Why does Sup Forums think that only young women should have kids?

Why does Sup Forums think that only young women should have kids?

if you have a kid around your thirties or older you're just going to have an autistic baby.

Is that what you want? You want a son or daughter who draws Sonic porn when they're 40 years old?

Let me guess, she's childless, or had them old, and has never done lifelong outcome studies in this because none were possible or needed before?

>top midwife
>claims
>experts
Why don't we just flip a coin

My mom gave birth to me in her thirties
Oh shit

Someone in the business of assisting middle age women to have kids is upset that facts show that middle age women having kids is less than ideal. Color me shocked that she is worried about her shekel supply declining.

Yes goyim, keep putting off children until it's too later.

While the chances for the child having issues increases as the mother's age increases, I would say that it's safer for woman to have children in their twenties.

But if they want to run the risk, they can.

Having kids in your late 30s or early 40s is basically as bad as cousin marriage. Yeah, good fucking reasons to advocate against it.
This is the same kind of bullshit strong independent womyn were pushing for before in relation to fetal alcohol syndrome being "exaggerated or made up".

A 37 year old woman has a daughter

She'll be 50 while the daughter is 13

Menarche + Menopause pathologies meet, cycle repeats

The point isn't that no women should be having kids 3x+. The midwife is right that the risks are sometimes exaggerated. The point is that the best child-bearing years are a women's 20s. Women shouldn't be unduly putting off having children to "enjoy their youth" or "focus on their career."

Hey, my mom was 50 when I was 13 and I turned out just--just--...

My mother is 45 and I'm 20 meaning she had me around 25, which Sup Forums seems to advocate. What Sup Forums doesn't seem to be considering is how unprepared women around this age really are, especially for motherhood

And here you are on Sup Forums. The prophecy fulfilled.

My mother had me when she was young. She also had kids later in life. Now I have a brother with downs syndrome. And if you don't reply to this post you will too.

Because Sup Forums follows the studies that support their traditional believes over the appeal to feelings these people use to justify their degenerate lifestyles.

it seems obvious that there's the need of a better culture that supports women that aspire to be ideal mothers then.
or technologies that cover the cons of later motherhood.

>Japan
>knowing about reproduction
> calling anyone else autistic

My fucking sides!

It's all about averages. The chance that the child will be born with some physical or mental deformities is higher as the mother gets older. If they want to risk that then it's fine but it's their kid.

Anecdotally, my mom had her third kid when she was 40, and the only defect was that the kid was a girl

The only people having children in Japan are the 30 and 40 year olds and, quelle suprise, they're autistic.

The problem for the most part is that because of the current economic climate in Japan, and all around the developed world, it's not exactly economically viable for people in their 20s to have kids. So you either only get the rich, who will be able to support children or pay nannies and others to raise their child for them, or the very unintelligent and poor people who are too dumb to not have a lot of children. The middle class is the only class that's not having a lot of children, or any at all, because it's not easy to have any unless you're very lucky.

It's why welfare leeches and coloureds have so many children, they're just too dumb and poor not to.

> mom had me with 40
JUST
U
S
T

>the foestus is unaffected by geriatric ji-