Why is critical theory wrong?

Why is critical theory wrong?

Other urls found in this thread:

britannica.com/topic/postmodernism-philosophy
youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE
youtube.com/watch?v=bOgkGzMdieI
youtube.com/watch?v=q6c_dinY3fM
youtube.com/watch?v=xnqIj8C2Aek
youtube.com/watch?v=VggFao85vTs
youtube.com/watch?v=2hWYgPDVX_8
youtube.com/watch?v=b5tci36bNjg
youtube.com/watch?v=PFHa4db3hA0
youtube.com/watch?v=A94smJ9QJ5g
youtube.com/watch?v=hvNNtBmA3SQ
youtu.be/kPdxhLUKZYM?list=PLo0ThsDnveH5nv5TNviBrGTX9P6IrYfIe&t=412
youtube.com/watch?v=tPc899uUb-A
youtube.com/watch?v=jgGP_evkvOk
youtube.com/watch?v=TxpIsep4160
youtube.com/watch?v=R3nXvScRazg
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

If your argument relies on arbitrarily redefining language in order to be even remotely coherent, then it's not an argument.

Dispelling critical theory is as easy as refusing to agree on the asinine redefining of reality, and refusing the illogical premises they draw from such practices outright.

Not to mention, OP is a fag.

Interesting. What is a classical example of critical theorists playing at these semantic games?

Language is malleable though, the spoken word constantly evolves

britannica.com/topic/postmodernism-philosophy

Here's a quick rundown.
Hint for semantic games: Critical theory is Frankist-Sabbataean Satanist Jews at Weimar Frankfurt School inspired by Kabbalah moral relativism

>If your argument relies on arbitrarily redefining language in order to be even remotely coherent, then it's not an argument.

This is not an argument.

it's just a theory
a GAME THEORY

Because Jews

critical theory isnt wrong its just used wrong morals change during history and things that where once acceptable are now taboo topics.

Look at any example of critical theory brought into the real or academic world. Critical race theory is based completely around redefining racism and the end product is the popular concept that minorities cannot be racist due to a lack of systematic power, and adversely, whites are inherently guilty of/benefiting from racism.

Crit theory isn't an evolution of language any more than milhouse is a meme.

Not an argument.

It's a classic jew trick relying on arbitrariness.

It's about (((their))) globalist agenda. They want to run a prison planet of race-less, culture-less, nation-less, identity-less subdued sheep. They make up less than 1% of the world's population, yet look at all they control from the world's finances to the media that brainwashes us.

In short, they use the entertainment and news media to encourage globalism and discourage nationalism and traditional western values. They distort and lie about the present and past in that effort.

The truth about immigration, by the numbers:
>youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE

Cultural Marxist Jews Admit Organizing White Genocide

The plan to eliminate the white race:
>youtube.com/watch?v=bOgkGzMdieI

Cultural Marxism in action… Political Correctness, the tip of the blade:
>youtube.com/watch?v=q6c_dinY3fM

Cultural Marxism & Social Justice Explained:
>youtube.com/watch?v=xnqIj8C2Aek

Why are we in Decline - Cultural Marxism:
>youtube.com/watch?v=VggFao85vTs

Leftist subversion explained by former KGB agent Yuri Bezmenov:
>youtube.com/watch?v=2hWYgPDVX_8

also see

The facts about slavery in North America:
>youtube.com/watch?v=b5tci36bNjg
>youtube.com/watch?v=PFHa4db3hA0
>youtube.com/watch?v=A94smJ9QJ5g

Cultural Marxist Jews fund media propaganda against whites on an enormous scale:
>youtube.com/watch?v=hvNNtBmA3SQ

Does this sound familiar at all? (starting at 6:52)
>youtu.be/kPdxhLUKZYM?list=PLo0ThsDnveH5nv5TNviBrGTX9P6IrYfIe&t=412

The Holocaust:
>youtube.com/watch?v=tPc899uUb-A
>youtube.com/watch?v=jgGP_evkvOk
>youtube.com/watch?v=TxpIsep4160

>Critical race theory is based completely around redefining racism and the end product is the popular concept that minorities cannot be racist due to a lack of systematic power, and adversely, whites are inherently guilty of/benefiting from racism.
Of course, the conclusions drawn by critical theory of any kind CANNOT be proven directly. One cannot directly begin to prove with evidence the conclusions, and that's the entire point. It's the ultimate process of inflating a weak idea with verbiage. In order to "prove" the conclusions crit theory draws, one must carefully walk down a predetermined "logical" exercises where they accept a series of platitudes that gradually lead to the overall acceptance of the conclusion.

In essence it's an exercise in putting the cart before the horse, but the professors are conmen who put the cart on a slope, smack the horse on the ass, and call the results proof that carts can pull horses.

Critical theory isn't necessarily wrong in an abstract sense, but for it to be right you'd need a true scientific understanding of the things you try to change instead of some ideological bullshit. Even then it would only work as a catalyst for societal adaptation to actual technological and environmental change, not as a tool to creating whatever retarded utopian society you would ever want. And even without it, the society will adapt to the changing realities anyway, only slower.

So when critical theory is used to take society somewhere that is not optimal for the present reality, it will only increase friction in society, thus needing increasing authority and control and ultimately stripping the people of the freedom to do things the way that makes actually sense as opposed to what the critical theorists want them to do.

Anything can be "wrong" if taken to the extreme. Critical theory is essential to contemporary thought. However, it is best used as a tool for deconstruction. If it is not balanced by some grounded, positive ideas, critical theory often becomes a cynical worldview. Since the kernel of critical theory is malleability of meaning, the critical theory cynic is drawn into a woeful rehashing of human insignificance and imperfection. We can also see the negative impact this thought has on the young and on average people. Criticism as a philosophic exploration should be reserved for people strong enough to wield it.

>Why is critical theory wrong?

its not a theory. the name is just semantic manipulation as all things jewish.

And worst of all, Adorno wasnt even the worst, Marcusa was the most satanic kike.

Could possibly not be an argument.

Because its task is to criticize the tradition without affirming it or stating any positive vision

>Look at any example of critical theory brought into the real or academic world. Critical race theory is based completely around redefining racism and the end product is the popular concept that minorities cannot be racist due to a lack of systematic power, and adversely, whites are inherently guilty of/benefiting from racism.

so we would agree that "crit theory" is basically an antiwhtie rhetoric wraped in celophane? bascially political bullshiting in academic context?

what is even theoretical about it? the basic premise doesnt even exist (it does actually - its "all white people are evil").

youtube.com/watch?v=R3nXvScRazg

Because Western Civ is the best civ

bramp

Criticism is a hammer.
Critical theory is the notion that the pillars of society are nails.

It's not "wrong", because their purpose is not to be "right", their purpose is to promote revolutionary material to the masses, without the establishment knowing it. Thats how we got here today. It's a recipe for faggotry, social acid on the cultural establishment of any nation.