Was french revolution the start of everything bad in today's western world?

Was french revolution the start of everything bad in today's western world?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_justice
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutions_of_1848
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Fischhof
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Goldmark
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neue_Rheinische_Zeitung
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_of_Trent
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6c/Declaration_of_the_Rights_of_Man_and_of_the_Citizen_in_1789.jpg
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

it was the first big jewish plot

>>Catholicism

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_justice
the term "social justice" became used explicitly from the 1840s. A Jesuit priest named Luigi Taparelli is typically credited with coining the term, and it spread during the revolutions of 1848 with the work of Antonio Rosmini-Serbati

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutions_of_1848
The Revolutions of 1848, known in some countries as the Spring of Nations, People's Spring, Springtime of the Peoples, or the Year of Revolution, were a series of political upheavals throughout Europe in 1848. It remains the most widespread revolutionary wave in European history.
The revolutions were essentially democratic in nature, with the aim of removing the old feudal structures
The revolutionary wave began in France in February, and immediately spread to most of Europe. Over 50 countries were affected
Both liberal reformers and radical politicians were reshaping national governments. new values and ideas such as popular liberalism and socialism began to emerge.
disruptive ideas gained popularity: democracy, liberalism, and socialism
The revolutions of 1848 were followed by new centrist coalitions dominated by liberals nervous of the threat of working-class socialism

Reinhard Rürup has described the 1848 Revolutions as a turning point in the development of modern antisemitism through the development of conspiracies that presented Jews as representative both of the forces of social revolution (apparently typified in Joseph Goldmark and Adolf Fischhof of Vienna) and of international capital, as seen in the 1848 report from Eduard von Müller-Tellering, the Viennese correspondent of Marx's Neue Rheinische Zeitung, which declared: "tyranny comes from money and the money belongs to the Jews"

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Fischhof
was politician of Jewish descent, one of the leaders in the revolutionary movement of 1848, commanding the students' legion of Vienna and presiding over the Committee of Public Security. He was especially prominent in the Constitutional Assembly. In the Liberal cabinet of Doblhoff he was attached as counsellor to the Ministry of the Interior. After the dissolution of the Kremsier Parliament on 7 March 1849, Fischhof was arrested, accused of rebellion and high treason

at least most of the cucks that enticed it got lynched afterwards anyway.

But short answer: yes.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Goldmark
A revolutionist in his youth, Goldmark took part as a leader in the Revolution of 1848, along with Adolf Fischhof, fighting for Jewish emancipation. When the revolution was stamped down, Goldmark was sentenced to death but managed to escape to the United States and settle in New York City, he continued to be active in politics during the rest of his life. He amassed a great deal of property to leave to his large family

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neue_Rheinische_Zeitung
"New Rhenish Newspaper: Organ of Democracy" was a daily newspaper, published by Karl Marx between 1 June 1848 and 19 May 1849. It is recognised by historians as one of the most important dailies of the Revolutions of 1848
The paper was established by Karl Marx, Frederick Engels, as well as leading members of the Communist League
"Organ of Democracy," referring not to the establishment of parliamentary democracy, but to the revolutionary "Democratic front" which included the progressive petty bourgeoisie, the working class, and the peasantry.
what one historian has called "the leading centre of the Communist League, directing the political activity of its members throughout Germany during the revolutionary period.
NRZ was outspoken for Monarchist counter-revolution, and actively agitated for their defeat. The paper was also critical of the willingness of the liberal bourgeoisie to compromise with Monarchist forces which Marx and his comrades believed would have negative impacts upon the revolution.

Engels recalled that the NRZ had a political program with two main points: and War with Russia. With respect to foreign affairs, Engels recalled that the NRZ sought "to support every revolutionary people and to call for a general war of revolutionary Europe against the mighty bulwark of European reaction — Russia." This policy was intended to undermine both the authority of Prussia and Tsarist Russia, both considered reactionary. Marx and Engels believed that "if Germany could be successfully brought to make war against Russia, it would be the end for the Habsburgs and Hohenzollerns and the revolution would triumph

On 16 May 1849 Marx received an official note from the royal government declaring:
"The tendency of the Neue Rheinische Zeitung to provoke in its readers contempt for the present government, and incite them to violent revolution and the setting up of a social republic
its last issue on 19 May 1849, known as the "red issue" as it was printed entirely in red ink. Marx closed with a sharp rebuttal "And the 'social republic'? Have we proclaimed it only in the 'latest pieces' of the Neue Rheinische Zeitung? Did we not speak plainly and clearly enough for these dullards who failed to see the 'red' thread running through all our comments and reports on the European movement? When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.

>Was one of France's greatest historical moments the start of everything bad in history?

Yes. That and the Industrial Revolution.

The Council of Trent was, the declaration of war against Christendom by the Vatican heretics.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_of_Trent

Napoleon was the best thing that could have happened considering the circumstances. The French revolution was a bit of the 20th century that happened in the 18th.

Louis XIV kinda bankrupted the country, but his rule was truly glorious.

so basically the american revolution caused all of our problems

Yes.
fpbp

It inspired the American Revolution, so fuck you!

yup and you guys fucked that up.
should of gave us mutts representation and not stamp taxed our asses.

It started with the English civil war, after the restoration all the crazies moved to the American colonies like Massachusetts where they were bidding their time.

yes it was, they overthrew the monarchy which led to the liberal degeneracy we see today.

pretty much

no

Absolutely. The French AND the American (((Revolutions))). 2 Jewish farces.

They unleashed on us the "Leftwing vs Rightwing" dialectic system and the evil values of "equality" and "human rights".

Go check out the "The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen", the major ideological document that came out of the French (((Revolution))): upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6c/Declaration_of_the_Rights_of_Man_and_of_the_Citizen_in_1789.jpg

Check out the Pyramid with the Eye on top...yep that's the JEWlluminati Pyramid.

its the jews

What? It's the other way around! The French (partly) drew courage from the American Revolution.

you guys seen your genetic equals below you because they were on a different continent.
cultural differences between the colonies were greater than their differences between GB.
you guys fucked up bad.
The problem is how much stronger the United states landmass is than an island. You would never be able to control it
You guys are lucky 90% of canada is not suitable for agriculture or they would be USA north, not cities clinging to the border.

Actually the 2 were deeply interconnected. They were JEWlluminati-manufactured.

Check my previous post.

hnnngggggg

>Was french revolution the start of everything bad in today's western world?
no, it was the american revolution who started it

The (((Reformation))) actually.

This fag started it all.

I don't get the whole representation thing, if you had seats in parliament you would still be massivly outnumbered and thus easilly outvoted

yes

Protestantism is the worst version of Christianity
Catholicism is a good mix of european paganism and sematic teachings

>luther

HOW???

Europe was weak af before reformation, reformation made Western world fierce and powerfull.

not in your country

>I don't get the whole representation thing
the representation thing was just a excuse for rebellion

I do agree about the relationship thing, the whole thing was a legislative mess.The laws regarding the american colonies should of been changed based on how big they had become

>I do agree about the relationship thing, the whole thing was a legislative mess.The laws regarding the american colonies should of been changed based on how big they had become
you should have mean it clear who is the boss like the spanish did in south and central america or like you did in india and africa

Why do I see people getting this wrong so fucking often?

The American Revolution was more than a decade before the French Revolution. Holy fucking shit.

and yet they persecuted jews relentlessly since its inception and only stopped very recently when they became pozzed

You're indoctrinated since child in your country to love it and in your history classes. Sorry but you must take the redpill.

Yep. The source of all evil together with the American Revolution.

>basically the american revolution caused all of our problems
*bongs taking our guns caused all of our problems
fx'd that for you

pretty sure that was the bible. according to the book we wrote we are chooosen.

Look how great those places are today.

British colonial rule has never worked out in the favor of the colonized lands.

Taxes and representation is just a meme. It really had to do with American nationalism.

>British colonial rule has never worked out in the favor of the colonized lands.
what do you mean africa and india are better now than before colonial rule + colonialism is suppose to benefit the colonizer not ones being colonized but still the africans and indians thanks to colonialism got acces to technological and medical advances that they would have never got otherwise

Maybe because most of the colonized lands are full of NIGGERS ??

Yes but they are full of backwards savages and civil war. The same for every other country that was born out of colonial rule which did not emancipate itself. We have British colonial administration to thank for the existence of Israel ffs. The british threw all of their colonists under the bus when it suited the economic interests of their elite to do so.

If America never got free it would literally be Brazil tier today.

Not really colonization was.

Most of your inmigrants will still be undiscovered if you didn't do that.

>Yes but they are full of backwards savages and civil war.
that is beacuse of the ethinic diveresity in this places
> The british threw all of their colonists under the bus when it suited the economic interests of their elite to do so
thats beacuse the british economy was rekt after ww2 + with the lost of the suez in 1956 and with the increasing anti-imperaliaism in the west and with the USSR funding black nationalists movement in africa it was impossible for the british to keep the empire together

They actively sabotaged all of the attempted white ethnostates in Africa after leaving. Its like the crown was so butthurt about American success that they swore from then on to smother in their cradles every nascent euorpean expat civilization rising under their power.

>They actively sabotaged all of the attempted white ethnostates in Africa after leaving
well you didnt help either, in fact the only country who helped white ethnostates in africa was isreal

>fuck authority and its interpretations of the sacred text, I'll just believe it says whatever I want

#teamF

America helped out covertly through the CIA, but obviously the TPTB in America had the same vested interest in sabotaging an America 2.0 arising on an even larger continent than this one.

No, 1960's were. Also fuck some French monarch, what good did he do? If he was such a good ruler maybe his subjects wouldn't have started a revolution. Napoleon did nothing wrong, he was French patriot.

No, the French revolution would have happened regardless. France & Spain had spent themselves into poverty and currency debasement / hyper inflation. However without the French and Spanish colonial empires much of the wealth gathered from those slaves / gold / spices were also necessary to build the coal mines & infrastructure which led to the industrial revolution.

Fucking frenchies.

You mean the most gruesome events of France history. It was a bloodbath. Half the country was set on fire, and most of the west was ravaged. Fuck the Republic.

French Revolution was communist garbage.

American Revolution was well-intentioned, but the political theorists of the time didn't realize that minarchical constitutional states don't stay that way for very long. Not 10 years after the revolution were militias mustered to march on their own countrymen for protesting excessive taxation.

how can Lauren even compete with her Aryan goddess sister?