It's it true Sup Forums?

>#YouTubeJail : Sup Forums Organizes Pushback
youtu.be/IuRXrnYGWtQ

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Xha80dXYf4Y
twitter.com/AnonBabble

*is it

>shilling for (((adnauseum)))

>(((adnauseum)))
quick rundown? I was about to install it. I have (((AdBlock))), it lets (((Google))) (((ads))) in.

We don't really organize..... it would be more accurate to say we collectively act.

Bog'd

...

It's a classic case of jews jewing jews. Do not get involved in their petty infighting.

Odd hive mind

Further coincidences: The sites is owned by (((Jamie Schuler))), grant manager at (((NYU School of Law)))

Quick rundown on adnauseum:
>owned by jew
>makes you slightly less secure than adblocker
>the plus side is it spams misinfo to adverts
>the argument is that they're anti tracking
>ads are now fronts and mostly have the purpose of tracking your actions online for data
>adnaseum wants to destroy adrev until ad providers adopt ethical standards of their choosing.
>pale moon blocked it

I suppose it depends if you want to fuck with a company's revenue to make a point or not. If you do you could get Adnauseum otherwise just get uBlock because ABP got compromised.

Fuck off Black Pigeon Speaks u fat jew, stop shilling your gave video u fat fuck

Pic related, this is BPS, clearly a kike

>no linking his video on bitchute

YOU HAD ONE JOB!

>you can't have anything that promotes violence and hate!
Those (((rules))) are dumb as shit and clearly meant to target "alt-right nazis" directly. Are they going to ban war songs etc. ?

I haven't seen any Irish Republican or Unionist songs being restricted. Will Rule Britannia be restricted? etc.

Are we always right? Yes.

Arpaio, a US miilitary vet (who swore an oath to uphold the Constituion the United States of America at all costs), went and chose to uphold the law or our land and got censored by a liberal/commie judge, was never allowed an appeal, and was told to "just deal with it." Meanwhile......

PHOENIX (AP) - A political group funded largely by liberal hedge-fund tycoon George Soros has recently raised $2.9 million in its bid to oust Sheriff Joe Arpaio, including getting a $250,000 contribution from the widow of Apple co-founder Steve Jobs.

Records released Friday say Soros contributed $2 million to Maricopa Strong over the five-week period ending on Oct. 27. He previously contributed $300,000.

In all, the group has collected $3.2 million during the campaign. Three other people gave six-figure contributions. Laurene Powell Jobs, president Emerson Collective LLC, a social activism organization, provided her contribution to the group on Oct. 5.

Are we still pretending this Soros fuck isn't a globalist? Are we still pretending this 80 year old piece of shit kike isn't trying to manipulate our sovereignty? Are we still pretending he's not an evil son of a bitch? Where are the leftists? Get fucking real. The jews ARE the problem.

Scott Storch?

does he have more sites? somewhere he must be selling his botnet

It gets more confusing. It's actually a Chinese woman who seemingly is part of the new Jewish Male + Asian Female movement.

Her background is entirely in finance and i can't find any other sites owned by her.

I'd like to thank Youtube for gratifying us with all those shills pushing for their controlled opposition alternative solutions

proofs

i didn't believe it at first, but is real


youtube.com/watch?v=Xha80dXYf4Y

I thought this would make people actually realise the inherent flaw in the internet and the world wide web, namely that it is controlled entirely right down to the wires and routing stations, by shadowy corporations beholden to no-one.

This should make you realise that the best way to regard the web is a temporary object, that could vanish at any moment, and to conduct your online life with a strong sense that it should also be able to be brought offline, away from these groups.

But nope, it looks like the "lesson" people are learning is less one of side-eyed scepticism as to the host and DNS companies long-term viability (remember when Yahoo took down GeoCities and never told anyone?), and more a surface level "GOOGLE AND FACEBOOK ARE BAD".

None of you have learned your lesson, because rather than make moves to ensure there is never such a powerful duo again, you're seeking to replace it with another lower-down group and elevate them to that level.

He looks normal

>Black Pigeon Speaks isn't black

legit surprised

he said it himself in some interview maybe a year ago

>Sup Forums Organizes
An oxymoron, really. I don't really know how shit gets done around here

It really doesnt, since like 2007 anyway

Quit being a ShareJew faggot. BPS is brotier.

...

I fucking hate when people talk about Sup Forums doings and plans in public.

Anyone shilling against adnauseum's a shill. Go back in the archives and notice that before it started hurting (((them))) no one was against it. After google issued their first refund, suddenly "people" are coming out and insulting the developers/advertising ublock which doesn't hurt (((them))) by polluting their dataset.

BPS LIVES IN JAPAN

yea pretty much this, I tried adnauseam but feel much less secure than my current setup, if it worked without disabling adblockers I'd use it but I'm too fond of my current ad smashing combo, especially for some porn sites.

I've got ublock + pic related on chrome and no-script too on firefox

Bump.

I've noticed adnauseam has them rattled. Why is this?

you aren't wrong but you don't really suggest solutions tbf

Hits them right in the shekels

Google just had to refund a ton of ad buyers and they still want more refunded

The competing companies will automatically lose favour with the shadow gov for decapitating their prize pig

The part where they fight for the top spot will redpill the usurpers when they catch flack from juden

>chrome
Stop using the botnet, you idiot.
Any anti-ad extension that isn't compatible with FF is garbage in my book.

I did. What we need to do is establish a culture where things that we put up should be easily for everyone to pull down onto their computer, and then also encourage others to put up content on their own site so that even if the original goes down the culture has ensured many other versions in the wild.

The true benefit of the internet is not that it reaches a large audience, not really. It's that it has no boundaries on the amount of copies that can exist of one file. While you might counter that 100,000 people watched in on Youtube, we'd have a far safer and stable presence if instead 1000 people saw in on 100 sites.

>Google just had to refund a ton of ad buyers
not sure that's entirely related though, bots account for around half of internet traffic and ad nauseam is only used by a small subset of the people using ad blockers

know that Sup Forums does not organize, they just collectively act.
Depending on each case, some make plans, but those plans are tips for most.
Sharing information posing the truth should not be censored, when done then there's a thought police. Kinda 1984 dystopian figure with that INGSOC.

Ublock is on fire fox too. I don't understand how Adblock is still alive with Ublock being a thing. I guess just because Adblock has a much better, more marketable name.

An issue is that those usurpers would have by then been either disprivileged or kicked off entirely. Let's say that a video platform begins to be popular with people with our politics, there's nothing stopping the DNS providers or the domain registers from just kicking them off, and as we have seen with Daily Stormer they can be merciless in their hunt.

But say that this site encouraged a "share and share alike" attitude to its creations, that they have gone down doesn't matter too much when what they did has sprung up on countless other sites all over the world.

Of course, the drawback of such a plan is that those that create things, be they essays, articles, videos, whatever, have to be gracious in how they release items. I think we should encourage a culture away from daily blogs, and towards longer formed creations that tackle an issue from its larger implications.

Don't give up on commentary on current events, but at the same time don't create 300 videos then cry when no one wants to upload them anywhere.

>Push back against youtube
>Links the youtube link instead of a BitChute alternative

>Sup Forums is always right
This meme is brought to you by the same liars who say Sup Forums isn't a single person

I didn't understand it like that, sorry.

The thing is it's going in the opposite direction because while the number of people on internet has dramatically increased they're also much less tech savy than before and they tend to gather in these big places where it's easy for them, which in return pushes content providers to adapt to this format to reach their audience, even if they could build something around their own site.

I'd be down for that but I can't imagine my friends doing it since it's still too convenient for them, they won't give a fuck until it's too late

That's something we're just to have to accept. Not to sound overly flippant, but these people will never be willing to upset their daily lives no matter what, so we have to stop expecting them to. It happens all the time, a good example is the signing of Charter 77 in CZ, back in the days of the Cold War, where many countless people agreed the government was inhumane, but only 200 or so would put their name to the accusation.

90%, if not more, of people will always just want their Facebook likes and recommended videos on YouTube. To try and cater to their whims will hold us back, because we could never compete for them to the level of the major corporations that engage them.

This is why I advocate a sense of "What if..." to our plans. "What if they throttle the site down to a few KB/s?" "What if they take the entirety of the site down and delete all the content, or make it unavailable (just pulling the plug makes it non-existent to the web)"

This is why I advocate to a different culture in our creations, so that being able to have a "file section" on your site doesn't consume nearly the entirety of it, same with the bandwidth. This is what I meant when I spoke of graciousness about content creation.

Think that Common Sense is something like 130KB in plain text and 160KB in HTML, there's no reason EVERY single person couldn't have such a document on their site. A few-hundred MB video becomes a bigger ask. For a modern incarnation of what I'm advocating, if you use Gopher you'll see every single hole has the "Why is Gopher Still Relevant?" text file on it. For an older example, think how many copies of the Anarchist's Cookbook must exist out in the wild.

The Leaf shills again

...

our House sigil and words?

>points at flag

ooooh. Rare.