Is he right about the Alt-Right being essentially right-wing SJWs?

...

You tell me, OP. Because I don't care.

No but i wouldn't expect any different of an analogy from a guy whose audience is mostly kids

I don't watch his videos. He is a weak apologist from what I heard on that Destiny debate

>mostly kids

You do realize where you are right now right?

>Sargoy of Cuckad

kill yourself for even posting this shit here

Doesn't have anything to do with us.

yes

yes, now come to the center we have cookies!

No, Sargon is an SJW in denial. When that silly wench called him out on stage it proved it.
Instead of taking it like a man he whined like a bitch to vidcon and got his group of female framed faggots to act like SJW's

...

He is alt right, he's just in denial.

lmao

...

He mainly refers to himself as a "radical centrist" but, ok.

>welfare made black people poor
WHy the fuck does he still support welfare then? DOes he want to keep black people poor? Is he maybe /ourguy/?

>Is he right about the Alt-Right being essentially right-wing SJWs?

It doesn't matter. Competition is always healthy in basically any facet of society. An alt-right is necessary to challenge others and advance our understanding of the world. The existence of the alt-right has done almost nothing but good.

>wants to save Western Civilization
>counter-signals the only group prepared to save Western Civilization

Also, shaming tactics work on cucks. He's a fucking idiot to attempt it. It's a jewish tactic, and he's so averse to naming the jew, he'll never be able to admit it.

Because roads and helping people and stuff. Such is radical centrism.

Conservatives are just right-wing liberals!

Sargon's issue is that he can't/doesn't differentiate beliefs and actions beyond a very small scope. The best way to think of Sargon is that he is "Lawful Good" cleric and his religion is Enlightenment. Anything outside of that may be lawful, good, or not, but it will never be better than Enlightenment, which is perfect in his mind.

So when he sees a bunch of white ethno-nationalists and a bunch of black ethno-nationalists, he just sees ethno-nationalists and doesn't see anything beyond that like why they might be, who might be in the right over their nationalism, etc. Sargon's complaints about Muslims/Asians in England is never that they will replace the native population, merely that they aren't behaving as English people culturally. If tomorrow, every native Brit was gon, but all the Arabs suddenly acted like right proper brits and acted according to the Enlightenment, then Sargon would be perfectly happy.

The problem for/with Sargon is this: there are only so many tactics out there to get what you want politically or socially. For the last sixty years, those tactics have been stripped down to the ones the Left uses, and the former tactics of the Right cannot accomplish anything. So when the alt-right acts like the alt-left, because that is the only tactic with a chance to accomplish their goals, Sargon sees them using leftist tactics and categorizes that as "they're no different." Sure, there might be similar motives, but both sides desire radically different results, but he sees the slightly similar motives, and the similar tactics, and assumes there is no difference.

See, this is the disease of Liberalism: it can never tolerate authority. You get rid of the European aristocracy and the Bourgeoisie takes their place . . . and then you claim we need to overthrow the Bourgeoisie! The Revolution swallows its own people. Revolutionaries are nothing but murderous cowards. Society didn't become more free after the French Revolution, it became less so. And when the Bourgeoisie is overthrown and replaced by the Communist Party society will be even less free (as history as shown).

Liberals and Socialists are useful idiots. They can't see that behind the cry of "Liberty! Overthrow your oppressors!" there is an even greater tyrannical force waiting to take over.
The Old Kings of Europe at least had a modicum of sympathy for their subjects, because they knew that their subjects were immortal souls like themselves and that they would be judged more harshly by God because of their greater responsibility (look it up, this is the universal teaching of the Church). Now, the masters that have replaced the Kings of Europe with their "Enlightenment ideals" only look as humans as cattle who are to be placated with vain entertainment and food so as to keep them docile. THAT is the Enlightenment: the gradual reduction of human dignity from Sons of God to Dumb Apes that need to be brainwashed (look it up; read Walter Lippman's "Public Opinion" or Edward Bernays' "Propaganda", for example).
It was no accident that the Bolshevik Communists slaughtered Christians and persecuted the Russian Orthodox Church: Communism/Socialism is inherently godless; it views humanity as just another animal that needs to be effectively managed and farmed.
Such Enlightenment. Such Illumination.

She's cute. Can I have her?

No, she's mine.

No

He's just a fence-sitting faggot.

Alt-right engages in identity politics. Apparently white people having a group identity is problematic to Sargon. So who's really acting like an SJW?

I actually have more respect for antifa than hack pseudo-intellectuals like Sargon. At least antifa picks a fucking side.

I like you user, keep up the good work

Nah. Guy's a fucking idiot who should have stuck to doing tours of archeological sites. He's like some asshole version of Lindybeige who got a little too high off his own farts, didn't heed the advice of people who were screaming about getting nigged and kiked, and is now going to get nigged and kiked into oblivion.

kek'd

Well said.

The reason the left is now pushing centrist positions is because finally they realize they are losing so now they are gonna try to make Alt right look like extremist in other to avoid the backlash. Don't be an idiot and fall for that shit, they did this during Clinton years in office they are gonna keep pushing to the left less aggressively now.

The difference between the "new right" and sjw crew is that this movement is inherently self correcting, due to the anonymous and unmoderated nature of Sup Forums. Any individual on the right may share any or all of the negative characteristics common in sjws. The difference is the universal endorsement of those characteristics they exhibit, vs the endlessly self critical and half ironic ramblings of Sup Forums which endlessly stumbles towards truth.

Yes. Instead of being concerned with geopolitics and economic issues the primary issues driving the alt right is identity politics, they have been primed to think in racial terms just like sjws, they are two sides of the same coin. Its a distraction.

>la everyone is wrong but me centrist man

Nah Alt-right is far more superior than leftist SJWs

checked.
this man speaks the truth.

Can people be right about things but still be completely ignorant as a whole?

Yeah dude what an intellectual

...