Explain to me right now why two people who love each other should not have the right to marry each other

Explain to me right now why two people who love each other should not have the right to marry each other.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE
youtube.com/watch?v=bOgkGzMdieI
youtube.com/watch?v=q6c_dinY3fM
youtube.com/watch?v=xnqIj8C2Aek
youtube.com/watch?v=VggFao85vTs
youtube.com/watch?v=IfCOO7Z39j0
youtube.com/watch?v=2hWYgPDVX_8
youtube.com/watch?v=b5tci36bNjg
youtube.com/watch?v=PFHa4db3hA0
youtube.com/watch?v=A94smJ9QJ5g
youtube.com/watch?v=hvNNtBmA3SQ
youtube.com/watch?v=gwd_Iofr6ZQ
youtu.be/kPdxhLUKZYM?list=PLo0ThsDnveH5nv5TNviBrGTX9P6IrYfIe&t=412
youtube.com/watch?v=tPc899uUb-A
youtube.com/watch?v=jgGP_evkvOk
youtube.com/watch?v=TxpIsep4160
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

no

>Explain to me right now why
It's about (((their))) globalist agenda. They want to run a prison planet of race-less, culture-less, nation-less, identity-less subdued sheep. They make up less than 1% of the world's population, yet look at all they control from the world's finances to the media that brainwashes us.

In short, they use the entertainment and news media to encourage globalism and discourage nationalism and traditional western values. They distort and lie about the present and past in that effort.

The truth about immigration, by the numbers:
>youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE

Cultural Marxist Jews Admit Organizing White Genocide

The plan to eliminate the white race:
>youtube.com/watch?v=bOgkGzMdieI

Cultural Marxism in action… Political Correctness, the tip of the blade:
>youtube.com/watch?v=q6c_dinY3fM

Cultural Marxism & Social Justice explained:
>youtube.com/watch?v=xnqIj8C2Aek

Why are we in decline - Cultural Marxism:
>youtube.com/watch?v=VggFao85vTs

The Jewish role in the refugee crisis:
>youtube.com/watch?v=IfCOO7Z39j0

Leftist subversion explained by former KGB agent Yuri Bezmenov:
>youtube.com/watch?v=2hWYgPDVX_8

also see

The facts about slavery in North America:
>youtube.com/watch?v=b5tci36bNjg
>youtube.com/watch?v=PFHa4db3hA0
>youtube.com/watch?v=A94smJ9QJ5g

Cultural Marxist Jews fund media propaganda against whites on an enormous scale:
>youtube.com/watch?v=hvNNtBmA3SQ

The Jewish role in the porn industry:
>youtube.com/watch?v=gwd_Iofr6ZQ

Does this sound familiar at all? (starting at 6:52)
>youtu.be/kPdxhLUKZYM?list=PLo0ThsDnveH5nv5TNviBrGTX9P6IrYfIe&t=412

The Holocaust:
>youtube.com/watch?v=tPc899uUb-A
>youtube.com/watch?v=jgGP_evkvOk
>youtube.com/watch?v=TxpIsep4160

They can't procreate and children shouldn't be raised without a mother or a father.
You're glorifying hedonism.

Because JEEEEEEZZZUS. YEEEEE HAAAAW!

Because that's not what marriage is about.
Marriage is about a man and a number of women greater or equal to one establishing a household for the purpose of having children. It's not about a couple of butt pirates or carpet munchers making turdbabies and raising cats.

I know that for a cuck it's hard to see why your wife shouldn't be able to marry the man she actually loves, but things exist for a purpose beyond your feelings.

I don't see a reason not too, but marriage law is really complicated. And generally gay people tend to be the masters of makeing there agenda law.

I don't know it seems like a slipper slope from allowing gay people to marry to being imprisoned for misgendering a person.

>They can't procreate
Should old people be allowed to marry?

Because they shouldn't be allowed to exist(Romans 1:26-32 Leviticus 20:13). Akso they don't love they list which is why they are never monogamous. Also b8 thread.

Because state sanctioned anything is shit and should be fucking purged.

The concept of marriage is religious in nature. Most religions don't look to fondly on the gays, ergo, gays should not be married. The state, doesn't matter WHAT fucking country you're in, should back the fuck off about this shit.

Also, what this faggot said.

Marriage is a Christian custom. America has a separation of church and state. Therefore, marriage should remain in the hands of Christ, who says only man and woman shall marry.

Your problem is with the tax benefits given to Americans. Nothing more. Just legislate for civil unions or removing tax benefits - or is there some deeper butthurt your feels are asspaining over?

Because you don't want your country to go to shit like ours has. And even more so Canada.

>t. Mongoloid who probably watches Seth Rogan cartoons

Yes. Only people who can/have the potential to procreate should be allowed to marry.

Marriage is not about love. It was never about love and it will never be about love.
The purpose of marriage is procreation within a secure and stable relationship. It has nothing to do with perverted fudge packers and their feelings of "love".

No. Neither should people known to be infertile.

Gays arent people

...

>homos
>people

>incest and pedophilia is okay

Old people can procreate specifically men, Women on the other hand can become barren after a certain age but its not a 100% guarantee they will

Not just gays, but commies, niggers, leftist, and jews too.

Because marriage must have a chance for procreation. Homosexuals have 0% chance of reproduction within a civil union, and therefore their marriage serves no benefit to society.

Children can be adopted, but must go to traditional married couples to ensure the best chance of their success.

>having your head shoved this far up your own ass

100% fucking degenerate

But... what about two people who love each being about to get married? Why are you against freedom to marry?

Lots of people who can't procreate marry. Lots of people procreate outside of marriage.

Because biology thats why.

Because marriage creates the building block of society: a family unit. Marriage isn't for a bunch of defectives to use as a vehicle to destroy society

Actually, before no fault divorce, if a woman knew she was infertile and did not disclose it prior to marriage, it was grounds for divorce. Also, the marriage was not binding until sexual consummation.

All of this proves the intent of marriage is procreation. All forms of non-procreative sex are degenerate.

Yes. They still can act as caregivers within a traditional marriage setting.

...it's common sense. You don't outlaw marriage for straight couples just because a minority is infertile

I dont give two fucks about others. Just keep that faggot shit away from me. I hope they get depressed and die of aids.

>All forms of non-procreative sex are degenerate.
Does that include condoms, birth control, and contraception?

>lots of people do X
Not an argument.

Would you allow a child to marry an adult?

...

Marriage being exclusive to people who can procreate is not an argument either.

...

>deparaved modern faggots
>capable of experiencing human emotions

Implying_implications.tif

because that's fucking gay? what more of a reason do you need to ban it? it's fucking gay desu

Absolutely. The downfall of the West really began in earnest when the Anglican Church allowed birth control in the 1930s.

No sex outside marriage, abundant procreation within marriage.

>impaling someone's shithole with your cock
>love

Pick one faggot

Because Marriage is a religious thing, you already have civil unions. You should be fighting to change the legislation to change these problems (like inheritance not working correctly for homosexual couples) instead of this bandaid solution.

...

Same-sex marriages have no social benefit.

this again? didn't they fix this a few years ago?

Why does marriage exist?

what kind of world are we in that we have to ask if being a faggot is wrong? it's an inherent wrong, it's fundamental, there's no arguing about it desu

the first one please :3

kek

Considering infertility was legal grounds for divorce when divorce required just grounds, yes it is.

What's going to be the best way to rub it in Sup Forumss face when the NO vote inevitably loses?

While I agree modesty and Christian values are desperately needed to eliminate promiscuity, I think condoms do a wonderful service.

Two people expressing love and commitment to one another and having a big party.

Do you know what exists for brining babies Ito the world? Sex. And it's got nothing to do with marriage.

don't fucking jinx it mate
but im gonna go around a fuck a bunch of guys even though im straight

Australia hasn't gotten around to destroying their normalcy yet.

...

Letting a black bull fuck you in the arse, m8.

No, historically. Why was it invented?

I'll laugh when it happens, all it will do is keep stoking the coals of a worldwide racewar. Do it ya fuckin pooftah.

Homosexual intercourse breeds disease and creates death

Heterosexual intercourse breeds healthy children and creates life

Everything should be done to prevent the popularisation and normalisation of vile rebellions against healthy natural life and civilisation.

Marriage isn't a right. marriage is a religious ceremony, an oath to God that you will not betray each other. Marriage requires the approval of the society you live in, therefore two people being in love is irrelevant. In fact, throughout history, love has had relatively little to do with marriage.

Marriage is a contract between a man and a woman before their deity that they will attempt to reproduce and create children that are ethnically desired by their nation.

There is literally no purpose for people of the same sex to be married.

Every condom stops white babies from being born. They should be illegal and users should be punished.

Truvada and the fall of mankind

You have statistics that show single parents raise kids better than families?

its a ceremony that society created to allow people to express their love
thats it

The best way will be posting the score line.

>auspol thread
>express opinion that individuals shouldn't be subjugated by the government.
>"oh and btw, 68-32 LOL"

The slope will get more slippery. It never ends at just marriage

There's actually no way you're as stupid as you are portraying yourself to be. Here's your (you) I have no wish to waste more time in what is obviously a bait thread.

Good luck convincing people of that.

because the balls shouldn't touch

King David is more based than you and he was bi and gays can even have their own kids. Somebody did a satanic scare from the 80s thread? Seems to happen only during republigoyim times. Like hurricanes do. Enjoy your thread

The African birth explosion could've been avoided had it not been for Catholics, Mormons, and Evangelicals pushing against condoms.

It's true.

No, it isn't. It's not about love. Marriage existed long before it became accepted to choose your own mate.

What does this have to do with race you stupid Amerishart

Marriage was invented to more easily control the masses by religious authorities.
It's the same reason religion was invented.

Then why the contract? People in love need legal backing to prove it to each other?

it also stops the birth of black babies
checkmate you fuck

So why do gays want to be more easily controlled by religion?

holy fucking shit
>american education
do a bit of reading mate

You're also confusing wedding (a ceremony) with marriage (aka matrimony, a state of being joined).

Blacks believe condoms give them aids.

It's not my job. It's how my wife and I live. God will judge those who disobey his commands.

>condoms fitting the bbc
nice try, dicklet

That's not an argument. Why do they need a legally binding contract? Why do they need divorce court? It's love. Do you sign an agreement whenever you start to love a girl, assuming you have?

>wife
And you don't believe in condoms...

/thread

You need to pull your head out of your arse, faggot.

Nah, it could could have been better avoided by not creating a false state of abundance by throwing free shit at them.

But I just established that it isn't about that anymore.

My girlfriend and I are planning our wedding around furnishing a house with the wedding presents. We won't have the ceremony without 5kms of a church. Marriage is just a good excuse for a party.

>It's not about love.
>Marriage existed long before it became accepted to choose your own mate.
That's a fallacy - argument from tradition.

Just because marriage has meant X for a long time doesn't mean it can't mean Y now. I can find plenty of archaic definitions for English words.

It's acceptable to say "I think marriage should be... and therefore..." but don't try and say "Marriage is..." if what you're saying clearly and objectively is not the case.

Which isn't to say that marriage IS about love, because it's not that either. But it's certainly not what you're trying to imply it is.

Marriage is legal recognition of a relationship where there is an intent to create a life together. If you look at the definition the courts use of a defacto relationship you find very close to exactly the same words. It's not about love, it's not about children, or anything else. It is just "intent to create a life together."

So children who haven't even entered puberty should be able to marry and have sex with adults or other children? Even people in the same family?

the thread right under yours

i'll let you fuck my arse, cobba

The protections and privileges of marriage are there because the family is the best way to ensure a successful new generation is brought up and contributes to society.

Same sex marriage cannot spawn children, and are proven to be much less stable than traditional marriage, with shit outcomes for any children brought up in that environment. This extends to married heterosexual couples that don't have kids, they contribute more to a stable society than homosexuals do.

If two fags want to live together and sodomize each other ten times a day they can go right ahead, but offering them any legal status above single unmarried people is pointless and even counterproductive.

Blacks don't use condoms. Every sheboon has 15 kids in tow. Whites have to surpass black birth rates, or go extinct. Make your choice, degenerate.

Gay people can have kids, how many times do we have to say this.

>But I just established that it isn't about that anymore.

Oh so if it can change why are you upset that we've changed it to exclude gays? Should people be able to marry consenting animals too?