Remainder to install google killer

remainder to install google killer
adnauseam.io/

run this script every day
jsfiddle.net/codefag/3t9r045q/

tips
>set clicking on ads to "sometimes" in adnau settings
>disable other ad blockers and script blockers
>run script in separate browser
>do not use chrome

and watch them die

Other urls found in this thread:

patriotmoneynews.com/google-issues-refunds-to-advertisers-over-fake-traffic/
addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/random-agent-spoofer/
medium.com/insurge-intelligence/how-the-cia-made-google-e836451a959e
thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/16086-nsa-taps-directly-into-undersea-fiber-optic-data-cables
wsj.com/articles/google-issuing-refunds-to-advertisers-over-fake-traffic-plans-new-safeguard-1503675395
archive.is/ZsqYo
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Where's rockmelt

I'm using vivaldi, it's not there either.

Brave is not excellent on Desktop. I mean, one can't even follow your
>remainder to install google killer
advice on it.

It's great on android, acceptable on iOS, and absolute shit on desktop. Pale Moon also stopped Adnauseam from being able to install unless you dig into the about:config settings.

This chart is all wrong for the advice you're trying to give out.

Here is the ultimate red pill on AdNauseam.

The Marxist Jews are the masters of subversion. They know best how to infiltrate the discourse and twist it for their own good. One of their common techniques is called "false equivalence". The trick is to substitute a minor, mundane issue for a major one and eventually take the attention away from really important things. So called "ad surveillance" is one of the examples. Yeah, it's kinda nasty, but no more than dog poo in the street. It's basically cookie tracking which can be disabled with one click. Only tech-illiterate normies who buy shit online are affected by it. Can I easily disable government surveillance? The effects of mass migration, affirmative action, anti-hate speech regulations? The Marxist Jews don't want people to talk about it, they want everybody to focus on their ad poos. This is not even helping the cause. Instead of promoting alternatives to Google services and Youtube, damaging Google's reputation in the eyes of normies, they make people vent out in a safe outlet, which may actually benefit Google in the first place.

Big advertisers have been waging click wars on each other for YEARS. Reports of mass click fraud date back to 2015, 2013, 2011.. And they use much more sophisticated methods than just blatantly sending 100 clicks an hour from your home IP. Over 50% of web traffic is bot traffic at this point. Do you think Google's quantitative analysts are dumb? That they don't have early filters in place? If anything, it's Google's competitors that will suffer from click fraud first.

So, what's the REAL goal of these Jews?
- To give Google an edge over competitors because the latter can't handle click fraud effectively and lack good quants
- To sell data to Google for their new adblocker
- To suppress smaller scapegoat websites in favor of (((big))) ones
- To push the discourse sideways, in a safe direction
- To expose the IP addresses of people with questionable political views
We can only guess.

Isn't Vivaldi closed-source?

I don't know, I just didn't wanted jewgle shit anymore and vivaldi had nice reviews. It's slower than Chrome but not that bad.

I didn't tryed all those browsers. I just saved that pic and used it to bake the break cuz the last one is over 300

I'm not doing it because I'm concerned about ad surveillance. I just want to take down google for all the shit they are pulling. I want to make an example out of them, by breaching the trust that companies have with them as an advertising company.

I am also using a separate browser (Chromium) to use it, and am ONLY using it to target Google.com. I use FF with NoScript and U Block Origin, as well as a bunch of other shit, for everything else.

According to Wikipedia, it's proprietary freeware. I'd be wary.

If this is true why would they bother banning it from chrome? While all other adblocks are acessible.
This doesnt hold up.

Thanks based chicken maker.

...

It's more fun to just larp and shitpost as an asshole, that throws them off too. I just wish youtube would stop recommending serial killer documentaries to me, wtf youtube? fuck you.

>resisting your true calling.
Wewlad

Google doesn't require warrants or subpoenas for info requests 99% of the time.

They'll literally just fork your shit over.

Im gettimg a fainth smell of piss and milk ITT

So is Opera anyway.

1. Any love for Cyberfox?
2. Where do the alternatives go on this list?

Never tried. Any good?

I'm pretty sure the mozilla issue doesn't affect waterfox.

so what browser should we use?

Here, have some OC

cant be tracked with ads if you block them all in the first place. this is stupid and gives them revenue. this is a psyop

Pale Moon just popped up with a message politely telling me to go fuck myself for installing adnauseam, and that its blocked.

lol wow. It works on Waterfox.

I have it installed on on Opera. Works good. It makes me happy watching the tally of the money I am costing Jewgle just by browsing the internet.

this. when caught making money off fake clicks they only return 7-11% of the money.

It still devalues ads?

>using anything but chrome

enjoy your 1997 "secure" browsers, sempai

Waterfox would be a much better browser if the user ID said firefox so that I could blend in better.
I bet theres only 1 person using waterfox in my entire state, it would stand out too much desu

Can't they get sued for fraud?

explanation for this you useless memeflagger? or are you just shitposting?

Google’s refunds amount to only a fraction of the cost of the ads served to invalid traffic, which has left some advertising executives unsatisfied, the people familiar with the situation said. Google has offered to reimburse its “platform fee,” which ad buyers said typically ranges from about 7% to 10% of their total purchase

patriotmoneynews.com/google-issues-refunds-to-advertisers-over-fake-traffic/

Here's a reminder that by using sites that use captchas like this one, google already knows it. And if you actually bought a pass then you're just as stupid. There is no escaping google.

opera babyyy

I wanna make it clear that the stormfags calling out the adnauseam devs for being Jewish need to be ignored. Their stance is pointless as clearly we are going above what the expected use of adnauseam is. Even if it was made to

>push cultural Marxist culture...

It doesn't matter because we are clearly using it as a tool for attacking a threat to free speech. In one of the few ways an every day common man is able to

so the script seems to work well
even setting it right to "sometimes" the script does $700 per hour and looks really random
I had it running overnight and it accumulated thousands of dollars
I don't even use the browser running it

>Can't they get sued for fraud?
how much do you think it would cost to sue google, the second biggest company in the world? probably more than most spend on adds

read the thread, palemoon blocked adnau, brave is shit on desktop

>Every thread it is the same fag with the snek flag
You hiding a leaf under there?

>addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/random-agent-spoofer/
or 'user agent switcher'

I understand that. sucks. But, if enough attention is brought to it and even normies start to see it, wouldn't the government be forced to step in?

thats why you use main browser for shitposting and separate one to run script

>bet theres only 1 person using waterfox in my entire state,

fuck i must be drunk, wrong post second time

read

>wouldn't the government be forced to step in?
medium.com/insurge-intelligence/how-the-cia-made-google-e836451a959e

google IS the government

that 11% is the profit dumbass.
this is how media buying works.

you buy $1000 worth of ads from google. they charge you 7-11% fees on top of that $1000. then they take out another 7-11% of that from the $1000 and give the rest to the website publisher.

that second 7-11% pays for the staff and servers etc. the first 7-11% is the profit. so when they're refunding that 7-11% they're refunding all the profit.

Cyberfox says it's Firefox. Looking at it now.

>that 11% is the profit dumbass.
ya i want a source on that

this
Why don't more people use Opera? I've been using it for 3 years and have never had any problems with it.

The anti-brave mentality is caused by people who forget this is an anti-google options thread and not an "off-the-grid" Sup Forums autist thread. You might as well leave it but bump it down a peg by saying "Once it gets X amount of users the owner will start selling your data like every other browser.

Brave worked fine for me.
its UI was kind of bare and it didn't handle as many tabs as fire fox but when it ran with just a few tabs it ran better than fire fox with one.

Because Sup Forums is full of devs looking for beta testers for free, why do you think a Browser like (((Brave))) is on second place and is NOT ABLE to run AdNa or any other extension.
Tested Browsers for AdNa, which work are
>Waterfox
>SJWFox
>Opera
>Vivald
>IceCat
>Iridium

Opera is owned by a Chinese company, meaning it is a Chinese botnet.

Whether or not that is worse than feeding into google is up to you.

>leftie socialist Jew
>literally hate everything capitalism, including Google
Why the fuck shouldn't I use the extension of faggot lefties if it does the job right?

>it's just cookie tracking goy, you can totally disable it and Google will totally not keep doing what you disabled
Fuck off shill. Tell me exactly why can't I give a shit about my privacy AND mass immigration? I'm not some brainless fuck that can't focus on more than one thing at a time.

it's not open source so everyone mildly tech-savvy recommends against it
it's not installed by default so normies don't use it
what does everyone think of Vivaldi?

Never heard of it, gonna check it out.

I'll take a look at that
I checked the github page for waterfox and the dev is aware of the issue but hasn't commented on it further

ok, heres the updated version lol

i have a network account so i can both buy and sell ads on google AdX their ad exchange.

google "double dips" like every other exchange charging platform fees to both the buy-side and the sell-side.

the actual rates vary substantially depending on how big of a player you are and how you negotiate. the actual range is probably more like 1-18%.

and then they take as much as 30% on the sell side.

but in general the sell-side fees cover maintenance, operations, and R&D and the buy-side fees are the cream. i've actually been trying to get in touch with my google rep for 2 weeks and it's fucking impossible. they're basically not even answering their phones out of fear of a class action or an investigator calling or something like that. or because they know they're fucked and getting fired. their office has to look like a killhouse right now. refunding the demand-side fees is refunding the cream, there's no other way around it. that's how these businesses work and i've worked in this industry a long time.

This
>installing adNoseum and allowing pop-ups and removing your adblocker because you trust jews to jew other jews
SHIGGY DIGGY

>tfw I use a chromebook because I bought it two years ago when Google was nice and it was only $250
Almost bought a PC from Costco but they were out of the Lenovo I wanted. I refuse to go back to hard drives

>be me
>fell for the brave meme
>i use forced learning on myself so i uninstalled all my other browsers to power learn brave.
>cant install add ons but shits built in right?
>see some adds and pop ups. wtf? apparently it only blocks 3rd party adds!
> go to steal got off the internet, brave has a built in torrent downloader
>all downloads fail, says they need to be verified or some shit!!!!! cant use regular program
>and the cherry on top. cant view my pics through my browser to post on Sup Forums
>sperg out
>install pale moon, uninstall brave

Just cross out the firefox branches too, can't use waterfox and shit because it depends on firefox updates somehow making it dependent enough to be cucked into whatever shit Mozilla is doing with Soros.

Cyber fox is slow trash use water fox.
>tow I started the brave push on Sup Forums and pol

Feels fucking great, I wanna see the browser become the next chrome they already have there own digital currency, along with new investors.

Personally I like it because it's like old Firefox. Seems faster but it might be because it looks lightweight.

Then try Cyberfox.

What, really? I've found it to be pretty fast. Weird.

>waterfox
>https everywhere
>better privacy
>ublock origin
>decentraleyes
>random agent spoofer
>noscript
>>clear default whitelist in ns, only add domains you need to make pages work

Updated in light of new info.

>Lenovo
Lol, killyourself.

Remove the HDD from whatever pc you want, and run an OS from a disk.

Better crack open the linux autism box.

idk man, I think im dumb, I still dont understand wtf adnauseam exactly is, someone inform me moar pls

I checked it out just now, seems to not be focused on privacy like waterfox is.

just going to use telnet from now on.

thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/16086-nsa-taps-directly-into-undersea-fiber-optic-data-cables

shouldn't the fact that Mozzila teamed up with George Soros (one of Sup Forums's mortal enemies) make it crossed of the list as well?

Any way to make it better, or should I just go back to Waterfox?

this whole effort is about incremental gains
let's get people off of the chrome botnet first, or at least get them to install ublock origin before we go full Stallman

I'll tell you exactly what it is very simply:

The internet has ads on it. These ads get shown to you at the expense of whoever is trying to sell stuff. They pay google to show you these ads.

In order to not see those ads (because they are ugly as shit and intrusive) most people use adblockers.
All adblockers do is they stop the ads from connecting to your computer, therefore you never get them or see them. This is defensive adblocking.

But adnauseum takes things on the OFFENSIVE by connecting to the ad in the background (without showing it to you) and giving it a fake click from your computer. And it does this to every single ad it captures. Keep in mind most people that don't use adblockers still hardly click on ads, so if Every. Single. Ad. gets clicked on it creates a lot of noise for Google. And at the same time each click costs money for the advertisers that google has to refund out of their own pocket when they realize it was caused by fake traffic.

ignore the OP cunt, he posts this same shit everyday.

These threads get started by people under google-AD payroll, they get paid per click (fractions of a cent, but it all adds up)

The more people download this shit, the more autoclicks he gets, far FAR more than the average user without adblock.
It's just to slightly boost revenue.

Ignore OP, and just use Adblock.

Didn't Pale Moon blocked AdNauseum ?

Waterfox is the safest bet for now, will have to see how he handles the updates. If you have a github account pester him about the useragent thing.

Some one make a Sup Forumsfox or Sup Forumscat would be a pretty cool name for our browser

its a trick to get you to go from blocking ads to clicking everything automatically. along with the niceness of giving them revenue vs not, you also open yourself up to tracking. this is all bullshit.

>And at the same time each click costs money for the advertisers that google has to refund out of their own pocket when they realize it was caused by fake traffic.

That's the part that doesnt happen. There's no way for it to differentiate which clicks are fake, so there is no refund.

All this does is result in advertisers being paid more. If you dont like ads, dont fucking fund them!

use adblocker!

Wonder if they can bypass VPNs as well.

Agreed, I think it's nice we are moving in the right direction at least

I don't, but let's hope some anons here do it.

I've actually wondered that before: why don't some on Sup Forums and Sup Forums team up to make a privacy-based browser?

>so if Every. Single. Ad. gets clicked on it creates a lot of noise for Google. And at the same time each click costs money for the advertisers that google has to refund out of their own pocket when they realize it was caused by fake traffic.

I dont think you realize how big Google's servers are, they can handle that easily, also pretty sure Google doesnt do refunds, so fuck this

...

>I've actually wondered that before: why don't some on Sup Forums and Sup Forums team up to make a privacy-based browser?

Didnt Sup Forums make Pale Moon or something but it failed?

...

>JUST US ADBLOCK GOY
>DON'T COMMIT ECONOMIC TERRORISM
flag, coward

>brave

I refuse to use a browser that can't into uMatrix. I just tested Brave and couldn't figure out how to add it.

Where is duckduckgo?

To all the doubters/shills:
wsj.com/articles/google-issuing-refunds-to-advertisers-over-fake-traffic-plans-new-safeguard-1503675395

...

It doesn't matter how big the server is if the network it's on is congested. Besides, it's not even about simply giving the server a lot to do. Google's main thing is data analytics, garbage data gives garbage analysis. They can't sell "everyone likes everything".

>archive.is/ZsqYo
I use what works. if a Sup Forumsentelman comes up with a better solution, well golden. As long they don't, I use the program of a tranny that don't want to be part of Alphabet inc, change your gender with goolag kids

>Kill yourself over a brand
What a raging asshole/homosexual. I like their touch pads and their power ports compared to HPs. Other than that type of stuff the store bought laptops are all the same.

Qupzilla now it's named falcon

btw, flag coward

...

What's wrong with Opera?

What happens is companies start getting hit the massive bills.
You pay into the system to spread word of your service or product and statistically some ads will be clicked.
Even if they don't, word of your product is spread and getting into the minds of the consumer which gives you more of a presence above competitors.

Companies pay into these given a rough estimate of how many clicks they get, if they're already highly popular they're already willing to pay out more for ad space.

So then what happens is all of a sudden you get bombarded with clicks, well above the statistical amount. It seems like no skin off google's nose since that means the advertiser has to pay them a big fat wad for all those clicks. But the advertiser will not be happy about it. They will get charged with a bill and see no increase in their sales to reflect their tremendous click count. This makes google seem like the bad guy, arouses suspicion that google is gypping them. To damage control Google has to say that clicks are being bombarded by fake clicks and refund money to advertisers. Still it creates such a bad prescient it damages googles reputation.

>>"Personal Injury Attorney"
You okay there user?