Vote No

Daily reminder that if you don't vote no then you are not a true Australian shitposter
If you actively pass up an opportunity to make this many people assblasted then you need to leave.

Blame the law for taking my license away, I can't get anywhere near a post box without my fucking car...

Please vote no Aussies. If this passes your children will begin to be turned into trannies. The slippery slope is not a fallacy.

Ambyan Borther!

Don't be a lazy nigger
Walk or ride, take a taxi if you have to.
Every vote counts

>They won't come after your school kids next, don't be ridiculou-

This, the genital mutilation meme starts not long after fag marriage.

you can clearly see that the kid isn't comfortable there. these people aren't blind, they're monsters.

What is happening in australia?

Gay marriage vote

>if you don't vote no then you are not a true Australian shitposter
You're a fucking retarded newfag
True shitposter would vote yes just to piss off all of the soft cunts here on Sup Forums because that's what shitposters do

>US and S Korea only nation's besides Israel to have high circumcision rates
>Hur dur the whole world is jewed

The "no" side has no argument at all, which is why their loss is inevitable.

I would enjoy listening to Tony cry on talk radio but I dont listen to that trash so I'll have to take his word for it

Even actual homosexual dingos should vote no if they consider themselves the kings of bantz.

Is talk radio conservative in AUSland too?

While circumcision is bad, wound vaginas and frankenpenises are even worse.

yeah, it's just a bunch of old dudes ranting about windmills and millennials

He's not talking about circumcision you fucking literal leaf nigger. Were talking about forced child sex changes. Something you and government support.

>The "no" side has no argument at all
how about "don't destroy everything we have created"

I'm in CA and a teacher pissed off a bunch of parents of 5-6 year olds by "explaining" that their classmate is "transgender".
Kids came home confused and disgruntled and somehow that's supposed to be our new norm

>t. Professional American Genital Examiner
How much do you get paid as a PAGE?
how often do people beat you up for trying to see their junk
Do you observe children?

So you would vote to accept migrants into your country to piss people of on Sup Forums? You'd let a nigger fuck your girl and raise a nigger child to piss off Sup Forums?

>Children afraid Jew magic will change their genders
>Forced child sex changes
Wtf, I don't live in Iran

what have you ever created m8? apart from inadequacy

are you disrespecting gynecologists?

>So you would vote to accept migrants into your country to piss people of on Sup Forums?
You're the biggest crybabies out there so yeah
>You'd let a nigger fuck your girl and raise a nigger child to piss off Sup Forums?
>your girl
Lmao go back to plebbit

Uhm no sweaty that's not right.
A shit poster would vote no but tell pol he voted yes.
All that matters is the (you)s

>Sup Forums
>having a girlfriend
>having children
top lel my friend

"we"

Women pay and consent to a doctor that looks at their vagina you smartshart

You will soon :)

right, but if you dont contribute you can't complain

t Jewish projection.

"i'm going to destroy everything that western civilization has ever created, and if you object to this i am going to ignore you because i have decided that you are not qualified enough to object"
see where this gets you

The fact that you believe letting some people marry means that the fabric of society is going to be destroyed proves to me that you're a dumb dumb.

I find it hilarious that dumb dumbs like you hold onto this for dear life, when the odds of yes winning are something like 95%. Enjoy losing, nerd

Why do trannies always dress like theire cosplaying MLP characters?

What are aussies voting? Its a referendum?Whats the question?

do you see how you're being manipulative?

you want gays to marry because you dislike the concept of marriage
you dislike the concept of marriage because it is a core component of christianity
you hate christianity because it dictates that there is supreme order in the universe
you hate the concept of supreme order because you hate the concept of something being better than you
you hate the concept of something being better than you because you are a narcissist

you will deny this, and you will attempt to slander me, because you refuse to acknowledge that you are fundamentally broken. instead of realizing that you are fucked, you have decided to attempt to destroy the very order itself that everything we experience is built upon.

put simply, you want to kill god.

Yeah, wasn't that the one where they had the student change from girl to boy clothes as a demonstration for the class? It as reported that one of the girls who saw it cried to her mother when she went home, saying she was "afraid of transforming into a boy all of a sudden". If this doesn't redial normies to the transgendered Kike bullshit, then we really are doomed...

Vote no if you have common sense. You can change who you love and who you are at anytime. But your body is something that once it's done you can never go back.

fag marriage

>2017
>believing in god
hahahahaha hahahahaha

Voting, lol, Australia doesn't have a democracy. How could you honestly believe that it would ever amount to anything?
These people are in our schools, our government is made up of foreigners and the law bought and sold by corporate bodies through "elected" officials.

how can you not?

Vote no to what?
Redpill me

say no for gay marriage Aussie edition

Australia is holding a non-binding plebiscite on fag marriage. This means that, irregardless of the result, nothing real will come out of it.

Therefore it is the perfect opportunity to shitpost with no consequences.

Wait, what are the Ostriches voting for this time?

lmao, the truth is no one gives two shits whether fags can marry.

The whole thing is a distraction/cover-up.

"Oh yes goyim, wel'l let you vote on the most important issue in australia, whether homosexuals can marry!"

"Why can't we vote on a royal commission on what the fuck happened to our NBN?"

No that's not important, don't look at the literal billions we handed to Telstra for questionable/corrupt reasons.

Poofter nuptials

>irregardless

>not voting no to piss off the Greens and homofags and telling Sup Forums you voted yes to piss of Sup Forums
Don't try to teach ausfags about shitposting you degenerate

Removing the meaning of the institutions on which society is based does destroy said society.

>have sex for the first time
>stick benis in bagina
>pull benis out
>its covered in doody
>find out the bagina was a hoax and it was actually a man with OP's pic equipped

well, actually a lot of people care.

But yes, jews

>voting yes
>everyone i know is voting yes
>butthurt bogans
>butthurt christcucks
>pathetic 'no' arguments

fuaaaark mates, the outcome of this vote is going to be great
salty dead jew lovers for days

VOTE NO

I already signed up at one of the pro equality booths and said thank you for helping me vote no.

Lucky you, guys. In my country we didn't even get to have a vote. Probably because the socialist gov knew they'd lose if they left it to popular vote.

kek

It's not a vote. It's a plebicite. The govt aren't compelled to do anything with the information.

just because your an atheist doen't mean you should support destroying marriage.

Marriage was an institution long before Christcuckery became the norm

If we manage to pull through, it will be the greatest shitpost of our time. The anal devastation will be legendary.

It's a survey not a referendum, it's not legally binding

Can Kiwis vote?

>non-binding
Meaning if yes wins, they'll pass the law saying they have a mandate. If no wins, they'll pass the law saying something so important shouldn't be left to the people.

>He knows about queen Chrysalis

I am doing my utmost to ensure as many people as possible vote No with careful use of propaganda right now.

This is the right wing cuckservative party you're talking about, m8. The only reason they held the plebiscite in the first place was to kick the can of gay marriage down the road a little further without losing too many votes. Theres no way they're going to pass it if the vote comes back no.

Heh I'm australian born chinese. And I am redpilled as fk. And I am voting no.

>New Atheism
user...

>only voting no to make people "assblasted"
>ass not arse
You're a disgrace to the flag.

>I'm Australian born Chinese.
So you're Chinese?

>my pastor/priest told me god is real
>read my silly book, ignore the contradictions
>larp some meaning and relevance into my life

lmao give me more canned responses you fags

God still loves you.

>My Pastor/Priest
Not Christian, I am a theist based on the Aristotelian proof for the existence of an unmoved mover.

Pic related is from the recent book "Five Proofs" by Edward Feser.

Pretty sure the gays are already asshurt as is

I'm inclined to vote no because I want no government involvment in marriage at all. Why the fuck would we want to give them more control over what individuals can and can't do.

Your barbaric outpost doesn't even have absentee balloting yet? Jesus.

fuck you voting yes

>Train engines exist in and of themselves.
>They are in no way constructs of steel created by humans, which require fuel to operate (not one but THREE different chains of origin).

Also

>It is theoretically philosophically feasible for the chain of infinite regress to be solved through an entity that has no other point of origin.
>Therefore A. that entity definitely exists and B. out of all the myriad of possible entities that fill this void, the correct answer comes from the mad ravings of a bronze age goat-fucking sandnigger.

>Not understanding that the train was used as an analogy.

Also
>Therefore A. that entity definitely exists and B. out of all the myriad of possible entities that fill this void, the correct answer comes from the mad ravings of a bronze age goat-fucking sandnigger.

Pic Related

>Australian

...

>B. out of all the myriad of possible entities that fill this void, the correct answer comes from the mad ravings of a bronze age goat-fucking sandnigger.

this, i will never understand how the theory of the immobile motor proves ANY religion rather than proving/theorizing the existance of a supernatural being/force of wich nothing else is know other that it originated the universe

>Not understanding that the train was used as an analogy.
>The fact that it was used as an analogy excuses it from the fact that it fails an an analogy.
The example of the train having an engine is not a good analogy for an starting point with no other point of origin because the engine HAS AN ORIGIN.

The origin has merely shifted form.

>Posts the argument.
>Where's your argument?
Right in front of you, you merely ignored it because you had nothing to begin with.

Not only has the image you posted not given a sufficient reason why such an entity must exist, it has not even ATTEMPTED to give any reason whatsoever why said entity must be the God of the bible.

It does not, that requires a separate argument entirely, but a purely actual being does exist.

> rather than proving/theorizing the existence of a supernatural being/force of which nothing else is know other that it originated the universe.

We can give attributes to this being user.

It never made the claim to be such an argument nor did I ever make the claim I was defending the christian god.

Secondly, read this for the argument I am defending.

Here is another argument from "Five Proofs" by Edward Feser.

my brother is gay. wat do

Both of these proofs do make a fair amount of logical sense, but they both have an issue in them that negates many of the conclusions.

The issue is shared across them, and that is the presumption of the purely actual actualiser.

Since Aristotle is the one who gave the description of actualisation and potential, I shall refer to the Aristotelian proof.

The issue comes in around point 12, which states that because a series of concurrent actualisers cannot regress infinitely, therefore a purely actual actualiser must exist which terminates the regress.

However, no reason is given why such an actualiser must be purely actual.

The rest of the points given rely upon this idea of the purely actual actualiser, which through being purely actual must have no potential and, therefore, no imperfections.

But, without first proving why the root actualiser must be purely actual, the reason given for why the root actualiser must have no imperfections does not stand.

An argument is given around point 34, that any potential that is actualised must either be actualised by the root actualiser or by a series of actualisers terminated by said root actualiser.

In other words, said root actualiser must be all-encompassing and thus be purely actual.

The issue with this being that these perfect traits do not exist in this world, so there is no adequate reason for the root actualiser to necessarily possess these perfect traits of a purely actual being.

That is to say, even if the root actualiser is all-encompassing, that is irrelevant when all that is is not necessarily all that can be, for not all things exist.

For example, we have yet to experience any entity that has the trait of omnipotence, so it is not necessary for a root actualiser to possess the trait of omnipotence.

>Why bat shit crazies do crazy shit?

Free ropeless bungee jumps.

I hear you have some really nice spots for that over there.

SAY NO TO BIGOTRY

sex

>Sup Forums doesn't even discuss politics, they're only here simply to troll

There's a reason you're all stereotyped as fat neck beards. It's your unwillingness to discuss the one thing you're supposed to discuss. Politics.

SMASH THE HOMOPHOBE

We are discussing the politics that go into trolling you trollophobic bigot.

DIE CIS SCUM

Cool, I'm going to shill and hope it passes, honestly. Only because you faggots deserve it.

Cunts, they make it out like all they want is to be happy and married. Thats not their end game at all. They want to destory everything that makes your society what it is.

Vote no. Learn from our mistake.