Asians are more compatible with Libertarianism than Whites

Democracy is obviously incompatible with Libertarianism, but non Democratic systems can still implement Libertarian policies. Different groups are none the less far more capable of handling freedom than others.


Asians will work if left alone. Whites will riot and demand gib me dats.

Asians will take care of their families is left alone, whites will have kids out of wedlock, divorce their spouse, and pursue hypergamy and other deviant relationships.

Asians will be content with constant and high GDP growth Whites will bitch about how its not fair that the doctor makes more than the single mom at McDonalds.

Asians will choose not to abuse drugs. Whites will go crazy on the legalized substances.

Asians will keep to themselves and respect others private property and personal space. Half of young white are not capable of doing so, and would feel that they are entitled to get away with poor behavior which their parents and media would defend.

Asians would be forward thinking and support the society they are in. Whites, no matter how good, would find something to rebel about.

eh, its not all good

Compare it to where it was in 1960. Then look where the West was in 1960.

Their culture that promites those values also makes them tend to codify them. They may not need the state to enforce them but they want it to.

sorry but its all going to shit now, look to japan if you want a better example.

Because of mainlandisation?
Singapore makes a pretty good point too.

yeah pretty much. they are starting to majorly interfere in the judicial system, so it's all over now. singapore is basically a single party authoritarian state. not saying it isn't nice, but it's definitely not an example if libertarianism

This thread makes auguments of Asians somehow are better at being a civic society but in actual fact it is just falsehood when competition and corruption runs deeper than the ocean and the population is not physically even able to mount any form of rebellion. They are not peaceful, just incapable.

i'm honestly surprised china didn't just come in and bayonet your """democratic""" separatists

they will if they do anything significant.

democracy is dying a slow death here, and there are a shit load of muslim immigrants coming in.

i'm not exactly sure what you can actually achieve with democracy being exclusively in hk - i'm certain thatcher was gambling on hk people migrating into mainland china to incite change

anyway, i'm more concerned with hk staying out of the firewall, which nobody points out apparently...
then i saw your weather and gps apps have switched from google maps to a local version
>it's all over confirmed

i'm no demofag, but if we truly become just another chinese city it will be pretty sad. the party bulldozes local culture and language and pushes a sanitized national identity instead.

english use is falling dramatically and tourism is falling as well. hardly any of the community newsletters or tv channels have english translations or subtitles anymore. just last week they announced they are replacing bbc radio with chinese state radio.

> what you can achieve
A rich and sympaththic trading hub showing to be the better alternative by its mere existance.

>A rich and sympaththic
More like getting maximum jew'd and maximum commie at the same time. It is dead Jim.

How much are cantonese capable of keeping their language and way of living as a subculture staying under itself or are there policies to prevent even this most basic form of resistance?

when guangzhou (canton) fell into communist territory during/after the chinese civil war, massive numbers of people flooded into british hong kong which is about 100 km away. hong kong then became the hub of traditional cantonese culture, as the brits didn't push english and british culture that hard outside of government.

cantonese still lives on in guangzhou, but if you want to get anywhere in life you need to learn mandarin and embrace northern culture. there has long been a north/south divide in china.

about 10 years ago they tried to ban taxi drivers who can't speak mandarin, people freaked the fuck out so they didn't do it, but many think they will try again soon.

whites will build the future

asians will implement the structures that whites put in place allowing them to replicate the future whites already created in their own countries

eh, cantonese will probably recede in canton, won't go extinct, but will decrease in use
it will go on strong in canada :/

Ah i see, so it will slip into obscurity as that funny dialect you read about in the tourist magazins about the area but not die out by forced assimilation. I heard in some places in china theyd put up signs reminding people about not speaking Wu so I dont know how far and blatant they could go.
> north/south divide
I know that northern and southern han are different and that the south has many ethnic minorities which shaped the culture there, but not more and how that actually shows.
Could you sum up northern vs southern mentality or is that too broad of a category?

Some day the diaspora will probably just buy themselves a slice of canada and make a new china lel.

Hong hong has like 7mil people while neighbouring Shenzhen has 20mil
who the fuck cares

I assume we care because we live there, globalfag.

It's pretty much like in the US pre civil war. South views North as being the detached political power base of the country, North views South as out of touch hicks

That is complete bullshit. Asians are more autocratic, collectivist and follow hierarchical structures, they dont value "muh freedoms" that much, even in "democratic" countries like Japan. Economic progress of South Korea, Singapur and Japan was achieved trough totalitarian governance and after it was gone it all slowed down.

But it doesnt even matter, since Libertarianism is meme-tier ideology that will be never implemented by any real country, only by Somalia and such.

>implying democracy entails freedom

Asians are more compatible with libertarianism
Asians are more compatible with socialism
Asians are more compatible with Communism
Asians are more compatible with Absolute Monarchy

Maybe Asians are just better?

fun fact, academics are trying hard to figure it out too
both SK and taiwan democratized by overthrowing a oppressive government when GDP per capita is around 3k
China is now like 10k, what is going on?

>asians are more compatible with one meme and three shit systems
>maybe they're just better lol

Commies, everyone.

>muh democracy
>muh classical liberalism
>muh universal human rights
>muh jewish oligarchy
>muh coffee indo-mulatto great great great grandchildren
>mfw

democracy != success

okay, glad you recognize this but seriously stop race mixing with Asians and let's work on fighting the elite together.

China is the closest to the ultimate system. You guys haven't noticed it yet. They're capitalism but yet they're also socialism. They're one party but yet they're unlike other one-party systems. The China of today utilizes the best of Chinese history and as expected they come out on top.

my flag

>Asians are more autocratic, collectivist and follow hierarchical structures, they dont value "muh freedoms" that much, even in "democratic" countries like Japan.

That's because to have freedom you must have order. It is a duality but it is also paradoxical at the same time. You whites have not yet figured out that you can't just have complete freedom.

A strong authoritarian empire is the perfect system for white people, rally men around a king or emperor and see how glorious we can be!

>asians will implement the structures that whites put in place allowing them to replicate the future whites already created in their own countries

This is literally impossible because you are the one that is backward, not Asians.

>They are not peaceful, just incapable.
It is the peaceful that lends itself to incapability. You do not need masculinity in a peaceful society. You have to understand that YOU are the backward one, not them.

Libertarianism is a meme and doesn't appeal to a large enough amount of people to ever be a realistic political outcome.
Also Asians aren't libertarian at all and even if an Asian country had a relatively small government, were fiscally conservative, etc. as they are in some instances, they're still very socially conservative and somewhat collectivist.

You are of course talking about chinese and japanese, because other 'asians' are literally shit tier people

Also I suggest you go and meet these asians with values, maybe travel to china, you will see that modern generation is quite degenerated, maybe less so than whites because they had much less influence from jews.

White countries without jews white people not influenced by jews are objectively the best.

>because other 'asians' are literally shit tier people
That is not necessarily true. You are only saying that because of the color of their skin. Any poor country is going to seem bad because they are poor. But the heart of Asian people are always superior to white people.

>Also I suggest you go and meet these asians with values, maybe travel to china, you will see that modern generation is quite degenerated, maybe less so than whites because they had much less influence from jews.

They are somewhat degenerated yes, but they are degenerated in a 99% Asian country. All Asian countries, even the "shit-tier" ones are 99%. There's always going to be degenerates. But the fact that you're not 99% White and they are means that you fucked up.

From a shit tier Asian country. Find a similar African city. I'll wait.

It has little to do with them being poor. They are savages and simply uncivilised. Take for example india and compare it to china, how can one country be so advanced and other claiming 3000 years of culture, yet literally live in shit.
Not even gonna talk about indias retarded brother pakistan and their inbred cousins and other stans

Also even countries like malaysia, philippines are quite shit. Asian superiority is mostly a myth. There are a small number if superior asians but they surrounded by billions of idiotic asians

>Take for example india and compare it to china, how can one country be so advanced and other claiming 3000 years of culture, yet literally live in shit.

Indians are Caucasian.

>Also even countries like malaysia, philippines are quite shit.

Malaysia is fine. Philippines is shit due to American colonization & also large portions of their people aren't genetically Asian.

> You whites have not yet figured out that
You do realise that what you said is just liberalism right? Invented by Europeans and then forced upon some asian coutries by the US. Asians just dont value freedom or liberty that much, thats just how it is.

If left alone whites would live just fine, it's the certain 40% nigger country that has the problems you listed due to its huge non-human hominid population.
Asians are eusocial insectoids, they are absolutely incapable of adopting libertarianism. If a group of them is left alone they would quickly produce a new leader to follow.

>You do realise that what you said is just liberalism right?

No. Asians have the greater understanding of the law of one. Taoism/Daoism came from Asian people. Has nothing to do with liberalism. Liberalism espouses freedoms and Asians have the understanding that you cannot have complete freedom.

canton = guangdong province

there's more than 3 cities that speak it canton(ese)

Okay and that has Dao got to do with political system? Also, Koreans are majority christians and Japanese are shinto/nonreligious.

>Okay and that has Dao got to do with political system?
Everything. Left Right politics are POLARIZED. Daoism teaches you that there is no left/right. One compliments the other and forms the whole.

>Also, Koreans are majority christians and Japanese are shinto/nonreligious.
They were modeled after China and China's system was the law of one.

>Koreans are majority christians
27.6%