Fascism > Monarchy > Republic > Anarchy, Libertarian > Democracy > Communism

Fascism > Monarchy > Republic > Anarchy, Libertarian > Democracy > Communism

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=W8N3FF_3KvU
youtube.com/watch?v=ca8CpIFb0_E
archive.is/GZMcT
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Monarchy > Republic > Fascism = Libertarianism > Democracy >>>>>>>>> Communism

The state exists to serve the body politic.

Literally what.

Anarchism/communism>socialism>liberalism>conservatism>fascism>monarchism

A homogeneous libertarian republic like what America's founding fathers described is the best form of government.

Conservatism is not an ideology you dumbfuck. Most modern conservatives in the west are some form of liberal.

The founding fathers were not libertarians.

>american "conservatives" are liberals
Fixed that for you. In Europe we have real conservatives.

Conservatism isn't a fucking ideology. It isn't even a fucking political position. It's a way of going about politics, based on a mindset of skepticism towards significant change unless the current methods are clearly not working. A conservative's political position is entirely contextual.

>we will pay for schools, roads, the army, space, research grants, social security, medicare, medicaid

BUT DONT YOU DARE MAKE ME PAY FOR PLANNED PARENTHOOD!!

The absolute state of modern Republicanism.

Anarchism in any form is just one thin step above Communism. Otherwise good list

Authoritarian Libertarian. The state shall serve the people..
I want to water the trees, won't you lend your blood?

Curious what point you think you're making.

Minarchist founded the greatest country on the planet which is a Libertarian belief.

Libertarian>Republic>Fascism>Democracy>Anarchy>Monarchy>Communism

Absolutely none of those ideologies will save us from human nature, which is the final boss. The sociopath and the manipulator cabals will inevitably rise to the top - and those who are of this inclination will always try to diminish the intelligence and will of the population so that there are no competitors. The ideology simply changes the tools which they will use against us. Even if there was a great leader, a brilliant leader who managed to run any of those systems perfectly and brainwashes everyone on the planet into compliance - those who come after will always destroy it. Even if we were to purge all of (((them))) right now at the same time, the same ugly beast will rear its head in one way or another.

It's worth fighting the good fight, but it will never end because of how dysfunctional we are as a species, capitalist / democracy has lasted a long time in the current age with relative "success," but only because if thrives on how messed up we are, while trash like communism is easily the most out of touch.

YAAAAAAAAASSSSS

>Fascism=lolbertarianism

WE NEED AN AMBULANCE HERE, HIS BRAIN IS DYING

That's a bit of a defeatist attitude lad. Have you accepted some form of spirituality into your life? Strive toward perfection, even if it can never fully be reached.

Civilization is somewhat of a hard feat for us to attain as humans. It is based of an operating mode that is not present in all of humans, to that of the standard family unit, or in similar quantities in the first place. And even the quality and usage in history, footprint of this behavior is somewhat...somewhat questionable.

This matters because civilization is an even more advanced form of that. Our many biological directives, and many weird mutations and consequences of civilization basically just give it a life of about 3 generations before things that to decay very badly.

But in each cycle we adapt a little bit more to civilization. We can do civilization a little bit longer, a little bit more stable...have even learned how to tame many of out behaviors. Violent ones even with hobbies, sports, even new things like video games. It is not always that we will have to make room for our own natures desire to go into chaos. Eventually we will have adapted enough to make a continuous, and stable civilization. And then its off to the stars with us. Part of that process is also removal of unwanted genetic factors like jews, niggers and many mudslimes.

>pic
i fucking hate it here when r/K selection gets connected to binary political choice instead of wealth, culture etc. This leap of faith is huge.

wat, no its not

youtube.com/watch?v=W8N3FF_3KvU

It explains most of our problems.

youtube.com/watch?v=ca8CpIFb0_E

Things like the amygdala size, and testosterone levels are fairly accurate to predict the type of person to about 80% most likely.

Monarchists are fuckin gay desu

>shitty movie
>u need magic stupidity in your life user

get off the internet granpa

>Autism the post

Fascism>Monarchy>anything thats pure capitalissm=communism

>rabbit
>docile

Rabbits are fucking ferocious when defending their territory against other small animals.

Someone explain to me why I should lend fascism (and the corporatism therein) any credence.

I'm painfully are of the shortfalls of democracy, having read my Hoppe, Schmitt, and all the alt-right fan favorites, etc. etc. I'm no fan of democracy, but I have to rely on the Churchill axiom of "this sucks but it's all we have." I understand it's a breeding ground for degeneracy, strife, and in some ways is set up to fail. But authoritarian governments are also doomed to failure.

I like the idea of heavily restricted democracy wherein only white, property owning, children-having males of the age 25 and over can vote (i.e. intelligent people with time preference and a stake in the future). I also think it can be stabilized by squelching federal power more, implementing longer term limits (might be unpopular here), setting limits to federal power, enumerating specific government powers and implementing clauses allowing for no change to these powers, and setting comprehensive, impregnable regulations against any kind of bribery, "donations," racketeering, etc.

I'm sympathetic to the quasi-monarchy that some alt-right leaders propose, but not so much when it's accompanied with corporatism. I know a lot try to defend corporatism by pointing out incentive stipulations but nah.

So defend fascism faggots. I understand dire times call for greater authority, like when huwhites become a minority, but I don't trust authority nor do I believe it can be rolled back without bloodshed.

It says on pic about K-wolf-conservative and r-rabbit-liberal. And either it uses some strange definition for "conservatives" and "liberals" or idk. Because liberals (white liberals for that case) you often see choose to have less children, which is K, while conservatives would like to have more, which might be still K, because humans are generally K. And now in case of wealth redistribution (which is "plentiful resources" for some time) or any other situation, where "more children" equates "more wealth 99% guaranteed now or when they grow up old enough to work", they will choose r. The point is, in many cases such situation leading to r selection may be served under politically conservative sauce. You may say that welfare nigs (r) from USA are liberals. Kinda... But tell me something liberal about muslims of Gulf monarchies living off oil-based welfare state. Or hell, how about picrelated? They choose r because someone needs to farm the land.

And that's not to mention that r/K selection theory wasn't designed for sociological purposes.

And i see that Molonox here explains that r-selection is also caused by defencelessness. Well, then people from picrelated will die out if they don't breed enough kids for only purpose to work on farmlands. And they still are conservative.

To summarise my point: i fail to see any links between political liberalism and r-selection and therefore entire link of r/K-selection to political orientation is also flawed.

This is all the help i can give you guys
>pic and filename

Ancap>Libertarianism>>>Fascism>>>>>>>>>everything else>>>>>>POWERGAP>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>anything even remotely on the left side of the compass

>also cased by defenselessness

It is caused by the lack of predators, it is also caused by an easy life, your amygdala needs to grow under stress, under duress. Otherwise full maturity will never be achieved. There are many more factors mentioned as well, some are the causes, some are correlated, some are in symbiosis.

But the large amygdala for example is well studied. The larger it is, the more people you can remember, the bigger your social group becomes, of close nit friends.

The second biggest factor for men is testosterone. Getting lots of testosterone comes with success (also hard work, trial and error, most factors that increase your test naturally also increase the size of your amygdala)

Now the transition between a nu male, r selected person and a strong, K selected person may be gradual in some cases, it may intersect boundaries and some so called K selected people could be comfortable to be surrounded by r selected degenerates (easier access to females)

But just as most weight lifters are right wing, one can very hardly escape this reality. It may be somewhat of a social construct on personality types, like that of the briggs meyers types, but it is very well tied to testosterone and amygdala size in scientific literature. Just because you dont know the ins and out of the whole theory (as you stagger to even barely mention one variable around it), doesnt mean that you get to comment on it.

One reply for (you) as I have better things to do now than to "argue" with uneducated morons who cant even understand the content.

also here is a fun fact: We target r selected specifically with specific tactics that more than not actually work very, VERY well

archive.is/GZMcT