting toward a common goal here? what is your object of discussion?
Austin Thompson
...
Hudson Jones
...
Lucas Clark
>Having a central bank at all
Fractional reserve banking is fraud abolish Central banks and Fiat currency. Get your gold back white man
Juan Ward
>what's your point?
No point in particular other than a chart starting on 1996 doesn't indicate anything.
>how is this useful discussion?
It's not, where do you think you are?
>what is your object of discussion?
How the time scope in the chart doesn't change the fact these lines don't match.
Christopher Ross
The chart literally says "money printed by the federal reserve."
Can you give me a link to that same chart?
Robert Gray
>what lines do they peddle to justify (((them))) owning our Reserve Banks
let them do what they want or they will attack our economy even more
seriously though it's totally unconstitutional bretton woods agreement or not
Joshua Rogers
You chart consists of cash that isn't in banks, checking accounts and travelers checks. It does not include the money loaned to government's and Banks and cooperation or held in stock or bonds or even CDs. It's little people's money.
You are comparing cash and checking accounts to all money. Little people's money to (((their))) money.