Checkmate Climate Deniers

...

Other urls found in this thread:

cliffmass.blogspot.com/2017/08/global-warming-and-hurricane-harvey.html
sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/clausius.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_common_physics_notations
cato.org/people/ryan-maue
youtu.be/uIybC1mFEx8
youtu.be/4XOmJY8WB-w
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

cliffmass.blogspot.com/2017/08/global-warming-and-hurricane-harvey.html

Every summer it's "global warming" every winter it's "climate change".....

Woah, basic math that looks hard on a surface level, really makes you think

dp = L
dT = T

What nigga

can someone tell me what DELTA s is?

>Kurt "reading hentai to my kids" Eichenwald

>winter is too hot
>"it proves climate change!!!!!!"
>winter is really fucking cold
>"it proves climate change!!!!!!"
>summer is too cold
>"it proves climate change!!!!!!"
>summer is really fucking hot
>"it proves climate change!!!!!!"

great theory

It's been climate change for 80 years. Just because the media gives it flash names it doesn't change the fact it's been called climate change by climatologists since the beginning of the research into it.

delta is short hand for difference. Did you never have any math in school?

only if change in V equals 1...fuck you.

sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/clausius.htm

WHAT'S THE s YOU FUCKING MOUNTAIN NIGGER?!!!

I think he means the "s" part

I believe in climate change, but it's sure as shit not man-made.

entropy?

WOAAHA YOU CAN USE CALCULUS TO SHOW HOW TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE ARE RELATED????
CLIMATE CHANGE DENIERS ETERNALLY:
B T F O
T
F
O

TOLD STATUS: STONE TOLD AUSTIN

Differential

dispacement in meters. a.k.a. space. You retarded nigger?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_common_physics_notations

The change affecting it's designated variable. an incremental variation in a variable.

s is distance.
Delta s is change in distance. In the civilized world we use 'x' to denote distance but americucks prefer this notation.

Warmer air leads to the possibility of stronger storms and more precipitation

Yes we know that isn't the question(s)

The questions are thus:
1. Is it the fault of humans
Answer: debateable not sure

2. Cannot be stopped weather humans are at fault or not
Answer: probably not at this point

3. Are large powerful storms caused directly by the climate change
Answer: no, that's impossible to know for sure but it could increase the chances of strong storms.

SPECIFIC entropy, asswipe

actually it began as global cooling in the 60s you shmeg licking prolapse bugler. fucking readit tier climatologist

just realized the v stands for Volume in this equation and not velocity, you can't be sure anything adhering to correct scientific notations, so s is probably "speed" or some bullshit
>american science

we are doing it word by word, gunter

[citation needed]

OP = FAG

>Heh, don't believe your lying eyes, Goys, the planet is getting warmer. How do we know? We use these formulas... What's that? You can't understand the formulas? Guess you'll just have to take us at our word then, Goys!

citations are for those with the capacity to be educated.

lol at this asswipe just "casually" dropping the equation like he was the one calculating it, or could understand the work for that matter.
What a douchenozzle.

Would be more useful if he defined his terms

Kek. I'll remember that one for the next time I want to get out of having to prove the BS I pulled out of my ass.

Δ
ΔΔ

It also started as the greenhouse theory which was invented to explain why Venus is hot enough to melt lead.

Venus wasn't expected or predicted to be that hot.

Someone riddle me this:
Global warming
->
Atmosphere is hotter
->
Atmosphere has more energy
->
Lightnings are caused by high energy differentials in the atmosphere

Why is it that the amount of lightning strikes in germany are continously lowering each year?

> build houses in an area that was a flood plain since whites built a city there

> big hurricane floods the area

> WHAT NOT CLIMATE DENIERS?! THESE TYPE OF FLOOD NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE!

Now the MILF porn tentacle monster is in on tweeting about climate change. Where's the equation he uses to rationalize his browsing history?

Delta s is entropy, Hans. Fucking christ, go back to gymnasium you rat child

>drunpfff impeach! You climate denying racist reeeeeee

That's not why people build in flood areas. They build there because the land is cheaper and they know the gubbament is going to bail out everyone afflicted by the flood anyway.

Wow if it's that simple Kurt Buchenwald should be claiming the Clay Millennium prize for existence and uniqueness of Navier-Stokes solutions any day now.

As Confucius once said: "let me google that for you... nah if you cant use google you belong in an oven"

We haven't had a cat 4 make landfall in over 10 years which is unheard of in America and yet every single climate scientist will refuse to admit this

think of delta as "change in" related to some increment of time or movement or whatever.

damn that basic calculus really blew me the fuck out

I'LL SHOW YOU THE SCIENCE PAPER! I HAVE GOOGLE+ !

Specific volume. No way you can get pressure otherwise

Stopped reading at (((Eichenwald))).

Global warming is misleading, the proper term is climate change because the climate in some places is changing. Some places are getting colder others are getting hotter and others are the same, in average the earth seems to be getting hotter.

Regardless of that, lightnings are supposed to increase in most places due to climate change.

not for the entire globe

can people pls stop trying to explain to me what delta means? My issue was the small s, but now that I realize he uses small v for Volume I see how the s is Entropy

>"I-I was trying to prove it existed!"

I already know what I'll find. A few hundred media articles and blog posts misinterpreting a study. In any case you're the one who made a very bold claim and even cited a year so I thought you had citations handy. Guess you're just pulling shit out of your ass and then when getting called out to present your evidence your response is "Find the evidence for my claim yourself".

>hurr durr, I have a simple equation to a complex problem
That's why Eichelwald is not a scientist.

wtf I love math now

They have twatter in prison?

I thought we were still in a cooling trend? Oh well, if we just fuck with the data some more we'll get the results the government wants to pass the climate change legislation they want because you know......CLIMATE SCIENCE.

What does this have to do with tentacle pron?

ypu are the reason i have stopped browsing Sup Forums... These beyond retarded statements by obese inbres white muricans, who dont have the brain capacity to understand basic science makes me gag.

I think i'm better off at /biz/

>Hurricane scientist
Sup Forums if you're going to try to fake your way through arguments at least use something that actually exists.

Translated: Pressure gradient with respect to temperature is equal to latent heat over temperature times change in volume which is equal change in entropy over change in volume. I hate shit like this - faggots who post a basic equation and then act like they're a fucking genius, lauding their knowledge over the peasantry despite having no fucking idea what any of the equation actually means.

but that is exact science.

who denies climate?

this equation obviously does not calculate anything to do with hurricanes.

What it says:
the rate of change of pressure with respect to temperature is equal to the ratio of the length of something to its temperature and a small element of volume which is equal to the ratio of the small change in entropy corresponding to its small change in volume

Isn't that the guy that watches hentia with his kids?

...

What do you climate change deniers base your denial on? I'm genuinely interested. It's like when people think cancer is caused by yeast, I would like to understand your point of view

fuck you

OP, that you Kurt?? go eat a butter stick then jack off to little kid Asian porn fucko

human dumpster

Feelz.

Hurricanes existed since ever you Liberal faggot that has nothing to do with humans anything more then vulcano explosion.
Damn Liberals are fucking retared

alex jones. breitbart.

Climate change IS a thing. But humanity is not even close to cause it.

oh what the hell is latent heat

This idiot is going to goad the Trump Army into proving weather geoengineering.

lack of evidence + issue with Grant $ dependent "scientific" conclusions

Delta s is change in entropy.

How the fuck does nobody know s means entropy?

Climate change is real, is just not man made.

regardless its safe to say this has nothing to do with hurricanes accept as some small element used in a massive simulation somewhere?

> Occasional hurricanes or two kilometer thick ice covering half the planet.

Hurricanes please.

I don't even know where to start on this stupid oversimplification...someone just send him more epilepsy gifs

shhh nobody believes your smugposting

cato.org/people/ryan-maue

What have you done to me Sup Forums?

K(u)=P(e)
R(t) D(o)

my sides

Congrats you put 3 different terms in your tweet...and now ? What shall that prove ? The question is not if the increase in strength of hurriance is a function of temperature and air saturation,the question is: Is an increase in temperature a function of an increase of anthropogenic co2 emmisions.In reality what these terms show is that with increased temperaturre hurricanse actually are weaker.A nice try to scare people.As if Eichenwald himself is an expert on these things.He is just using a white character trait: being rational an scientific.A typical jewish trick.

kurt is such a fucking faggotron
how is he still employed after that Tucker shit?

Calculated. Result: Negligible impact.

Toy models and simplified equations work great for ideal cases... nature is rarely ideal. I'm doing research on complex plasmas right now, looking for evidence of a physical effect our group has predicted but which has never been observed. In an ideal world it would be a simple case to create an experiment to see the effect we're looking for, but in reality we've got six or seven other separate phenomena to worry about, all of which are potentially co-dependent on one another, and any of which could cause similar results. The only way to handle it is to take enough data in all the right regimes to eliminate the other effects as an explanation one by one.


The excess energy required to make a phase transition. In order to go from a liquid to a gas or a solid to a liquid or vice versa, you need enough energy to bring the system to a new equilibrium temperature, plus a little extra to actually transition it from one phase to another.

It can be applied to explain the basic physics, but it's a gross oversimplification of what the people predicting how these storm systems work actually do. It's the equivalent of posting the basic equation for compound interest accompanied by a tweet saying "this is the equation that governs all banking, I'm a pro at economics"

Diameter of penis = Length of the tentacle / clit circumference

> 80 years

Nigger, 40 years ago the talk was about the next ice age. They blamed the Blizzard of 1978 on that.

When the warming trend started again they went to greenhouse gasses and global warming. Somewhere in the middle we had the hole in the ozone layer.

It wasn't until the cooling trend started again did we get climate change added to the vernacular of this fucking doomsday cult.

it's not distance it's entropy and S is the universal notation for this

d-delet this

Education is reaching entropy

Your telling me that on a planet millions of years old in a galaxy that's billions of years old in a universe that's infinite, that we humans have managed to fuck everything in a little as 150-200 years? The left loves to espouse science when it's convenient but when it doesn't agree that simply replace with feelings. The amount of time we have been an industrial civilization is less than a blink in space time. It's a pretty arrogant position to assume that we are so significant to affect things that are so beyond us in a significant way. It's delusional is what it is.

Then scientists should get people to stop using those terms because they're completely undermining their work by making it seem disengenious to the average person

>posting an equation without defining the variables
Why?

Some education about the Rothschild involvement in the climate scam. This is a start.

youtu.be/uIybC1mFEx8
youtu.be/4XOmJY8WB-w

what is L. s and v presumably aren't velocity and displacement. maybe this is just over my head.

What is this supposed to prove?

The media was talking about that. Doesn't mean climatologists or meteorologists made such claims.

>get the media to stop sensationalizing and misinterpreting science
Yea sure. Easy task.