HABBENING: Vox Day NOT Suing Gab

What does Sup Forums think of this?
> @GTKRWN posts on Gab: "Everyone stay away from @voxday He is a faggot Talmudic half jew half Mexican Pedophile pretending to be White."

gab.ai/GTKRWN/posts/11748825

> A couple others make similar posts.

gab.ai/Fabian_Nazism/posts/11749651
gab.ai/dantheman10/posts/11773072

> Vox Day reports the post to Andrew Torba

> Vox Day demands that Gab disclose the identities of the users in order to sue them for libel
> Torba says No: "@Voxday, you are fortunate enough to choose who to publish and who can comment on your blog, but Gab is a completely different environment, a platform for free speech for all viewpoints. We do not agree when it comes to censorship. Gab will not be the judge of what is or is not libelous. If a competent court requires us to take down a post because it is deemed libelous, Gab will comply. Libel as we all know is not protected by the first amendment."

> Vox Day assembles the Legal Legion of Evil to discuss his options: "I respect Gab's right to run their business as they see fit. But there is no way that any responsible parent will permit such baseless and reprehensible accusations to stand uncontested, and so the Legal Legion and I will be pursuing this matter until the defamation is removed and the @dantheman10, @GTKRWN, and @Fabian_Nazism are forced to answer for their defamatory actions."

> Vox Day refuses to use Gab for the foreseeable future: "In the meantime, if you follow me on social media, you can do so on Twitter, as I will not be using Gab until the defamation is removed and policies are instituted that can be reasonably expected to prevent similar incidents in the future."

What do you reckon Sup Forums? Is Vox Day in the right or is he over-reacting?

As Vox explains on his blog, he's taking a leaf out of Milo Yiannopoulos's book: voxday.blogspot.com.au/2017/09/legal-update.html

pic related

I've never seen someone get so buttblasted like Vox has recently.

>Richard Spencer is fake right because he's a SOCIALIST
>Andrew Anglin is not only fake right but multiple people all SHILLING
>the free speech website I use posting something I don't like? DELET THIS RIGHT NOW

But maybe Vox has a point.
Maybe he's on a crusade to purge all the useless worms who make it impossible for normies to join the Alt-Right:

> Richard Spenser
MSM's favourite TV supervillain

> Andrew Anglin
A younger faggier version of David Duke

> Going after ppl who call him a paedophile on the internet
Milo and Assange both recommend suing people who libel you on the internet.

He might have a point.

>"CENSOR EVERYONE I DON'T LIKE!"

He's just saying he wants to sue people who call him a paedophile, what's wrong with that?

Vox Day IS a faggot though

Look at the rest of the post... The guy is being pretty ridiculous and no one would take that to heart, only reason to be offended by it of course would be if there was some truth to it.

>defamation is covered by free speech

Are you guys legitimately retarded?

...

>"OH MY GOD! YOU SUGGESTED I'M RETARDED! I'M GONNA SUE YOU!"

You know for it to be libel he has to prove that he has suffered financially from it right?

Vox is in the right here
I can call Vox Day a dirty faggot who gets his fee fees too easily in a bunch over shitlord shitposting

I cannot call him a sexual predator or claim he belongs to a controversial group without proof
Doesn't even have to be substantial proof, so long as the claim is not baseless

Nice quads, I'm no longer subscribing to Vox products because of these accusations
My digital entity may serve as evidence of financial damages to Vox Day's brand

He can't win a libel lawsuit without proving that he has financially suffered from the libel.

>(((gab)))
>this kind of faggot drama
fuck that place

>I cannot call him a sexual predator or claim he belongs to a controversial group without proof

I remember he sent a letter to the ADL or SPLC to demand they retract calling him a white nationalist or something like that

Stormniggers should just have buttsex with Antifa already. They're both socialist cancer.

There's a HUGE difference between telling someone to go fuck themselves, and literally accusing them of a crime.

So I can just accuse you of being a criminal with literally no evidence and no repercussions? Please.

Being a pedophile is the lowest of the low. They don't last too longs in prisons, even other criminals see how vile they are.

Retracted calling him a racist. He is a nationalist.

Yeah if you go on gab and call me a pedophile I can't just sue you

Richard Spencer supports the existence of the EU instead of separate sovereign nations. Anglin is a cuck. Both are socialist trash.

Wouldn't he have to formally report him to the police though?
I swear... you fucking Jews see a highway and go "Hey, why don't we drop a bunch of rocks all over it?"

>There's a HUGE difference between telling someone to go fuck themselves, and literally accusing them of a crime.
What crime was he accused of?

Anglin should be about 10 inches shorter and have a Filipina teenager in his right arm.

Defamation suit
I can claim such actions restrict my ability to promote myself and cause harm to my character

pedophilia
If you're gonna claim that, at least have some squiggly logos you can claim symbolize pedophilia

But he has to actually prove that lol

Vox is right about a lot of things but his feminine histrionics make him completely insufferable. He needs to learn when to shut the fuck up.

Spencer read Archeofuturism and thinks that by aping beliefs of its author he's being smart. Of course nobody in the media has noticed this, because they don't read wrongthinkery.

Unfortunately it's not a crime to be a pedophile.
It's a crime to rape children.

>Internet entity
>Someone on openly accessible platform on internet makes potentially damaging claims
>Internet consumers (Vox's target demo) may access such unverified claims and draw inaccurate conclusions

It's not a slam-dunk case and it'd be a waste of time to pursue but there is legal merit to his actions

He would also have to prove that there were some damages to even have standing to sue. You'd have to convince the court that people saw the post and believed what it said and that it actually harmed you. You can't sue RandomFrog88 for calling you a 'gay Mexican pedo' right after he sent a Nazi Frog meme to a Korean woman and called her a wop. You'll get laughed out of court.

No it isn't actually a slam dunk case you don't know shit he has to prove that it has financially effected him and you don't even believe that.

That's a mental disorder, not a crime.

Pedophilia is not a crime and it never should be. Thinking shouldn't be a crime no matter what the thought is. When thinking is a criminal act we call that a THOUGHT CRIME, and that's some Orwellian oppression mother fucker. If a pedo keeps his hands to himself (most do) then who gives a fuck.

kek

"methinks thou doth protest too much"

Yet Sup Forums called Ben Garrison a 'Nazi' and murderer for years and nobody had much of a problem with that.

to sue for this shit you have to show that its actually caused harm. that is, if they can even find the identity of the guy who said it

Chief Weeping Cuck

Pretty rich after Vox made it seem like he was gonna have Torba kick Anglin off of Gab the other night.

Another (((gab))) thread.
Fuck off with your fucking honeypot.

Gab is here to stay, faggot. Get used to it.

so now Torba is for freedom of expression?
Am I confused or is he confused?

but Zyklon Ben is /ourguy/ lad, you'll see

Why gab.ai is considered a honeypot apart from its supposed jewish name.

>@GTKRWN
ow the edge

Lefty shills as posing as right wingers are trying to scare people away from Gab because it's one of the only places they haven't been able to subvert yet.

>he has to prove that he has suffered financially from it
legally speaking that isn't very difficult to do, there doesn't really need to be concrete evidence. For example he could claim a loss in book sales or something like that

He could just complain to the registrar to have the posts removed because their abuse policy states they don't allow anyone using their services to engage in defamation

How does vox actually prove that he's not a pedophile?
If you can sue someone for calling you something that you don't say you are then can't we sue any leftist who calls us racist/nazi/white supremacist?

Vox is being a faggot hypocrite.

Secondly - Torba can shut the fuck up - He pulled down a fucking Sup Forums tier meme because - something that barely approached offensive, and was in no way illegal or even remotely libelous. Why? Beacuse it was posted by Andrew Anglin, and his registrar told them they would kick Gab off if they allowed Anglin to post "offensive" material on Gab.

So much for free speech.

how is this a happening

Boner test.

They show you little kids and if you get an erection you're a pedo.

>Vox goes to a third party doctor to administer the test
>gets an erections as soon as they show a kid
We need to make this lawsuit happen

See, I can kinda understand talking about how Nazi LARPers aren't helping the movement, but this is the same guy who unwaveringly talks about how the Alt Lite will come around eventually. All while Cernovich and co attack the Alt Right.

cant sue a person for libel when the person is not doing so to make money. how hard is this to understand

kys
take your personal drama somewhere else

that's not how it works. you have to prove that it has or is likely to cause you to lose money.