Roman Empire fell because it angered Gods. They adopted cuckianity and were punished by ancient Deities, if we want to save white race from getting annihilated by mudslimes we need to regain Zeus' favour by crucifying all those pesky christcucks. Prove me wrong.
Also we need SPQR flag, DEUS VULT
Other urls found in this thread:
pewforum.org
edition.cnn.com
unvis.it
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
twitter.com
>prove me wrong.
But you are right user.
you're the same faggot from last night I already BTFO you once why are you trading out again
The spiritual rot of the Romans started when Carthage was eliminated.
You got utterly blown the fuck out yesterday. Go home nigger
Rome fell because they were conquered by superior Germanic Franks
Right Wing politics are concerned with the long-term survival of Civilization
Christianity is only concerned with personal salvation to become part of a nebulous afterlife for which no evidence exists, and for which this world needs to be sacrificed, which is best expressed in the way early christians like Martin of Tours refused to fight enemies of their nations, insofar killing in this world could cost them heaven
When Jesus says "if they take your coat, let them have your shirt as well", "do not resist evil", "I have come to turn a man against his own household", "if you don't hate your self and your own family you can't follow me", "love your enemies, pray for your persecutors", "the meek will inherit the Earth", "those that wanna die will live", "blessed are those the persecuted, for they will be my Kingdom", "do not save treasures for tomorrow", "carry your cross so that you can receive eternal reward", "Sell all your possessions and give the money to the poor, and you'll have treasure in heaven", "it is easier for a camel to go through a needle's eye than for the rich to enter Heaven", "Woe to you who are well fed, Woe to you who laugh, for you will mourn and weep"...
... he is not kidding, or meaning the opposite, but actually setting down a morality where the world is a lie and only the afterlife is the real deal, so destroying your life in this world, "carrying your cross" as he says, is completely logical
Sup Forums "christians" seem to believe Jesus actually meant the OPPOSITE of all that, and that Jesus wants you to defend your family, that Jesus wants you to kill your enemies, to become prosperous, well-fed and rich in this world, and to avoid persecution and death!
Only a person that does not actually believe in the Heaven for the persecuted, the meek, and the martyred would actually re-interpret Christianity as a cult of earthly power which declares "the strong shall inherit the Earth", "my kingdom is of this world" and "you must destroy the enemies of your nation"
Only some one that just wanna use Christianity as an empty shell devoid of any true religious promises would claim that Paul and Peter misinterpreted Jesus when they submitted to their enemies and died to them while praying for them, instead of fighting the romans back and establishing a crusader kingdom, thing that one would expect them to do if Jesus meant "be a fighter and impose your will on your enemies" when he said "love your enemies and lend all they need to them without expecting anything in return"
But using Christianity as a shell devoid of any religious promises simply allows its poisonous morality to survive into the next generation.
You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because "I didn't come to bring peace", but you can't stop them from reading the rest of the paragraph and realizing what Jesus wanted is for them to put christian morality above the good-being of their own families.
You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because "Buy a sword", but you can't stop them from reading the next chapter and realizing that Jesus stopped Peter from using the sword to fight and defeat the romans, and reprimanded him for misunderstanding, all while asking him to carry his own cross (Peter, fully realizing that Jesus meant all the stuff about embracing death and his kingdom was not of this world, that angelic chariots were not going to slay his enemies and bring him victory, realized he was doomed, and would then deny Jesus 3 times)
You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because ""Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you in pieces", but you can't stop them from reading the rest of the paragraph and realizing that Jesus was asking them, not to destroy their enemies, but to not put in risk their own moral position by criticizing others. You may want them to believe that Jesus, in the middle of a speech about not judging other people and sharing, suddenly decided that speak against the muslims that didn't even exist back then!
That is not going to fly.
Sooner or later, your "strict catholic crusader" state will be reformed into liberalism, because the Gospel will still exist, because your children, like Peter, will realize that Jesus meant it when he said "you are to be persecuted and martyred for me", that Jesus didn't say "you will live in a stable and powerful civilization, free of oppresion and death, thanks to me".
Christianity can't cure a disease it caused
Pagan Romans were fundamentally free of the chains of jewish power, so much that they almost exterminated them all in their own homeland after the rebellion of Bar Kocheba
It would be Christian Europe that would fall under permanent jewish influence, with the jewish-controlled churches banning europeans from financing and loaning, giving them as a monopoly to jews
By the modern era, Christians were so throughly judaized, that they started to actively wish for the restoration of Israel so that the end of the world would finally come around and their civilization would die!
And why would it be otherwise?
A religion which such obsession with death, with promise is the end of the world, is fundamentally a time-bomb in the basement of a civilization
Do you really believe that the early christians that embraced their martyrhood to the lions said to themselves "I am dying to this lion so that the white race can survive, fuck jews!" or any such anachronistic reinterpretation that you have decided to give to their death cult?
No point arguing with Jewish-Christians
> inb4 Turning the other cheek does not mean pacifism. Slapping someone's face with the back of your hand was an insult for a very long time.
no it wasn't. that shit was made up by radical black-nationalist liberal theologist Walter Wink to justify social rebellion in South Africa.
There are NO sources to it outside his books
> Christianity made Europe...
Christianity made Europe a mess...
That "conversion" of Europe involved a lot of killing of whites and destruction of history and art, even worse, it involved killing scientists that went through the Middle Ages, so much that Islam got ahead of Europe during the Middle Ages
> bu... but the surviving scientists were christians and even talked well of the kike Jesus!!!
see: pewforum.org
> According to the poll, just over half of scientists (51%) believe in some form of deity or higher power; specifically, 33% of scientists say they believe in God, while 18% believe in a universal spirit or higher power.
Now that not being a christian is not a death sentence, most scientists don't give a fuck about pretending to worship a kike
Certainly, if Christianity was pro-Science, it would not be anti-world, and it would have not allowed Islam to get ahead of Europe and almost cuck it completely during the Middle Ages
I mean really: FUCKING ISLAM GOT AHEAD OF EUROPE
Is that the religion that you claim "made Europe"?
You believe in an era where the Islamic World was ahead of Europe, so much that our word for complex mathematics is ALGEBRA, an arab word!
But then, Jesus the Kike promised that.
He said clearly that, while men would love their enemies, men would have their enemies in their own household, so it is no wonder europeans were killing each other until well
Question for you
How would you prove to the Pope or any mainstream christian that "do not resist evil" is out of context?
The context of the story is how christians should behave the opposite of gentiles, who love their friends and families, and hate their enemies
The larger context is a Gospel where all the main figures mentioned allowed their enemies to kill them without slaying them back: Jesus, Peter, Paul
What is true context of the paragraph?
How do you turn "Do not resist evil" into "FUCK OFF MUSLIMS!"?
Notice that even Luther agreed that the duty of Christians on this world was to suffer persecution to gain Heaven
Jews are a very successful group that has become successful by monopolising finances through ethnic networking and promoting ideologies that demonize their own actions so that the goyim won't copy their success
so they promote anti-nationalistic Communism among the goyim while endorsing Zionism for themselves
that is why they promoted universalist Christianity among the goyim while keeping Judaism for themselves, and including it as the Old Testament within Christianity, so that they would remain the most important people of the world.
So there is no real contradiction once you understand how Jews work: Do as I say (Christianity), not as I do (Judaism, Old Testament).
then christians wonder why Jews dominate them!
You "christian" people seem to believe that Paul the Pharisee and Peter the Jew the grabbed their swords and killed the romans that wanted to execute them, come on
They were well aware that their religion demanded them to be submissive to their enemies and finally die to them, that is exactly the lesson they wanted the goyim to learn
Look, I know that you actually don't believe in the whole "infinite treasures in Heaven" thing, so you are trying to justify fighting for survival in this world where you can get actual treasures, but don't try to rewrite history please
Everything wrong with the west after it became Christian is the product of historical accidents, Christianity being one of those accidents
One that endangers the survival of the West because of the morality contained within it.
In fact... but why should christians care if the West is endangered?
Do you really believe that the early christians that embraced their martyrhood to the lions said to themselves "I am dying to this lion so that the white race can survive, fuck jews!" or any such anachronistic reinterpretation that you have decided to give to their death cult?
His Kingdom is not of this world. Jesus didn't want people to create biggest empires in his name
He just hated the world and wanted it all to end
Outside of the cross, a symbol of humiliating execution, most "christian symbolism" is stolen out of pagans anyways
oh look
another laugh at larpagans thread
Whatever Christians would not wish others to do to them, they do not to others. And they comfort their oppressors and make them their friends; they do good to their enemies…. Through love towards their oppressors, they persuade them to become Christians.
—The Apology of Aristides 15
A soldier of the civil authority must be taught not to kill men and to refuse to do so if he is commanded, and to refuse to take an oath. If he is unwilling to comply, he must be rejected for baptism. A military commander or civic magistrate must resign or be rejected. If a believer seeks to become a soldier, he must be rejected, for he has despised God.
—Hippolytus of Rome
How can a man be master of another's life, if he is not even master of his own? Hence he ought to be poor in spirit, and look at Him who for our sake became poor of His own will; let him consider that we are all equal by nature, and not exalt himself impertinently against his own race[...]
—Gregory of Nyssa, Homilies on the Beatitudes
...
Those "christians" were barely christians at all outside of cultural symbolism
Whatever nonsense Jesus said in the Gospel was ignored by most of them
it is ironic that you have the creator of realpolitik as one of the exemplary christians, kek
and you know this how exactly?
also rome was the founder of Christianity
denying Christianity is denying's the Romans' longest lasting legacy
if you hate Christianity you hate Romans, sorry.
That only leaves you norse shit
Luther himself said that the duty of Christians on this world was to be persecuted and suffer, so even the religious father of the german nation claims otherwise
- "It is the duty of a Christian to suffer injustice, not to seize the sword and take to violence"
Those men you call christian did the exact opposite of what Luther said: They took the sword and engaged in violence against their enemies
> also rome was the founder of Christianity
Insane Nonsense. Christianity was born in the synagoges of the Middle East, so much that it existed effectively independently from Roman authority in Ethiopia and Persia
If Christianity is a religion of earthly power, why didn't it save the Western Roman Empire then? Why did Saint Augustine wrote that it was not a christian concern the existence or not of wordly kingdoms?
Why were Christians unable to save even their fucking holy land from the Muslims, if they are the religion of earthly power that you believe they are?
Why is the North Africa now muslim, if it was once christian and roman?
That they didn't manage to screw things completely over was an accident of history, not for lack of trying
and most importantly of all questions, why has Christianity become an enabler of the muslim invasion of Europe, if it is such religion of earthly power and "the strong will inherit the Earth" as you seem to believe?
why are all the christian mainstream churches pro-refugee, if christian doctrine says "hate your enemy, and do not lend to them all they want" instead of the opposite as you claim?
The strange thing is that "christians" like you are a minority within Christianity itself that they claim to represent, with everyone from the Pope to the Anglican Churches to the Protestant Churches actively cucking for the destruction of the West
The Pope literally points to the same verses that I do to justify his doctrine, yet you come here to tell me that he is wrong, and I am wrong, and even damn Jesus and paul were wrong tho, because some medieval crusader decided to recreate christianity as a earthly cult of power in order to sack Constantinople!
Christians were never supposed to get power.
The religion never worked like that. His kingdom is NOT of this world. That is why Paul didn't try to create a crusader state. Because the only stable, non self-contradicting position christianity can take is the one of a pacifist minority that is protected by the arms of someone with will to power.
"The meek will inherit the Earth" becomes a declaration of suicide when adopted by the strong
Jesus' kingdom is not of this world. All that embracing Christianity will accomplish is making people give up on fighting for this world because if they are victims they get big rewards in Heaven
The only way to counter Islam is to embrace Life in THIS world, REALITY, existence, and WILL to power; not to shift the value of life away from this world
a forced meme with little Gospel justification applied onto the whole thing 500 years after fact, when it became evident that Jesus was not coming back no matter how many christians martyred themselves
the entirity of the Gospel is built around a small minority of oppressed, persecuted people that shall embrace their suffering because it will give them the key to Heaven... an oppressed minority that suddenly found themselves governing an entire empire and not suffering anymore
The Pope and the Protestant Churches don't cuck for refugees because they somehow became corrupted by atheists
They cuck for a Israel that could cause WW-3 because they expect that this world will be destroyed and the blessings will come in the next world
They cuck for violent sandniggers because the meek will inherit the Earth, and those that love their enemies and lend everything to them will be blessed. They cuck for africans because the civilizational survival is meaningless for christians, as Saint Augustine pointed out in the City of God.
it is all about the other world m8
As Paul said, the world is the enemy of Christians, while right-wingers wanna WIN in this world, christians already "won" by forsaking the world in the name of the new one.
You can't be a real christian and then worry about this world when you already got a reward far larger and even eternal by carrying your cross in this life.
Literally all the followers of Jesus, and Jesus himself were kikes.
Among his followers there were many zealots, the most radical jews of them all, that wanted wars against Rome
But sure, he was "le anti-semite non-kike that kikes hated" right?
Now you are going to talk about how he disagreed with pharisees or whatever.
But why would the pharisees be discussing mosaic law with a non-jew? Never mind, what exactly did he denounce the pharisees for that makes him not a kike? Have you actually read the Gospel?
Can you point to a single value that Jesus denounced that wasn't valid?
Because the denounciations of Jesus were idiotic, insane, even marxist
There he denounces the pharisees for wanting to punish a slut! (Jesus didnt like slut shaming, quite liberal if you ask me!)
There he denounces the rich pharisees and promises the earth to the meek and the poor! (... and marxist)
There he denounces the pharisees for wanting to live, instead of embracing death like him!
There he denounces them over a disagreement on how Mosaic Law is applied! (but Jesus was not a Jew I swear!!!)
You blindly may say "he disagreed with the kikes" as if that was something we needed to applaud!
Muslims are hated by Jews as well, but Jews are smart enough to use them as a tool. The same way they use the insane anti-morality of Christianity to corrupt the ancient world and give themselves a privileged financial spot!
But if Jews don't like the own poison they created, that means that we shall drink it, according to you!
wtf I guess I love ISIS now!
>larpagans actually think this makes sense
you don't even realize how stupid you are do you?
you take a quote from one person
decide that his quote constitutes a rule for ALL CHRISTIANS
and then say
>hey he broke the rule so he's not a christian
>this guy broke the rule so he's also not a christian
>you're not a real christian if you break the rule
if they say they were a christian and others witnessed them going to church or doing christian activities then they were a christian you stupid imbecile
Your characterization is muddled and your understanding crashes upon concepts you fail to truly capture. Above all, you make no distinction between those duties we have to ourselves, and those to others, such as to family, community, or homeland. How could Christianity have survived for so long if we are to take your interpretation seriously? You don't really know what you're talking about.
Rome fell because it was taken over by Mystery Babylon. The same thing happened to the US beginning around 1900, which is why the country has gone to hell since then (Federal Reserve, political control by unelected policy groups like the Council on Foreign Relations, etc.)
No I'm not, i wasn't posting yesterday
they didn't just break the rules of "one guy" Luther, but they outright ignored every Jesus and Paul said about those same rules
You "christian" people seem to believe that Paul the Pharisee and Peter the Jew the grabbed their swords and killed the romans that wanted to execute them, come on
You are well aware that didn't happen
They were well aware that their religion demanded them to be submissive to their enemies and finally die to them, that is exactly the lesson they wanted the goyim to learn
Look, I know that you actually don't believe in the whole "infinite treasures in Heaven" thing, so you are trying to justify fighting for survival in this world where you can get actual treasures, but don't try to rewrite history please
If for you being christian means "going to church and ignoring everything the preacher says about the Gospel" then say it outloud
You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because "Buy a sword", but you can't stop them from reading the next chapter and realizing that Jesus stopped Peter from using the sword to fight and defeat the romans, and reprimanded him for misunderstanding, all while asking him to carry his own cross (Peter, fully realizing that Jesus meant all the stuff about embracing death and his kingdom was not of this world, that angelic chariots were not going to slay his enemies and bring him victory, realized he was doomed, and would then deny Jesus 3 times)
That is not going to fly.
Sooner or later, your "strict catholic crusader" state will be reformed into liberalism, because the Gospel will still exist, because your children, like Peter, will realize that Jesus meant it when he said "you are to be persecuted and martyred for me", that Jesus didn't say "you will live in a stable and powerful civilization, free of oppresion and death, thanks to me".
Some people do care about what their supposed religion is actually about
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
> and those to others, such as to family, community, or homeland
all of those concepts that Jesus outright demands that you reject "hate your own family", "I have come to put a man against his own household"
Christianity survived because Roman Culture was adopted by the invading germans, and the deathly parasite was contracted with it
But that didn't stop its virulence, and it has actually caused a lot of damage, in the 1500s and 1600s by making germans kill each other, in the 1800s and 1900s by becoming obsessed with the Apocalypse not arriving and adopting Zionism as the solution
I mean really, why the fuck would an apocalyptic cult care about the homeland at all?
What argument would you lead to the current christian leaders that would somehow show that Jesus actually said "Kill your enemies" instead of "Do not resist evil"?
and please tell me where in the Bible it says that christians must suffer and die and submit to everyone else
because the ACTUAL Bible has many verses with God telling His followers to destroy and annihilate their enemies and wipe them from history.
but no, you, who've never read the Bible and knows nothing about Christianity other than what you've Googled know more about Christianity, then me, a Christian who has actually read the Bible extensively
and yes I do believe in heaven and infinite riches not that infinite riches matter in heaven
...
kek, Christians literally have to make edits in order to have "arguments", yet the edit is so crappy that the word atheist is clearly misplaced
norse gods deliver
Talking with heathens is pointless.
Just till the DAY comes and we will grind their bones under our heels.
...
...
>Roman Empire fell because it angered Gods.
No it fell due to some retard giving anyone Roman citizenship.
Yeah this is the samefag.
>how do you do fellow niggers
...
...
...
This. Too much of expanision is called cancer. Stable borders for such large borders are unsustainable. Western part of the Roman Empire was left too open with bad leadership.
> because the ACTUAL Bible has many verses with God telling JEWS to destroy and annihilate their enemies and wipe them from history.
Are you jewish? Come on
You are very aware that all those references are to jews killing their enemies
It is extremely telling that you have to shift our debate from the BIBLE to the GOSPEL
You would assume that Christians would be able to tell they are supposed to follow the later
i mean really... do you really that "if they take your coat, let them have your shirt as well", "do not resist evil", "I have come to turn a man against his own household", "if you don't hate your self and your own family you can't follow me", "love your enemies, pray for your persecutors", "the meek will inherit the Earth", "those that wanna die will live", "blessed are those the persecuted, for they will be my Kingdom", "do not save treasures for tomorrow", "carry your cross so that you can receive eternal reward", "Sell all your possessions and give the money to the poor, and you'll have treasure in heaven", "it is easier for a camel to go through a needle's eye than for the rich to enter Heaven", "Woe to you who are well fed, Woe to you who laugh, for you will mourn and weep"... is compatible with the Old Testament?
how do you even make sense of that, being a jew and christian at the same time
> and yes I do believe in heaven and infinite riches not that infinite riches matter in heaven
Exactly. The promise of Jesus is absurd
it is greediness for the mentally challenged
* do you really think that
Very telling that Christians see a citation from an open-borders elite family as a positive thing
Pagans*
>outright demands that you reject "hate your own family", "I have come to put a man against his own household"
Those statements are to be understood within their own contexts. You know, like all statements ever. It obviously isn't meant literally since we are also told to "Honour thy father and thy mother."
>somehow show that Jesus actually said "Kill your enemies"
Under the conditions of a defensive war, obviously. It is better to be alive than dead, therefore protecting oneself is Good.
And he is wrong HOW exacly?
Fuck off back to stormfront, nu/pol/.
idk if you realize this but a requirement for being a CHRISTian is believing in Jesus CHRIST
and unless Jesus was not the Son of God, then Jews are not considered followers of God because they're not Christians
>livinig in heaven in splendor is absurd
nothing you say has any logical merit whatsoever and everything you claim is based on numerous misunderstandings of the Bible
you know how evolutionists say that you're an idiot if you don't believe in evolution and you never actually took the time to understand the science behind evolution?
well you're also an idiot for making claims about Christianity when you never read the Bible
You do know that it didn't actualy look like that,don't you? Most if not all "pagan" structures in greece and rome were build AFTER Christianity became a state religion of the empire. All those "temples" weren't build to exalt made up idols.
Question for you
How would you prove to the Pope or any mainstream christian that "do not resist evil" is out of context?
The context of the story is how christians should behave the opposite of gentiles, who love their friends and families, and hate their enemies
The larger context is a Gospel where all the main figures mentioned allowed their enemies to kill them without slaying them back: Jesus, Peter, Paul
What is true context of the paragraph?
How do you turn "Do not resist evil" into "FUCK OFF MUSLIMS!"?
> Under the conditions of a defensive war,
Jesus and Paul made no reference to such thing. I mean, I get that later christians realized it was a death cult and tried to changed that, but the cult was entirely functional without it
> Under the conditions of a defensive war,
Not if you invert all values as Christianity did. "those that wanna live will die, those that wanna die will live"
but then, you probably believe that Paul engaged in a defensive war against Rome or some nonsense
...
...
>reality of religion
...
Not a fan of Cuckianity but Cuckianity is not why Rome fell.
Rome fell because it entered the classic process of civilizational decline that comes from too much "Honey&Milk". Too much "Honey&Milk" makes a civilization lose it's will to live and that "death wish" manifests itself as Socialism-DoGoodism-Egalitarianism. A top Russian mathematician (cant remember his name) wrote a good book about this called "The Socialist Phenomenon", basically great civilizations are great when they are facing adversity, when adversity is gone they become Socialists-Egalitarians and from that point on is adversity all the way to the grave.
Some say there where also (((internal forces))) at work and they are probably right.
>muh poor heretics, sodomites and blasphemers!
Yeah teach me my history dumb murifag.
en.wikipedia.org
are you really claiming that the first christians didn't understand the Gospel but you do?
Me? I am the one that didn't the Bible!! laughable!!
If you read it you may realize that your DEUS VULT bullshit is mentioned NOWHERE in the Gospel and that the only way to claim that God wants you to kill your enemies is to claim to be a Jew!
t. Nietzsche
Go fucking suicide walking soap.
>wikipedia
If you aren't a Christian you have no right to talk about Scripture. Fuck off.
this is what happens when you adopt paganism
I love how Christians have to quote Jews to make their argument.
What is next, are you going to quote the black nationalist preacher that said that "offer your other cheek" actually meant "revolt against your enemies"?
...
Then you don't have to talk about the Gospel either
You are not a Christian, you are a fucking larper
Jesus' Kingdom is not of this world
Your version of Christianity never existed. Even the crusaders were subjected to jewish bankers that financed them
Remember goys, paganism is one step away from atheism. And atheism leads to degeneracy
>muh skin
I'm just gonna stop arguing with you...
you're just too stupid to even waste my time with aren't you?
>If you read it you may realize that your DEUS VULT bullshit is mentioned NOWHERE in the Gospel
i never said deus vult you buffoon
and yes ofc it isn't in the Bible because it's latin and was said by crusaders long after the Bible was written
>are you really claiming that the first christians didn't understand the Gospel but you do?
nothing i said resembles what you interprted me to have said in any way shape or form
and since you fail to understand anything I say and fail to make any logical arguments I'm just gonna leave you to your stupidity
>Roman Empire
>cuckianity
>save white race from mudslimes
>Zeus' favour
>SPQR flag
>DEUS VULT
It's like 9 kinds of stupid in one post
Read what Ben Klassen had to say about the end of the Roman Empire.
Yeah, everyone knows that christianity is in the forefront of the fight against gay agen... oh wait no the christian preachers fuck little kids
Well, at least they are against immigra... NO WAIT! All mainstream, historical churches are fully in bed with mass immigration!!!
>oh wait no the christian preachers fuck little kids
Didn't happen.
>historical churches are fully in bed with mass immigration
Nothing wrong with immigration.
Sure, stop arguing if you want
Any rational person can read what I already wrote in this thread, and realize that an apocalyptic cult that denies the World is not a solution: it is a fucking part of the problem
thanks for the bump
...
...
there you have it Sup Forums
what a fucking shame, if you erase all those tattoos from that right pic then you'd see what she could have become
I wish I could exclude myself from these people by saying "Not all Atheists are like that." but there are just so many fuckers like them that it really doesn't even matter if I did.
Pagan is /camfy/
It's because they abandoned their traditions. That spells collapse for literally every empire.
>implying i haven't been saging every single one of my comments in this shit thread
Except you fell for the jewish plot, hook line and sinker
Rome adopted Cuckianity because it was already decadent.
Pagantards use Rome's adoption of Cuckianity as some sort of recruitment strategy but the fact of the matter is that Paganism in all it's forms was already hopelessly decadent.
Cuckianity just came to fill the void...and yes, the Jews invented Cuckianity.
I am strictly Atheist-Racialist, science and race should be our "Gods".