Well you want to join the fight against Goolag and the Behemot Alphabet inc? You came to the right place rookie. Here is how we roll:
>Destroy their Ad Revenue Goolag relies on companies, small and big who pay them to display their ads to users which are most likely to buy the cheap Chinese shit they sell,creating profiles of you and track you.
>How to stop them Currently the best option seems to be a program named AdNauseam. It automatically clicks on ads without displaying them. >What does this do? It renders the profiles Goolag has of users useless and stops them from effectively tracking you and selling ad solutions. Means if you are a 400lbs basement haxxor masturbating to anime who starts clicking on car insurances for 50+, Goolag will at some point not know which ads to show you, and other users who have similar interests. It makes their service useless for companies who wants to sell anime porn AND car insurances for Boomers, so they might stop paying Goolag and drain their funds, make it impossible for goolag to build their Filter Bubble Utopia. (file-upload.net/download-12686520/Howitbegan-MichaelHanderhan.mp4.html)
>Come on just tell me how I can do this Step 1: Get a Browser that isn't controlled by Goolag. We have tested so far >Windows Vivaldi Opera Waterfox >Linux Icecat
Don't fall for the AdNauseam meme. It's a dud, and it's a Trojan horse. If you already used it, you wasted your time: Google doesn't lose a cent. Yes, Google refunds money. But none of that money comes from Google's own pocket. It's the money paid by advertisers in advance: part of it is simply returned for fake traffic, most of which is ditched early on and comes from competitors attacking each other. Now, who takes the hit? Small site owners whose ads you're targeting. Google loves punishing them for "bad traffic", when some asshole simply click-spammed them. On the other hand, Google turns a blind eye on big kike sites like major news outlets.
Don't underestimate the ad industry kikes. They'll just come up with more sophisticated, sly and Jewish kinds of ads that will fuck up your internet space even more. Google won't suffer, big kike sites won't suffer, but small NEET-owned sites will. Don't be an ass, let the little guy earn his cent. All ads are geared towards normies anyway, not you.
AdNauseam claims that its goal is to protect you from surveillance. That's a totally false premise and a lie. There's nothing easier than to stop getting tracked: all tracking is done through cookies and associated accounts. Just don't stay logged in to your Google account and use Private/Incognito mode. Or use cookie cleaners. As simple as that, you're not tracked anymore. The real goal of AdNauseam is to push its agenda. And it pretty much exposes you, too.
The creators of AdNauseam are literally SJW Marxist Jewish homos and trannies, this is not an exaggeration. You're basically taking part in kike wars and serving as a voluntary promoter of a yet unannounced product. It's their 4D chess. Now, what happens when AdNauseam clicks on ads for you? Your IP address, the whole information about your location is passed down there. You're not only not saved from surveillance, you're being surveilled on repeat. Do your math.
This is the "woman" behind AdNauseam, Helen Nissenbaum.
Adam Phillips
The Marxist Jews are the masters of subversion. They know best how to infiltrate the discourse and twist it for their own good. One of their common techniques is called "false equivalence". The trick is to substitute a minor, mundane issue for a major one and eventually take the attention away from really important things. So called "ad surveillance" is one of the examples. Yeah, it's kinda nasty, but no more than dog poo in the street. It's basically cookie tracking which can be disabled with one click. Only tech-illiterate normies who buy shit online are affected by it. Can I easily disable government surveillance? The effects of mass migration, affirmative action, anti-hate speech regulations? The Marxist Jews don't want people to talk about it, they want everybody to focus on their ad poos. This is not even helping the cause. Instead of promoting alternatives to Google services and Youtube, damaging Google's reputation in the eyes of normies, they make people vent out in a safe outlet, which may actually benefit Google in the first place.
Big advertisers have been waging click wars on each other for YEARS. Reports of mass click fraud date back to 2015, 2013, 2011.. And they use much more sophisticated methods than just blatantly sending 100 clicks an hour from your home IP. Over 50% of web traffic is bot traffic at this point. Do you think Google's quantitative analysts are dumb? That they don't have early filters in place? If anything, it's Google's competitors that will suffer from click fraud first.
So, what's the REAL goal of these Jews? - To give Google an edge over competitors because the latter can't handle click fraud effectively and lack good quants - To sell data to Google for their new adblocker - To suppress smaller scapegoat websites in favor of (((big))) ones - To push the discourse sideways, in a safe direction - To expose the IP addresses of people with questionable political views We can only guess.
Jaxson Edwards
lads and gents the running gag
Dylan Rivera
...
Jonathan Baker
>The Marxist Jews are the masters of subversion. They know best how to infiltrate the discourse and twist it for their own good. One of their common techniques is called "false equivalence". The trick is to substitute a minor, mundane issue for a major one and eventually take the attention away from really important things. So called "ad surveillance" is one of the examples. Yeah, it's kinda nasty, but no more than dog poo in the street. lol
Jackson Wilson
Previous thread edition. > > > >
Cooper Sanchez
What one user can do with two browsers running the script irregularly over 20 hours
Gabriel James
From a political standpoint, the EU has already took the fight against them, if Mr. Trump could be less butt hurt over our Cultural Marxists, it might be possible to break and ban Alphabet inc. from the west
Matthew Cox
filter everyone who seems to klick every random add all the time boom google only gets the right traffic again easy
come back with a better idea
Jacob Torres
that's why you turn the ad clicking % rate down, as is in the options
come back with better reddit spaced ideas
Ian Brooks
>Get a Browser that isn't controlled by Goolag. We have tested so far >Windows: >Vivaldi >Opera If you're already suggesting these you might save yourself the trouble and just use Edge.
Oliver James
I want to note something about this thread, and it's previous incarnation. This particular Austrian, here known as '7rHxSL4W' has something to prove. He's fallen victim to confirmation bias as Austrians are so prone...however, it must be noted that throughout history the Austrian Gymnasium has been used to churn out diplomatic functionaries and unironic shills for the establishment.
This poor bastard is an exemplar of the west which _must_ be saved. Be aware that Austrian posters in this thread are Memetic Hazards.
Non-lethal memes only.
Asher Long
... and the shills answer their master's cry.
Juan Ward
Does this work with Chrome? has anyone tested? it's the only browser I use
Nicholas Lewis
Absolutely Dialectic.
Jeremiah Price
Yeah I would like to keep the red pilling about the Highland Group up, but that will bring all the shills out even more than now. It is sad that they are so egomaniac that they even dismiss their Saint Popper and don't accept that the theories they base their fever dream on have been disproved over the last 3 decades.
THE HIGHLANDS FORUM >Welcome to The Bilderberg Group, 2017 Edition Sorry for the shitty formatting, all I've got right now is my tablet, and I'm fucking tired. So I'm just copy and pasting some quotes I pulled from the article and posted on Gab. I can't do the article justice, it's a must read. >"One idea is to establish a telecoms partnership that would unilaterally delete content deemed to “fuel hatred and violence” in situations considered “appropriate.”
Sounds familiar… >"Known as the ‘Highlands Forum,’ this private network has operated as a bridge between the Pentagon and powerful American elites" >"The Highlands Forum has for 20 years provided an off the record space for some of the most prominent members of the shadow intelligence community to convene with senior US government officials, alongside other leaders in relevant industries." >"The Highlands Forum has served as a two-way ‘influence bridge’: on the one hand, for the shadow network of private contractors to influence the formulation of … US military intelligence; and on the other, for the Pentagon to influence what is going on in the private sector." No surprises here, we all knew something like this existed. Now we've got a name boys. >"… outlined a strategy for “perception management” AKA the feds have been memeing for quite some time.
Henry Lee
>"Notice that in 1998, the Highlands ‘Group’ became a ‘Forum.’ According to O’Neill, this was to avoid subjecting Highlands Forums meetings to “bureaucratic restrictions.” (FACA) [Prevents secret consultation with private groups to create policy]" Basically, they have made it impossible to FOIA any minutes of their meetings. Whatever they are doing, they want it to be secret. >"The Highlands Forum … Its purpose is to provide the Pentagon a shadow social networking mechanism to cement lasting relationships with corporate power, and to identify new talent, that can be used to fine-tune information warfare strategies in absolute secrecy." Basically, we need to screen all of these new alt-tech companies to make sure they have no association with The Highlands Forum. If they are connected at all, they are co-opted 100%. >"Delegates have included senior personnel from SAIC and Booz Allen Hamilton, RAND Corp., Cisco, Human Genome Sciences, eBay, PayPal, IBM, Google, Microsoft, AT&T, the BBC, Disney, General Electric, Enron, among innumerable others" Basically, the military industrial complex, plus everyone censoring and deplatforming us. >"maintains a comprehensive database of 1,700 non-state groups including " … strategic NON-VIOLENT actors,” to analyze their “organizational patterns, areas of cooperation, strategies and tactics.” Hey, that's us. The article provides compelling evidence that political activism is specifically targeted. If you had any doubts that there were shills or people observing us, this should end all doubt.
Thomas Lee
>Dr, Itamara Lochard,… - Highlands. "[Taught] courses on 'Irregular Warfare’ and 'Internal War’" Again, shilling, propaganda, and instigation of a civil war. It's all here. >"MIIS CySec is formally partnered with the Pentagon’s Highlands Forum through an MoU … initiative itself is funded by George C. Lee: the Goldman Sachs executive who led the billion dollar valuations of Facebook, Google, eBay, and other tech companies." All funded by (((Goldmann Sachs))) >"A major function of mass surveillance that is often overlooked is that of knowing the adversary to such an extent that they can be manipulated into defeat. The problem is that the adversary is not just terrorists. It’s you and me." Eg. Charlottesvile Yeah, these are the fuckers coordinating this shit. I know this might not teach us a whole lot we didn't know or at least suspect. Hell the articles are 2 years old. But we need to remember the name… THE HIGHLANDS FORUM
Says the salty dude with the meme flag from the sell outs from the Bureau
David Wood
>keep the red pilling about the Highland Group up, Please do this.
I guarantee Helen Nussbaum is connected.
Ryan Reyes
Nice pastajew
Jackson Cooper
Prove me wrong about Gymnasium.
Austria-user, we are on the same side. Your methods are retarded. Please, let's synthesize our approach before running into battle.
Bentley James
Not quite. It is that kind of tranny that just wants to be left alone and not used for the "end all conflicts by literally trying to change the human nature through race mixing based on disproved theories" kind of tranny. Sell outs you are for a hand of Shekel betraying your own kind
Julian Miller
would this not help drive away business from google's ad services? given that they'll treat their customers like shit.
Eli Nelson
I would agree to a cease fire with lefties muslim and Niggers, not with a sell out
Isaac Jones
>betraying your own kind Explain this. You're a foreigner to me. You are not my kind.
Joshua Wilson
>thinking a few autists from Sup Forums not using google is going to make a difference
Isaiah Evans
>I would agree to a cease fire with lefties muslim and Niggers LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, THIS IS WHY EUROPE IS DYING
Nathan Anderson
If you could harvest the corporate butthurt in these threads and turn it into energy we'd have created the world's first perpetual motion machine
Dominic Kelly
Oh, so you are not of European descent, socialised around cultural principles combining pagan finity of life with the Christian part taking away the fear of the infinity of death without getting cucked and decided for the virtual security of being a cattle in a jewish pasture without fence not moving, even without the fear of somebody cattle probing you. Sad that you took the Shekel and gave up your independence. Never mind. Filtered >on the internet against goolag >destroys europe we lad
Gavin Rogers
so many posters immediately shilling against this is confirming that it's effective almost no one on Sup Forums should be upset by this
Ethan King
>Why is this not illegal?
Clicking on adverts is not illegal.
Clicking on adverts all the time is not illegal.
Clicking on adverts is by definition a responsive action. Are you saying I am responding as quickly as the server can send me adverts an act of spam or flood attack? Because that would make your server the attacker and the clicker the victim.
If clicking on adverts more than a certain number of times in a certain period is illegal, why would sending the clicker at least the equal number of adverts in the same time period legal by the same logic?
By any measure and by any definition of the law, clicking on all the adverts all the time is not illegal.
...
(Continued)
1/2
Aiden Edwards
2/2
...
However Google might be committing click fraud by knowingly send out adverts to the same person before he can reasonably click a second time. That is, the technical method of how Google display their advert is flawed, but they still charge advertisers by number of clicks, not by the more reasonable measure of how a normal person who intent fulfill the purpose of the advert, i.e. clicking and then proceed to become a customer brought in by the clicking action, would need time to complete said action and therefore complete the purpose of the paid advert, therefore the risk of displaying adverts during this time when a person is still completing this process triggered by an earlier advert he clicked, lies solely on Google alone as it is a completely understandable, foreseeable and preventable risk that the commercial model that Google choose to follow carry. In other words, it is a risk that originates from Google's however justifiably flawed technical method of serving adverts that Google decided to accept by adopting said flawed advert delivery method of the flawed model of advert commercialization.
Therefore Google may be committing click fraud (towards the advertisers) by adopting said flawed methods and models. Which explains the previous lawsuits they decided to pay out over the last few years.
Therefore, however unrealistic and unhuman clicking on adverts multiple times a minute can be, it is also not illegal to do so.
>But does it not seem kind of a dick thing to do?
Still not illegal.
Serving adverts faster than a normal person can reasonably read or consume, is also a dick move.
Secretly logging which adverts said person had clicked and had not clicked, is definitely a dick move, also creepy and definitely stalkerish.
Easton Hall
Bumping because google is literally Satan.
Julian Smith
WITNESSED
Isaac Nguyen
I was speaking of your sub-130 iq, but if you insist on virtue signaling so loudly, may you be so unenlightened with your 'filtering'
Isaiah Hughes
...
Julian Hughes
Get another computer and click all the ads with it.
Jaxson Scott
>Step 3: >Disable other adblockers and no cookie options and block pop ups, else the ads will not be "displayed" and AdNauseam can't click on them ya, fuck that
Justin White
So this doesn't work with Firefox? What's the most similar browser for me to use?
Adam Brooks
>People still not grasping how social media works People HATE fucking google. HATE IT. The same people posting on Sup Forums are also posting on reddit with people posting on facebook with people posting on youtube. That's how this shit spreads so fast.
Nicholas Smith
Today in people that don't understand computers.
Tyler Bailey
>AdNauseam
NO! This is a trojan
Jason Wood
>Satan >666
Jaxson Wilson
How do you like loop/spam fake clicking the ads?
Caleb Perry
come on Jeff don't be disappointed, try to become better. No conflicts is stupid, no war is literally static. Whites are not static, making whites static would make them Niggers, do you want to make the world Niggers. And what is so hard to understand about the difference between a cease fire and peace. The Shekel didn't help to improve you, the security made the same with you as it has done with the boomers. Lazy sell outs
Jose Morgan
WEAPONIZED AUTISM
Austin Foster
it works, op is just a retard
Jayden Moore
>still getting ads >post 2000 the fucking bottom barrel retards on this board i swear. the most damage done to these parasites was the rise of ad blocking apps. the reason ad blocking apps became their kryptonite was off the fucking endless pages of screaming emoji shit that used to blight every site.
Anthony Evans
You'll never beat the Googs, Drumpfkins! Face it, you lost and you lost bigly. The future is female, so back into the dustbin of history. It's 2017, virgins.
Camden Parker
it does work with firefox though
Isaiah Phillips
lol why? ill tell you what this will do. make google more money, they only refund 7-11%. i haven't seen an add in 8 years i think thats good enough
Lincoln Rivera
Read the OP.
Hunter Flores
Not quite, SJWFox is just on the same level as IE and Chrome, same goes for SJWmoon and SJWBrave. Those who bend down before the yiddish masters can be considered traitors
Thomas King
I smell sneaky jew tricks. I mean, If I watched a Sargon video, I would technically be clicking on all the ads every video making him money.
Just use ad block. Fuck google.
Zachary Edwards
I installed AdNa as you guys told me, but i never leave Sup Forums and I already made around 3000 fake clicks, before i realised that
Ethan Lopez
i did. he's full of shit
Aaron Lee
you can white list Sup Forums. Or even better use side browser which runs the script and use your usual browser with your favourite ad blockers for shitposting
Angel Morris
Donald J Trump, 45th President of the United States. If we can help create that, we can do anything.
Wyatt Fisher
well memed my friend, meanwhile ill click ads using firefox
Kevin Martin
>Filtered (You)
The absolute state of 7rHxSL4W... White men are generally disciplined enough to actually filter when they say they filter...So you must be female or Jewish....Typical tricks shlomo!
Juan Butler
I can't stop you, will I stop you, no, you are a free meme flag
Jose Long
bump
Blake Perry
How is Brave SJW?
Jacob Williams
How do I get AdNauseam on my android phone?
Christian Gomez
no, because those advertisers will realize that you arent a real clicker and sue google for their money back
Robert Mitchell
one cannot install AdNa on it. No developers mode to install apps from folder
Jordan Nelson
It's in early beta you retard.
Leo Kelly
>one cannot install Anything on it. ftfy
John Hernandez
well for the purpose of attacking goolag it is useless for now so no intention to tell anyone ITT to download it
Adam Sanders
>no, because those advertisers will realize that you arent a real clicker and sue google for their money back
How are they going to prove that without my browser history. All google will see is clicking traffic going way up, they won't give a fuck about context.
It's a money making scam for you tube fags getting fucked by the SJWs. As I recall, these are the same faggots that attacked the advertisements of gaming ((("journalists"))) with the same excuse. I'm not defending it, but they did play dirty first now they're getting an eye full of shit.
Asher Walker
If you want to use firefox use waterfox instead, just a regular privacy oriented fork
Wyatt Edwards
Made another list.
Top 20K-100K most expensive keywords : Average = $45
For the 151 time >Marketing office knows that only roughly 15% of the clicks will create new customers >They pay per click >New customer number stays the same but click exponentially take off >Goolag asks for more Shekel >Budget office gets suspicious >informs legal matter office >They hire analyst >Analyst finds out that goolag broke contract >Goolag gets sued Now take this multiplied by some millions each suing for around 1 Million dollar.
Bentley Gonzalez
Good stuff, user. Saved
Jason Walker
pls make top 1-100k
Jonathan Jenkins
he thinks that I'm the driving force behind this threads and tries desperately to discredit me and bring third party anons away from downloading the app and attacking his indirect employer
Matthew Williams
How would you use a script to do that?
James Martin
Is ignoring the jew better than killing him and giving him ample room for his schemes?
The jew is a conundrum. How can it be finally defeated?
Kayden Bailey
Yes and yes.
Noah Clark
Browsers that require extensions to adjust their core functionality are inherently insecure. Eich is not SJW, just a shitheel.
Austrianon has Z E R O. experience in the ad industry. Evaluate it's statements accordingly.
Alexander Mitchell
That's exactly what it'll do user. When businesses do their quarterly books and see their advertising costs go up with revenues staying the same, they'll pull money from budget they spend on Google and other analytics services. If enough people install this addon it'll destroy all trust in Google's advertising services.
Noah Thomas
>How are they going to prove that without my browser history your ip address Make no mistake, zero people are going to make money off of this. If people end up running the same script that gets posted for the top 1 through whatever keywords and just massively inflate clickthrough rates that are already abysmal it's just going to be a massive clusterfuck. Click fraud is setup to stop people specifically farming their own websites, not people just clicking EVERY website like apes
Colton Walker
They'll give a fuck when advertisers start pulling out
Colton Baker
>its*
Jason Anderson
>Goolag gets sued >each suing for around 1 Million dollar.
lol. how much would it cost to sue google. probably more than was spent on the adds.
Nolan Jones
Working on a fork of FIREFOX and shitposting this austrian faggot into absolute hysterics is my immediate motivation.
My longer term motivation comes from dealing with NYU tech folks IRL, understanding their alignment with secret societies, and acting to suppress their agenda.
Austrianon may be an unwitting participant.
Aaron Brown
Excellent thread. >Step 1: >Get a Browser that isn't controlled by Goolag. We have tested so far >>Windows >Vivaldi >Opera >Waterfox
How about Yandex Browser? Anyone have any advice for email providers in general (versus gmail, of course)?
Jace White
>hurr hurr just block the adds
WHAT HAS EVERYONE WITH ANY CLOCKED LURK TIME BEEN DOING FOR THE PAST FIVE TO TEN YEARS?
Jonathan Hill
>Script Wut? you can do it in the app By tricking him into fighting against his own people for greed and the fear of losing his security. Soros early years are the best example
Luis Gonzalez
What does running the script do? I have adnaseam running and in maybe four cumulative hours of shitposting it's racked up $250. Does the script increase ad frequency, or increase the cost of clicking on ads? I've asked a few times and gotten no answer
Jacob Hughes
Or (((Google))) adjust their numbers to the new trend and avoid an expensive legal suit.
Remember, they don't need to charge per click. The threshold can be lowered (not raised) without affecting googles customers. Google will be watching, we will barely make a dent.
Ad block does way more damage than ad nauseum and it's actually useful.
Nicholas Phillips
You're on an anonymous forum. Stop LARPy vagueposting if you're trying to be serious.
