British schools and TV think this is what Roman Britain looked like

>British schools and TV think this is what Roman Britain looked like

JUST

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Maurice
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Brits are natural born preppers

He could be a Nubian or Ethiopian. What's the problem here exactly?

No. just...no

>no, just no
No you moron there is no problem here, it would be a problem if the show took place before 212AD.

>Nubian
>Travelling tens of thousand of kilometers from home, by boat or by feet
>To a fucking island
>Is somewhat represented 50/50 in the legions
Sure, and I'm Jesus Christ, coming back to announce the End Times, kackass

no we dont.

>no we dont.
wtf that's racismo

Historians have confirmed that there were black people in Britain around Roman times.

Nice attempt at whitewashing history though, alt right, but the facts are on our side as always.

Opinion denied.

WE


WUZ


ROMANS


N
SHEEEIT

There genuinely were black people, called Aethiopians, who lived in the city of Rome. And it's entirely plausible that some of them wound up in Roman Britain.

There is a reason you people are a joke. Learn history, instead of repeating it.

Nope.

Just nope.

You are the joke if you believe in this historical revisionist bullshit. That is if this isn't just troll attempts.

nice source

fucking idiots, most of the Roman legions on hadrians wall were from Gaul (France) and Spain. There was a Battallion of Syrian Archers mentioned ONCE in their Military records.
Thing is that the romans took People who were native to the lands as auxiliaries.
Taking Nubians from hot as fuck africa into fucking cold Britain letting them travel for months doesnt even make sense if you think one second about it.
Is this childminded thinking about history real or is this Propaganda ? This gotta be satire

>hey guys, there was like 0.01% black guys in Britain during the Roman period
>therefore Britain was diverse as fuck!

Nope.

Straight up, uncut, pure as fuck propaganda.

>tfw no gibs in medieval age

That is neither the Nubian nor Ethiopian phenotype.
He's clearly west african.

(((historians)))

and about the show...
>lorica segmentata in 43ad in Britannia

Just a huge fake story.
And he doen't look like a Numidian or an Aethiopian (and both, as regular roman soldier should have been more unique than rare, and no auxiliares toops from there are known to be gone in Britain)

>0.01% black
>Britain during roman times was diverse guys
That bitch is ugly

I fucking hate this argument. Just because European countries in the past were not 100% ethnically diverse ,that doesn't mean they had all kind of ethnicity all around the word. And oh, if there is an admixture in some Europeans that was due non European with mixing with European that was not because they lived in harmony but because they get DIVERSED.

BLaCKED

Shut up watermelonfaggot

They don't.

Blacks in Britain just don't have any culture or history of their own, so they adopt local culture and history as "Brits" not as "blacks".

This is actually a GOOD thing.
In any case much better than rejecting the culture of the country you live in.

The good point too, he's clearly a West African nigger.

>In any case much better than rejecting the culture of the country you live in.
>3rd world immigrants to Britain are adopting British culture and history
smoke less weed dude

The BBC used to be so good.

Just plain old simple TV with good news and docos, an easy formula which stood the test of time, like a grand parent to all other channels.

Then it got filled with marxist tossers and look at it now.

Never buy a TV if you come here.

>Blacks adopting local culture
That's the most hilarious thing I've read this week

Everybody knows that all civilizations of ancient times were black, the first chinese were black, ancient japanese black, first romans black, egyptians were black.
Deal with it white boi we are the creators of science and civilization.

where is the source for the proof though?

Because 99.9% of roman legionnaires were white by todays standards. Even people that lived around the med looked all similar and would look like modern south Italians. There were virtually no niggers in Rome and showing how black an "average" Roman was in Roman britain is a multicult meme used by british elites to make sub saharan negroes feel like Britain is "their country too", which is ansurd.

Rome never conquered any land with a black population. Pretty much all Roman citizens went on their entite lives without ever seeing anyone black. Sub Saharans were very rare.

niggers were used in the conquest of britain because Brits had no idea what niggers were and were scared shitless of them.

But they were auxilaries, and not equiped like roman legionaires.

Good. That means i don't have to respect niggers.

t.Welshman

WE

>South Italians
>white

There were black Romans you dumb wh*Te faggot.

What Ethiopian or Nubian legion (if they ever existed) was stationed in Britain? Maybe one or two niggers casually set foot on the island at some point but nothing aside that.

maybe a nubian/aethiop trader would venture that far and thats pushing it.

Children today will be more likely to believe the liberal lies that niggers built everything and that white people stole everything.

>Greeks and Romans had black slaves
>they conquered Britain
>they bring slaves with them

NOS

wat

Source that.

Nonody was scared of people with different skin colour you idiot. What was a woad-painted Cetlic warrior high on some shrooms supposed to be "afraid" of? If anything the problem of Celtic britons was that they were too fearless, being a war and gliry obsessed culture every man was eager to rush at the enemy and start killing so that eberyone sees their bravery, which led to attempts at zerg rushing the Legions and didn't work very well since the frenzied celts were notoriously hard to command once they got near the enemy.

>Greeks
>Black slaves
mhhhmm nope. A negro slave in Greece would be extremely rare.

But I thought Roman Britain was diverse? Why would the Celts be scared of niggers?

>black Roman slaves/ex-slaves
>Dressed in legionnaire armor

If they wanted to go full WE WUZ, they could have at least adorned the dindu in gladiator attire in order to maintain a bit of historical accuracy. It's a known fact that gladiators that were extremely successful/popular were able to earn their freedom.

Yes, America has really come in to its own since the war of independence.

We wuz Caesars an' sheeit

Jesus Christ dat pic/video.
I don't understand how larger public in Britain are okay with this kind of altering history.

Maybe but as slaves

>Black people never existed in Ro-

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Maurice

...Woah

White compared to a south African anyway, and enough with the divide and conquer tactics all whites must stand together and fight back against (((them)))

The point is to generate a revisionist history to show that foreigners were always a part of the land. It's almost like it's the beginning of the 1984 system of keeping time at an endless "present".

Howd they manage to go from that to this?

Romans had legionnaires from all of their territories. They controlled a lot of north africa, it's not a stretch to think that there where nigs in the roman army.

>Even people that lived around the med looked all similar and would look like modern south Italians

Come on--I don't believe dindus were even .05% of the Roman population, but don't start white WE WUZing. Pic related is what the Persians looked like before Xerxes's reign.

Forgot pic

>clearly west african bantu nig nose
>"muh nubian or ethiopian"
fuck off

You have no history in Europe. Period!

It's a bad thing, becuase it's harder to deport them.

1-The empire had territories un the North of africa.
2-and the Roman army had a lot of stranger mercenarys.

That video is very enriching user.