Churchill was objectively a better man than Hitler by every possible metric:

Churchill was objectively a better man than Hitler by every possible metric:

>Churchill died a revered hero of his country; Hitler committed suicide 50 feet underground after denouncing his countrymen, and is now universally hated except by a fringe internet fanclub.
>Churchill had a successful and varied career before becoming Prime Minister; Hitler barely rose to the rank of corporal, and then was a failed artist.
>Churchill was a talented writer, even going so far as to win the Nobel Prize in literature; Hitler's books are infamous for their turgidity.
>Churchill gained power legitimately, once by succession, the other by outright winning an election; Hitler gained power through thuggishness, intimidation and constitutional chicanery.
>Churchill was happily married and had five children; Hitler was sexually neurotic, had no children, and only married his waifu a few hours before committing suicide.
>Churchill could hold his drink; Hitler couldn't.
>Churchill had a sense of humour; Hitler didn't.
>Churchill could hold a room's attention with his mere avuncular presence; Hitler had to rely on shouting autistically.

Finally

>Churchill won the war and Hitler didn't.

Other urls found in this thread:

hitlerorchurchill.info
youtu.be/jgGP_evkvOk
winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/did-churchill-cause-the-bengal-famine/
tmh.floonet.net/pdf/BritishBulldog.pdf
forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=7259
youtu.be/rd7LcaXZzUs?t=21m40s
youtu.be/rd7LcaXZzUs?t=26m37s
youtu.be/rd7LcaXZzUs?t=32m1s
youtu.be/rd7LcaXZzUs?t=32m40s
youtube.com/watch?v=HNhF28fzN9I&feature=youtu.be&t=219
theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/04/15/kevin-macdonald-the-monstrous-winston-churchill/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>inherent Jew debt from your father
>spend the rest of your life paying it out
"""great man"""

hitlerorchurchill.info

Was he?

The mere fact your country worships him makes me smile every time something bad happens to you, you will all burn in hell.

Where is your fucking empire?!Why are you getting reverse colonized by shitskins!?Jesus fuck if you would've lost the war it would not have been so bad.

>>Churchill won the war and Hitler didn't.

Always funny when Britcucks go around claiming Russian and American victories as their own.

eternal anglo

m8 you're literally being cucked hard by Merkel's Germany. Whatever state Germany finds itself in it causes mischief.

And that's the funniest thing about it. They pissed away their empire for nothing. Well, same goes for the rest of europe sadly.

>Starved millions of Indians just a few years before while exporting any food they produced to the home country
>Take over 23% of the worlds land area, brutally repress people under your control, engage in mass extermination, starvation, genocide, etc.
>do everything in your power to draw the US into the first world war and celebrate when the lusitania was sunk
>"hey Germany wants danzig back after that treaty that even we admit was BS took it away from them"
>no, instead let's just turn the world into a massive meatgrinder

Fuck Nazis, but fuck Anglos even more

Only thing Churchill did wrong is that he didn't kill every single German out of existence.

I wouldn't deny that the USA and USSR had the biggest roles in winning the war, but Britain's role in North Africa (stopping the Jerries getting the oil in the Middle East) is often overlooked, not to mention the fighting on the Western front (albeit not nearly as intense as in Russia). Major land offensive in Burma too.

Had Hitler won, Churchill would have been known as well as Chiang Kai-shek. Who's that? Exactly.
Instead of the Holocaust we would have the Holodomor instead of racism dominating progressive issues it would be "classism".

The world would be largely the same with Germany v US facing of in a Cold War.

Stalin would have committed suicide in the Russian Metro.

I think the real hero in the whole story was Bomber Harris.

Churchill was bankrupt and owned money to the kikes, so he betrayed all White people and here we are. So much misinformation about the wars.

>American victories

The Jews bribed him to break up the empire.
He should have been hung for treason.

noice

>turned the 2nd Franco-Prussian war into WW1
>turned the german conquest of Danzig into WW2 and gave more than half of Europe to communists
>acuses germany of "causing mischief"
Just die already for God's sake, you have already done enough harm.

A Nazi who has to substantiate his position by lies. Why am I not surprised?

"Churchill apparently never said this. The quote is found mainly on Revisionist, neo-Nazi, or conspiracy sites where they quote one another.

I did not find the quote on any reputable historical site."

>what is the pacific campaign

Beats being a starving commie any day..
bowl of rice?

Read David Irvings Churchills war.

youtu.be/jgGP_evkvOk

>Pacific campaign
>winning the war in Europe

At this point I don't even care, whatever, you were sent by God to save the world but Germany destroyed it and filled all our countries with brown people and dearranged degenerates. Happy now? Does this make you proud? Does this allow you to sleep at night?

The very first line of your post contains the lie that Churchill caused the Bengal Famine, a fabrication from a book written in 2009 that no credible historian accepts.

"Alas, in the words of a wartime statesman, “a lie will gallop halfway round the world before the truth has time to pull its breeches on.”

The charge stems from a 2009 book accusing Churchill of irresponsibility over Bengal that amounted to a war crime, repeated by scores of sources since. As Churchill once remarked, “I should think it was hardly possible to state the opposite of the truth with more precision.”

The truth—documented by Sir Martin Gilbert and Hillsdale College—is that Churchill did everything he could in the midst of world war to save the Bengalis; and that without him the famine would have been worse.

On receiving news of the spreading food shortage Churchill spoke to his Cabinet, saying he would welcome a statement by Lord Wavell, his new Viceroy of India, that his duty “was to make sure that India was a safe base for the great operations against Japan which were now pending, and that the war was pressed to a successful conclusion, and that famine and food difficulties were dealt with.”

Churchill then wrote to Wavell personally:

Peace, order and a high condition of war-time well-being among the masses of the people constitute the essential foundation of the forward thrust against the enemy….The hard pressures of world-war have for the first time for many years brought conditions of scarcity, verging in some localities into actual famine, upon India. Every effort must be made, even by the diversion of shipping urgently needed for war purposes, to deal with local shortages….Every effort should be made by you to assuage the strife between the Hindus and Moslems and to induce them to work together for the common good."

Read more: winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/did-churchill-cause-the-bengal-famine/

Nazi Germany caused the war along with all its terrible carnage, and then in the ensuing demoralized atmosphere tainted all sensible nationalism and patriotism by association with its fanatic kind of biological racialism. Are _you_ happy now?

>Emrys Hughes, Winston Churchill - His Career in War and Peace, p. 145
I found a fucking source in the first page, you are really mentally disabled, friend.

Any decent human being has the duty of taking a piss on his grave

Britain was saved by the channel from the French fate. The Brits fought valiantly, as did the others, but in the end were not strong enough anymore to fight their enemies on their own. Everywhere where they fought alone it was defeat after defeat after defeat. Had Britain estimated her strength better who knows? Maybe she'd still have her empire.
Absolutely nothing good came of the first and second world wars for anybody.

By the way, If Churchill was the Jewish puppet people like you say he was, and the Jewish plan has always been to flood Europe with immigrants, why did he oppose mass coloured immigration into Britain? "Problems wh. will arise if many coloured people settle here," he said to his cabinet in 1954. "Are we to saddle ourselves with colour problems in UK? Attracted by Welfare State. Public opinion in UK won't tolerate it once it gets beyond certain limits."

Why did he write his article "Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People"?

"There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek -- all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses."

Do you care to produce a single piece of evidence that Churchill was ever bribed by a Jew?

Was he mistaken in any of his early warnings about Hitler? In 19 October 1930 he told Prince Bismarck that “he was convinced that Hitler or his followers would seize the first available opportunity to resort to armed force.” How about his saying that Hitler would refuse to be appeased?

>implying all of Europe wasn't practising Eurgenics before ww2
>implying nationalism was not racist before ww2
>implying both are somehow bad
>implying you actually cared about poland and German expansionism when you owned 1/3 of the world and didn't declare war on the ussr after they invaded poland
you either have no idea about European history or are just an utter moron, either way have a good night, I have better things to do than argue with a wall

Fuck off, you bluepilled wog. Churchill destroyed our nation and damned Europe to hell. Fuck Churchill, fuck you.

FDR, Stalin and Churchill.

Had Hitler not stabbed Stalin in the back and had the Japs not bombed Pearl harbour it would have been just us.

Silly Japs and Hitler.

couldnt you say churchill fuked up by not acting sooner about hitler.. maybe could have saved a few MILLION jews.
just saying

Because, you daft cunt, he was played by the Jews. He hated Germany and wanted it to die, the Jews obliged him via bringing him to prominence (see: an organisation called the Focus) and destroyed his nation in trying to destroy Germany. Churchill didn't agree to mass migration, but his spite towards Germany allowed him to play into the Kikes' hands and fit their purpose, and, by the time Berlin was in ashes, Churchill had no say in preserving British Britain.

>If Churchill was the Jewish puppet
Jewish or not he was retard or really vile and willingly or not destroyed both your country and Europe

Your source is lying to you. The people on the Holocaust denial forum CODOH have investigated that book and found that the quotation is nowhere to be found. See for yourself. You surely won't accuse them of bias.

"I've checked pages 45 and 145 of Emry Hughes' Winston Churchill In War and Peace (1950, London, Unity), and an online version of the "British Bulldog" edition from 1955 tmh.floonet.net/pdf/BritishBulldog.pdf

The alleged quote does not appear on either page 45 nor 145 of Hughes' original 1950 edition, and it doesn't appear ANYWHERE in the 1955 "British Bulldog" edition."

forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=7259

...

>They attack us for our policy in the last war where they imprisoned us without trial in order to stop our mouths. They have never been able even to suggest that we did anything against our country. We were patriots who had fought in the previous war - I had fought in the 1914 war in Flanders.

>But we were determined to save the new generation from another unnecessary war which would bring even greater disaster for mankind. They imprisoned us because they feared we would persuade the people to make peace. but were we not right? Are we not now proved to have been right?

>What good has that war done to anyone?

>Is anyone better off in the long run?

>If anyone thinks so let him look at the present state of Britain. As a result of that war we have lost the empire; India gone, Burma gone, Ceylon gone - Ireland and south Africa on their way out - Canada drawn under the power of the almighty dollar, and Australia and New Zealand threatened by the same influenced - While communist bands are organised by Moscow to attack us throughout the East.

>The war we opposed has landed Britain in the biggest mess, and Europe and us all , in the greatest danger our history has ever known. You can now judge the results for yourselves and I ask you whether we were wrong after all to have opposed that war!

>My friends there is nothing in my life of which I am so proud as having suffered at that time for a great belief. And you may yet be glad that there are some Englishmen who are known throughout the world to have on their hands no blood from the brothers war.

I know, you've been force-fed lies about Churchill being some great patriot who offered his blood, toil, tears and sweat to preserve his nation, but in reality he was a fat alcoholic warmonger who wanted to destroy Germany at all costs. The Kikes used this against him.
Abandon your pathetic affection for that fat cunt and take on another hero.

USSR would've declared war on Germany in 1943. Think you could've held on for that long?

We should not have declared war on Nazi Germany in 1939---they were unjustly attacking sovereign nations, but it was nothing to throw British lives away on---nevertheless, Hitler's conduct was what provoked it. You are blind if you deny that fact. If Churchill was "played by the Jews" then Adolf Hitler gave him the perfect opportunity to be so "played." Oswald Mosley was right to condemn both sides.

>words mean more than actions
Spoken like a true limey

“I was not Hitler’s ally. As far as I and Hitler go, the answer is this. I declared in a speech in 1934, that we could never have any racial policy in Great Britain because we were running a multiracial Empire. The Germans were antisemites and I was not.”

youtu.be/rd7LcaXZzUs?t=21m40s

-

INTERVIEWER: If Hitler had survived the war, would you have been in favour of his being tried and convicted for war crimes?

OSWALD MOSLEY: Yes, I think any one who has committed crimes should always be tried under whatever law exists.

INTERVIEWER: And do you think he should have been, or would have been, found guilty?

OSWALD MOSLEY: I have said again and again that the murder of the Jews in the concentration camps was an outrageous and vile crime. While I don’t think nearly so many were killed as are supposed to be killed, that doesn’t matter. Any crime, the murder of any defenceless prisoner, is a crime, and everybody must detest it.

youtu.be/rd7LcaXZzUs?t=26m37s

-

INTERVIEWER: Would you say that the wrong side won the war?

OSWALD MOSLEY: No, certainly not. And I offered to fight in the last war the moment the life of Britain was at stake.

youtu.be/rd7LcaXZzUs?t=32m1s

-

INTERVIEWER: Would you say it would have been better, or not been better, if Hitler had never existed?

OSWALD MOSLEY: No, certainly better that he should not ever have existed, because his existence led to 25 million Europeans being killed.

youtu.be/rd7LcaXZzUs?t=32m40s

-

INTERVIEWER: Sir Oswald, do you now, looking back with the hindsight and knowledge of history, blame the Jews or Hitler for the Second World War?

SIR OSWALD MOSLEY: I blame both: Hitler for driving east, before he had got a diplomatic arrangement with us; Jews, for gradually persuading us, or the British people or government, to do absurd things which were bound to result in war. I was against both mistakes.

youtube.com/watch?v=HNhF28fzN9I&feature=youtu.be&t=219

Hilarious Wyatt, and let's now take a look how Hitler built his blitzkrieg lightening war military

Aww lets not.

And wtf acting sooner? You guys were sobbing about us not trying to deal with Hitler along with all the other Nazi apologist liberals, some of you'd already written us off, and were glad too 'Muh Tea war still cuts deep'

We stood strong,alongside France and Poland and other based allies in Europe, even poo in loo fought for us and Africans.

Not taking anything away from USA at all, without them we'd basically be fucked, but lets not pretend either you really gave much of a shit at the start.

You're clearly getting hung up on specifics, the logic of which I don't fully understand.

WW1 was going to happen no matter what. The big picture is that Britain and Germany were both too big for their boots. Somehow or another there was going to be a war, and Germany instigated it (wanton expansionism into European neighbours).

More of the blame for WW2 lies with those vying for hard reparations from Germany, mainly the French. Britain wanted a more balanced approach to prevent Germany from becoming the unstable hellhole it did. Ultimately, though, German expansionism went too far and once again war became inevitable.

>tmh.floonet.net/pdf/BritishBulldog.pdf
404 NOT FOUND, and maybe it was deleted from this edition.

Churchill could have accepted one of Hitler's many peace offerings, that would have been enough. You yourself said we should not have declared war on Germany in the first place (Chamberlain, slightly sympathetic to Germany, may well have accepted peace after the fall of France, which was why (((they))) removed him), so Churchill should have accepted the peace offering. he didn't because we wanted to see Germany burn ("this is a war against the strength of the German people" - Churchill) and get knocked out as a competitor to Britain.
>unjustly attacking sovereign nations
Like we attacked India.

Imagine, just for a second, if Churchill had taken Hitler's offer of peace. The U.K. would have their empire and Europe would be 100% white.

Still, Churchill could have made peace. It was perfectly feasible that peaceful relations, even co-operation, could have existed between the Empire and the Reich. Hitler was autistic in his Anglophilia.

All of these are totally reasonable positions. Even David Irving doesn't argue the large amount of deaths from the camps.

14/88
Look at those digits

Why was England so deathly afraid of a continental empire when it was a maritime power with far-flung colonies?

At the very least Churchill is no worse than Hitler was for declaring war, because Hitler provoked the declaration. But obviously the man who provoked the declaration has the greater share of blame, so Hitler is to be regarded as the worse man. The one who deserves our reverence is the great Sir Oswald Mosley.

All the Poles had to do was open a land corridor to Danzig.

Indeed. It fucks me off the way the press vilified Irving.
(((They))) broke him in the end. Such a shame.

>wanton expansionism into European neighbours
They only moved troops through Belgium (although it was strategically useless and gave you a reason to join the war), how the fuck is this "wanton expansionism"? I was just saying blaming Germany alone for WW1 is plain stupid.

>German expansionism
Again, you owned 1/3 of the fucking planet. Who the fuck were you to talk about expansionism?

What's wrong with this quote? Hitler was continuing to do what Wilhelm II did and what Wilhelm I and Bismark did. Obviously, Germany was a problem no matter who was in charge.

its a pasta

The sheer disrespect and power he has over everything we cherish gives me a raging hard on

imagine having that power. you fuck the cops that the plebs revere and respect. While looking them in the eyes and disrespecting said plebs

Dying =/= being killed

Churchill's position was that Hitler was not a rational actor nor in any way trustworthy, which he was hardly unjustified to think. As pointed out here he predicted Hitler would attempt a military coup as early as 1930. He totally rejected appeasement, and how was he not entirely vindicated in his supposition that Hitler would break his promises when he spat in Chamberlain's face by annexing Czechoslovakia? Churchill should not have declared war in the first place, but then he was declaring war on the supposition that Hitler was a madman and an intransigent promise-breaker, and Hitler had only confirmed those apprehensions by all his conduct.

Just make sure to buy his books before (((they))) buy the rights and then never reprint them, or (((revise))) them.

Because our government had always pursued the policy of equality on the continent and competition overseas. Not saying this is good, but that's how it was.
Churchill was a twat. He didn't wage the war to liberate Poland (which was occupied by the USSR, Jew-owned), nor to stop the spread of fascism, but JUST to hold Germany down. He himself said this. Churchill should have made peace with Hitler rather than firebomb German cities. We could have united to fight Bolshevism, the TRUE threat to Europe at that time, but, no, we went after Germany.

You omit the occupation of the Rhineland and the annexation of Czechoslovakia which preceded the invasion of Poland.

Don't start that bullshit. You're not a communist (I assume) so don't start relativising like one.

this is a slide thread btw.

anyone in the UK who has done 2 minutes of research can see that Churchill was a drunk jew plant.

nice piece of (((anglo))) propaganda you got there user

They weren't afraid. There was a hell of a lot of (((propaganda))) on British society.
I think it all stems from the Balfour declaration with the Rothschilds, (((they))) wanted the war and they wanted the end of the empire.

Churchill won the war and as a result, Britain was destroyed and is now a radioactive hell on earth where Paki rape gangs rule the night

Why?

Because Churchill was a tool of the Jews and he won a victory for them.

As pointed out here the quotation about "holding Germany down" in is a fake.

>signed in good faith
Bullshit. The allies deserved nothing but destruction and still do.

Churchill never declared war, Chamberlain did. Churchill prolonged the war unnecessarily, leading us down this dire path.
Hitler would not have attacked Britain. He didn't attack Italy, another ally? In Mein Kampf, he said that he saw two feasible allies for Germany: Britain and Italy. He loved our nation, and to the end of the war had nothing but sympathy for our people.

I don't think he's saying "I hate Germans I want to kill them all"

I think he's saying "Germans keep trying to fucking take over Europe and oppress other people, and they should really be stopped from doing that"

Germans can continue to exist as long as they stay in their own fucking country

It means WW2 was not about "righteousness", it was just another British imperialist war like WW1, the first gave women voting rights and caused the first sexual revolution, the second caused what you see everyday (from transgenders to sandniggers and niggers behaving like apes in European soil).

>everything that goes against my shitty country is fake
you are really funny to observe

...

See

>you will live to witness the day when Allied nations turn into brazils
Feels fucking good man.

Leave Wales, leave Scotland, leave Ireland you fucking hypocrite.

>Troops through Belgium
And where were those troops going? For swim in the channel?

>you owned 1/3 of the planet
We only owned countries which couldn't govern themselves and were in desperate need of civilisation. Germany attacked civilised people.

literally damage control

hitler on suicide watch

For the time being it's only fake because you said so. And even if it were the fact you didn't declare war upon the USSR after the invasion of Poland is proof enough, everybody accepts this fact, even historians.

>britain literally does nothing
>in fact we appease hitler for fucking ages
>this is while he continues to aggressively expand and take over territory (which isn't his, and which isn't german) across europe
>"it's just a british imperialist war"
What have you been smoking, Jorge?

Krauts are still trying to take over Europe, only with an army of shitskins.

Churchill is despised here. Abandoned ANZACs at Gallipoli, destroyed the empire ver a war Britain has no need to fight, hid multiple peace offers from the people after the disaster of Dunkirk.
Should have been flushed at birth with the rest of the turds.

fpbp

theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/04/15/kevin-macdonald-the-monstrous-winston-churchill/

Notice how they do not respond to this because it is well sourced and they have no retort.

You're a fucking idiot.

Indeed.

>And where were those troops going?
To fuck the frenchy faggots, it was a mistake as I said before since the maginot line didn't exist back then. Holding france and fully focusing on russia until she collapsed would have been a far better option.

>civilised
civilisation is a very relative term, all the peoples you attack had all the characteristics that define civilisation and yet it was 100% ok, and besides germany only wanted Danzig.

Based Capeposter.

Build that mosque boy.

Was India British? Was burma British? Was malaya British? Shall I continue?

>he's this mad at British superiority
No surprise coming from a fucking monkey.

>it was just another British imperialist war like WW1
>Britain invaded a neutral country without valid reason
>Britain was the only imperial power at the time
Yeah you're full of shit

Yes. Yes they were.

You and England got so much out of you alliance with the Jews huh? Enjoy the privelege of witnessing your own extermination

You'll be no different from mr.monkey here in 40 years. Be sure to send my regards to that kike lover Churchill when Ahmed blows you up.

If Hitler had conquered all of Europe, unopposed, then he would have been an existential threat to us. We weren't going to allow that to happen. The Eternal Kraut needed to be put down which is why we put them down.

How can limeys be such blatant hypocrites?

Is it any surprise a nazi is degenerate?