Please explain to me why my country is so fucking communist...

Please explain to me why my country is so fucking communist. Thank fuck in the recent UKGE the conservatives won more of our counties

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=xFOoRAp5QtM
scotland.datashine.org.uk/#table=KS202SC&col=KS202SC0004&ramp=RdYlBu&layers=BTTT&zoom=8&lon=-3.7546&lat=54.8425
mises.org/blog/dangers-universal-basic-income
scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment?id=8a55eaa6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

because you have sense

>claim to want independence
>but need England to pay for everything

Scotcuck "nationalists" really make me think

Escaping through the lily fields I came across an empty space
It trembled and exploded, left a bus stop in its place
The bus came by and I got on, that's when it all began
There was Cowboy Neal at the wheel of the bus to never ever land

She is being controlled by high level pedos, look at the "Named Person Scheme" if you want to scratch the surface

Just looked over a few article titles and whatever that is it seems pretty fucked up. Of course google is suppresing any meaningful results. Have anything you can give to on?

Because its a good idea. Capitalism is cancer to culture. Mixed economy is better.

read on*

Yeah the nationalists are dumbfucks who put our economy into a recession. Just as bad as fucking labour.

Look at what's going on in nurseries and libraries at the "creches". Google "Shanarri" and "Girfec".
Then do "Shah Nari" in Google translate, with Arabic as source, into English. Look up "Giira"

she doesn't even believe it she'll just say anything after the pounding she took last election
also wtf is with europe and female political leaders

Because we're not 100% a country (making decisions but not feeling the repurcussions of decisions due to being bailed out by england, etc)

Anyone else feel like the past 3 years have been wave after wave of slavs/africans?

Aye. I keep seeing more and more every year.

the makeup of parliament shocked me, all of a sudden seemed way more "diverse"

£150 a week fuck that sounds nice might become a neet if that is implemented for unemployed people

It doesn't work, what does it mean?

>Named Person Scheme
Fucking hell. That's a new low.

And how are they going to pay for this?

They can't

If this goes through i'm quiting my job and living off that.

Can survive paying rent and get cheap ass food, and still have enough money to go on a holiday every 3 or 4 months

But they've promised it to people.

What haven't they fucking promised? She's worse than hillary

Wasn't Merkel from East Berlin and a member of some
Communist youth group and some kind of East German
KGB type of organization before the wall came down?

I mean, that would explain it.

>implying losers on Sup Forums understand how national economics work

Hitler turned Germany from a bankrupt, degenerate slum to the most powerful country in the world in 10 years. Money has the value we give it

Shah Nari = King Fire
Kids chant this in the nurseries and libraries now

But England is evil and muh benefits though.

Whoops. Got my dried up old communist slags mixed up.

Not idea what this cunt's deal is. Socialist I presume.

Scotland runs a deficit higher than Greece, how will she pay for this?

Please answer my question.

Nog will love this. They will go to Scotland now!

>implying you, a loser on Sup Forums, know how national economics work

(you)

Pic related
They'll never leave you, only the swedes will.

Obligatory

youtube.com/watch?v=xFOoRAp5QtM

>supporting any of the parties.
Good goy

But how will you generate wealth to pay the people? How the eternal jew will make gains from stupid goyims if they aren't working anymore?

They are already in Scotland lad and more will come unfortunately.

>nobody is working! Lazy goys, now we have to import even more non-scots than ever!

I don't support the conservatives, they're just better than the SNPniggers

But Scotland's 96% white, the largest minority being 2.9% asian

wtf I love SNP now!

Why do people support UBI?

it's legit straight up communism

>give out free shit
>oh whoops we cant fund you anymore
>goes bankrupt
>fucking england

How do people fall for this moron shit

REMOVE TARTAN

>""""""white""""""
Look at ireland, 75% irish, but very high "white"%.
Is it really irish? We'll be the same soon.

but the niggers would want the ubi too?

Because the Luddites were right. Technology is tearing the economy down.

Also why do people think its a good idea giving out free shit? Esepcially to teenagers that will use it to buy weed and do fuck all?

The fucking welfare state has been a disaster, now we just want to hand out free shit to everyone???

I don't think its Sturgeon m8 . I think it's john swinney who is either a pedo or indebted to high level pedos. He's the cunt that's constantly trying to push it through

They want scottish paying for something that has taxes.

In Ayrshire most whites are Scottish with less than 1/4 any other white.
Here's the 2011 census data scotland.datashine.org.uk/#table=KS202SC&col=KS202SC0004&ramp=RdYlBu&layers=BTTT&zoom=8&lon=-3.7546&lat=54.8425
Sad how only about 30% of the population identifies as British, with around 65% being Scottish only identity

>King Fire
Eh? What is king fire

>Pay all tax to London exchequer
>Get less than half of it back to run domestic affairs
>Other half goes towards funding London based Govt depts like defense, foreign affairs
>English claim they're funding Scotland
mfw
>Kids in care in Rotherham get gang-raped and exploited on an industrial scale by Muzzies
>Scottish Govt takes steps to ensure every child in Scotland has a registered guardian
>Get called Pedos by the English for doing it
mfw
>monetary policy ran from London causes recession in Scotland
>Blames Scotland
mfw
>

Ba'al was refered to as "Moloch" - it means "King" in many ancient languages

Any kid taken away under the "Named Person Scheme" won't be seen again. Look at the paperwork.

The Luddites are extinct. As will be the commies.

Private property is the only property there is.

Unless they are willing to fix prices everywhere it will just cause inflation.

5.295 million people in Scotland as of 2011.

£150 a week for everyone in scotland is £ forty-one billion three hundred forty million per year, let alone for life.

the number was so big google would only give me it in words.

5.3m x £150 x 52 weeks

It's almost as if the article is talking shite.

i agree.

but it just goes to show how impossible universal income would be. that is just Scotland and just for a year. there are some people who want it for the entire UK it would be trillions

Somewhere between 20-30% of Scots will destroy themselves with drink and drugs if you give them £600 a month. For the rest of us, we'll just end up paying more taxes, and everyone will raise their prices.

Because the general population of Scotland are Heroin addicted, Alcoholics who contribute nothing to society

But you also can eliminate welfare and other hand outs, reducing government programs and departments as you consolidate everything into simple ubi payments.

Apparently the SNP used the exact same calculation as you did, the stupid cunts that they are.

Then England give you independance in one single week and you cancel UBI because you no longeur have access to other's people money.

Flawless plan.

I don't think they intend to give it to 1 year olds, they would just spend it on Heroin and Alcohol.

It'd more likely be £70 a week like the dole

Yet somehow manage to maintain a higher employment rate than the English and a balance of trade surplus. Something's not right here...may it be, no, it can't be that you're a doss cunt, could it?

Universal Basic Income (money for nothing) won't work. Because redistributing money from others to reward people who don't work or do lowly productive things would exacerbate existing problems and diminish wealth in general.
---------
Where UBI Proponents Go Wrong

A universal basic income is not the god-sent welfare policy that it initially seems to be. It does not create incentive to work. It won’t help solve unemployment, and it will not alleviate poverty. The truth is that a UBI will exaggerate all of these factors in comparison to what would exist in a more unhampered market. There is even reason to think that it would be worse in the long run than traditional, means-tested welfare systems.

First, UBI does not eliminate the disincentives to work that are inherent in welfare programs; it simply moves them around. This program must be financed after all, and any welfare system, including the UBI, is necessarily a wealth redistribution scheme. Wealth must be forced from those who have it to those who do not. This means that at some point on the income ladder, people must go from being net receivers of benefits to being net payers of benefits.

The progressive taxation that is necessary to finance a UBI means that the more a person earns, the higher percentage of their wealth will be taken from them. The work disincentives are therefore still very much present in the tax system. They’ve simply been transferred onto different, higher income groups of people

mises.org/blog/dangers-universal-basic-income

You might as well burn the money in Scotland, gives us a valid reason to actually conquer you.

its time to start gassing degenerates britbros

We have a high employment rate than England. Just fuck off.

Good luck to Scotland paying for the unemployed for life, and free prescriptions and NHS, free universities...

And they want to leave the UK. I feel like I want them to leave too, just build up Hadrian's wall a bit to keep them out when the inevitable collapse comes.

Prepare for the influx of gibsmedats.

>a wild band of angry scottish farmers appear
England's greatest weakness

I want it too. Maybe we can finally build up our economy and population that was destroyed by england again.

>tfw no ubi
ywn have time every morning to stir last night's haggis

>Be a manager of a store for a big 3 retailer
>Colleague who does 27 hours has a pay query
>All I notice is £870 she gets paid for 110 hours a month tax-free (or near enough)
>Look at one of my supervisors pay, as colleague seems really high for what she does and I hate taxation (theft)
>Supervisors get about an extra £1.80 per hour
>Do about 165-170 hours in a month on top of having to do weekends a few times per month
>Get about 1300 per month after tax
>An extra £470 in return for technical equivalent of an extra two days work per week, ~20% extra pay, 200% extra stress/responsibility and social life constraints
>This tax goes to shit like in the OP
>mfw I'm taxed a bit over half of what this colleague earns in a month

the west needs to be glassed and soon

taxation is legitimate theft

I would accept a UBI if it was a reward as part of an after work\after school program. A Universal Basic Income should reward a Universal Basic Standard of fitness, education and applying oneself

You cannot just give people money. They will fucking destroy themselves and the people around them.

don't feel too bad, our tax money goes to israel :(

>blahblahblah
>senior fellow kike
>one of many

Wow I'm shocked. Never fails. EVER. Fucking place FILLED with them.

You're a retard for falling for the "le work hard meme".

The jews laugh at people like you. Keep being a good goy, we all know you won't do shit about it anyway.

It was the Tories in coalition that raised the tax-free allowance to 11,500. Was a brilliant move on their part, signalled to the poor that they could count on the Tories while giving tonnes of expendable income to a group struggling with rising prices.

That's because the economy is constantly trying to catch up and adjust to all this change. When a machine replaces thousands of low level workers, nobody has any idea on what to do with those workers.

It'll never happen, but the SNP are desperately trying to retain votes.

They're still planning on raising the age eligibility of free bus passes whilst giving them like candy to drug abusers and alcoholics, whilst also planning to give them to modern apprentices too. The bus companies only get 59% off that reimbursed every once in a while and they wonder why the companies keep on going out of business?

Is she our new rollsafe?

>Ignoring OP because he's a retard who thinks UBI is "communist"

Going to be interesting to see how 'Scottish' Labour reacts, given UBI is a *universalist* (liberal) policy. If OP wasn't a fuckwit, he'd know that SL has previously opposed the winter fuel payment, free bus-passes for pensioners, and the council tax freeze because...you guessed it...they're universal, i.e. non means-tested benefits.
If OP wasn't a retard, then he'd know that universalism is viewed as a great evil by the modern intersectionalist Labour Party, because it isn't *progressivism*. It redistributes income *equally*. Since those who'd receive it haven't faced equal 'oppression', to compensate them equally contravenes the notion of social justice.

A prison sentence reflects two policy aims: rehabilitation and *restorative justice*, i.e. punishment. SJW's don't want to merely 'rehabilitate' society - they want to punish the historical oppressors. It doesn't think they should get anything and that they should lose everything.

Universalism is the classical liberal approach - reconcile, move on, compromise, and all sing cumbaya (seriously, look this shit up, fucktard). Let bygones be bygones, etc. We're all the same.

The SNP is a *liberal* social democratic political party. It has included an explicit commitment to the policy of universalism in its charter and manifestos for decades (go look at its website). This is why Labour hates the SNP - it's a liberal party masquerading as a leftist party (for Scottish votes), while Labour is a leftist party that has masqueraded as a liberal party for 30 years (for 'middle-England' vote). The fucking nerve of the cunts.

As for this roll-out, this is good for UK plc. Scotland, once again, becomes the testing ground for UK policy. We want to see real data - not the opinions of a 90 IQ terminal virgin on Sup Forums who thinks he knows economics - to see if there's any merit to UBI.

>WE BE STRONK HAGGISNIGGERS WE DON NEED UK
>NO EU PLS TAKE US BACK WE GUD GOYS DINDU NUFFINK
t. The eternal Haggis

It's a scheme supported by every children's charity and teachers body in Scotland, to nominate a responsible 3rd party as a surrogate guardian of every child (not legal guardian, just someone the child can contact if needed, or who can mediate in family 'disputes').
Social Services already fulfil this role, but on a 'needs-must', reactive basis. In light of Social Services failing to safeguard many kids (baby p was the 'final straw'), the Scottish Gov brought in a proactive policy that was being put forward by the charities.

The 'Ulster Loyalist' contingent don't like it. They see it as a threat to their traditions. They think they'll have their kids taken off them. They could be right.

My youngest brother is a retard because of my mother. Another topped himself. I look normal on the outside (job, wife, kids) but I'm on Sup Forums so you know I'm fucked up on the inside. Two other siblings grew up in care. Haven't seen them in 20 years. If I could have gone to someone, maybe I could have saved them. Giving comfort to some halfwits teaching their kids to hate Catholics isn't a concern to me. Sometimes (a lot of times), kids are better off without their shirty parents.

The only thing I support from her, Now I can be a neet with flashy things

Why would anyone like the idea that the state gets to decide who is fit to be a parent?

Indeed. I know John. He's a good man. Devout Christian. He's doing the right thing.

He is a pedo Satanist

Read the Lord Carloway judgement from back in 2015.
scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment?id=8a55eaa6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7
A excerpt:
>The mere creation of a named person, available to assist a child or parent, no more confuses or diminishes the legal role, duties and responsibilities of parents in relation to their children than the provision of social services or education generally. It has no effect whatsoever on the legal, moral or social relationships within the family. The assertion to the contrary, without any supporting basis, has the appearance of hyperbole. Similar considerations apply to the description, of what has been thought by Parliament to be an appropriate step to protect the welfare of children, as an “arrogation by the state to itself of functions which, in a properly regulated democratic state, require to be left with parents”. The legislation does not involve the state taking over any functions currently carried out by parents in relation to their children. For these reasons, the petitioners’ challenge, in so far as it is based upon the Article 8 right to respect for a private and family life, must fail.

>whinging about free money

Is this virtue signaling about how not jewish you are?

The state? Is he like the famous hacker known as "Sup Forums"? Or the notorious shitposter called "Sup Forums"?

I'm talking about people. Named persons don't work for the state. That's like saying your god parents work for your ma and da. Often, they'll be people who know the family well.

The state can already make that decision anyway. Social workers can take your kids away. Abusive parents take comfort in the fact there isn't nearly enough of them so the parents can go under the radar/fob them off. All "the state" is doing is adding (voluntary) resources.

What kind of fucking moron are you to ask me that question by the way? What answer did you expect?
>nah, you're right faggot. I'm glad my mother caused my epilepsy, made my younger brother a partial vegetable, and drove another to suicide. How dare the state interfere!
What a colossal retard you are. If I hadn't met so many of you old firm trogs in rl I'd think you were trolling. But, nah, you actually thought you were writing something intelligent I daresay...

Welcome to 'Scot'Sup Forums.

>mfw aberdeen south
>mfw really want to run as an mp because everyone here has lost faith in politicians

Carpe diem?

That won't work on them. They think he's part of an anti-Rangers conspiracy because he ruled against the club in a tax case. It's all part of an anti-Rangers conspiracy...

The old firm lot should be first against the wall, both sides are a fucking blight.

Maybe UKplc wasn't being stupid when it stuck all its nukes right next to them. Shame the whole country would have to be sacrificed to do humanity a favour.

Ehh, they started with you guys earlier. They were going for the whole western world.

That's not communist, it's populist.

give that man a refugee.jpg