Feudalism = failed

>Feudalism = failed
>Democracy = failed
>Monarchism = failed
>Fascism = failed
>NatSoc = failed
>Communsim = failed
>Capitalism = failed
>Neoliberalism = failed

We need a new system guys, any ideas?

Anonymous image board run government.

Globalism :^)

NatSoc again

Monarchy never failed.

It's often an overlooked fact that thanks to the World Wars, the Jews were able to destroy the monarchies of Europe.

It's literally the most natural system because there will ALWAYS be aristocratic families vying for power. Before, with the king, that power was permanently safe.

Now, it's a competitive free market to see who can manipulate the masses the most and dumb them down so a new king can be elected behind the scenes.

We need to stop this dumb productivism, we lose so muche time were we could do more important thing.

Juche

>We need a new system guys

No.

Christian theocracy works.

/thread

This thread is going to piss off a lot of people.... prepare for a shitstorm..

monarchies fail, monarchism doesnt

state sponsored religion is an important redpill

White-ism
Killing all non-white will bring peace to this earth.

Anarchy has never been tried.

>Communsim = failed
O really :^)

just b urself-ism

What we need is for Richard M Nixon to return and rule the Anglo world once more

Well natsoc in itself didnt fail ,ot was other forces killing it because they didnt like it it didnt fall by itself like the other systems

Darwinism is next

>Feudalism = failed
umm...no...think again sweetie...

>>Feudalism = failed
>>Democracy = failed
>>Monarchism = failed
>>Fascism = failed
>>NatSoc = failed
>>Communsim = failed
>>Capitalism = failed
>>Neoliberalism = failed

Alienism, we do what the aliens asked us to do. Which is stop wars and love one another.

sage

>Capitalism = failed

Hey burger, you can come here, i can recreate USSR for you.

technocracy plox

this is one of my gripes against National Socialism

Nazi Germany only existed for 11 years. The USSR pretty much had a massive turn around in terms of actual quality and progress, which is why some still see Stalin favorably.

However, after that little 'boom', the test of time was put upon the USSR and we actually saw the holes in the bottom of the boat.

If the USSR only lasted 11 years like Nazi Germany, I PROMISE you that it would be worshiped as fervently as Natsocs worship Nazi Germany

Anarchist is the moment bewteen the fall of a state et the new one, so it has been tried.

And it is disgusting.

White homogeneous society works that is why it is banned.

It has.

Maybe every system is doomed to fail not because of the system but because the species designing the system is inherently flawed. Somehow human beings can't assemble a productive society that is good for all and lasts for an extended period of time. It always follows a framework of creation>implementation>productivity>contentment>discontentment>disintegration

History verifies my claim, we're doomed to repeat the cycle despite the ideology..

Half of the things you listed didn't fail, though.

>monarchy failed

Wayne, you need to develop a cult of personality before you do anything major.

Have a little novelty you're known for that stands out. Get really buff and competitive in powerlifting or something and it'll make you more interesting at face value.

Natsoc but purge the leftists first

NatSoc wouldn't have failed if it wasnt the dumb westeners.

>Hohols
>Recreating a superpower

It will fail when "gas the kikes" gets quads.

the only thing left to try is a star trek style society. we will have warp drive with a decade so we will need to be setup by then as a one world government. i think justin trudeau is the ideal person to lead us

Some of them actually never failed. Also you need to see how each system ended. Some collapsed because of themselves others ended because the whole world truned against them.

>monarchism
>even coming close to failing

Feudalism and Monarchy is bad because you're stuck with the Aristocrat or King you get, odds are they're inbred and paranoid fucks.

Democracy is bad because there's too many useful idiots.

Fascism and NatSoc dictates too much about what you should be doing in your free time.

Communism never worked and neoliberalism is what leads to that system of mass starvation.

Capitalism is okay until lobbyists start controlling the government, then it becomes a monopoly of few ruling over the majority.


What we need is a "democracy" where only people deemed worthy of contributing to society vote. None of this everyone is equal bullshit. There is absolutely no reason that someone with no interest in politics should vote once every 4 years because all they hear on TV is that the other side is literally Hitler.

Kinda sick of that system.

...

Meritocracy. Every man starts with no more than the other.

also fascism is a very new ideology that hasent been tried much

Monarchism failed in Russia

Socialism with Chinese Characteristics
Socialist Market Economics

What you're going to find is that the system is a meme. It's a fucking facade, a charade, a story we tell people to keep them lulled into complacency.

Our governments aren't ruled by systems, or laws, they are ruled by people. Power blocs of business, intellectual, and political interests; the elite class. This is the way things are, this is the way things have always been.

It doesn't matter what system you have. What matters is WHO is in charge, and what ideas they have in their heads. Your system should be designed to get the right people in positions of power, good, moral, fair people. It could be monarchy, or democracy, or whatever. As long as it works to put the right sort of people at the top of the social and political hierarchy.

Has NatSoc ever been tried more than once? The results were pretty good at first weren't they? If it wasn't for that nasty war and the whole genocide thing perhaps it would have continued to be successful? We should try it again.

>Capitalism
>failed
Fuck off faggot

>Feudalism and Monarchy is bad because you're stuck with the Aristocrat or King you get, odds are they're inbred and paranoid fucks.

Here's the thing you need to understand.

At least you know who is ruling you and who is always immediately accountable.

Behind the scenes of any country ever made there are secret societies, noble families, and scary cult-like groups all vying for a monopoly of power. Having a permanent position, like king, prevents any of them from secretly getting into power because the royal family is in itself a noble family/secret society.

Not to mention it's important to have a life long career. Imagine if a college grad only worked his job for 4 years and that was it. Do you think he'd be very good at it?

He needs to get experience that comes with a life time of building a legacy. Term limits are memes.

Hmmmm, all of mankind's attempts to rule over other men have failed.

What's the lesson here?

basically 1776 laws

>Fascism
>Failed
Hol' up, when did this happen
I was not aware of this

Counter-semitism. I am a counter-semite.

Monarchy didn't fail, m8. It's still the very best way to run an empire. After the bomb, it's what we'll all go back to for stability, too.

Democracy worked great for hundreds of years, we just have too many idiots are able to vote now. I suggest we have some type of democratic socialism. Screw the tax cuts we give to billion dollar companies and put that money towards healthcare and food programs. Get rid of Corn subsidies so we stop killing our own with High Fructose Corn Syrup. HFCS is one of the major killers and raises healthcare costs for all of us. The increase in the price of junk food will reduce demand for it. Also, make it illegal to buy junk food with food stamps. Make it so food stamps can only be used to buy whole foods that you have to prepare yourself.

IDGAFISM-short for I Don't Give A Fuck ism.

barbarianism

It literally has

>Fascism = failed
>NatSoc = failed
they didn't fail, they were brought down by a zergrush organised by the jews because they were too succesful

Socialism = no guns
So fuck off.

Oligarchical republic - Republic of Venice
lasted over 500 years, never failed, destroyed by Napoleon - best government that ever existed

Too much capitalisme totally killed the democracy, Trump was a good surprise but he will do nothing about that, and after him same circus.

?

I'm the 2nd guy you replied to

re-read muh post. I'm talking bad against National Socialism. I think it would be a modern day North Korea. The USSR had a boom, but existed beyond 11 years and we saw beyond the fancy advertising.

Nazi Germany only lasted 11 years so it looks like the same "progress" the USSR made.

>Socialism = no guns
yeah perhaps in cucked marxism socialist

in national socialism everyone gets a gun for free and children get trained how to use and clean them in the Hitlerjugend

I have no problem with socialism, and even less with weaponized people.

NatSoc didn't fail it was destroyed by outside overwhelming force

>It didn't fail per se
>It just got smashed by better systems
Hmm

>Natsoc pic is everyone working as brothers with no ruling entity because they're all equals

so fucking dumb.

Which objective parameters were used to make the chart? oh, 0.

It's all thanks to Capitalist countries faggot

hmmm how come this doesn't happen in all capitalist society's but al the ones that were communist?

>What's wrong with that? The rich are making everything cheaper anyways.

" Technocracy " coupled with Democracy

LOOK IT UP

Thank you OP for not being a faggot.

...

Nope. It had to forge money to stay afloat. Left to its own devices (ie no WW2) it would have collapsed before seeing out a decade. It borrowed too much, and centrally planned too much. It had an undeniably amazing effect at motivating the nation, but needed to loosen back into capitalism after three years or so. Turnips are a poor substitute for potatoes.

That's the plan

China

LOVE THE TENTACLE !

Monarchy never failed, it just lost popularity

>Capitalism = failed
>Standing in a grocery store with loads of food thanks to capitalism

Top kek.

How can be erect nipples visible through bra?

>smashed
please, if you didn't gang up on NatSoc from 3 sides with 4 superpowers at the same time it would have never been defeated.
NatSoc and fascism don't collapse on themselves they need to be destroyed

leeches and parasites will not be tolerated, the advancement of our Volk is the number 1 priority

also
>they're all equals
start reading about fascism burgerbro, fascism implies a national order that is important to uphold: the smartest need to go to university, women should take care of the household,...

Not wrong... Kingdoms will return .

"I do not know what weapons will be used in WW3 but in WW4 , it will be sticks and stones"

>NatSoc

Was soaring extremely successfuly until the jealousy of banker controlled England forced war on them.

Was truly not given a chance.

>this

Kids play follow the leader and not follow the continental congress and house of representatives for a reason.

It makes sense to put the capable person in the country in charge...

Monarchy never failed, it more just faded into obscurity in favor of the new systems, which actually failed. Maybe it's time we go back.

By this token, one problem you can identify with modern capitalism is that it works to put the most economically successful people at the top of the social and political hierarchy.

But the problem here is, the most economically successful people aren't always the best to rule. In fact, they might be absolutely monstrous psychopathic lunatics. They might be from a totally alien culture that is hostile to your people and their interests. For example, the USA has foreign governments openly lobbying for legislation. The Saudis are buying huge stakes in major media organizations to sway the political debate, and of course you know about our friends from Israel steering US foreign policy to their own benefit

Monarchy has a problem, because although the rulers are born and bred for their task, educated in the traditions, culture, and philosophy of their people, they often become disconnected from the populace at large. The king will have no connection to a peasant, will not care about his wellbeing, in fact will probably just engage in drunken sex parties while his nation dies away. He didn't have to climb the ladder of achievement to get where he is, he was born into it.

This is part of the benefit of elections. You're able to put people in power that actually identify with the populace. Maybe they rose to prominence through the military, or from humble beginnings. They are not part of the elite cabal.

Of course, the problem with elections is that people are fucking stupid. So in my mind, this is a question about how to set up a voting system that excludes the stupids. I would favor a form of limited franchise democracy, where people have to pass some sort of muster in order to be allowed a vote. Some people's votes will count for more than others. Perhaps something like the system in Starship Troopers

Dis

If the Russians made the effort to build a fake chimney, why didn't they attach it to the building?

>Capitalism = failed
>USA.PNG
Lol

>steals assloads of German ideas and intellectuals.
>pretends it's theirs.
Typical

Nazis picked their fights one by one. 90% of nazi casualties were on the Eastern front. Millions of lives were lost fighting the Nazis and you pieces of shit disrespect their effort.

Gas the kikes

It was given a chance. It worked very well in the short time it existed in the 1930s.
Extremely well, actually.

A true Theocracy.

The nipple is very erect and strong

Small regional governments with grassroots democracy on all issues to engage citizens. This can be done by getting people to vote using their cell phones. All regional governments will be united by a small central government akin to advisory boards not bureaucracies that prescribe fair resource use and protection against other nations.

The central government will have few voices to move policy through easier thus avoid political BS. Also, their terms will be short enough and can be impeached any time to prevent power grabs.

Free market capitalism is used for economic growth, but caps are placed to prevent monopolies and wealth gaps.

I think this system is centralized enough to unite all governments, but not a huge bureaucracy that can crush constituents. It has the benefits of capitalism including economies of scale, but it doesn't let the 0.01% hog all the value created by workers.