Mfw a dean at my college tells me not to discuss White Genocide with other students, because "it's been disproven."

>mfw a dean at my college tells me not to discuss White Genocide with other students, because "it's been disproven."

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE
youtube.com/watch?v=bOgkGzMdieI
youtube.com/watch?v=q6c_dinY3fM
youtube.com/watch?v=xnqIj8C2Aek
youtube.com/watch?v=VggFao85vTs
youtube.com/watch?v=IfCOO7Z39j0
youtube.com/watch?v=2hWYgPDVX_8
youtube.com/watch?v=b5tci36bNjg
youtube.com/watch?v=PFHa4db3hA0
youtube.com/watch?v=A94smJ9QJ5g
youtube.com/watch?v=hvNNtBmA3SQ
youtube.com/watch?v=gwd_Iofr6ZQ
youtu.be/kPdxhLUKZYM?list=PLo0ThsDnveH5nv5TNviBrGTX9P6IrYfIe&t=412
youtube.com/watch?v=tPc899uUb-A
youtube.com/watch?v=jgGP_evkvOk
youtube.com/watch?v=TxpIsep4160
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Tell him that the free and open discussion of any topics is the cornerstone of academia.

Talk about the Arab slave trade.

Then the Jewish boat companies.

Then the Barbary Wars.
>Literally the first war the US got into after the Revolution was with Muslims

Does that mean you can’t talk about the six gorillion either?

Ask him to help educate you on it, then. That proof would be great to help deradicalize yourself.

Then post it here for us to laugh/rage at.

>certain ideas have so little evidence that to allow their consideration would be to mock our educational system

>>Literally the first war the US got into after the Revolution was with Muslims
Wait what is this?

If you think he's wrong, write a paper demonstrating the elements of of the Genocide Convention have been met.

Zimbabwe?

lol, if the dean personally tells you not to do something it's probably best just to let it go

this, hes obviously just saying to you haha i think i have an argument, try and challenge me fucker , but you have to say to him like oh really what is it , dont be a pussy, this is how you actually get smart, by challenging other peoples views in academia

"From the Halls of Montezuma to the Shore of Tripoli"

Arab pirates kept kidnapping our sailors and selling them into slavery.

Jefferson sent the marines to fuck their shit up.

>no, the 6 million has been proven by experts, and you will find that all of my professors are in agreement about this. Also, it's important that we all take the time to inform ourselves about the worst genocide in human history. Hitler was the most evil man who ever lived. Six. million. Six million people were murdered by Hitler and the Nazis.

>Well, actually, even the official dogma is that the 6 million number is just the number of Jews which were killed under Hitler -- Official history also says that an almost equal number of non-Jews were killed. People like non-Jewish homosexuals and Gypsies.

>Yes, it was a terrible, evil death machine that Hitler and the Nazis built. All that death. All that suffering. The suffering and death of 6 million people is something that no man of conscience should ever forget.

Let's waste a few years on disproving purple elephants, thai mong.

This, better to not fight it because you will get in more trouble then its worth.

I see

The dean, white-presenting, claimed not to be a Jew, but I noted that he couldn't completely repress a smile when I spoke of the ongoing replacement of the white populations of Europe and the United States. On this point, he was adamant that, since there are many more white people than black people in the U.S., that means that the idea of White Genocide is disproven. Understand that, up until this point, he had been at least somewhat rational and honest in his arguments, but that here he obviously knew that what he was saying had no bearing on the issue at all, which made me immediately suspect him of being a Jew. Even after I noted that the African American poulation has been steady as a percent of the whole, and is not really what White Genocide is referring to (as he knew perfectly well), he then argued strongly that the only factor which was reasonable to consider was the fact that white people are currently in the majority. When confronted on the nonsensicalness of this position, he declared that demographic trends and rates of change are of absolutely no consequence where demography is concerned -- Only the absolute numbers and percentages of TODAY can be considered interesting or important, and those numbers show that there is no replacement of the white population, since Whites are in the majority. He said this with a straight face. He then said in the next sentence that neither of us should care at all about white people disappearing because we'll both be dead by then.

My question is: Assuming that he was not a Jew, how can such dishonesty and hatred for one's own people exist in a white person? How does the mind of a true-believer communist work? Do I need to read the various communist writings in order to "get" what makes these people tick? Is extreme egalitarianism, and a literal inability to hear truthful statements which may lead away from that mental ideal, a religion at this level? Any insight is appreciated.

How many people did Stalin kill? How many "concentration camps" on the soviet occupied territory are propaganda from humanitarian Joseph Stalin?

Get /fit/ and get laid, LARPer

White nationalism attracts the worst, most autistic subsets of whites

>Get laid

You mean get married. If you're fucking around with your women they'll just grow resentful and become horrible mothersn

>so you think that one genocide justifies another one? Very interesting.

>no, no, I'm not saying that at all. Rather than justifying anything, I am merely pointing out the obvious hypocrisy of allowing only serious discussion of The Holocaust, while downplaying or even ignoring other genocides throughout history -- some of which were actually perpetrated by Jewish leaders against a non-Jewish populace.

>Again, you're justifying the murder of 6 million Jewish innocents because "Look, someone else also did something bad over here!" This is classic anti-Semitism.

You, sir. You have the mind of a jew.

That's is exaclty what I thought. If he wasn't a Jew by blood, how can such a dishonorable argumentation style be explained? I am forced to conclude that he is either an ethnic Jew, or that he has somehow be spiritually transformed into a literal Jew. I want to understand.

Ask for sources and tell him that the wage gap has been disproven too

South Africa?

This.

Ask him at what point did the holocaust become a holocaust? It started somewhere, and started small

Maryland.

>White genocide can't have been disproven because it is an argument about the future.

White genocide is the idea that future demographic replacement and subsequent oppression will lead to genocide.

Look at South Africa. . .

He is not a serious academic if he doesn't understand this. But none of them are anything other than ideologues and party loyalists so....

Call him a bloviating communist. A cultural Marxist hack.

no one is genociding white people. if anything white people are committing suicide so call it white suicide

This. He'd say yes of course because academics are all easily flattered, then you'd have a great opportunity to thoroughly redpill him.

Here's some arguments 1/2

White men are never ever ever allowed to have a moral justification for their viewpoints.

The Jews correctly assert that morality is reality therefore if you can control the moral narrative you can control society.

No one in the Jewish coalition can be portrayed as wrong. Ever.

Argument from ignorance. Not showing there is evidence against something when someone poses something to consider and dismissing it anyway would be the mockery of our educational system -- a system which, if you've ever been a part, itself should be scrutinized.
Appeal to the stone. This fallacy can be used against anything:
>everything you say is equivalent to purple elefants, therefore I don't have to prove how they equivalently don't exist.
If you insist on filling in the gaps of your epistemological framework with what you think is "obvious" or not, you will remain an idiot.

Will keep this in mind.

WRONG. Boy you are assuming a whole lot there. I simply tire of evil Hitler this and evil Hitler that. The only reason Stalin isn't the first one brought up when we are talking genocide and death camps is because he was on the winning side of WW2. Antisemitism? please spare me your race carding bullshit. How typical, calling someone racist who disagrees with you.

2/3
Because giving something a name is powerful.

It identifies it.

Ignorance is blindness so if a thing cannot be named it cannot be understood.

That's why the left names averything but won't let you name anything.

To erase your mind.

>2cukgook
What does Kek mean by this?

Shit dude you're lucky he threw you a warning. You a published author or something? They'd have just immediately expelled and fucked over undergrads.

You do understand that I'm paraphrasing the professor's and my conversation at that point, I hope.

You need to keep this shit under your hat except with very, very close friends.

If you don't have very, very close friends (the type who would give their life for you and vice versa) you need to work out, improve your social skills, and become good enough at your career to attract respect from other men.

Stop larping and fedora "debating" and save yourself and your people.

3/3

BLM logic

Black lives matter argues systemic racism.

The idea that

>racism is unconscious and this bias is irrepressible
>this unconscious bias leads to discrimination of minorities.
>therefore the law must be changed to favor minorities.

Taken to its logical conclusion follows the idea of white genocide.

>if whites become a minority then the majority will use the laws and unconscious bias to discriminate against whites.

Ergo separatism is the only logical solution.

If that's really your face when, then, well, proven.

This is good.

Beautiful proof. QED

>dean at my college
It's about (((their))) globalist agenda. They want to run a prison planet of race-less, culture-less, nation-less, identity-less subdued sheep. They make up less than 1% of the world's population, yet look at all they control from the world's finances to the media that brainwashes us.

In short, they use the entertainment and news media to encourage globalism and discourage nationalism and traditional western values. They distort and lie about the present and past in that effort.

The truth about immigration, by the numbers:
>youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE

Cultural Marxist Jews Admit Organizing White Genocide

The plan to eliminate the white race:
>youtube.com/watch?v=bOgkGzMdieI

Cultural Marxism in action… Political Correctness, the tip of the blade:
>youtube.com/watch?v=q6c_dinY3fM

Cultural Marxism & Social Justice explained:
>youtube.com/watch?v=xnqIj8C2Aek

Why are we in decline - Cultural Marxism:
>youtube.com/watch?v=VggFao85vTs

The Jewish role in the refugee crisis:
>youtube.com/watch?v=IfCOO7Z39j0

Leftist subversion explained by former KGB agent Yuri Bezmenov:
>youtube.com/watch?v=2hWYgPDVX_8

also see

The facts about slavery in North America:
>youtube.com/watch?v=b5tci36bNjg
>youtube.com/watch?v=PFHa4db3hA0
>youtube.com/watch?v=A94smJ9QJ5g

Cultural Marxist Jews fund media propaganda against whites on an enormous scale:
>youtube.com/watch?v=hvNNtBmA3SQ

The Jewish role in the porn industry:
>youtube.com/watch?v=gwd_Iofr6ZQ

Does this sound familiar at all? (starting at 6:52)
>youtu.be/kPdxhLUKZYM?list=PLo0ThsDnveH5nv5TNviBrGTX9P6IrYfIe&t=412

The Holocaust:
>youtube.com/watch?v=tPc899uUb-A
>youtube.com/watch?v=jgGP_evkvOk
>youtube.com/watch?v=TxpIsep4160

>the Jewish boat companies

...

>ID: 2cukGOok
Holy fuck this is like consecutive digits except ascended beyond the confines of numerals.

This is such masterful strawmaning, I can't help but wonder if it's on purpose. He assumes a false dichotomy (da joos or other people) by appeal to relative privation (this is bad so this can't be bad) and makes it out to be your argument. Any stupid person watching this conversation could easily agree with him. Then again, it's possible you misunderstood everything he was saying and that's just how your mind interpreted it.

Tell him the holocuax has been disprove with out offering any evidence. That fucking Cuck

Ah Ok, my apologies. I'm glad I never had to deal with shit like that at college.

>Fgt
>Faggot
Please get in the argument with 2cuckgook

Oh shit that's me

Ay, fuck you moonface.

This

No worries m8. I'm glad I got to see first hand the worst of what people have said is true about educators today -- That they are mostly militant anti-white commies. Very disturbing.

wew

We are all here because of breeding rights.

Part 1/6

Human beings operate largely upon unconscious biases and impulses rationalized to the conscious mind. (Bicameralism)

Many of these are breeding directives which are primal which cause us to act in irrational and destructive ways. Society itself was structured to control these destructive impulses.

Many of the negative male urges are constrained by law, or legal framework, or societal structure because society itself was created around suppressing men's more destructive urges. Because men had power.

However women were suppressed by cultural norms and legal frameworks and religion. All 3 of those control mechanism were destroyed in the last 3 generations. All of them.

Meaning what we have done is let loose the darkest portions of the female psyche to run loose upon society to dominate and control it even mandating its acceptance as law.

This of course has negative outcomes some of which are talked about, for example the book "the war on boys", but most go unchecked and unbalanced and they may ultimately prove to be fatal to the host societies.

Part 2

You all are fighting over outmoded tribal breeding rights.

That's all any of this is.

Your talk about fairness, and projection of personal morality upon the state, limiting immigration, banning abortion.

Are just ways to protect your right to successfully breed with a superior woman.

Woman of course do not share the same hardwired biological impulses you have.

That's why they have no revulsion towards foreign men and no problem with infanticide. For a woman their primary goal is child fitness.

Which means stopping rape (unwanted men), abortion (killing unwanted babies), and open borders (bigger pool), legalized cuckoldry (actual and monetary via family law), supporting their illegitimate children via the state or stepfathers. (Welfare, entitlements, etc)

Guilt, sympathy, and female collectivism are used to push gynocentrism aided by the matriarchal Jews.

We are all hardwired wrong. And due to this faulty hardwiring we have become a gynocentric feminist matriarchal cultural Marxist shithole.

You are here to restore balance to the male female paradigm in order to gain better breeding rights for yourself and your male kids.

Kek

Part 3

That is the subtextual point.

You are hardwired to see the danger and start a war over tribal breeding rights.

When objectively you can have as many kids as you want in a very safe and prosperous society that fulfills your every whim.

And because all our collective brains are broken (for lack of a more precise word) we are driven to destroy this society and maybe ourselves to achieve an anachronism.

A world that no longer exists or even matters.

Part 4

It's not driven by sexual envy user, nor did I ever say it was.

I pontificate it is driven by hardwired biological instinct. I never say that instinct is inaccurate.

Only that it is wrong to the extent it causes us to act in a dangerously irrational way, or in unconscious ways.

For example a coal burner will have a black child, hang out with blacks, but still be incredibly racist and never live in a ghetto. Her brain bifurcated reason to allow breeding and out group genetics.

No rational woman would do this because it is a wholly irrational act with horrible outcomes which are so obvious we all say burn the coal pay the toll. A sad commentary on this very phenomenon.

However we are blithely unaware of this dangerous subconscious drive within ourselves.

You should probably proxy a new ID before you start shitposting your magnum opus, zipperhead.

Part 5

Then religion becomes the medium through which our biological interests are morally justified the unconscious expression of our Id convicting the rational mind to violence whilst maintaing and preserving the necessary psychologically of believeing ourselves to be good.

Part 6/6

Human beings operate largely upon unconscious biases and impulses rationalized to the conscious mind.

Many of these are breeding directives which are primal.

Many of the negative male urges are contained by law, or legal framework, or societal structure.

However women whom have been suppressed by cultural norms and legal frameworks have seen those control mechanism destroyed in the last 3 generations.

Meaning what we have done is let loose the darkest portions of the female psyche to run loose upon society. To dominate and control it.

This of course has negative outcomes some of which are talked about like in the book "the war on boys" but most go unchecked and unbalanced and they may ultimately prove to be fatal to the host societies.

Because your professor is privileged his brain has rationalized and has become blind to reality. Even if you explain it to him he will not be able to understand it, or worse will lash out in anger.

That's also why Marine officers carry an Arab-style sword.

I can do the same pretty easily after spending years on here. You must be able to debate the topic from all angles and understand how they argue.

ITT: The Tale of 2CukGook

Why is the man in the largest frame you fucking misogynist

>man
I got news for ya...

Gross lol

"So discussing literally any genocide other than the Holocaust is anti-Semitic?"

"Exact-er, I mean no, but...what I meant wHL2.EXE HAS STOPPED WORKING"

Dehumanization campaign against whites is being run by media and government tho

>discussing literally any genocide other than the Holocaust is anti-Semitic

Name. We need a name.

Fuck, even the right-wings men are prettier.

This. YOUR identity is safe here OP.

>be burger
>pay 200,000 burgerdollars to get lectured by a cuck
>go into debt for this shit
>no refunds, no bankrupcy

>he thinks I meant it as a personal belief
I'm saying that if I was in OP's shoes, that's what I would ask the Dean. It's clearly what the Dean thinks, based on his strawmanning.

No, just the thought of that triggered me because that is the actual leftist mindset

oh

...

Did you ask him when the science was settled?

You must be new to college indoctrination, errrr I mean education in the new merica.
Only the pretense of free speech, and intelligent discussion are allowed. If you choose to debate outside of the approved facts you are a Neanderthal.

Can't talk about white genocide without talking about the JQ.

Holy shit you're autistic

Canada is set to be 20% white by 2060. All white countries have a sub 2.0 replacement rate, and factors prevent it from being above 2.0 White children under 5 were the minority in the US as of 2014, and 40% of German children were immigrants. In 4 years, the 20-30 range of the German population will be majority non-white. Once whites lose the majority, blacks will vote themselves reparations, and BLM has said "give us your house"

He then has to explain why America cant replicate Zimbabwe with farm repossessions, when black lawyers like pic related are already pushing for legal murder and rape of white people by blacks through jury nullification. He cant.

Challenge the (((dean))) to think of it as a thought experiment, since "it's been disproven" and all.

We pay the money for the degree.
The money goes towards a little line of ink under your name that will never ever leave you and theoretically makes you a more economically desirable individual, it could have been some sort of "work pass level 3" or "identification of excellence card" But that the educational field (and the diploma) has been chosen for this denomination was no mistake, it is the easiest way to transmit information to a malleable audience

Also Canada takes away children from families who believe in the Christian definition of marriage and moves them outside that religious group, which is the textbook UN definition of genocide, beyond any argument. Britain does it too, puts Christian children in with muslims who take their crosses etc and make them learn Arabic. The Jew is relying on your lack of information, and the stress of putting you on the spot to win the argument. He knows hes wrong, thats why he smiled, he knew he was about to make you very angry. Chances are this is a dangerous game, and he wants you to do something to get expelled. Hes not having the discussion for your, or his benefit.

OP if you're STEM, just do bare minium to get As in the general ed classes like this one. That way you can get a good degree.

If not STEM, go out in a blaze of Sup Forums glory debating and get expelled. Then go to trade school or IT and get like $50/hr. Screw these assholes only teaching because people take Classical 3rd century Mediterranean-African-Indo relations majors.