>communism has never been tried or established
That's because everyone denies the anarchist success in human history. Anarchists established real communism in Spain, Mexico, Ukraine et cetera.
It was working communism, a stateless society with absolute equality. These attempts were always brought down by violence, not because they didn't work out.
>annex farm lands by force
>complain about having your land taken by the state by force to end your communist experiment
Fuck off, cunt.
>get btfo by a stronger group
>this somehow doesn't invalidate anarchism
Someone is always stronger in the hierarchy, which makes it impossible to maintain a system with no hierarchy.
>>get btfo by a stronger group
>>this somehow doesn't invalidate anarchism
Nazis got btfo by communism, so nationalsocialism is invalidated aswell?
>>annex farm lands by force
It wasn't annexed by force, the farmers wanted it, because they were part of the anarchist movement.
Yeah, no. At least get your basic facts right if you want to make a point.
>the farmers wanted their land taken from them.
*ahem...*
Aren't your] forgetting?
GENERAL FRANCO, user. GENERAL FRANCO.
>It wasn't annexed by force, the farmers wanted it, because they were part of the anarchist movement.
Unless it was literally every farmer it's an unethical action and violent resistance is justified.
>State sanctioned slavery is bad, anarchist sanctioned slavery is good!
>Revolutionary Insurrectionary Army of Ukraine
>peasants and workers army
>peasants opposed the ideology
sure mate
Anarchists in Spain didn't loose because of Franco, they were backstabbed by orthodox communists and stalin lovers.
>Anarchists
>Established
You are clueless
>china is a democracy
The only real communism is when the entire community falls mere peasants feasts on my fecal matter and loves it.
China is a authoritarian Kleptocracy
If I call myself and three of my friends the 'Revolutionary Spanish Worker's Front' does that mean I am entitled to speak on behalf of and claim the property of all Spanish workers? Because I called myself that?
I knew you would attempt to make this argument. No, because National Socialism never pretended that hierarchy never existed among nations. Germany's battlefield defeat did not invalidate the foundation of NatSoc. It did not invalidate any of the ideas of Fascism or NatSoc, where as in Anarchy, no hierarchy is the basis of the ideology. A hierarchy naturally arises in any set of circumstances. In this case, the hierarchy manifested itself in a more powerful army like the Soviet Union or Nationalist Spain. In any, case it was much more of a triumph of the Allied nations over the Axis nations than it was Communism/Liberalism over National Socialism/Fascism.
They call themselves as a democracy
>Anarchists established real communism in Spain
> backstabbed by orthodox communists and stalin lovers.
You can't even make up your mind, can you?
Your movment in Spain was defeated due to the prowess of one man:
GENERAL FRANCO, user. GENERAL FRANCO.
Yes, peasants opposed the ideology, you dumb fucking cunt. People tend to want to hold on to what little property they have. However a horde of 100,000 savages can present a convincing case for parting of your land in facor of collectivization. Your makhno, anarchist success was frought with in-fighting and hardcore oppression of every single drop of individualism. Making everybody poor is not the same as making everybody free, you 15-year old cock sucker.
And that's utter bull shit as well. The CNT/FAI were (and are) completely intolerant pieces of filth. Like most anarchists they did their very best to destroy everything that didn't fit their purpose. That, and the poverty, eventually leads to people being fucking sick of your meme-ideology.
Real capitalism has never been tried
7x57 and Franco made sure your shit didn't fly.
Anarcho-communism and communism are not the same thing. Neither will ever work. With anarcho-communism, you get exactly what you described. You live by the sword, you die by the sword, and pulling the victim card after the fact makes you look like an idiot. The societies you're talking about had regular rapes en masse, they crucified priests and burned down or had orgies in churches. Then your dumbass wants to say
>"Waaahh it was great except the governments were bullies and we got BTFO."
Fuck you, you little faggot. Regular communism will never work before they have never and will never be able to plan the economy properly and the ruling elite will starve their people every single time. There's literally nothing you could say to change either one of these very real facts. You'll grow up one day though and get an actual job, just stop using up all the data on your mom's phone plan and get ready for school, you whiny little cunt.
Read about the spanish civil war and the war between stalinists and anarchists
The references you have provided are but a mere footnote, a minor inconveniece that was stamped into oblivion by the military might of that man:
GENERAL FRANCO, user. GENERAL FRANCO.
Anarchy is so jewish banking...
>These attempts were always brought down by violence, not because they didn't work out.
>These attempts were always brought down by violence
who would have thought, stateless territories are defenseless against states ?!?!
>not because they didn't work out.
you mean the famines, social degeneration, lawlessness and chaos that permeated those "regimes"
anarchists are either violent psychopaths or infantile manchildren