Don't tolerate intolerance

Damn. Good. Point.

Only reason you could have do disagree with this is because you're a nazi. You aren't a nazi, are you?

...

(((karl popper)))

Ok i get it. Tolerance leads to Intolerance, which leads to the rise of Hitler and Nationalism.

But what is the bad news?

So terrorists can't demand human rights because they are actively trying to destroy the institution that created human rights to begin with, which is civilization.
Thanks pooper.

...

NAWWWWWWWWWWWW

fuck off kike

tolerance is a virtue of weaklings

This same logic can be applied to the commies.

Also, election to political office is different from larping as a nazi in the street.

So since they are being intolerant, we should not tolerate liberals' intolerance, right?

Checkmate atheists.

...

Tolerance is the problem in the first place. I want uncensored freedom of speech, not tolerance. Fuck tolerance.

Gas this Karl Popper faggot.

Tolerance and political correctness = Jewish censorship.

Was waiting for this. Thank you

...

I'll agree with this statement the day you'll apply this to Islam and when you'll stop preaching out own instinction.
Until then stick it up your ass.

nice comic that tries to infentilize the readers, but 1 question still remains

can I be intolerant to people who are intolerant to the intolerant?

Have you noticed?

Liberal shit -> low energy lies on cool, expensive, paid hipster designs, artistic photos.

Sup Forums masterpieces -> Powerful memes with ms paint.

Tolerance and apathy are last virtues of a dying society.

kek

It's beautiful user

>Make laws that limit speech or representation
>Be surprised when these laws are used by the opposition against you
The biggest flaw in the thinking of statists is that laws that they pass will never be used against them. Fascists think that the military will never be used against them, communists never think that suppression of speech will be used against them.

So, I should be intolerant of tolerance while being intolerant of intolerance?

I'm so confused.

kek

or just concise powerful words in green ascii

...

>ignore logic and just believe me intolerance is tolerance
No, it's not a good point. We value tolerance because we value freedom. If a society becomes a nazi shithole that society willfully and freely chose to be a shithole, therefore that society deserves to be a shithole. Part of having freedom is accepting to deal with the consequences of your choices.

I agree with this up to a point. If people are openly calling for genocide or mass violence it shouldn't be tolerated. However this doesn't only apply to right wing extremism, this includes communism and Islam as well.

gb2
>>>/leftypol/

R
A
R
E

Ben Garrison's signature makes it a 10/10 top kek

...

ya that's pretty good, I posted it in response to the orginal dumb fb post i downloading op from, probably won't make me any friends but whatever hah

any juicy lib salt replies from it?

Just posted bruh and it's 3:40. Prob won't see anything before this thread archives, but if I do and it's humorous I'll post it.

I dont get the ben garrison signature? Is he a real Neo Nazi?

Antifa isn't a new organization. One of the primary reasons for hitlers rise to power was the streisand effect caused by the suppresion of the NSDAP. If an idea is truly bad, then in the light of day and under the scrutiny of all it will be destroyed.

>Outing how new you are

Ben "Zyklon" Garrison LOVES it when we shop his comics into Sup Forums memes

This fucking stupid logic makes it completely A-OK to exclude the pro-immigration, no-border imbeciles that are dead set on destroying our countries.

Even if a society can only stay tolerant by being intolerant towards the intolerant ones this society isn't completely tolerant and therefore in some way intolerant.

It's like saying that every woman's able to get pregnant: There are, were and will be always some who can't. Many social constructs aren't apriori like math.

Tolerance is a frankfurt school faggotry anyways and is pushed in a way too toxic behavior as we can see by looking at places like Sweden, Germany, France and - my City (dead Meme) - England. Intolerance is something every human has and should have - especially when it comes to things that harms your society like mass immigration.

No matter what the faggot says: If you're not tolerating an idea because of it's intolerance you're not (completely) tolerant. This bitch is just trying to save "tolerance" in general by spreading a subjective philosophical judgement. The dumbass species "human" will always try to justify it's bullshit whilst trying to held on to the society's most worshipped value: Goodness.

Ok am Nazi now what do?

Great point. That's why we need to lock up or deport all these anti-white bigots.

It's kinda a meme

Also btw I didn't create that edit it was from another thread back when the oic in the OP first came out

Great, now let's kick out all those people intolerant of gun rights, white pride, and the free market

>be intolerant because someone else is intolerant
that's like saying you should jump off a cliff because it's the right thing to do to oppose other people who jump off a cliff
fucking liberals, i'm starting to think you don't have a collective brain between the lot of you

>Jew says not to tolerate Wrongthink

Wonder what I should do?

>normies think they'd win a war with National Socialist soldiers

This isn't the 30's. Netflix watching soyboy normalfags would be butchered.

>be OP
>stupid as shit leftard
>ask to pol "You aren't a nazi, are you?"

Look you silly stupid faggot, ideas and words cannot harm you, you little piece of faggot weak snowflake. You should worry only by actions. That's what the law is for, and that's why you have the 2A.
I'm ok with a commie diving a speech all day on the public park, but I'll shoot him the minute he tries to distribute my property.
See the difference between words and actions?

He's wrong. The Wiemar Republic strongly pushed downward on Nazi politicking. It did not stop the nazis from coming to power, and once they were in power, they used the same reasoning to push back against those who would oppose them.

Popper himself was a whiny little bitch who used to throw tantrums when people disagreed with him so it makes sense that the undefinable measure of "Tolerance" is the one he would use.

It's not even a paradox. It's just an even dumber way of saying "We have to destroy our rights in order to save them."

I was just about to post something similar, but this is much better.

National Socialist soldiers are all at least 90 years old now. We'd kick their asses user.

based koreans say :git off meh property nigguh!

is there a normie version of this?
Think this could be more palatable if the jihadi in the 2nd and 3rd panels was more like the first and wasn't so cartoonish. great potential to counter the "punch GnAtSeaZ" crowd.

Holy kek. I was just going to tell you autists to do this. Nice work

>defending tolerance requires to not tolerate the intolerant
>therefore we should not tolerate not tolerating the intolerant

No, it requires you to selectively tolerate intolerance. Islamic intolerance is a-ok in the US to liberals, but conservative intolerance is not. They preach pretty much the same thing, but because the American right has been the left's adversary for so long, the left will always do mental gymnastics so as to not have to tolerate the right, while still trying to be the good guys. It's a classic case of I can do this bad thing, but you can't unless you agree with me. Pretty much every movement seems to do this shit. Very rarely do you see people who are intellectually honest and don't do this shit.