How accurate is this? Should libertarian societies go full 1488 when faced with any sort of threat (such as communism)?

How accurate is this? Should libertarian societies go full 1488 when faced with any sort of threat (such as communism)?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=vXDCDsbWuNU
youtube.com/watch?v=Hg9hhQ8K4a0
myredditnudes.com/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Yes- not necessarily full 14/88, but definitely fascist.

Anybody have the Gadsden edit with the snake wrapped around a boot saying "You treaded, now it's my turn' or something to that effect?

THIS
>THIS
THIS

THIS. this is pretty much how it should be: fuck big government and fuck the state, but if it is necessary to do so, I'll gladly go full NatSoc. Lefties and ethnics can either fuck off peacefully or feel the 14/88

>t. lolberg

fascism is the response to an extreme threat of freedom

Yes.

Yes. Trying to appease CNN does nothing except make us look weak.

Fairly accurate.

>can't attack the people who reciprocate
>instead attack your "allies" who are trying to start pacifism as a categorical imperative

Not the image, but you'd probably like this video.
youtube.com/watch?v=vXDCDsbWuNU
>don't leave lion alone
>lion gets up
>lion goes full fascist modde

Am I the only person not dumb enough to have a lolbertarian phase before going full natsoc? Pie in the sky snek shit has always seemed self-defeating and undesirable to me.

libertarians are just capitalists.

Low effort gaslight.

You should be ashamed.

Libertarianism with a focus on Constitutional rights can only comfortably co-exist with a Conservative majority society.

obviously and?

capitalism is exploitation

communism is more individualistic. To each according to his ability.

how is capitalism exploitation?

magic

i swear to fuck if this guy tells me to read marx

Their shafting of Ron is what caused all this. They didn't listen. Now it's too late.

It's not accurate and yes they should. Most libertarians I know just deny there is a problem, "muh freedom as long as they don't physically restrain me and they contribute to muh economy it's all good". When most of their country will be enriched they will just move out to small villages because they are fucking cucks.
You can't just wait for an agression when the invasion is demographical and cultural, otherwise it will be too late to defend yourself because you'll be alone

All social systems are exploitative. It's kind of how these things work.

That is capitalism you are thinking of. Communism is to each an equal share regardless of their work or ability and to the reigning government goes the rest.

"The exploiters are the agents able to command goods, with revenue from their wages, that are embodied with more labour than the exploiters themselves have put forth. These agents often have class status and ownership of productive assets that aid the optimization of exploitation. The exploiters would typically be the bourgeoisie. Meanwhile, the exploited are those who receive less than the average product he or she produces. If workers receive an amount equivalent to their average product, there is no revenue left over. Thus, these workers cannot enjoy the fruits of their own labours and the difference between what is made and what that can purchase cannot be justified by redistribution according to need. The exploited are the proletariat."

Hahaha. To each according to his ability (as determined by the state) to each according to his need (as determined by the state.) Very free and individualistic

HES GOT YOU FIGURED OUT U SCARED YET? XD

/an/ here, just so you know a rattlesnake can bite through a leather boot.

>libertarian to natsoc
>rational human with sense of decency towards others to closeted racist socialist with a fancy name
>inb4 muh fallacy IQ gap charts

my problem with this is how the only measure of value in communist economics is how much time you spend stacking boxes, and anyone doing anything other than that is seen as exploitative for not stacking the boxes

Exactly, it's hell for anybody with ambitions of any kind

whenever i see this picture i feel like i can smell it
it isnt good

Uh huh

Fascism is an extreme threat of freedom.

Libertarianism can only work in a high IQ homogeneous society with a strong work ethic and solid family structures.

The more the US resembles Brazil and Europe resembles North Africa, the less liberty both places will have.

freedom doesnt apply to the enemies of freedom

>a wide blanket statement said with the audacity of confidence confused with fact
>flag
ah nevermind

Libertianism is an ideology about individualism, so libertians would not cooperate when threat comes.

This nigga is one day away from realizing he's a NatSoc.

That's what we've been saying all along.

shieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet

Seriously though, just admit it.

No fkn tread

i do think that national socialism worked in germany at a time that anarcho-capitalism would not have

Shitbertarians and ancraps are the most cringeworthy people on the planet.

By what metric did it not work? Because the allies zerg rushed them and Hitler made some retarded mistakes in Russia does not mean it didn't work.

Ok, that's it. Come on. Switch that flag and join us, you know it's the true way. Germany needed it and so do we.

Dat reading comprehension. You bring shame to the swastika

i made no claim that national socialism didnt work

Communists are not people friend. The NAP does not apply.

Not my brightest moment.

You'll have to forgive the kneejerk assumption.

Fascism is capitalism in decay. It's an inevitable reaction, not a question of "should" or "should not".

i think what the golden one talks about, things like turning the meta political position to the right, is more necessary than waving a nazi flag right now

Yes, but to clarify, a libertarian society would have exist without a state. I personally believe something like Assassination Politics or some kind of crowdfunded deadpool using cryptocoin would protect against aggressing powers. In the case of current society, I would support a 1488-style revolution, purging the aggressing statists either via gas chamber or helicopter. Either way, the eternal Jew and the eternal Marxist must be dealt with. I have my reservations about NatSocs but they arent raping and replacing an entire race of people in their own homes, they would merely be responding to those aggressions.

I'm not asking you to get 1488 tattooed in your forehead, real national socialists understand optics, Hitler was a master of swaying the crowds. I'm just saying that here, you should show what you really are. Read the books on the left if you still have reservations.

I only have this lol

Savages and weak men who refuse to drive them out are the enemies of freedom.

>I personally believe something like Assassination Politics or some kind of crowdfunded deadpool using cryptocoin would protect against aggressing powers.

Wtf how would this not just be chaos? There needs to be principals for a society to exist, if the most money just buys politics by assassination, how is that any better then what we have?

/r/ing the brain level meme with the snek who becomes fascist

What else is he going to recommend to you? Communists don't even know that other books exist.

libertarians don't exist they're just pedophiles

They should. This is what Abraham Lincoln did and people still bitch about it today, but he was right.

i meant instead of actually giving an argument telling me about a book, but i guess he just fucking left lmao

Extremely accurate. When shit hits the fan, and the only choices are some leftist commie scum, or right wing nationalist fascists, who do you think all the ancaps and libertarians will side with? Of course they hate fascism but they hate communism more. Fascism will rise again and it will purge our nations of this degeneracy, hopefully forever this time.

I don't have that and couldn't find it but I do have this

wow that triggers me beyond all belief
fuck maldraw

Oops.

...

...

...

...

...

Sometimes you got to do what you got to do

...

thats a really nice flag
remove text
make it bright enough with proper contrast
will be an excellent right proper flag of its own

...

...

>Lion has autistic meltdown, even attacking his children.
Yeah, that sounds about right.

Nice memes bro

>No Mein Kampf
It isn't very intellectual, but every fascist should read it.

How about no state, ever?

...

How about it won't work and you know it?


I was aboud do bost dat, fugg :DD

Of course. The problem is tht a lot of these kids really need to get a solid foundation and know what the fuck is going on before they can glean the important stuff out of works like Mein Kampf. The full image set is designed to transform a total noob into someone who is qualified to read a book and actually get it.

>youtube.com/watch?v=Hg9hhQ8K4a0

Suck a dick, you commie faggot.
It would work, thanks to economic incentive; something communism is devoid of, unless you're #1 in the #1 (and only) party.

...

>It would work
Keep telling yourself that.

My doubts with the liberatian side of things came when i thought. I would like the government to keep itself out from agreements/business between two consenting parties as long it is just their own selves and propery at line.
But then I was thinking on "juridically correct fraud" two parties may enter an agreement which is unfair to one side without one side realizing it because of the wordgames etc.
The one side does not even have to be a retard - other ones just have to be more intelligent or have better training (less morals).
In a way it seems that the "freedom" would lead to a breeding ground of kikery where the most ratty and lwyery ones would prosper.
On the other hand big-daddy-government stepping in and holding hands / looking over on the contracts etc. seems like a trouble also - the central authority inherent to such things being easy to subvert by subverting only a small amount of people.

Tell me why it wouldn't?

Mein Kampf is actually probably a better starting point. It isn't that hard to read and it isn't very high minded. Plus, a lot of the political perspectives are very similar to the situation of today.

It's written here , but I'll highlight it (free of charge!) for your convenience.

>Libertarianism is a great ideology when you live in a Protestant Anglo-Saxon society. Libertarianism is suicide when you live in a "progressive", multi-cultural hell hole.

Sure, Mein Kampf is easy to read and it summarizes a lot of feelings, but a lot of people waver after being "convinced" by it because it's basically propaganda. That doesn't mean its bad, but it can blindside people with all the race and volk shit if they aren't trained to put themselves in the shoes of a disgruntled WW 1 vet living in (((Weimar.))) Ultimately its not going to hurt anybody if they start with it but it will definitely need a reread after further training.

True. A healthy society needs all aspects if it wants to survive the onslaught of Communism and Communist subversion.

>Should libertarian societies dump their principles at the first sign of trouble?
LOL

>sure I'm a, whaddayacallit, a libertarian I just think we should set up a police state and massacre all the minorities and kill the jews and -
Ever notice lately how many racists, fascists and other assorted authoritarian types have been trying to piggy-back onto the libertarian movement? It's almost like they realize their true ideals are abhorrent to most Americans so they try to hide them and sneak them in under cover of something else. Similar to how pro-Soviet communists tried to infiltrate left wing and progressive movements back in the day. Didn't work then. Won't work now.

The mask comes off. Didn't fit too well anyway...

Wrong. Its "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need." If you're gonna be a mong and defend that failed system at least use the right quotes. I guess you can't truthful about it though because in that case it would be impossible to defend with reasoned arguments.

>What is the NAP?
>What is self-defence?
>What is private military?
>What is a democratic local ordinance?

Did we say anything racist you massive faggot? Commies are as malicious as terrorists, they need to be dealt with to defend our selves

...

>It's bait because I can't answer it, better just disregard it!
Also your little bullshit above about MUH NATURAL ORDER, anarcho-capitalism supports MUH NATURAL ORDER more than Nazism does.
It is also naturally hierarchical as there's no state to give you a cronyist leg up (affirmative action).

>Did we say anything racist you massive faggot?
You're not fooling anyone homie.

>Commies are as malicious as terrorists
WHAT commies? You mean anyone to the left of Augusto Pinochet? Communism's a dead ideology except in shitholes like Cuba and N Korea. Even China's abandoned it as far as their economy goes, though they've sadly maintained the Party dictatorship.

China is state capitalism, with a 'communist' sugar coating.

...