Is there a way that nu-moot would implement new flags for Sup Forums? I'd sure like a National Capitalist flag...

Is there a way that nu-moot would implement new flags for Sup Forums? I'd sure like a National Capitalist flag, for example.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/yeJ-iv3MOTo
hooktube.com/watch?v=yeJ-iv3MOTo
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>Nationalism and Capitalism working at the same time.

This. They're incompatible. Heil Hitler.

Also red ensign for nationalist leafs

gadsen flag is close enough

>waaaahhhh give me my own special snowflake

oh fuck off you desperate, puerile little faggot.

>when libertarians can't give up their pet ideology
face reality, you're not a capitalist anymore.

don't turn Sup Forums into /leftypol/, we have enough flag as it is
i went on there and the amount of flags they have is fucking insane

Why do people identify as capitalists? Capitalist is a term invented by Marx to describe the way the banking industry ruled society.

a weeb libertarian
the jokes write themselves

>what was the 1950s
>what was Henry Ford
Ultra nationalist business was the norm

HOW BOUT YOU TAKE A FUCKIN SELFIE AND POST IT NEXT TO YOUR FLAGGOT

>lefties being identity freaks
whats new

one for each gender they've made up

bump

Meme flags are dumb.

>lets drive another nail into the coffin

the 1950s was keynesian economics you uneducated fucking flyover country turd

>Keynesian isn't capitalist
Topkek

This
I'd say they are compatible to a certain degre. Very limited immigration and protectionism with very low government intervention in economics in other fields.

bumperoni

demanding customization is a leftist ideal

>implying we aren't still using the Keynesian model
Shame on you, anons.

is this a bait?

The only flag we should want

fagflags need to fuck off before I start filtering you faggots literally instead of just mentally

We need to chon-tier and add tons of flags to express every possible emotion and add the ability to easily avatarfag as your favorite anime character.

YOU NAZI FAGGOTS DO NOT UNDERSTAND CLASSICAL LIBERALISM (IE LIBERTARIANISM)

>Classical liberalism (ie political and economic liberty) is not a reduction to the individual. It is merely the removal of arbitrary tyranny, whether by a dumb, democratic mob or by some elite.

>Classical liberalism does not reduce to: "Progress is the only value" or “everything is an economic calculation.” It is simply the liberty needed to not have someone else's idea of "progress"--or anything else--shoved down your throat. It is the liberty not to have someone else appropriate your resources to “do good” as they see fit.

>Classical liberalism created thousands of private organizations in America that allowed for people to take their path, whether it be religious, philosophical, scientific, artistic etc. Individualism at the level of government was intended to maximize the ability of individuals to form social groups that really matter to them.

NOW EVERYTHING IS A MIXED SYSTEM AT BEST. The countries that still sustain a relatively high IQ (and mostly homogeneous) population, while still having remnants of political and economic freedom, still have the highest quality of life.

>I'm an individualist cuck on an anonymous imageboard
>I can't have an avatar so I want my personal brand to be reflected on a cuck flag
>I actually like the flag function

Kys

This

>Nationalism and Socialism working at the same time
ftfy

not an argument you bitchy ass retard.

Look, an angry weeb libertarian

>1950s
>ultra capitalist
Yeah no. Protectionism ran deep in those days. Trade tariffs raped anyone who dared to fuck over American workers. The unions had also gained a lot of power.
You libertarian fucks love free trade to much to be called Nationalists. Some "right" libertarians on Sup Forums believe they are nationalists because they oppose mass immigration. But the minute you bring up free trade they go full globalist because of "muh profits!". A true nationalist is willing to do anything for his country even if it means imposing policies that are not capitalist. Because they loyalty lies to the nation not to an economic system. Ultimately libertarians loyalty lies to capitalism. And if something is anti capitalist they will oppose it, even if it is good for the nation
tl;dr you really cant be a nationalist capitalist.
No true nationalist is a full capitalist, socialist or whatever. They usually borrow from any economic system whatever helps their nation best

Its better name is mercantilism if you want to google it.

You Nazi faggots are pretentious and snarky just like all lefties. You think because you are "redpilled" on race and the JQ you have some superior knowledge that elevates you above anyone who doesn't "get it."

Every time I have a chance to debate one of you fuckers online, or in person, it's always the same. Just like dogmatic lefties you can't actually defend your NAZI positions well because you're all monomaniacs obsessed with Jews and Nazis and virtually ignorant of everything else.

You are NOT special just because you are race realists. You are NOT superior just because you are race realists. The obvious demarcations of race existed well before the Nazis and were also ensconced in the American tradition. The classical liberal model WAS WHITE NATIONALIST you stupid fucks.

Ah, but you've all been raised on Jewish propaganda that turns everything into THEIR drama. And so you embrace that, simply flipping the Jew script and making yourself NAZIs in the caricature they have created for you.

The Nazi stuff is pathetic and it's holding white identity back.

See:

>angry weeb imagines he's a lion

Well this is certainly a high quality argument

No, capitalism and nationalism doesn't equate to mercantilism. Proper capitalism is not mercantilist. That is not a free market. Free market is free. If the State is controlling trade and competition it isn't exactly free, is it? That being called "capitalist" is a willful misrepresentation.

National as OP probably intends it is simply a capitalist system, a free market and free political system, that is bound by a constitution which defines the fundamentals of the nation.

Just imagine if the constitution explicitly defined America as a European nation. Imagine if it explicitly denied immigration access to non-Europeans.

The only reason this wasn't so is because the European racial stock of America was assumed, as was the continuance of America as a European-derived peoples. For at that time it would have been unthinkable that a nation of white people would willingly allow themselves to be displaced.

What old flags are still missing? I remember you used to be able to post as Israel

This desu. The larping needs to stop, embrace the model of classical liberalism.

It means you believe capital should be allowed to be owned privately. Its pretty much the entire right side of the spectrum.

jidf also is gone

some emoticon would be nice too

Communist. You seriously associate yourself with communism? That's basically an admission of retardation.

fuck you

Unite and make alliances, right?

We mostly just believe the public should have more control over the means of production? what is so bad about that?

this flag should have more colors and symbols

Autarky doesn't work. Any real nationalist that truly has the best interests of the people in mind is in favour of free trade

Libertarian nationalism is the next big thing, screencap this

Why not National Communistic Free liberal Minarchist Libertarian Sexism?

I'm afraid some ideas are incompatible. However, I have reconciled myself that a white revolution will probably resemble a new Nazism. The Nazi folks are plebeian and don't even know it. They are lowest common denominator. They will bake into the cake of the new white identity movement so much dysfunction that it will take decades for white people to sort it out.

But hey, at least we'll have white racial consciousness again. So if I have to hold my tongue and goose step I will. Just hope the pretentious, arrogant NAZI faggots at the top don't kill me before I have a chance to die a noble death at the hands of the enemy.

Screen cap a leaf...... pfffffttttt hahahahaha

>selling out your countries to multinational corporations and globalists
>nationalist

wtf is that even supposed to support?that flag is so full of fuck i dont even

>forcing the average citizen to subsidize protected industry
>nationalist

>I'm not familiar with concept of sarcasm

I have created a new flag

not so much the what with commies but the how.

You could squeeze an (R) in there, so we are united.

I think the flag you are looking for is a swastika.

National socialism does that too though, but with racial bias. Why do commies hate white people?

>united
allied that is
oops, wrong flag

Sargon, please fuck off. A classical liberal system is easily subvertable, as evidence by world politics. You can't go back the the golden age of classical American liberalism. You don't have the same breed of people that you did back then. You don't have the industriousness that European migrants had, you don't have feudalism from which Europeans had to run away from.
Faggot you do need a strong white identitarian movement. I will agree that the world of tomorrow should be built on libertarian values, but it will simply not fix any of the major problems facing Europe/the US today with the same expediency as fascism.

youtu.be/yeJ-iv3MOTo

> Monarchy
> Fascism
> Nazism
> Right-wing
pick one

>National socialism
like a safety net? Each giving what they can, so the whole benefits?

Again with the misconceptions about liberty/libertarianism. For fuck's sake.

>You libertarian fucks love free trade to much to be called Nationalists... the minute you bring up free trade they go full globalist because of "muh profits!" A true nationalist is willing to do anything for his country even if it means imposing policies that are not capitalist.

It's not MUH PROFITS you dumb fuck. It's not that simple.

Do you know the actual liberty position on free trade? It is a concept called the seen vs. the unseen. It is about taking into account the ENTIRE economic picture and not just the negative impact on a few workers. Analyze the entire impact of tariffs/trade restrictions and you see that it does NOT benefit the nation imposing those restrictions.

When you protect unproductive industries you are simply forcing the consumer to support those industries. So, for instance, millions of people who could a quality microwave for 60 dollars now have to pay 100 dollars for lesser quality because of protection for native workers.

The impact of that resounds over time, with protected production continuing to decline in quality and consumers needing to continually pay more to support them.

There is much more to the analysis but at least that should rattle your brain enough to know it's not so simple.

>add JIDF flag
>add Christianity flag
>remove either Muslim or Jihady flag, they're the same fucking thing
this is the bare minimum that should be done

>Oh a YouTube link
>I'll mirror this to another plat-
>Don't upload elsewhere without my permission!

This guy isn't worth a view.
hooktube.com/watch?v=yeJ-iv3MOTo

Fuck off, buddy. You need to unite more. And when you unite, you can form alliances, like that show where the island tries to kill Californians.

>liberalism
>right wing

oops, wrong flag
Really, the state is just an individual, multiplied, so it's that much better!

bump, to unite the right, if G*d wills it.

Here's a quick rundown

All of what you like except no kikes or niggers

>oops, wrong flag
LMAO

I meant to post this one

but that's not nationalism dumby

You're the one that needs to fuck off you pretentious Nazi faggot. Every one of you faggots thinks you are far smarter than you actually are.

Why the fuck are you assuming your socialist model is somehow more stable? The classical liberal system is easily subvertable and your evidence is "world politics"? FUCK OFF.

It is a matter of WHICH would be more successful, an authoritarian system led by a small elite in the fashion of the NAZI's making arbitrary proclamations against this or that sexuality, this or that art, this or that thing as forbidden and "decadent," etc.

VERSUS

A small elite leading an army of white people who demand their liberty regardless of who leads them. Yes, they may get behind a charismatic leader but if that leader (or small elite) gets bought out, betrays the revolution, it doesn't matter. The people want a white nation and they want liberty and they don't want some authoritative bullshit shoved down their throat.

You ASSUME the former is superior because that's all your weak mind can imagine. Too many fucking holocaust movies. Too much Jewish propaganda, ironically.

>The classical liberal system is easily subvertable and your evidence is "world politics"?
Yes, it is. Which liberal values are represented in the world scenes today? What would the founding fathers say about central banking, neoconservatism, neoliberalism, neo-Marxism, saying there are less than 182 genders is a hate crime, whites getting displaced, the undermining of the nation state throughout the world, etc?
>It is a matter of WHICH would be more successful, an authoritarian system led by a small elite in the fashion of the NAZI's making arbitrary proclamations against this or that sexuality, this or that art, this or that thing as forbidden and "decadent," etc.
Those "proclamations" are quite literally NOT arbitrary. You sound like those "weed lmao" faggots. You've probably been here long enough to know that stances against degenerate sexuality are not arbitrary.

Fuck this shit isn't even exclusively Nazi, even goddamn commies hated fags. Do you think American puritans were any fucking better? HELL NO! They were even worse than Nazis in their prudishness. The main reason your classical liberal model worked to begin with is because most of the Europeans that moved to the US were batshit religious zealots.

And also do we need to talk about how non-whites were viewed? Hell, even non-Anglos were discriminated against, let alone non-fucking-whites.

Your libertarian utopia is built on totalitarian values, cunt. The difference is that the people imposed those ideals on society, not the other way around. This is, admittedly, the best way to form a society, however IT CANNOT BE REPLICATED EVER AGAIN! ,

Also I have no idea why you're calling Nazis pretentious.

JUST A REMINDER

To all those who think capitalism is the product of Jewish intellectuals (some of them are)

THIS is the Jew who dictated NAZI economic policy, only they altered it from a universalist to a racial nationalist economic system. But all the same idiocy is in place, along with all the slanderous misrepresentations of capitalism.

In fact, the Jew Karl Marx was far more influential on Nazi economic policy than any single Jew was to the classical liberal conception of economics.

OP here,
NEW BREAD
NEW BREAD
NEW BREAD
NEW BREAD

I call nazis pretentious as in HAVING A PRETENSE TO KNOWLEDGE YOU DON'T HAVE.

Your presumptions about the classical liberal tradition are idiotic. These things are relative. I am not stating that ANY system is beyond being subverted. I made this graphic for fuck's sake:

First, early America wasn't all puritans. Read Charles Murray on this. America was very Christian but freedom allowed for all sorts of bizarre cults and communes and sexual experimentation. That shit was going on right from the start. (For example, search Benjamin Franklin Hellfire Club)

You know NOTHING of how the classical liberal construction arose. It was the crown jewel of the enlightenment and you piss all over it.

Classical liberalism realized that millions had been killed because of humans insisting they can force their neighbor to abide by a certain morality. Humans had been in a constant struggle to seize the reigns of power so their personal morality can rule over others.

Classical liberalism said THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT YOUR PERSONAL ARMY.

More than that, the classical liberals understood that when left to their own devices humans will form social groups, even institutions, that could be powerful enough to outlast any nation. (Witness the Jews!)

And yes, they presumed a white nation for this system. ANY political and economic system functions best with a homogeneous, high IQ population. SOCIALISM is no different, so why insist on socialism over the classical liberal model for a national white identity?

bump