*bombs your capital*

*bombs your capital*
>teehee we are the good guys btw

You guys aren't serious about being Nazis though right?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_bombing_of_Rotterdam
resort.com/~prime8/Orwell/07_14_44.html
youtube.com/watch?v=yhI0rBY9ikI
youtube.com/watch?v=E19NClbk7-Q&t=6m30s
youtube.com/watch?v=E19NClbk7-Q&t=12m12s
youtube.com/watch?v=wGqJcJUQwhs&t=3m30s
youtu.be/rd7LcaXZzUs?t=21m40s
youtu.be/rd7LcaXZzUs?t=26m37s
youtu.be/rd7LcaXZzUs?t=32m1s
youtu.be/rd7LcaXZzUs?t=32m40s
youtube.com/watch?v=HNhF28fzN9I&feature=youtu.be&t=219
youtube.com/watch?v=wGqJcJUQwhs
youtube.com/watch?v=HNhF28fzN9I
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

didn't england bomb major german cities first? Fuck off bluepilled faggot.

This is now a 3rd Reich redpill /thread

didn't they bomb your cities before the war started?

>bombing anglos doesnt make you the good guy
Then what the hell does????

The first bombs dropped on London were accidental. Hitler ordered the arrest of the pilots who did so. England's response was to not bomb strategic locations but to break the will of the people via terrorism, i.e. Dresden incendiary bombing. Look it up. RAF even spoke out against there own actions after the war. They bombed, then when firefighters and rescue crews went out they bombed again.

kek

Killing enemy civilian from air was legal. But killing them using a bullet fired from the ground was illegal.

>muh terrorism
>muh dresden dindu nuffin
You do realise the countryside of England was littered with Hitlers butterfly bombs right? Suppose they were a mistake too right?

Fucking apologist, fuck off, fucking die you muslim loving nigger nazi shitskin.

the were Communist controlled cites
Communist controlled cites are
not real cities

They asked us to do it

we should do it again imo

>anglos
>not the bad guys

>Bombing commies is a bad thing

This is a lie on par with the false Churchill quote you put in the other thread, if you are the same Spaniard. English bombing of German civilians was a direct response to what the Nazis did to Rotterdam.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_bombing_of_Rotterdam

"The objective was to support the German troops fighting in the city, break Dutch resistance and force the Dutch to surrender. Even though preceding negotiations resulted in a ceasefire, the bombardment took place nonetheless, in conditions which remain controversial, and destroyed almost the entire historic city centre, killing nearly 900 people and making 85,000 others homeless.

The psychological and physical success of the raid, from the German perspective, led the Oberkommando der Luftwaffe (OKL) to threaten to destroy the city of Utrecht if the Dutch Government did not surrender. The Dutch capitulated early the next morning.

The United Kingdom had a policy of only bombing military targets and infrastructure such as ports and railways which were of military importance.[39] While it was acknowledged that bombing of Germany would cause civilian casualties, the British government renounced the deliberate bombing of civilian property outside combat zones (which after the fall of Poland, meant German areas east of the Rhine) as a military tactic. This policy was abandoned on 15 May 1940, one day after the Rotterdam Blitz, when the RAF was directed to attack targets in the Ruhr, including oil plants and other civilian industrial targets which aided the German war effort, such as blast furnaces that at night were self-illuminating. The first RAF raid on the interior of Germany took place on the night of 15/16 May 1940.[40][41]"

The National Socialists were literally the closest thing to perfection imaginable in that time period.
Undoubtedly the objective good guys, angels, almost exactly the light and day difference that is turned around on us now.

If Britain didn't want its cities bombed, maybe they shouldn't have declared war on Germany and started terriorbombing Germany's cities in night raids just because their air force couldn't penetrate German air space during the day to do actual useful tactical damage.

>The Nazis entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everybody else, and nobody was going to bomb them. At Rotterdam, London, Warsaw, and half a hundred other places, they put that rather naive theory into operation. They sowed the wind, and now, they are going to reap the whirlwind

A dozen offers of peace after you had your arse handed to you at Dunkirk. The biggest mistake Hitler made was not obliterating every BEF soldier and boat trying to evacuate them as they fled like cowards.
Churchill sold the empire for sheckles.

So you're saying Hitler used a tactic that shortened the war and saved lives by doing so while brits were just being spiteful cunts who slaughtered civilians with no real goal to achieve?
Pretty sure that makes you the bad guys.

"First of all there is the charge, which is becoming quite a common one, that "we started it," i.e. that Britain was the first country to practise systematic bombing of civilians. How anyone can make this claim, with the history of the past dozen years in mind, is almost beyond me. The first act in the present war -- some hours, if I remember rightly, before any declaration of war passed -- was the German bombing of Warsaw. The Germans bombed and shelled the city so intensively that, according to the Poles, at one time 700 fires were raging simultaneously. They made a film of the destruction of Warsaw, which they entitled "Baptism of Fire" and sent all round the world with the object of terrorising neutrals.

... The other thing that needs dealing with is the parrot cry "killing women and children." I pointed out before, but evidently it needs repeating, that it is probably somewhat better to kill a cross-section of the population than to kill only the young men. If the figures published by the Germans are true, and we have really killed 1,200,000 civilians in our raids, that loss of life has probably harmed the German race somewhat less than a corresponding loss on the Russian front or in Africa and Italy.

Any nation at war will do its best to protect its children, and the number of children killed in raids probably does not correspond to their percentage of the general population. Women cannot be protected to the same extent, but the outcry against killing women, if you accept killing at all, is sheer sentimentality. Why is it worse to kill a woman than a man?"

-- George Orwell

resort.com/~prime8/Orwell/07_14_44.html

See George Orwell's words of wisdom in .

>tldnr yes we killed women and children and achieved nothing while doing so in retaliation of hitlers actions that ended the war with the Netherlands and saved thousands of lives but we are totally still the good guys
L
U
H

M
A
Y
O

>People who killed millions of Europeans for conquest
>Objective good guys
>Literally angels

Sometimes it's easy to forget that Sup Forums is full of edgy teenagers and literal retards.

You forgot to mention muh six guzillion

Putting aside the fact that you started it, do you think that men are somehow less valuable than women?

>People who killed millions of Europeans for conquest

Come one now mahommad, we all know the only reason the treaty with Poland was made was because you were itching to bring Germany back into the kike banking fold.
Notice as well that Russia also invaded and occupied Poland with Germany, but there is never a complaint made about that. Couldn't be because the kike communists were ruling USSR at the time and you were all buddy buddy.
England were the aggressors and dragged the Commonwealth into a war that didn't need to be fought and brought all Commonwealth nations unending shame.

Yeah, the Russian communists and Jew leaders were unending filth, we seem to be in agreement.

youtube.com/watch?v=yhI0rBY9ikI

Watch this.

this

Fucking Germans made my Grandma homeless that day. We should've taken some clay from them after the war.

Here's Dutch people welcoming German soldiers (6m 30s)
youtube.com/watch?v=E19NClbk7-Q&t=6m30s

Here's the Dutch and the Germans remembering the people who died in the Rotterdam blitz and laying wreaths (12m 12s)
youtube.com/watch?v=E19NClbk7-Q&t=12m12s

Here's Goebbels remembering/laying a wreath for the people who died in the May days
youtube.com/watch?v=wGqJcJUQwhs&t=3m30s

well..

The Nazis and the Bolsheviks were just as bad as each other.

False dichotomy. Britain should not have declared war on Germany in 1939, because far-flung European countries which we had nothing to do with were not worth wasting British lives on, but equally it was Hitler's criminal treaty-breaking and invasion of sovereign countries that provoked it. You are a fool if you idolize him. The only man worthy of reverence and respect in the whole affair is the great Sir Oswald Mosley.

>We should've taken some clay from them after the war.
Yeah, that's exactly what some communists and EU-fanatics (I repeat myself) were planning.
Some of them were even literally for a global muh western values state.

Germans tried to bomb our cities, so we delivered retribution tenfold on Dresden. Filthy Krauts deserved every last bomb

DO IT AGAIN BOMBER HARRIS

Yeah, I'll pay the Mosley comment. Still didn't address the fact you have no issue with Stalin's invasion of Poland, though.

An invasion of either Poland or Germany for that matter by Communists would have been met with swift retribution by Britain in an alternate universe where Germany had peaceably kept to her own borders. I do not conceive how you imagine we could have dealt with both Germany and Russia at the same time. We had to make do with the first and closest aggressor. Hitler dug his own grave.

Oh right I guess Germany shouldn't have declared war on Britain

A man called Hans goes about punching weaker men on a street, but leaves a strong man called John Bull alone. John Bull shouts, "if you keep punching people, I'll sort you out." The puncher continues to punch. John Bull cries again, "If you punch one more person, you've had it." Hans ignores the warning, and finally John Bull puts him in his place. Hans then commences to blubber and cry about this wanton act of violence. This is the position taken up by people of your cast of mind.

They are all idiots, we Dutch people need to follow our own path and not fall to failed foreign ideologies.

There are still a lot of powerful people in the EU pulling the strings from behind the curtain planning for a United states of Europe. The ''western values'' part is just propaganda, coming from people living in places where police raids your home when you make a ''wrong'' facebook post.

Yet every time Poland is brought up, bongs carry on with much Nazis invaded Poland. Never a mention of Russia's equal invasion.of Polish territory.
Germany at least had the excuse of ending the genocide of ethnic Germans in the Versailles redrawing of Polish borders.
If you're going to criticise one, you have to crticise both.
Good for the goose, good for the gander.

Schlomo commands John Bull to kidnap the children of Hans, some of which Hans hasn't seen in awhile, and give them away to sweaty foreigners. Then Schlomo and John Bull drug Hans and leave him for dead.
Once Hans recovers from the drugs, he immediately goes to work in order to rescue his children so they can live at home again.

He saves one child who comes running with tears of joy. He saves another who does the same. There's one left, begging for help, held hostage by one of the sweaty foreigners
"Wot de fook m8, Schlomo doesn't like that and I owe him money!" shrieks John Bull from the top of his lungs. "If you dare save your kid I'll fooken gank ya! I'll do literally anything to protect that sweaty foreigner m8"
Regardless, Hans asks the sweaty foreigner if he can have his child back. "Yes please!" screams the child. But the sick sweaty foreigner would rather keep on to the child.

"That's it." says Hans "I've tried reasoning. I'm taking him no matter what."
He takes the child, who is overjoyed. Then Hans tells the sweaty foreigner to leave it alone and accept the fact Hans got his kid back. But the sweaty foreigner won't take it, as he knows John Bull will dance like a monkey at his behest.
So he refuses to accept that Hans got his kid back. Hans smashes him to the ground.

"W O T D E F O O K " gurgles John Bull almost unintelligibly, and Schlomo helps him call all of John Bull's friends to gang up on Hans for daring to take his children back.

"The event alleged in TGSNT as "the Danzig massacre" is a hoax; what Dennis Wise is most likely referring to is rather an event known as "Bloody Sunday" which took place in Bromberg (today the city of Bydgoszcz) and firstly happened three days AFTER the German invasion of Poland and secondly many of the involved Volksdeutsche were in reality part of a poorly trained Pro-Nazi paramilitary force called the Selbstschutz who attacked the organized Polish Army during the German invasion and got the shit wrecked out of them as a result. When the Wehrmacht came across this, they reported their deaths back to Nazi leadership in Germany who used it for propaganda purposes ("muh innnocent defenseless German civilians hacked to death by Polish barbarians") to justify their invasion of Poland that had already begun via false flag (Gleiwitz incident[10]) and subsequent reprisals against the Polish populace once the nation was erased from the world map for the next 6 years and turned into a new entity known as the Generalgouvernement.

Also, Poland never owned Danzig during the pre-war time. It was a free city under administration by the League of Nations. The war started because Hitler wanted the Danzig corridor. When Poland refused to just hand the area over as had been the case with Czechia ceding the Sudetenland and getting entirely annexed in the progress while the world remained silent, Hitler invaded. "

>That time the Jews kidnapped Germany's children

Shit I forgot about that part.

>Hitler annexes Austria and half of Czechoslovakia
>Britain: okay lol no worries, just don't use war to get any territories
>Germany: no problemo, my British brother, I am only interested in lands populated by ethnic Germans!
>6 months later
>Germany: *invades Prague*
>Britain and France: what the fuck stop that. if you touch Poland we will not hesitate to retaliate
>Germany: oops! teehee~ sorry... won't happen again...
>*invades Poland*
>Britain and France: we warned you, we are declaring war
>Germany: WTF... I hate Anglos now
>half a year of Britain's "Phoney War" where they don't really attack Germany, just set up defences in other countries
>Germany: ugh, the insolence of these Jew controlled Anglos, so aggressive...
>*invades Denmark and Norway*
>Britain and France: Jesus fuck
>Germany: stop oppressing me *invades France and starts bombing Britain*

>80 years later
>FUCKING WARMONGER CHURCHILL HITLER DID NOTHING WRONG THE JEWS DECLARED WAR ON GERMANY HITLER NEEDED TO EXTERMINATE THE POLES FOR THE SIX GORILLION ETHNIC GERMANS [cites Der Sturmer article] ANGLOS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR WORLD WAR II AND EVERYTHING WRONG WITH THE WORLD HITLER JUST WANTED TO SAVE EUROPE

Really makes you think...

Re-uniting the Germans had to be done by force, as quickly as possible, at every risk of starting another World War, and by annexing Czechoslovakia, eh?

Schlomo doesn't like to remind people

>Polish people having self-determination is a good analogy to kidnapping children

Really?

>holding political views best described as "national socialism" means you literally personally bombed London

It didn't happen by force until Britain made it literally impossible to reunite with Danzig (which voted in the NSDAP the same year as Germany did, and was one of the most fervent National Socialist places in the German sphere)

Germany helped the Slovaks when they wanted independence (and left them independent for the first time in recent history.)
Sure, they didn't respect the artificial post-WW1 creation of an independent Czechia after Hacha taunted Hitler for war several times, and tried to humiliate him. They made Bohemia into a German protectorate again just like it had been for almost all of the past millennium.

Without firing a shot.

fuckers bombed my house during ww2 a new one was built post war obviously

hey nigger

peace was proposed after dunkirk

before france even fell

And they would have had it, had they allowed Danzig to return. But Britain's war guarantee seemed too nice.
Or had they accepted the fact they lost Danzig and the corridor in 1940, instead of crying for Britain.
Or had the Soviets not preferred no Polish state.

The losers as usual. Fuck with the Anglo and die.

Germany non white in one generation.

>If only they gave us the Sudetenland they would have been okay

They did but apparently it wasn't enough.

You think you won that war?

If Britain had accepted European civilisation would have been lost. The whole of Europe under the twin shades of Nazism and Soviet Communism. Do you know how vulnerable Britain would have been?

Perhaps Benes/Hacha shouldn't have taunted Germany for years on end and then try to suppress the Slovakians when they too wanted independence, just as the Germans.
Czechoslovakia was a fiasco of a state, basically a mini-Austro-Hungaria

>The only man worthy of reverence and respect in the whole affair is the great Sir Oswald Mosley.
You do realise Mosley would've allied with Germany? What do you think his reasons were for that, and why was he wrong to hold his anti-war campaign?

If he is the only man worthy of reverence and respect, what exactly do you have reverence and respect for regarding this man during WW2? Is not his main and only noteworthy stance during the war his very campaign to stop the war?

>Fuck with the Anglo and die.
So how come all those rape gangs and pakis in your country are doing fine?

“I was not Hitler’s ally. As far as I and Hitler go, the answer is this. I declared in a speech in 1934, that we could never have any racial policy in Great Britain because we were running a multiracial Empire. The Germans were antisemites and I was not.”

youtu.be/rd7LcaXZzUs?t=21m40s

-

INTERVIEWER: If Hitler had survived the war, would you have been in favour of his being tried and convicted for war crimes?

OSWALD MOSLEY: Yes, I think any one who has committed crimes should always be tried under whatever law exists.

INTERVIEWER: And do you think he should have been, or would have been, found guilty?

OSWALD MOSLEY: I have said again and again that the murder of the Jews in the concentration camps was an outrageous and vile crime. While I don’t think nearly so many were killed as are supposed to be killed, that doesn’t matter. Any crime, the murder of any defenceless prisoner, is a crime, and everybody must detest it.

youtu.be/rd7LcaXZzUs?t=26m37s

-

INTERVIEWER: Would you say that the wrong side won the war?

OSWALD MOSLEY: No, certainly not. And I offered to fight in the last war the moment the life of Britain was at stake.

youtu.be/rd7LcaXZzUs?t=32m1s

-

INTERVIEWER: Would you say it would have been better, or not been better, if Hitler had never existed?

OSWALD MOSLEY: No, certainly better that he should not ever have existed, because his existence led to 25 million Europeans being killed.

youtu.be/rd7LcaXZzUs?t=32m40s

-

INTERVIEWER: Sir Oswald, do you now, looking back with the hindsight and knowledge of history, blame the Jews or Hitler for the Second World War?

SIR OSWALD MOSLEY: I blame both: Hitler for driving east, before he had got a diplomatic arrangement with us; Jews, for gradually persuading us, or the British people or government, to do absurd things which were bound to result in war. I was against both mistakes.

youtube.com/watch?v=HNhF28fzN9I&feature=youtu.be&t=219

>If Britain had accepted European civilisation would have been lost. The whole of Europe under the twin shades of Nazism and Soviet Communism. Do you know how vulnerable Britain would have been?
Lol I'm sure the largest empire the world has ever seen would be a lot more vulnerable than the tiny island nation of Britain relying on America for protection against a Soviet Union spanning across Europe and Asia.

Had Germany won, there'd be no Soviet Union, Britain would've kept its empire and likely only America would lapse into degeneracy.
Regardless of whether Brits knew that is what would've happened, that is what would've happened.

The dude cucked to try and get elected. He's not consistent.
I admire him, but he was willing to sacrifice his positions in order to be more marketable.

He wanted racial segregation by nations. No way you change your mind on that.

You said he's the only man deserving respect during the war. During the war he held campaigns against the war?
Why was he wrong to do that, and what do you respect him for?

>mosley is a pozzed jew apologist
The bongs can't even be proper nazis...
Sad!

Having an empire doesn't mean much when you're cut off from the continent and surrounded by a mobilised Germany which has all the chips in the game. If Britain had negotiated its likely that Germany could have made them accept terms like demilitarisation and shit.

A eugenicist, totalitarian, socialist, free-speech-censoring, expansionist, Lebensborn-program state led by a lunatic tyrant would certainly be a guiding light for humanity.

I imagine the inevitable reaction against it would have made even more people run to the other extreme of Communism and bring a hell upon us even worse than the one which we are presently experiencing.

He never changed his opinions. Not once. He was never an adherent to the racialist policies of the Nazis, and he was always against persecution and treating people badly simply on the basis of race. He was a man of principle, not a brute, a monster, and devotee of realpolitik like Herr Hitler.

LOL wow victory sure is sweet.

>sacrificed finest men for the jews
>loses all colonies.
>london ruled by muslims
>gayest country on Earth
>all women now whores
>niggers fuck all your slags
>totally irrelevant bitch of USA

Yay!!! Victory!!!

>bombing subhumans
Hitler did nothing wrong

Right, I said if Germany won, not if they negotiated peace.
If Germany won, Britain would still have been independent and with its huge empire.
Hitler said he'd protect the British empire with German soldiers if only the Brits would ally themselves with him. He said that after the fall of France.

There's no way Britain would be vulnerable with a German victory, as Hitler was obsessed with being an ally of Britain. The same would go for peace treaties, I doubt Germany would take advantage beyond simply returning the colonies which were taken after WW1.
Sure, I'll admit there's no way Britain could know just how strongly Hitler wanted to be allied with Britain, especially after all the propaganda saying it's just a ploy, but the whole point here is seeing it from past the point of being allied.

How can you possibly say Britain's position is less vulnerable after the war, relying on an allied power several magnitudes stronger than itself, rather than one merely a bit stronger?

>realpolitik
>Bad
Bong education

Two World Wars and you still have failed to learn a lesson.

Yes. We're still doing better than Germany

>40% Non White in one generation

And at least we have our commonwealth and anglosphere states to continue on our genetic, spiritual and cultural legacy. What legacy does Germany have?

>A eugenicist
Literally nothing wrong with positive eugenics
>totalitarian
Buzzword, means very little. Authoritarian? Sure.
>socialist
Not in the Marxist definition, but yes it had social programs.
Do you want to get rid of the NHS etc? Most Brits don't.
>free-speech-censoring
Leftists don't deserve free speech. There's no reason to be muh centrist about this.
Sure, if I was dictator I'd allow them to speak, but I'd break them up once they're too powerful.
>expansionist
Yeah I guess the Britain empire was born that big
>Lebensborn-program
Only wrong because it didn't pre-select families prior to having children.
They had supply and demand fucked up.

>you guys
>pol is one person

you're worse than people who think reddit is one person. But seriously everyone on Reddit is a beta fag

>we
Austrians talking like they were responsible for anything Nazi Germany did is as retarded as Canadians that think they deserve credit for Brittan burning the White House down.

>Bombing G*rmans

Allies did nothing wrong

>outcry against killing women is sentimental
Actually, it might be neat survival instincts.

If a few hundred men survive a war, they can repopulate the world to a reasonable degree within a few decades. Men are thus inherently in greater supply reproductively, and are in this sense more disposable.

If the same number of women survive it could take millennia to get back to full strength. Hence women are more valuable in this sense. Wouldn't be surprised if the disdain for killing women stemmed from this.

>What legacy does Germany have?
110 Million ethnic Germans in Europe.
Meanwhile you have mutts and rape gangs
Fight harder for your sandniggers, that always works out, doesn't it?
You had the chance to fight for the white man both times, you refused. Britain deserves its fall.

>He never changed his opinions. Not once.

"We can live in peace and friendship side by side, in separate nations and developments. But we can not have the mix of the peoples and races who are widely different and divergent - it will lead to nothing but trouble."

And in a later interview he said he'd have pakis in his cabinet and wouldn't deport them or segregate them.
I tried to find the exact quote, but can't find it by skipping through.
I know it's in here; youtube.com/watch?v=wGqJcJUQwhs

>You have mutts and rape gangs

I'm sorry, what was that Fritz? You're certainly not one to be talking about rape gangs

>The absolute state of Krautposters

Wrong link, here: youtube.com/watch?v=HNhF28fzN9I

Why do you find pleasure in destroying other people's homes.

Britain's state of mass rape of young girls by organised Pakistania rape gangs is worse than Germany's rampant migrants.
It's all fucked up, and if you people were reasonable you'd realise that, but anglos like you keep clinging to their fabricated post-WW2 identity.

>You're certainly not one to be talking about rape gangs
Count the cases, all of them together are not even one week of what the thousands of girls in Britain who were routinely raped and pimped out had to go through.
But sure, keep on talking about Germany if it makes you feel better
The 1400 in Rotherham were bad, how do you feel about the at least 6000 that we're recently revealed?

I want to slaughter the Jews and the Mexicans. Is that too much Nazi for you?

>inb4 bong didn't even know about the 6000+ in Sandwell

Based Spain has spoken.

Oh and Nearly none of those are actual rapes while Britain had pakis burning their initials with hot irons into the asses of 8-14 year olds for literal decades
But hey, at least your public baths aren't marked on a map on the internet, right?

>Germans
>People

I'm sorry but in a pure numbers game, Germany loses. At least with the Rotherham shit there was actual public outrage. Germany's endless African intake doesn't seem to have even stirred a reaction among your people, looking at how your next election is probably going to go. White Germans are infinitely more cucked than us, and it doesn't look like it's going to get better for them any time soon

Damn did they actually brand them
Hot

Going by rapes, the UK is worse.
I don't think anybody denies that 80 years of brainwashing didn't have its effects on Germans.

>public outrage
>nothing changed and nobody talks about the 6000+ in Sandwell
Wow you're retarded
And you talk to me about elections? You don't even have an anti immigration party, you have ukip,but they want to make it easier for sandniggers from the commonwealth to come while making it harder for eastern Europeans.
Plus,they are fucking dead after Brexit.
How about this, once you have an actual right wing party like the AfD, we'll talk.

The police saw the girls being raped and arrested them instead for being drunk or high.
Pakis take 8 year old British girls, get them addicted to drugs and rape them for 3 decades, the police knows about it the entire time, helps the pakis arrests the girls when they complain and that retarded brit thinks he's hot shit when the most right wing party he has wants more pakis and Indians and less Europeans.
The absolute state of Britain.

because eternal anglo enemy of the aryan race

>Nigel left to cry while masturbating to cuck porn
Good, hope you kill yourself. Pakis in Britain piss me off, but the only thing worse is Brita thinking they achieved anything while other countries at least have parties trying to turn the tide.
You don't, there are no brits trying to get rid of the sandniggers, at least not politically.
Maybe AfD will just get 15%, maybe more, similar to Denmark and the Netherlands it'll probably take a while for them to pick up steam and force the other parties to change.
But at least we are trying.
Every country is trying, even Sweden. Just Britain isn't, Britons sit on their fat asses,the statistically fattest assets in Europe and look down on others while doing nothing,fighting for nothing,slowly dying.
You don't deserve to die for your mistakes in the past, you don't deserve to die for being cunts.
You deserve to die for not trying while sneering at others like arrogant pricks.

>conquest
It's called self defense buddy

True, the holocaust was a purely self defence situation

Von braun was aiming for the moon

he just sometimes hit London

Can definitely sneer at you from Northern Ireland tho big lad, we burn out shitskins